Debunking Rape Epidemic Claims

[StLucieBengal]

So if coyote is bothered by calling it rape jihad maybe we should just call it what it is.... Ethnic cleansing.

So if the crime stats are muddled on rapes vs sexual assaults.. Then we can just call all this ethnic cleansing and move forward with how we are going to expel this evil from our midst.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

So if coyote is bothered by calling it rape jihad maybe we should just call it what it is.... Ethnic cleansing.

So if the crime stats are muddled on rapes vs sexual assaults.. Then we can just call all this ethnic cleansing and move forward with how we are going to expel this evil from our midst.

What is so ridiculous is the way this creature admits that rape during war is common, yet when her heroes do just that during their assault on the west, she calls people bigots if they point quite correctly to the nature of such. She then has the utter temerity to claim she never supported the actions of the rapists involved.

This is one thoroughly disturbed individual.

 

[Coyote]

So if coyote is bothered by calling it rape jihad maybe we should just call it what it is.... Ethnic cleansing.

How about simply being accurate and calling it what it is - rape? Is it so hard to do that?

So if the crime stats are muddled on rapes vs sexual assaults.. Then we can just call all this ethnic cleansing and move forward with how we are going to expel this evil from our midst.

I suspect that's what they thought when they saw black men standing near white women. Strange Fruit indeed....

The hysteria is rising - now it's "ethnic cleansing"....with the same lack of hard data to support it.

 

[Coyote]

If you google "rape jihad" - top two sites that come up are Frontpage Mag and Pamela Gellar. Not exactly reputable, to put it mildly. Hate sites, like Stormfront.

Rape is rape. But some people seem to need to make it into something more sinister.

 

[StLucieBengal]

So if coyote is bothered by calling it rape jihad maybe we should just call it what it is.... Ethnic cleansing.

How about simply being accurate and calling it what it is - rape? Is it so hard to do that?

So if the crime stats are muddled on rapes vs sexual assaults.. Then we can just call all this ethnic cleansing and move forward with how we are going to expel this evil from our midst.

I suspect that's what they thought when they saw black men standing near white women. Strange Fruit indeed....

The hysteria is rising - now it's "ethnic cleansing"....with the same lack of hard data to support it.

1. So are you saying that America has a rape/sex assault epidemic at the hands of black men at any point?

I can't remember when there has ever been a claim that it was even happening.

2. Actually ethnic cleansing fits better when you compromise based on your points.

3. Rape or sexual assault.... Neither should be permitted. If you want to argue over gangs of Muslims groping white women in Europe vs actual penetration then that's on you. As far as I am concerned both are power plays by these Muslim migrants and it comes from them not knowing anything different. Which is why they need shipped back and those areas need closed off from the west until they have a reformation and calm this nonsense down.

4. Rape Jihad is a way to discuss this issue because it lets everyone know your talking about the Muslims Raping away. If we just said rape then there would be question of non Muslims rape vs Muslim rape.

 

[StLucieBengal]

If you google "rape jihad" - top two sites that come up are Frontpage Mag and Pamela Gellar. Not exactly reputable, to put it mildly. Hate sites, like Stormfront.

Rape is rape. But some people seem to need to make it into something more sinister.

Rape is sinister. The fact that you can't or won't acknowledge that is scary.

You are caught up into phrasing. Rape Jihad, ethnic cleansing, rape, sexual assaults, these are all despicable acts and as far as I am concerned there is no "best option"

 

[Mindful]

If you google "rape jihad" - top two sites that come up are Frontpage Mag and Pamela Gellar. Not exactly reputable, to put it mildly. Hate sites, like Stormfront.

Rape is rape. But some people seem to need to make it into something more sinister.

Rape is sinister. The fact that you can't or won't acknowledge that is scary.

You are caught up into phrasing. Rape Jihad, ethnic cleansing, rape, sexual assaults, these are all despicable acts and as far as I am concerned there is no "best option"

I came across this:

When It Comes To Hate, The Left Beats The Right, Hands Down

 

[StLucieBengal]

If you google "rape jihad" - top two sites that come up are Frontpage Mag and Pamela Gellar. Not exactly reputable, to put it mildly. Hate sites, like Stormfront.

