Dem Debate Night...

[Missouri_Mike]

It should have ended with something all democrats could use tonight.

The number to the suicide hot line.

 

[Obiwan]

100 people killed a day from gun shot Wounds? Lol

Is that how the Democrats are explaining all those new voters they're registering???

 

[Claudette]

Well I got a good laugh out of it. Boy did I get a good laugh. I laughed myself silly then turned it off.

 

[imawhosure]

Watched that debate as objectively as I could. Came to the conclusion that they all suck, but the best of the worst by far is Mayor Pete. He at least can make a point without screeching. In a debate with Trump, his demeanor would be the hardest to crack. But then again, since he is on the periphery of the candidates, nobody is really checking him that close either.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Debate was like a room full of toddlers yelling over each other as the adults attempt and fail to get them in line.

An absolute embarrassment by any measurement.

And how they have black support with all that asinine patronizing is beyond me.

 

[Auld Phart]

I may have misheard, but did one of those fools compare their assault weapons ban to smoking/cigarettes?

 

[Ame®icano]

No American flag again

Of course not, they don't want to offend their voters.

 

[toobfreak]

… and they are off to a fighting start!! Tough questions and biting responses.

Tough questions and biting responses. DANG! You must've been watching a different channel than I was on.

 

[SAYIT]

What a waste of time. I tried to watch highlights on YouTube and couldn't take more than 2 minutes. The Democrat party is terminally ill.

I admit I enjoyed it strictly for all the cringeworthy moments, and the Democrat Socialist Party does indeed seem to have a terminal case of Progressivitis.

And JFTR, Slo-Joe looks to have a bad case of BurismaVirus which I understand is terminal for presidential campaigns. Very sad

 

[SAYIT]

Watched that debate as objectively as I could. Came to the conclusion that they all suck, but the best of the worst by far is Mayor Pete. He at least can make a point without screeching. In a debate with Trump, his demeanor would be the hardest to crack. But then again, since he is on the periphery of the candidates, nobody is really checking him that close either.

Every Dem hopeful is (fatally) flawed and rest assured the Trump campaign is op-researching the top 4-5. Pete is clearly the most eloquent (and lucid) but his lack of experience and his "1st Lady" will be hinderances in many parts of the country. I find him to be shallow but adept at covering it. Trump would crack his technocrat veneer.

Conclusion: the Dems don't have a #1 starter … just a few #3 and the rest #5. The survivor must satisfy the "progressive" wing and will be burdened with the party's socialist platform and image.

"We’re losing our damn minds": James Carville unloads on the Democratic Party

 

[Nostra]

Biden won tonight. His lights were on - and he was home.

Mularkey!

 

[imawhosure]

Watched that debate as objectively as I could. Came to the conclusion that they all suck, but the best of the worst by far is Mayor Pete. He at least can make a point without screeching. In a debate with Trump, his demeanor would be the hardest to crack. But then again, since he is on the periphery of the candidates, nobody is really checking him that close either.

Every Dem hopeful is (fatally) flawed and rest assured the Trump campaign is op-researching the top 4-5. Pete is clearly the most eloquent (and lucid) but his lack of experience and his "1st Lady" will be hinderances in many parts of the country. I find him to be shallow but adept at covering it. Trump would crack his technocrat veneer.

Conclusion: the Dems don't have a #1 starter … just a few #3 and the rest #5. The survivor must satisfy the "progressive" wing and will be burdened with the party's socialist platform and image.

"We’re losing our damn minds": James Carville unloads on the Democratic Party

You know SAY, you spend more time on here than I do, so you could handle the thread about the question I really have-------------->

If BERNARD does NOT win the DNC nomination on the 1st ballot, we know they are going to ice him.

Sooooooooo, who will the DNC nominee be? Someone on the stage, or totally someone else not even presently running?

Personally, I feel it will be someone else not presently running. None of these people on the DNC side has the cache to beat Trump, and all of their sound bites in the vault during the debates will be used to torpedo them, like free healthcare for illegals.

No, I expect a big gun to be brought out like Kerry, or someone like that, as a conciliatory candidate to put the rank and file together; or at least that will be the reasoning they use!

 

[SAYIT]

Biden won tonight. His lights were on - and he was home.

Mularkey!

I believe she meant relatively speaking. Lakhota's lights are rarely on.

