Dear "Conservatives"....

[Truthmatters]

Dear conservatives, You cant win because the country is not as conservative as you are.

Dear moderate republicans, your ideas have failed yet again and you still back the failed ideas so you cant win either.

The problem with the right is their ideas are complete failures.

None of you accept facts when they prove your ideas wrong.

that stupidity aint flying anymore people are paying attention now.

well for sure Republican ideas have failed that the people felt the need to put them back in control of the House in 2010...but hey you all should just over look that..And the people in this country are mostly conservative..you all want to believe you Progressive-Commies are the majority and that most people think like you, but you're not...and hopefully the people have had enough of your Progressive Dear Leader, and finish the job they started in 2010

Dear idiot that was two years ago when some people actually thought the Tea party was something other than a republican trick.

 

[Meister]

Obama is losing the independent vote.
There is a reason for that.
It might have something to do with debt, deficit, unemployment, weak recovery, downgraded bonds, and Obamacare.

This is what the people of this country are concerned about. The left can throw in their fluff complaints for distraction purposes, but real issues will be what's on the minds of people when going behind the curtains to vote.

I can understand moderates and independents supporting Romney.

But conservatives?

Guess what? Now that we are in the general, he's only going to become more liberal.

Moderates and independents are the ones who actually win the elections for either party

 

[Ernie S.]

I can handle an incremental shift in policy. A Romney administration would be more Conservative than the present cluster ****.
Show me a true (sane) Conservative candidate that has a chance of actually taking the majority of the votes and I'll jump behind him.
Interestingly, under present circumstances, let's suppose Paul runs as an independent and wins 60 electoral votes, Obama wins 250 and Romney wins 228. Guess who would be sworn in on January 20, 2013?

 

[geauxtohell]

For conservatives the election doesn’t have anything to do with Romney, what he believes or doesn’t believe is irrelevant; whether Romney is a liberal or conservative is irrelevant.

What conservatives are voting for is what they imagine a Romney administration would look like, the actual administrators – appointed, not elected – who will run the country, rightwing extremists and partisan hacks who will determine the actual day to day policies, and make the actual day to day decisions.

And conservatives imagine most of these appointees will be hardcore conservative ideologues; conservatives won’t be voting for Romney, they’ll be voting for the likes of Karl Rove, Scooter Libby, Condoleezza Rice, Andrew Card, Alberto Gonzales, Karen Hughes, and Dick Cheney.

Indeed, the fact that Romney is weak and indecisive makes him even more attractive to conservatives, Romney will stay out of the way, act ‘presidential,’ as another republican shadow government manipulates the Nation from behind the scenes.

In essence they see Romney as another GWB, a clueless dolt content with being a vacuous figurehead.

That's absolutely ridiculous. Are you trying to make yourself as relevant as rdean?

Is Romney pro-life now?

Are you sure?

 

[Listening]

well for sure Republican ideas have failed that the people felt the need to put them back in control of the House in 2010...

Yeah, people are loving that. Not like that they're the most reviled Congress in history or anything.

Congress’s job-approval rating hits all-time low in new Gallup survey
By Jonathan Easley - 02/08/12 09:19 PM ET

An unpopular Congress is breaking its own records when it comes to dismal approval ratings.

Only 10 percent of those surveyed by Gallup approve of Congress’s job performance, according to results released Wednesday.

Which means what ?

Answer: most of them will get re-elected.

This argument is simply silly.

Nobody likes congress...but most like their congressman.

Most have no idea how this all hangs together...they just know we are in trouble.

Or does this mean Debbie Wasserman S*** is going to get tossed ?

 

[Toro]

...if you support the Massachusetts liberal known as Mitt Romney you are not a conservative, you are just a Republican that will support whatever bag of shit they send you.

At least the Paul people have the balls to support a losing candidate that truly ebndorses their beliefs.

Sign in below....

False dichotomy.

 

[geauxtohell]

Obama is losing the independent vote.
There is a reason for that.
It might have something to do with debt, deficit, unemployment, weak recovery, downgraded bonds, and Obamacare.