Rape is rape. But some people seem to need to make it into something more sinister.

Rape is sinister. The fact that you can't or won't acknowledge that is scary.

You are caught up into phrasing. Rape Jihad, ethnic cleansing, rape, sexual assaults, these are all despicable acts and as far as I am concerned there is no "best option"

I came across this:

When It Comes To Hate, The Left Beats The Right, Hands Down

Interesting article. I have discussed this many times before... The new leftists are more into hate vs the classic liberals. The younger they get the more hateful they become. I think the opposite is happening on the right.

We could be seeing a reset in parties. The establishment GOP and establishment Dems might end up together since Hillary will be the last establishment candidate to get a nomination most likely.

Personally I don't know where the alt right movement will go but I think with time they will meld with the conservative/libertarian base and just end up being he extreme version of new GOP.

The dems are moving to a more socialist mindset. Which is reflective in their candidates that have any passionate following.

The only way for the establishments to make it is for them to come together in one place. Either the dems or GOP or form their own deal.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Interesting article. I have discussed this many times before... The new leftists are more into hate vs the classic liberals. The younger they get the more hateful they become. I think the opposite is happening on the right.

.

I agree. What I have observed over the last 50 years is this:

1966 -- the left was non conformist. Today it is ultra-conformist.

1966 -- the left was based upon liberal principles. Today, it is based upon no principles at all other than identity and an opposition to anything considered conservative.

1966 -- the left sought a color-blind society. Today, it's all ABOUT color with all colors being free, you know, but some just being much more free than others.

1966 -- the left was against authoritarianism. Today it is the veritable source thereof.

1966 -- the left was about freeing people from oppression. Today, it is about creating an imaginary sense of such for some while ignoring egregious examples for others.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

If you google "rape jihad" - top two sites that come up are Frontpage Mag and Pamela Gellar. Not exactly reputable, to put it mildly. Hate sites, like Stormfront.

Rape is rape. But some people seem to need to make it into something more sinister.

That's odd -- when I googled the term, I came up with 469 THOUSAND hits.

As far as hate is concerned, yes, since it is Muslim men selecting a different ethnicity to rape, you defend it. If the reverse were true, you would be all over it like shit on stink.

Your trying to equate the rejection of systematic rape as a function of the ideology you support with "hate" only indicates how far down the rabbit hole you have travelled due to your mental illness.

 

[Coyote]

If you google "rape jihad" - top two sites that come up are Frontpage Mag and Pamela Gellar. Not exactly reputable, to put it mildly. Hate sites, like Stormfront.

Rape is rape. But some people seem to need to make it into something more sinister.

Rape is sinister. The fact that you can't or won't acknowledge that is scary.

You are caught up into phrasing. Rape Jihad, ethnic cleansing, rape, sexual assaults, these are all despicable acts and as far as I am concerned there is no "best option"

Rape is rape. It's an expression of brutality and power over a woman by a person who considers a woman less than. There is no ethnic cleansing going on and no "rape jihad". Ethnic cleansing has a very specific term and what makes a joke out of this (not out of rape, but out of these claims) is that somehow - all these migrants, who come from dozens of different countries and backgrounds, and "united" in "rape jihad". It's like people casually using Nazi references to modern day leaders and events.

And still, there is a lack of solid emperical evidence to support this "jihad".

 

[Mindful]

If you google "rape jihad" - top two sites that come up are Frontpage Mag and Pamela Gellar. Not exactly reputable, to put it mildly. Hate sites, like Stormfront.

Rape is rape. But some people seem to need to make it into something more sinister.

Rape is sinister. The fact that you can't or won't acknowledge that is scary.