 

[SAYIT]

Watched that debate as objectively as I could. Came to the conclusion that they all suck, but the best of the worst by far is Mayor Pete. He at least can make a point without screeching. In a debate with Trump, his demeanor would be the hardest to crack. But then again, since he is on the periphery of the candidates, nobody is really checking him that close either.

Every Dem hopeful is (fatally) flawed and rest assured the Trump campaign is op-researching the top 4-5. Pete is clearly the most eloquent (and lucid) but his lack of experience and his "1st Lady" will be hinderances in many parts of the country. I find him to be shallow but adept at covering it. Trump would crack his technocrat veneer.

Conclusion: the Dems don't have a #1 starter … just a few #3 and the rest #5. The survivor must satisfy the "progressive" wing and will be burdened with the party's socialist platform and image.

"We’re losing our damn minds": James Carville unloads on the Democratic Party

You know SAY, you spend more time on here than I do, so you could handle the thread about the question I really have-------------->

If BERNARD does NOT win the DNC nomination on the 1st ballot, we know they are going to ice him.

Sooooooooo, who will the DNC nominee be? Someone on the stage, or totally someone else not even presently running?

Personally, I feel it will be someone else not presently running. None of these people on the DNC side has the cache to beat Trump, and all of their sound bites in the vault during the debates will be used to torpedo them, like free healthcare for illegals.

No, I expect a big gun to be brought out like Kerry, or someone like that, as a conciliatory candidate to put the rank and file together; or at least that will be the reasoning they use!

Kerry is too old at 76 to be given the magic carpet ride and would attract exactly zero support from the under 35 crowd. It would have to be someone with name recognition who could excite the young lemmings while not repulsing the moderates … no easy task. There is still a chance that 2-3 currently jamming the mod lane will drop out and get behind a single non-socialist, perhaps in exchange for the VP slot or a cabinet position.

A brokered convention would be another Texas Chainsaw Massacre … a river of blood.

 

[Auld Phart]

Watched that debate as objectively as I could. Came to the conclusion that they all suck, but the best of the worst by far is Mayor Pete. He at least can make a point without screeching. In a debate with Trump, his demeanor would be the hardest to crack. But then again, since he is on the periphery of the candidates, nobody is really checking him that close either.

Every Dem hopeful is (fatally) flawed and rest assured the Trump campaign is op-researching the top 4-5. Pete is clearly the most eloquent (and lucid) but his lack of experience and his "1st Lady" will be hinderances in many parts of the country. I find him to be shallow but adept at covering it. Trump would crack his technocrat veneer.

Conclusion: the Dems don't have a #1 starter … just a few #3 and the rest #5. The survivor must satisfy the "progressive" wing and will be burdened with the party's socialist platform and image.

"We’re losing our damn minds": James Carville unloads on the Democratic Party

You know SAY, you spend more time on here than I do, so you could handle the thread about the question I really have-------------->

If BERNARD does NOT win the DNC nomination on the 1st ballot, we know they are going to ice him.

Sooooooooo, who will the DNC nominee be? Someone on the stage, or totally someone else not even presently running?

Personally, I feel it will be someone else not presently running. None of these people on the DNC side has the cache to beat Trump, and all of their sound bites in the vault during the debates will be used to torpedo them, like free healthcare for illegals.

No, I expect a big gun to be brought out like Kerry, or someone like that, as a conciliatory candidate to put the rank and file together; or at least that will be the reasoning they use!

Kerry is too old at 76 to be given the magic carpet ride and would attract exactly zero support from the under 35 crowd. It would have to be someone with name recognition who could excite the young lemmings while not repulsing the moderates … no easy task. There is still a chance that 2-3 currently jamming the mod lane will drop out and get behind a single non-socialist, perhaps in exchange for the VP slot or a cabinet position.

A brokered convention would be another Texas Chainsaw Massacre … a river of blood.

Kerry is too old at 76 to be given the magic carpet ride

and younger than Biden, Bloomberg, and Sanders.

 

[imawhosure]

Watched that debate as objectively as I could. Came to the conclusion that they all suck, but the best of the worst by far is Mayor Pete. He at least can make a point without screeching. In a debate with Trump, his demeanor would be the hardest to crack. But then again, since he is on the periphery of the candidates, nobody is really checking him that close either.

Every Dem hopeful is (fatally) flawed and rest assured the Trump campaign is op-researching the top 4-5. Pete is clearly the most eloquent (and lucid) but his lack of experience and his "1st Lady" will be hinderances in many parts of the country. I find him to be shallow but adept at covering it. Trump would crack his technocrat veneer.