This is what the people of this country are concerned about. The left can throw in their fluff complaints for distraction purposes, but real issues will be what's on the minds of people when going behind the curtains to vote.

I can understand moderates and independents supporting Romney.

But conservatives?

Guess what? Now that we are in the general, he's only going to become more liberal.

Moderates and independents are the ones who actually win the elections for either party

But that isn't what this thread is about.

 

[freedombecki]

Who the hell are you ?

I'll support who I want, where I want, when I want.

In this case, he's less a BOS than the current BOS-In-Chief we have now.

Eat crap and die.

So you are a Repblican, not a conservative. The two aren' mutually inclusive.

When you vote for a liberal for his nations highest office in November, you will demonstrate that you aren't a conservative.

Geaux, some of us Republicans are far right when it comes to fiscal government concerns. We were considered centrists in this country during the Clinton years. Republicans have always called the nation to get along with each other, starting with being antislavery.

Doing what is best for the most is not always a popular place to be.

Americans have always shared in the past. Now, politicians are putting their goals above the people, and it's not particularly good in the case of replacing the entire parameters of law, government, medicine, education, business, banks, energy to be in the hands of the government.

That didn't work when the bolsheviks took over. It just changed one master to another. Getting back to a master race schema just frightens many of us. We think grass-roots inventiveness and talent is the better way, and it comes from allowing people to enjoy the fruits of their labor and pass it on to whoever they choose to after they die.

The recent push to take everything away from people who have plenty, so they'll be eating dirt doesn't go well. It just isn't a fair way, and there are many examples of unfairness causing civil wars in the history books.

The republic idea abolishes the one-master thesis and gets into sharing based on what comes of a free-thinking society that promotes individuals for their 15 minutes, then enjoys using the paper clips, incandescent lamps, telephones, soya products, Russet potatoes, stem cell products, and other things they come by to improve life.

Republicans want to keep things as the founders intended--equal opportunities, the fun of your ideas catching on, finding and enjoying wealth through hard work, and just being free to do so.

My goodness, there are whole countries whose thesis is socialism. Try to cross their borders and see where that gets you.

 

[geauxtohell]

I can handle an incremental shift in policy. A Romney administration would be more Conservative than the present cluster ****.
Show me a true (sane) Conservative candidate that has a chance of actually taking the majority of the votes and I'll jump behind him.
Interestingly, under present circumstances, let's suppose Paul runs as an independent and wins 60 electoral votes, Obama wins 250 and Romney wins 228. Guess who would be sworn in on January 20, 2013?

Again, you would sacrifice a degree of principle for a degree of expediency....

 

[Ernie S.]

Dear conservatives, You cant win because the country is not as conservative as you are.

Dear moderate republicans, your ideas have failed yet again and you still back the failed ideas so you cant win either.

The problem with the right is their ideas are complete failures.

None of you accept facts when they prove your ideas wrong.

that stupidity aint flying anymore people are paying attention now.

No matter how many times you repeat your crap, it ain't going to become fact.

 

[Greenbeard]

Interestingly, under present circumstances, let's suppose Paul runs as an independent and wins 60 electoral votes, Obama wins 250 and Romney wins 228.

Dude, Perot won 0 electoral devotes, despite getting 19% of the popular vote.

How would the ~2-3% of the popular vote Ron Paul might pick up as an independent candidate deliver him any electoral votes, much less 60?

 

[geauxtohell]

...if you support the Massachusetts liberal known as Mitt Romney you are not a conservative, you are just a Republican that will support whatever bag of shit they send you.

At least the Paul people have the balls to support a losing candidate that truly ebndorses their beliefs.

Sign in below....

False dichotomy.

How so?

 

[Ernie S.]

i'm more concerned with getting the political leper out of office before he spreads any further than he has.

when was the last time a campaign won on "im not as bad as the other guy".

2008

 

[Stephanie]

I can understand moderates and independents supporting Romney.

But conservatives?

