Enemy combatants don’t have constitutional rights.It was his constitutional rights that were illegally revoked.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Enemy combatants don’t have constitutional rights.It was his constitutional rights that were illegally revoked.
.Meth labs have been found in Arizona. No boats were involved.
![]()
Meth lab busted near Rocky Point, Sonora officials say
Sonora and federal authorities busted a synthetic drug lab and arrested nine suspects while on patrol north of Puerto Peñasco last weekend.tucson.com
What drugs have been found in the Caribbean?.So.....................................................
Cocaine and fentanyl.What drugs have been found in the Caribbean?
No fentanyl. Got receipts?Cocaine and fentanyl.
Not yet. Just warming up. We do have 100,000 dead, so whatever hurts the drug cartels is a good thing.No fentanyl. Got receipts?
I'm not defending either action. In fact I have said in numerous posts in this thread both actions are dumb and we shouldn't be engaging in them. The problem is I'm arguing from a principled perspective and you from a purely ideological/political one. You're ok with one and against the other based purely on who's doing it. Saying it's ok to execute a US citizen because the Government has deemed them a terrorist without any kind of court hearing is so crazy dangerous I cant understand how anyone would defend it. I really can't understand that same person saying it's then somehow illegal for the same Government to use the same justification (terrorism) to kill non us citizens. Can you explain that to me?Wouldn’t that be the same for you? Isn’t the first guy a terrorist? Why is MAGA defending him?
The cartels aren’t shipping fentanyl through Venezuela. That’s just Epstein distraction.Not yet. Just warming up. We do have 100,000 dead, so whatever hurts the drug cartels is a good thing.
MAGA’s principles seem to kick in when there’s a political axe to grind. They’re defending actions that are nothing more than distractions from the Epstein scandal and how democracy is being subverted when a duly elected representative can’t get sworn in.I'm not defending either action. In fact I have said in numerous posts in this thread both actions are dumb and we shouldn't be engaging in them. The problem is I'm arguing from a principled perspective and you from a purely ideological/political one. You're ok with one and against the other based purely on who's doing it. Saying it's ok to execute a US citizen because the Government has deemed them a terrorist without any kind of court hearing is so crazy dangerous I cant understand how anyone would defend it. I really can't understand that same person saying it's then somehow illegal for the same Government to use the same justification (terrorism) to kill non us citizens. Can you explain that to me?
You have a great imagination.MAGA’s principles seem to kick in when there’s a political axe to grind. They’re defending actions that are nothing more than distractions from the Epstein scandal and how democracy is being subverted when a duly elected representative can’t get sworn in.
They do if they're United States citizens.Enemy combatants don’t have constitutional rights.
True facts, not your MAGA delusions.You have a great imagination.
I dont believe in your Fairy Tales
He needed to be in the US to press them.They do if they're United States citizens.
Oh darn, WHY was this person in a WAR ZONE?Depends on what they were doing.
Obama drone striked an American terrorist, and I didn't care, and you guys didn't say boo about it.
So no? None of that has anything to do with the question at hand. It's just a deflection.MAGA’s principles seem to kick in when there’s a political axe to grind. They’re defending actions that are nothing more than distractions from the Epstein scandal and how democracy is being subverted when a duly elected representative can’t get sworn in.
No he can be tried in absentia. The administration just circumvented his rights. If Trump and done it you would be apoplectic. Weren't you howling when they deported the illegal alien from Venezuela because of "due process"? I guess the Trump admin should have just designated him a terrorist, and drone struck him. Then you'd have been ok with it.He needed to be in the US to press them.
Hardly! That’s MAGA. distraction from Epstein and the shutdown.So no? None of that has anything to do with the question at hand. It's just a deflection.
You do realize that you are no different than everyone who is justifying the attacks on the drug boats and condemning the attack on the US citizen deemed a terrorist right?
Why do you love America’s enemies? You sound like the guys that were being paid by the Russians!No he can be tried in absentia. The administration just circumvented his rights. If Trump and done it you would be apoplectic. Weren't you howling when they deported the illegal alien from Venezuela because of "due process"? I guess the Trump admin should have just designated him a terrorist, and drone struck him. Then you'd have been ok with it.
Hardly! That’s MAGA. distraction from Epstein and the shutdown.
Why do you love America’s enemies? You sound like the guys that were being paid by the Russians!
Deflection. As I figured you can’t actually you have no answer the questions.
That’s the what all you MAGAs say when I won’t play your games. We’re talking Venezuela and you want to deflect to history.