Dem. Leader Hakeem Jeffries goes on record opposing suppressing illegal votes.

[Nostra]

Asking one to prove you are eligible to vote legally only suppresses illegal votes. Jeffries is on record opposing suppressing illegal votes.

 

[Auld Phart]

did he have a job in a pretzel factory before running for office?

 

[kyzr]

Not surprising.
We'll need to wait until next year with a GOP House & Senate to pass meaningful legislation.

 

[ozro]

It always amazes me how utterly stupid ourelected officials are.
Those that can, work.
Those that can't, run for office.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Jefferies is a solid gold demagogue.
He is pandering to the Dumb Democrat Cult.

 

[toobfreak]

Asking one to prove you are eligible to vote legally only suppresses illegal votes. Jeffries is on record opposing suppressing illegal votes.

I'm still trying to figure out how you even have illegal votes! When you go in to vote or vote by mail-in, the people there are supposed to SCREEN the applicants to assure each vote is LEGAL.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Asking one to prove you are eligible to vote legally only suppresses illegal votes. Jeffries is on record opposing suppressing illegal votes.

This is an example of a nothing bill. Passed via partisanship in an election year to have a talking point.

There are already existing laws on the books that prevent this. So passing a bill to prevent something that doesn't happen in the first place, and is already prevented by law...is just Republican kabuki theater.

 

[struth]

Asking one to prove you are eligible to vote legally only suppresses illegal votes. Jeffries is on record opposing suppressing illegal votes.

Apparently it's extreme MAGA Republican to require people to be a US Citizen and 18 to vote.....which is you know, what our Constitution requires.


So, let's be clear, the Dem leadership made clear, they think the US Constitution is extreme.

 

[struth]

This is an example of a nothing bill. Passed via partisanship in an election year to have a talking point.

There are already existing laws on the books that prevent this. So passing a bill to prevent something that doesn't happen in the first place, and is already prevented by law...is just Republican kabuki theater.

what are those laws? can you provide the code section for us?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

There lies part of the problem, that moron is a dem "leader '

 

[DigitalDrifter]

This is an example of a nothing bill. Passed via partisanship in an election year to have a talking point.

There are already existing laws on the books that prevent this. So passing a bill to prevent something that doesn't happen in the first place, and is already prevented by law...is just Republican kabuki theater.

So you're opposed to having another layer of laws to ensure illegals do not vote in OUR elections?

 

[toobfreak]

This is an example of a nothing bill. Passed via partisanship in an election year to have a talking point.
There are already existing laws on the books that prevent this. So passing a bill to prevent something that doesn't happen in the first place, and is already prevented by law...is just Republican kabuki theater.

If it is redundant and harmless, then why O why would anyone still vote against it? Better to have redundancy in protecting the integrity of our elections than not, right?

 

[jbrownson0831]

Jefferies is a solid gold demagogue.
He is pandering to the Dumb Democrat Cult.

He is right about one thing...
we are smarter than he thinks.

 

[Nostra]

This is an example of a nothing bill. Passed via partisanship in an election year to have a talking point.

There are already existing laws on the books that prevent this. So passing a bill to prevent something that doesn't happen in the first place, and is already prevented by law...is just Republican kabuki theater.

The bill requires a photo ID for federal elections. Not currently a requirement. And it increases penalties for illegally voting.

Why is your leader opposed to suppressing illegal votes?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The bill requires a photo ID for federal elections. Not currently a requirement. And it increases penalties for illegally voting.

Why is your leader opposed to suppressing illegal votes?

Because it will reduce voter turnout...lol that is the latest left loon shit for brain excuse I've read today

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

If it is redundant and harmless, then why O why would anyone still vote against it? Better to have redundancy in protecting the integrity of our elections than not, right?

Why bother posing it as a bill then in the first place?

1) It doesn't happen.
2) There are already laws preventing it.

Answer...bill passed for show in an election year.....next?

 

[Robert W]

I watched yesterday the lying done at the Congress by Democrats who claimed the law wanting to be passed by the republicans was a bad idea. Sure if you love illegal aliens voting it is a bad idea.

 

[Resnic]

Asking one to prove you are eligible to vote legally only suppresses illegal votes. Jeffries is on record opposing suppressing illegal votes.

It's no wonder.

George soros (of the world economic forum) son on his behalf donated heavily to Jefferies.

George Soros, other influential donors flocked to Hakeem Jeffries after he became top House Dem

Democratic Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries hauled in $9 million to his victory fund during the first quarter, which included cash from George Soros and other big donors.

www.foxnews.com

https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/28/politics/hakeem-jeffries-takeover-new-york-democrats/index.html

It's like Elon said, soros knows if you can't change the laws then you change the people enforce the laws.

 

[BluesLegend]

It always amazes me how utterly stupid ourelected officials are.

Why? That's where losers who can't get hired in the private sector go to mooch off taxpayers.

 

[my2¢]

After these past 8 years, restoring faith in the election process should be a priority for both parties. Although with my lack of faith in either major party, I'd put it in the hands of independents, Libertarians and other 3rd parties.