Debunking the Biden-Ukraine conspiracy theory

Rumpole

Diamond Member
Mar 20, 2023
2,834
2,245
1,928
I suspect this has been beaten to death, but, of late, I still see a number on the right on this forum promulgating the lie that Biden's withholding of loan guarantees to Ukraine was an attempt to prevent the investigation of Burisma, given that Hunter Biden was on the board.

At issue is this video, (link below) which many on the right falsely believe supports this conspiracy theory. But, context is missing. However, even without the context, there is nothing in the video that supports the claim.

I've seen that video a number of times. There is ZERO evidence the video proves that objective had anything to do with Biden attempting to thwart investigation into Burisma. In fact, the evidence proves the OPPOSITE.

Here are the multiple sourced FACTS.


ā€œā€œThe United States, the European Union, the I.M.F., and Ukraineā€™s leading reform figures were all pressing for Viktor Shokin to be removed from office because he was one of the biggest obstacles to fighting corruption in the entire country. This was a bipartisan goal in Congress as well.ā€

The withholding of loan guarantees spoken of by Biden in that video was the incentive to get the Poroshenko/Ukrainian Parliament to fire Shokin, the corrupt Ukraine prosecutor, which was the foreign policy of the United States, and the International Monetary Fund with the approval of Democrat and Senate Republicans, at that time.

Why? Because Obama was wary of providing military support to Ukraine, at the time, given the massive corruption in the Country, and SHOKIN was NOT doing his job to fight corruption and naturally Obama didn't want taxpayer funds misappropriated in a corrupt country.

That is precisely the OPPOSITE of the claim.

What, do you (who believe the conspiracy theory) think a man with 30 years in the Senate would be stupid enough to admit to a federal crime on television? If you do, you are unaware of the facts and haven't thought it through.


ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bidenā€“Ukraine_conspiracy_theory

The conspiracy theory alleges that then-Vice President Biden withheld loan guarantees to pressure Ukraine into firing a prosecutor to prevent a corruption investigation into Burisma and to protect his son. The United States did withhold government aid to pressure Ukraine into removing the prosecutor, in accord with the official and bipartisan policy of the federal government of the United States. The US government, along with the European Union, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, believed the prosecutor to be corrupt and ineffective and too lenient in investigating companies and oligarchs, including Burisma and its owner. A January 2018 video shows Biden taking credit for withholding the loan guarantees to have the prosecutor fired, acting to implement bipartisan US policy rather than for the reasons the conspiracy theory alleges.


Donald Trump said Ukraineā€™s former chief prosecutor was an honest, wronged man, fired after Joe Biden tried to shut down an investigation into his sonā€™s gas company. In Kiev, Oliver Carroll speaks to people who know Viktor Shokin, and finds a different story


Republicans wanted Shokin removed, as well:



(Even the GOP chairman of the Homeland Security Committee which spearheaded this report, Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, backed the effort to remove Shokin, saying the ā€œwhole worldā€ agreed he wasnā€™t doing a good job.)




Factchecking right wing lies

(Even the GOP chairman of the Homeland Security Committee which spearheaded this report, Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, backed the effort to remove Shokin, saying the ā€œwhole worldā€ agreed he wasnā€™t doing a good job.)


April 21, 2014: Biden, then vice president, visited Ukraineā€™s capital, Kiev, in a show of support for the countryā€™s government amid rising tensions with Russia.

May 13, 2014: Burisma Group, a private company that has drilled for natural gas in Ukraine since 2002, announced that Hunter Biden would be joining its board. Around that time, Burismaā€™s founder, a former government official named Mykola Zlochevsky, was under investigation for alleged money laundering by Britainā€™s Serious Fraud Office.

Dec. 8, 2015: Biden visited Kiev again and spoke out against bureaucratic corruption that he said was eating Ukraine ā€œlike a cancer.ā€ Biden threatened to withhold loan guarantees unless Ukraineā€™s top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who had been widely accused of corruption, was removed.