You are caught up into phrasing. Rape Jihad, ethnic cleansing, rape, sexual assaults, these are all despicable acts and as far as I am concerned there is no "best option"

Rape is rape. It's an expression of brutality and power over a woman by a person who considers a woman less than. There is no ethnic cleansing going on and no "rape jihad". Ethnic cleansing has a very specific term and what makes a joke out of this (not out of rape, but out of these claims) is that somehow - all these migrants, who come from dozens of different countries and backgrounds, and "united" in "rape jihad". It's like people casually using Nazi references to modern day leaders and events.

And still, there is a lack of solid emperical evidence to support this "jihad".

And rape of men? How would you describe that activity?

 

[Coyote]

So if coyote is bothered by calling it rape jihad maybe we should just call it what it is.... Ethnic cleansing.

How about simply being accurate and calling it what it is - rape? Is it so hard to do that?

So if the crime stats are muddled on rapes vs sexual assaults.. Then we can just call all this ethnic cleansing and move forward with how we are going to expel this evil from our midst.

I suspect that's what they thought when they saw black men standing near white women. Strange Fruit indeed....

The hysteria is rising - now it's "ethnic cleansing"....with the same lack of hard data to support it.

1. So are you saying that America has a rape/sex assault epidemic at the hands of black men at any point?

I can't remember when there has ever been a claim that it was even happening.

I'm talking about mindsets and perceptions, particularly during Jim Crow and civil rights era - in this case, the perception that black men want and try to rape white women, and it took very little for a black man to be accused, convicted and lynched whether or not there was evidence, people's statements were never questioned. If a black man jostled a white woman, he could be accused of assaulting her. The stereotype was that they were subhuman, uncivilized, etc. The mindset is the same as that of certain people regarding migrants today.

2. Actually ethnic cleansing fits better when you compromise based on your points.

From wikipedia:
Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of ethnic or religious groups from a given territory by a more powerful ethnic group, with the intent of making it ethnically homogeneous.[1] The forces applied may be various forms of forced migration (deportation, population transfer), intimidation, as well as mass murder and genocidal rape.

To even attempt to draw a parallel is ridiculous. Again, it's like people trying to draw parallels between modern political figures and Hitler.

3. Rape or sexual assault.... Neither should be permitted. If you want to argue over gangs of Muslims groping white women in Europe vs actual penetration then that's on you. As far as I am concerned both are power plays by these Muslim migrants and it comes from them not knowing anything different. Which is why they need shipped back and those areas need closed off from the west until they have a reformation and calm this nonsense down.

As far as I'm concerned, they are crimes, but there is a difference between rape, sexual assault and sexual harrassment. Those differences exist in the laws. It's like the difference between man-slaughter and murder.

4. Rape Jihad is a way to discuss this issue because it lets everyone know your talking about the Muslims Raping away. If we just said rape then there would be question of non Muslims rape vs Muslim rape.

Rape Jihad is nothing more than a way of inflamming the issue and creating scapegoats. There is no difference between non Muslim rape and Muslim rape. None. Rape is rape.

 

[Coyote]

If you google "rape jihad" - top two sites that come up are Frontpage Mag and Pamela Gellar. Not exactly reputable, to put it mildly. Hate sites, like Stormfront.

Rape is rape. But some people seem to need to make it into something more sinister.

Rape is sinister. The fact that you can't or won't acknowledge that is scary.

You are caught up into phrasing. Rape Jihad, ethnic cleansing, rape, sexual assaults, these are all despicable acts and as far as I am concerned there is no "best option"

Rape is rape. It's an expression of brutality and power over a woman by a person who considers a woman less than. There is no ethnic cleansing going on and no "rape jihad". Ethnic cleansing has a very specific term and what makes a joke out of this (not out of rape, but out of these claims) is that somehow - all these migrants, who come from dozens of different countries and backgrounds, and "united" in "rape jihad". It's like people casually using Nazi references to modern day leaders and events.

And still, there is a lack of solid emperical evidence to support this "jihad".

And rape of men? How would you describe that activity?

Rape.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

To listen to the Islamist, one might actually think Mohammad DIDN'T order his followers to use rape as an instrument to subdue those in the lands being invaded instead of doing so quite plainly.

