M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
So... The VPC lied?I do not know. Given the very low number of justifiable homicides, I do not find it believable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So... The VPC lied?I do not know. Given the very low number of justifiable homicides, I do not find it believable.
Why would the VPC lie about the number of defensive gun uses?Still, in my opinion, numbers given for gun self-defense are unrealistic.
According to the Table on p.6, only 1.1% of violent crimes resulted in self-defense by guns.Yes. In real life. The Violence Policy Center says so.
They mentioned that gun self-defense was used only in 1.1% of all crimes.Why would the VPC lie about the number of defensive gun uses?
Understand guns ? I served in the military and come from a long line of people who served as well you moron and have owned firearms for over 40 years. I've fired everything from a .22 caliber revolver all the way up to and including heavy machine guns and grenade launchers. I've forgotten more about firearms than you loons will ever know.Let me correct your ignorance/retardism. You had the right to bear arms in the UK. In 1870, licensing came into effect. You still can own a shotgun, it's up to the police to prove if you're unsuitable. You can own any other type of firearm, you have to prove you're suitable. One day you might get more than 2 brain cells to understand guns, but I doubt it.
Guess what brains? If you are of clean character, shoot guns in the UK, there's no issue. In America, you let any Tom Dick Harry have guns, that's why you're a crazy country with dreadful gun stats and gun nuts that are taf.
So you'd believe a sample size of 30 people, extrapolated to represent 300 million? Wow are you gullible...oh wait, you voted for Trump, got it.Over 5,000 interviews is not a limited sample...you doofus...that is a huge sample compared to any other study....
You moron...
What is the ideal sample size in qualitative research?
We’ll answer it this time. Based on studies that have been done in academia on this very issue, 30 seems to be an ideal sample size for the most comprehensive view, but studies can have as little as 10 total participants and still yield extremely fruitful, and applicable, results. (This goes back to excellence in recruiting.)
Our general recommendation for in-depth interviews is a sample size of 30, if we’re building a study that includes similar segments within the population. A minimum size can be 10 – but again, this assumes the population integrity in recruiting.
What is the ideal Sample Size in Qualitative Research? — Greenbook
Let’s explore the whole issue of panel size and what you should be looking for from participant panels when conducing qualitative research.www.greenbook.org
For example, Green and Thorogood [38] maintain that the experience of most qualitative researchers conducting an interview-based study with a fairly specific research question is that little new information is generated after interviewing 20 people or so belonging to one analytically relevant participant ‘category’ (pp. 102–104). Ritchie et al. [39] suggest that studies employing individual interviews conduct no more than 50 interviews so that researchers are able to manage the complexity of the analytic task. Similarly, Britten [40] notes that large interview studies will often comprise of 50 to 60 people.
Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period - BMC Medical Research Methodology
Background Choosing a suitable sample size in qualitative research is an area of conceptual debate and practical uncertainty. That sample size principles, guidelines and tools have been developed to enable researchers to set, and justify the acceptability of, their sample size is an indication...bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com
Remember....Kleck used 5,000 interviews....
Based on these estimates, assuming that the authors intended to test all of these associations, it would be necessary to choose the largest estimated sample size (2,630 subjects).
In case the required sample size is larger than the target population, the investigators may decide to perform a multicenter study, lengthen the period for data collection, modify the research question or face the possibility of not having sufficient power to draw valid conclusions.
Sample size: how many participants do I need in my research?
The importance of estimating sample sizes is rarely understood by researchers, when planning a study. This paper aims to highlight the centrality of sample size estimations in health research. Examples that help in understanding the basic concepts involved ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
According to the table on page 6, firearms are used in self-defense more than 100,000 times per year.According to the Table on p.6, only 1.1% of violent crimes resulted in self-defense by guns.
So you'd believe a sample size of 30 people, extrapolated to represent 300 million? Wow are you gullible...oh wait, you voted for Trump, got it.
As for this 5000, was that his entire set of positive respondants or just the total number of people interviewed?
Yes. In real life. The Violence Policy Center says so.
I've used a gun twice in self-defense but not reported because no shit was fired.When analyzing the most reliable data available, what is most striking is that in a nation of more than 300 million guns, how rarely firearms are used in self-defense.
You never had a right to own firearms what you had was a privilege granted by your king and the government. rights cannot be revoked by anyone as they belong to the person.Let me correct your ignorance/retardism. You had the right to bear arms in the UK. In 1870, licensing came into effect. You still can own a shotgun, it's up to the police to prove if you're unsuitable. You can own any other type of firearm, you have to prove you're suitable. One day you might get more than 2 brain cells to understand guns, but I doubt it.
Guess what brains? If you are of clean character, shoot guns in the UK, there's no issue. In America, you let any Tom Dick Harry have guns, that's why you're a crazy country with dreadful gun stats and gun nuts that are taf.
Tell that to the people saved by a civilian with a gun in that mall shooting.Agree 100%.
‘Good guy with a gun’ very rarely exists in real life. He/she is very common in Action Movies, but they are not Reality.
Tell that to the people saved by a civilian with a gun in that mall shooting.
According to the Table on p.6, only 1.1% of violent crimes resulted in self-defense by guns.
How Often Are Guns Used in Self Defense? | StatsAgree 100%.
‘Good guy with a gun’ very rarely exists in real life. He/she is very common in Action Movies, but they are not Reality.
And the thing is it doesn't matter how many DGUs there are.
Fucking retardYes… you had the Right to have guns and you had low gun crime rates…..you banned and confiscated guns and now your criminals are using now guns……..what you did has done nothing.
We have gun crime in the U.S. because our left wing political party, the democrats, are attacking and wrecking our local police and doing very thing they can to keep releasing the most violent criminals in the country….
We have over 600 million guns and over 21.5 million Americans can carry guns in public for self defense……normal gun owners are not the ones shooting people…..the people shooting each other are the criminals released from jail and prison by the democrats. They are the ones in democrat party controlled cities shooting and killing each other……
You doofus
That's just the point. You can just dribble out Constitution, Rights, 2nd Amendment. Theres nothing between your lugs to grasp the whole concept of the gun argument, you've just confirmed it.Understand guns ? I served in the military and come from a long line of people who served as well you moron and have owned firearms for over 40 years. I've fired everything from a .22 caliber revolver all the way up to and including heavy machine guns and grenade launchers. I've forgotten more about firearms than you loons will ever know.
I give zero fucks about what any other country in the world does. I live in the US and the Constitution that governs my country states my right to bears arms shall not be infringed.