Shokin had investigated Burisma but the probe was dormant at the time Biden pushed for the prosecutorā€™s termination, Bloomberg reported earlier this year, citing a former Ukrainian official.

March 29, 2016: The Ukrainian Parliament voted to remove Shokin.

Jan. 23, 2018: Biden, at a Council on Foreign Relations event, detailed how he had threatened to withhold funds from Ukraine if Shokin was not removed.

April 2019: Hunter Bidenā€™s term as a Burisma board member expired and he stepped down from the company.

May 16, 2019: Bloomberg quotes Ukraineā€™s current top prosecutor as saying he had no evidence of wrongdoing by Hunter Biden or his father.
 
I suspect this has been beaten to death, but, of late, I still see a number on the right on this forum promulgating the lie that Biden's withholding of loan guarantees to Ukraine was an attempt to prevent the investigation of Burisma, given that Hunter Biden was on the board.

At issue is this video, (link below) which many on the right falsely believe supports this conspiracy theory. But, context is missing. However, even without the context, there is nothing in the video that supports the claim.

I've seen that video a number of times. There is ZERO evidence the video proves that objective had anything to do with Biden attempting to thwart investigation into Burisma. In fact, the evidence proves the OPPOSITE.

Here are the multiple sourced FACTS.


ā€œā€œThe United States, the European Union, the I.M.F., and Ukraineā€™s leading reform figures were all pressing for Viktor Shokin to be removed from office because he was one of the biggest obstacles to fighting corruption in the entire country. This was a bipartisan goal in Congress as well.ā€

The withholding of loan guarantees spoken of by Biden in that video was the incentive to get the Poroshenko/Ukrainian Parliament to fire Shokin, the corrupt Ukraine prosecutor, which was the foreign policy of the United States, and the International Monetary Fund with the approval of Democrat and Senate Republicans, at that time.

Why? Because Obama was wary of providing military support to Ukraine, at the time, given the massive corruption in the Country, and SHOKIN was NOT doing his job to fight corruption and naturally Obama didn't want taxpayer funds misappropriated in a corrupt country.

That is precisely the OPPOSITE of the claim.

What, do you (who believe the conspiracy theory) think a man with 30 years in the Senate would be stupid enough to admit to a federal crime on television? If you do, you are unaware of the facts and haven't thought it through.


ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bidenā€“Ukraine_conspiracy_theory

The conspiracy theory alleges that then-Vice President Biden withheld loan guarantees to pressure Ukraine into firing a prosecutor to prevent a corruption investigation into Burisma and to protect his son. The United States did withhold government aid to pressure Ukraine into removing the prosecutor, in accord with the official and bipartisan policy of the federal government of the United States. The US government, along with the European Union, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, believed the prosecutor to be corrupt and ineffective and too lenient in investigating companies and oligarchs, including Burisma and its owner. A January 2018 video shows Biden taking credit for withholding the loan guarantees to have the prosecutor fired, acting to implement bipartisan US policy rather than for the reasons the conspiracy theory alleges.


Donald Trump said Ukraineā€™s former chief prosecutor was an honest, wronged man, fired after Joe Biden tried to shut down an investigation into his sonā€™s gas company. In Kiev, Oliver Carroll speaks to people who know Viktor Shokin, and finds a different story


Republicans wanted Shokin removed, as well:



(Even the GOP chairman of the Homeland Security Committee which spearheaded this report, Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, backed the effort to remove Shokin, saying the ā€œwhole worldā€ agreed he wasnā€™t doing a good job.)




Factchecking right wing lies

(Even the GOP chairman of the Homeland Security Committee which spearheaded this report, Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, backed the effort to remove Shokin, saying the ā€œwhole worldā€ agreed he wasnā€™t doing a good job.)


April 21, 2014: Biden, then vice president, visited Ukraineā€™s capital, Kiev, in a show of support for the countryā€™s government amid rising tensions with Russia.

May 13, 2014: Burisma Group, a private company that has drilled for natural gas in Ukraine since 2002, announced that Hunter Biden would be joining its board. Around that time, Burismaā€™s founder, a former government official named Mykola Zlochevsky, was under investigation for alleged money laundering by Britainā€™s Serious Fraud Office.