Of course, what does truth matter when the Islamist supporters get to feel so good about themselves by defending them?

 

[Tilly]

UK rape jihad, covered up by police and politicians:

Police withheld bombshell report revealing how gangs of Muslim men were grooming more than 100 schoolgirls as young as 13 in case it inflamed racial tensions ahead of General Election

• West Midlands Police release March 2010 document for first time this week
• It says 100 mainly white children were at serious risk of being groomed
• Report says perpetrators were all Asian, which could cause tension locally
• No appeal was made and the report was published for first time this week

Britain's second largest police force withheld a report about gangs of Muslim men grooming children in case it inflamed racial tensions ahead of a General Election, it was revealed today

Police withheld Muslim grooming report to avoid general election row

 

[Dogmaphobe]

So if coyote is bothered by calling it rape jihad maybe we should just call it what it is.... Ethnic cleansing.

How about simply being accurate and calling it what it is - rape? Is it so hard to do that?

So if the crime stats are muddled on rapes vs sexual assaults.. Then we can just call all this ethnic cleansing and move forward with how we are going to expel this evil from our midst.

I suspect that's what they thought when they saw black men standing near white women. Strange Fruit indeed....

The hysteria is rising - now it's "ethnic cleansing"....with the same lack of hard data to support it.

1. So are you saying that America has a rape/sex assault epidemic at the hands of black men at any point?

I can't remember when there has ever been a claim that it was even happening.

I'm talking about mindsets and perceptions, particularly during Jim Crow and civil rights era - in this case, the perception that black men want and try to rape white women, and it took very little for a black man to be accused, convicted and lynched whether or not there was evidence, people's statements were never questioned. If a black man jostled a white woman, he could be accused of assaulting her. The stereotype was that they were subhuman, uncivilized, etc. The mindset is the same as that of certain people regarding migrants today.

2. Actually ethnic cleansing fits better when you compromise based on your points.

From wikipedia:
Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of ethnic or religious groups from a given territory by a more powerful ethnic group, with the intent of making it ethnically homogeneous.[1] The forces applied may be various forms of forced migration (deportation, population transfer), intimidation, as well as mass murder and genocidal rape.

To even attempt to draw a parallel is ridiculous. Again, it's like people trying to draw parallels between modern political figures and Hitler.

3. Rape or sexual assault.... Neither should be permitted. If you want to argue over gangs of Muslims groping white women in Europe vs actual penetration then that's on you. As far as I am concerned both are power plays by these Muslim migrants and it comes from them not knowing anything different. Which is why they need shipped back and those areas need closed off from the west until they have a reformation and calm this nonsense down.

As far as I'm concerned, they are crimes, but there is a difference between rape, sexual assault and sexual harrassment. Those differences exist in the laws. It's like the difference between man-slaughter and murder.

4. Rape Jihad is a way to discuss this issue because it lets everyone know your talking about the Muslims Raping away. If we just said rape then there would be question of non Muslims rape vs Muslim rape.

Rape Jihad is nothing more than a way of inflamming the issue and creating scapegoats. There is no difference between non Muslim rape and Muslim rape. None. Rape is rape.

You would be singing SUCH a different tune if it were Swedish men selecting Muslims to rape. Instead of defending the rapists, you would be beside yourself with indignation.

 

[saveliberty]

Coyote is simply applying religious superiority of Muslims much the same as Fascists need to exert the same over others. Combine that with the liberal ability to find an excuse for bad behavior by selective and isolated worse offenders and you end up with Coyote.

 

[Coyote]

Coyote is simply applying religious superiority of Muslims much the same as Fascists need to exert the same over others. Combine that with the liberal ability to find an excuse for bad behavior by selective and isolated worse offenders and you end up with Coyote.

So you are joining the trolls.

 

[Tilly]

Coyote is simply applying religious superiority of Muslims much the same as Fascists need to exert the same over others. Combine that with the liberal ability to find an excuse for bad behavior by selective and isolated worse offenders and you end up with Coyote.

So you are joining the trolls.

You are the troll.