Conclusion: the Dems don't have a #1 starter … just a few #3 and the rest #5. The survivor must satisfy the "progressive" wing and will be burdened with the party's socialist platform and image.

"We’re losing our damn minds": James Carville unloads on the Democratic Party

You know SAY, you spend more time on here than I do, so you could handle the thread about the question I really have-------------->

If BERNARD does NOT win the DNC nomination on the 1st ballot, we know they are going to ice him.

Sooooooooo, who will the DNC nominee be? Someone on the stage, or totally someone else not even presently running?

Personally, I feel it will be someone else not presently running. None of these people on the DNC side has the cache to beat Trump, and all of their sound bites in the vault during the debates will be used to torpedo them, like free healthcare for illegals.

No, I expect a big gun to be brought out like Kerry, or someone like that, as a conciliatory candidate to put the rank and file together; or at least that will be the reasoning they use!

Kerry is too old at 76 to be given the magic carpet ride and would attract exactly zero support from the under 35 crowd. It would have to be someone with name recognition who could excite the young lemmings while not repulsing the moderates … no easy task. There is still a chance that 2-3 currently jamming the mod lane will drop out and get behind a single non-socialist, perhaps in exchange for the VP slot or a cabinet position.

A brokered convention would be another Texas Chainsaw Massacre … a river of blood.

Look at who/whom is running now! Is Kerry more lucid than Biden? Probably.

I am pretty sure if they hose BERNARD, they are going to one of their big guns, even if they are old. What choice have they really got, and as long as they are lucid, it is a better choice than anything on the stage.

They put their belief in Biden, didn't they? And the only reason they are backtracking is---------->he can NOT put 2 sentences together. So why not Kerry? He is younger than Joe, has a track record, and can at least put 1 and 1/2 sentences together!

Or maybe Hilly?

What Kerry and Hilly have in common is----------->they almost won, very close as we all know. So to think they are not the best vote getters if they can still speak, is a crazy thought!

 

[SAYIT]

Watched that debate as objectively as I could. Came to the conclusion that they all suck, but the best of the worst by far is Mayor Pete. He at least can make a point without screeching. In a debate with Trump, his demeanor would be the hardest to crack. But then again, since he is on the periphery of the candidates, nobody is really checking him that close either.

Every Dem hopeful is (fatally) flawed and rest assured the Trump campaign is op-researching the top 4-5. Pete is clearly the most eloquent (and lucid) but his lack of experience and his "1st Lady" will be hinderances in many parts of the country. I find him to be shallow but adept at covering it. Trump would crack his technocrat veneer.

Conclusion: the Dems don't have a #1 starter … just a few #3 and the rest #5. The survivor must satisfy the "progressive" wing and will be burdened with the party's socialist platform and image.

"We’re losing our damn minds": James Carville unloads on the Democratic Party

You know SAY, you spend more time on here than I do, so you could handle the thread about the question I really have-------------->

If BERNARD does NOT win the DNC nomination on the 1st ballot, we know they are going to ice him.

Sooooooooo, who will the DNC nominee be? Someone on the stage, or totally someone else not even presently running?

Personally, I feel it will be someone else not presently running. None of these people on the DNC side has the cache to beat Trump, and all of their sound bites in the vault during the debates will be used to torpedo them, like free healthcare for illegals.

No, I expect a big gun to be brought out like Kerry, or someone like that, as a conciliatory candidate to put the rank and file together; or at least that will be the reasoning they use!

Kerry is too old at 76 to be given the magic carpet ride and would attract exactly zero support from the under 35 crowd. It would have to be someone with name recognition who could excite the young lemmings while not repulsing the moderates … no easy task. There is still a chance that 2-3 currently jamming the mod lane will drop out and get behind a single non-socialist, perhaps in exchange for the VP slot or a cabinet position.

A brokered convention would be another Texas Chainsaw Massacre … a river of blood.

Look at who/whom is running now! Is Kerry more lucid than Biden? Probably.

I am pretty sure if they hose BERNARD, they are going to one of their big guns, even if they are old. What choice have they really got, and as long as they are lucid, it is a better choice than anything on the stage.

They put their belief in Biden, didn't they? And the only reason they are backtracking is---------->he can NOT put 2 sentences together. So why not Kerry? He is younger than Joe, has a track record, and can at least put 1 and 1/2 sentences together!