Dec. 8, 2015: Biden visited Kiev again and spoke out against bureaucratic corruption that he said was eating Ukraine ā€œlike a cancer.ā€ Biden threatened to withhold loan guarantees unless Ukraineā€™s top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who had been widely accused of corruption, was removed.

Shokin had investigated Burisma but the probe was dormant at the time Biden pushed for the prosecutorā€™s termination, Bloomberg reported earlier this year, citing a former Ukrainian official.

March 29, 2016: The Ukrainian Parliament voted to remove Shokin.

Jan. 23, 2018: Biden, at a Council on Foreign Relations event, detailed how he had threatened to withhold funds from Ukraine if Shokin was not removed.

April 2019: Hunter Bidenā€™s term as a Burisma board member expired and he stepped down from the company.

May 16, 2019: Bloomberg quotes Ukraineā€™s current top prosecutor as saying he had no evidence of wrongdoing by Hunter Biden or his father.

Only an imbecile would believe Biden wasn't trying to protect his son's criminal behavior.
 
You sure spent a lot of time covering for Biden and the Democrats. Too bad you are completely wrong. The Biden Crime Family has been in operation for decades and the insane salary that Hunter Biden was being paid to be on the board of a Ukrainian energy company FFS is just one of MANY examples of their pay for play operations with foreign entities.
 
fakeVerynews-trump.jpg
 
You sure spent a lot of time covering for Biden and the Democrats. Too bad you are completely wrong. The Biden Crime Family has been in operation for decades and the insane salary that Hunter Biden was being paid to be on the board of a Ukrainian energy company FFS is just one of MANY examples of their pay for play operations with foreign entities.
:yes_text12::thankusmile: Indeed,:2up:notice the trollboy used FAKE news sources,the CIA controlled lamestream media as his sources?:auiqs.jpg:


he just got his ass handed to him on a platter and taken to school in this thread by delldude :auiqs.jpg:

 
Only an imbecile would ignore the presented evidence and facts.

Only an imbecile would allege something without substantiation.

There is zero evidence Biden has committed any crimes of any real importance.
whatyever you say Ameirca hating langley shill. :auiqs.jpg: delldude in that link in my previous post checkmated you, debunking your propaganda CIA controlled sources.,here is a tissue while you do this in defeat-:itsok: where did you get that white clothing you are wearing in that pic there after delldude debunked you?:auiqs.jpg:

crying_baby.jpg
 
Last edited:
You sure spent a lot of time covering for Biden and the Democrats. Too bad you are completely wrong. The Biden Crime Family has been in operation for decades and the insane salary that Hunter Biden was being paid to be on the board of a Ukrainian energy company FFS is just one of MANY examples of their pay for play operations with foreign entities.

Biden's salary is commensurate with his bargaining position, namesake, and resume.

That's capitalism. There is zero evidence Hunter Biden did anything corrupt while on the board. Earning fees from namesake is common in society among siblings of the rich and famous.

All you have is innuendo and empty allegations.

And why would you care? Jared Kushner earned a $25,000,000 management fee by acquiring $2,000,000,000 from Mohammed Bin Salman, a brutal murderer, for a dubious investment fund, which was negotiated while he was leaving office, as senior staff advisor, noting that Hunter is a private citizen, and has every right to do business abroad. You don't care about real corruption, all you care about fake corruption based on innuendo and defamatory stories which provide zero evidence.
 
whatyever you say Ameirca hating langley shill. :auiqs.jpg: delldude in that link in my previous post checkmated you, debunking your propaganda CIA controlled sources.,here is a tissue while you do this in defeat-:itsok: where did you get that white clothing you are wearing in that pic there after delldude debunked you?:auiqs.jpg:
Incompetent rebuttal: juvenile retorts do not merit a proper response.
 
I suspect this has been beaten to death, but, of late, I still see a number on the right on this forum promulgating the lie that Biden's withholding of loan guarantees to Ukraine was an attempt to prevent the investigation of Burisma, given that Hunter Biden was on the board.

At issue is this video, (link below) which many on the right falsely believe supports this conspiracy theory. But, context is missing. However, even without the context, there is nothing in the video that supports the claim.

I've seen that video a number of times. There is ZERO evidence the video proves that objective had anything to do with Biden attempting to thwart investigation into Burisma. In fact, the evidence proves the OPPOSITE.

Here are the multiple sourced FACTS.


ā€œā€œThe United States, the European Union, the I.M.F., and Ukraineā€™s leading reform figures were all pressing for Viktor Shokin to be removed from office because he was one of the biggest obstacles to fighting corruption in the entire country. This was a bipartisan goal in Congress as well.ā€

The withholding of loan guarantees spoken of by Biden in that video was the incentive to get the Poroshenko/Ukrainian Parliament to fire Shokin, the corrupt Ukraine prosecutor, which was the foreign policy of the United States, and the International Monetary Fund with the approval of Democrat and Senate Republicans, at that time.

Why? Because Obama was wary of providing military support to Ukraine, at the time, given the massive corruption in the Country, and SHOKIN was NOT doing his job to fight corruption and naturally Obama didn't want taxpayer funds misappropriated in a corrupt country.

That is precisely the OPPOSITE of the claim.

What, do you (who believe the conspiracy theory) think a man with 30 years in the Senate would be stupid enough to admit to a federal crime on television? If you do, you are unaware of the facts and haven't thought it through.


ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bidenā€“Ukraine_conspiracy_theory

The conspiracy theory alleges that then-Vice President Biden withheld loan guarantees to pressure Ukraine into firing a prosecutor to prevent a corruption investigation into Burisma and to protect his son. The United States did withhold government aid to pressure Ukraine into removing the prosecutor, in accord with the official and bipartisan policy of the federal government of the United States. The US government, along with the European Union, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, believed the prosecutor to be corrupt and ineffective and too lenient in investigating companies and oligarchs, including Burisma and its owner. A January 2018 video shows Biden taking credit for withholding the loan guarantees to have the prosecutor fired, acting to implement bipartisan US policy rather than for the reasons the conspiracy theory alleges.


Donald Trump said Ukraineā€™s former chief prosecutor was an honest, wronged man, fired after Joe Biden tried to shut down an investigation into his sonā€™s gas company. In Kiev, Oliver Carroll speaks to people who know Viktor Shokin, and finds a different story


Republicans wanted Shokin removed, as well:



(Even the GOP chairman of the Homeland Security Committee which spearheaded this report, Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, backed the effort to remove Shokin, saying the ā€œwhole worldā€ agreed he wasnā€™t doing a good job.)




Factchecking right wing lies

(Even the GOP chairman of the Homeland Security Committee which spearheaded this report, Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, backed the effort to remove Shokin, saying the ā€œwhole worldā€ agreed he wasnā€™t doing a good job.)


April 21, 2014: Biden, then vice president, visited Ukraineā€™s capital, Kiev, in a show of support for the countryā€™s government amid rising tensions with Russia.

May 13, 2014: Burisma Group, a private company that has drilled for natural gas in Ukraine since 2002, announced that Hunter Biden would be joining its board. Around that time, Burismaā€™s founder, a former government official named Mykola Zlochevsky, was under investigation for alleged money laundering by Britainā€™s Serious Fraud Office.

Dec. 8, 2015: Biden visited Kiev again and spoke out against bureaucratic corruption that he said was eating Ukraine ā€œlike a cancer.ā€ Biden threatened to withhold loan guarantees unless Ukraineā€™s top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who had been widely accused of corruption, was removed.

Shokin had investigated Burisma but the probe was dormant at the time Biden pushed for the prosecutorā€™s termination, Bloomberg reported earlier this year, citing a former Ukrainian official.

March 29, 2016: The Ukrainian Parliament voted to remove Shokin.