Or maybe Hilly?

What Kerry and Hilly have in common is----------->they almost won, very close as we all know. So to think they are not the best vote getters if they can still speak, is a crazy thought!

Biden had instant name recognition, establishment bone fides, and the possibility of attracting donors. That made him attractive until he opened his mouth and catching BurismaVirus certainly didn't help. His staff had months to formulate lucid responses and the best they could do was "you're a lying, pony-faced dog soldier."
Yeah … that'll save him.

Anxious Democratic Establishment Asks, ‘Is There Anybody Else?’

 

[imawhosure]

Watched that debate as objectively as I could. Came to the conclusion that they all suck, but the best of the worst by far is Mayor Pete. He at least can make a point without screeching. In a debate with Trump, his demeanor would be the hardest to crack. But then again, since he is on the periphery of the candidates, nobody is really checking him that close either.

Every Dem hopeful is (fatally) flawed and rest assured the Trump campaign is op-researching the top 4-5. Pete is clearly the most eloquent (and lucid) but his lack of experience and his "1st Lady" will be hinderances in many parts of the country. I find him to be shallow but adept at covering it. Trump would crack his technocrat veneer.

Conclusion: the Dems don't have a #1 starter … just a few #3 and the rest #5. The survivor must satisfy the "progressive" wing and will be burdened with the party's socialist platform and image.

"We’re losing our damn minds": James Carville unloads on the Democratic Party

You know SAY, you spend more time on here than I do, so you could handle the thread about the question I really have-------------->

If BERNARD does NOT win the DNC nomination on the 1st ballot, we know they are going to ice him.

Sooooooooo, who will the DNC nominee be? Someone on the stage, or totally someone else not even presently running?

Personally, I feel it will be someone else not presently running. None of these people on the DNC side has the cache to beat Trump, and all of their sound bites in the vault during the debates will be used to torpedo them, like free healthcare for illegals.

No, I expect a big gun to be brought out like Kerry, or someone like that, as a conciliatory candidate to put the rank and file together; or at least that will be the reasoning they use!

Kerry is too old at 76 to be given the magic carpet ride and would attract exactly zero support from the under 35 crowd. It would have to be someone with name recognition who could excite the young lemmings while not repulsing the moderates … no easy task. There is still a chance that 2-3 currently jamming the mod lane will drop out and get behind a single non-socialist, perhaps in exchange for the VP slot or a cabinet position.

A brokered convention would be another Texas Chainsaw Massacre … a river of blood.

Look at who/whom is running now! Is Kerry more lucid than Biden? Probably.

I am pretty sure if they hose BERNARD, they are going to one of their big guns, even if they are old. What choice have they really got, and as long as they are lucid, it is a better choice than anything on the stage.

They put their belief in Biden, didn't they? And the only reason they are backtracking is---------->he can NOT put 2 sentences together. So why not Kerry? He is younger than Joe, has a track record, and can at least put 1 and 1/2 sentences together!

Or maybe Hilly?

What Kerry and Hilly have in common is----------->they almost won, very close as we all know. So to think they are not the best vote getters if they can still speak, is a crazy thought!

Biden had instant name recognition, establishment bone fides, and the possibility of attracting donors. That made him attractive until he opened his mouth and catching BurismaVirus certainly didn't help. His staff had months to formulate lucid responses and the best they could do was "you're a lying, pony-faced dog soldier."
Yeah … that'll save him.

Anxious Democratic Establishment Asks, ‘Is There Anybody Else?’

Well, we can agree to disagree on this one. What I can point out to you is------------> DOOMBERG, no matter what the man says, won't put 15 cents into a BERNARD candidacy, and the DNC is low on cash.

If DOOMBERG doesn't get the nod, he is going to have a large sway because of his deep pockets who does. It has to be a moderate, and they will negotiate (the DNC) a BERNARD apostle into the VP slot to keep the Bro
s on board.

This is politics 101! They can't alienate any of them, or they know for a fact they are going to lose! If Kerry can speak still, and is willing to take Warren along for the ride, and DOOMBERG will 1/2 way finance it, this seems one of the few choices they have.

 

[Thinker101]

Last night's democratic debate.

 

[basquebromance]

millionaires arguing with billionaires over who hates millionaires and billionaires most. that's what the Dem debate was!