Jan. 23, 2018: Biden, at a Council on Foreign Relations event, detailed how he had threatened to withhold funds from Ukraine if Shokin was not removed.

April 2019: Hunter Bidenā€™s term as a Burisma board member expired and he stepped down from the company.

May 16, 2019: Bloomberg quotes Ukraineā€™s current top prosecutor as saying he had no evidence of wrongdoing by Hunter Biden or his father.

1670857656810513.jpg
 
Biden's salary is commensurate with his bargaining position, namesake, and resume.

That's capitalism. There is zero evidence Hunter Biden did anything corrupt while on the board. Earning fees from namesake is common in society among siblings of the rich and famous.

All you have is innuendo and empty allegations.

And why would you care? Jared Kushner earned a $25,000,000 management fee by acquiring $2,000,000,000 from Mohammed Bin Salman, a brutal murderer, for a dubious investment fund, which was negotiated while he was leaving office, as senior staff advisor, noting that Hunter is a private citizen, and has every right to do business abroad. You don't care about real corruption, all you care about fake corruption based on innuendo and defamatory stories which provide zero evidence.
That's cronyism, not capitalism.
 
:yes_text12::thankusmile: Indeed,:2up:notice the trollboy used FAKE news sources,the CIA controlled lamestream media as his sources?:auiqs.jpg:


he just got his ass handed to him on a platter and taken to school in this thread by delldude :auiqs.jpg:



Americanthinker is a questionable source, an extreme right wing rag with no journalistic merit of any kind, trafficks in innuendo, omission of fact, mischaracterizations, politically charged rhetoric, distortions, all designed with a far right agenda.

Epic fail.

Find an article to support your claim in TheHill, or the Christian Science Monitor, or the Wall Street Journal, or news sources of a similar reputable caliber and then we'll talk. Until then, to but it in blunt terms, you do not have squat.
 
Americanthinker is a questionable source, an extreme right wing rag with no journalistic merit of any kind, trafficks in innuendo, omission of fact, mischaracterizations, politically charged rhetoric, distortions, all designed with a far right agenda.

Epic fail.
The NYT is a questionable source, an extreme left wing rag with no journalistic merit of any kind, trafficks in innuendo, omission of fact, mischaracterizations, politically charged rhetoric, distortions, all designed with a far left agenda.
 
That's cronyism, not capitalism.

Not if the employer is foreign to the employee.

Besides, it's not illegal, no matter how you slice it.

Would you turn down a high paying job because your father was famous, and the jo offered to you to sit on a board, and just give your opinion and vote on company policy?
 
Last edited:
You sure spent a lot of time covering for Biden and the Democrats. Too bad you are completely wrong. The Biden Crime Family has been in operation for decades and the insane salary that Hunter Biden was being paid to be on the board of a Ukrainian energy company FFS is just one of MANY examples of their pay for play operations with foreign entities.
This stuff happened before Trump became president, so it would have been investigated while Trump was president. Since it wasnt, youre just full of hot air.
 
The NYT is a questionable source, an extreme left wing rag with no journalistic merit of any kind, trafficks in innuendo, omission of fact, mischaracterizations, politically charged rhetoric, distortions, all designed with a far left agenda.

Incompetent rebuttal; mockery is not an argument.

The New York Times is one of the four American journals of Record, it has won 132 Pulitzer Prizes. It won its first award in 1918, and has since won more Pulitzer prizes than any other organization.

Americanthinker is pure fecal matter which attracts readers like shit attracts flies.

Your brain is mush.
 
Not if the employer is foreign to the employee.
What the fuck is that supposed to mean?

Besides, it's not illegal, no matter how you slice it.
It is illegal because Hunter is selling his father's influence in the government. Hist father is doing favors for his employer, and he is getting paid for it..


Would you turn down a high paying job because your father was famous, and the jo offered to you to sit on a board, and just give your opinion and vote on company policy?
If Biden was a famous actor, Burisma wouldn' tpay him a dime. He gets paid only becuase his father can do things like getting a prosecutor fired.
 

Forum List

Back
Top