Guess what? Now that we are in the general, he's only going to become more liberal.

Moderates and independents are the ones who actually win the elections for either party

But that isn't what this thread is about.

what is the thread suppose to be about?
for you to make fun of people?

 

[geauxtohell]

Who the hell are you ?

I'll support who I want, where I want, when I want.

In this case, he's less a BOS than the current BOS-In-Chief we have now.

Eat crap and die.

So you are a Repblican, not a conservative. The two aren' mutually inclusive.

When you vote for a liberal for his nations highest office in November, you will demonstrate that you aren't a conservative.

Geaux, some of us Republicans are far right when it comes to fiscal government concerns. We were considered centrists in this country during the Clinton years. Republicans have always called the nation to get along with each other, starting with being antislavery.

Doing what is best for the most is not always a popular place to be.

Americans have always shared in the past. Now, politicians are putting their goals above the people, and it's not particularly good in the case of replacing the entire parameters of law, government, medicine, education, business, banks, energy to be in the hands of the government.

That didn't work when the bolsheviks took over. It just changed one master to another. Getting back to a master race schema just frightens many of us. We think grass-roots inventiveness and talent is the better way, and it comes from allowing people to enjoy the fruits of their labor and pass it on to whoever they choose to after they die.

The recent push to take everything away from people who have plenty, so they'll be eating dirt doesn't go well. It just isn't a fair way, and there are many examples of unfairness causing civil wars in the history books.

The republic idea abolishes the one-master thesis and gets into sharing based on what comes of a free-thinking society that promotes individuals for their 15 minutes, then enjoys using the paper clips, incandescent lamps, telephones, soya products, Russet potatoes, stem cell products, and other things they come by to improve life.

Republicans want to keep things as the founders intended--equal opportunities, the fun of your ideas catching on, finding and enjoying wealth through hard work, and just being free to do so.

My goodness, there are whole countries whose thesis is socialism. Try to cross their borders and see where that gets you.

Master race?

Anyways, I notice you used the term "republican" and not "conservative"....

 

[geauxtohell]

Moderates and independents are the ones who actually win the elections for either party

But that isn't what this thread is about.

what is the thread suppose to be about?
for you to make fun of people?

It's self explanatory.

Who have I "made fun of".

Pointing out the obvious is just that. It's not being deliberately cruel.

 

[Stephanie]

But that isn't what this thread is about.

what is the thread suppose to be about?
for you to make fun of people?

It's self explanatory.

Who have I "made fun of".

Pointing out the obvious is just that. It's not being deliberately cruel.

yeah sure, if you say so

 

[geauxtohell]

what is the thread suppose to be about?
for you to make fun of people?

It's self explanatory.

Who have I "made fun of".

Pointing out the obvious is just that. It's not being deliberately cruel.

yeah sure, if you say so

Moving on.......

Is Mitt Romney a conservative?

 

[Truthmatters]

i'm more concerned with getting the political leper out of office before he spreads any further than he has.

when was the last time a campaign won on "im not as bad as the other guy".

2008

see this is why your party is failing.

Bush was so bad you guys are not even interested in him campaigning for Mitt or anyone.

Obama made things better while your party fought to **** everything he did up.


Now you want to blame Obama for what Bush did and the republicans actions to **** everything up.

Obama did not run on Bush is fucked.

The whole world already knew Bush fucked everything up.

 

[Listening]

...if you support the Massachusetts liberal known as Mitt Romney you are not a conservative

Whoops....someone is telling what you are and what you are not. I figured I knew what I was...I guess I should ask GTH if I am a man or a woman.

If I support Romney, I am a conservative supporting Romney...no need to read any more into than that.

...you are just a Republican that will support whatever bag of shit they send you.

That would be democrats and Kerry in 2004.

Romney, believe it or not actually has some real world experience with regards to the economy and business. Now, don't get me wrong....we don't elect dictators.....we also elect a congress....but our financial situation is a mess and everyone knows there is some pain coming. If I believe Romney can get it done better than Obama, then I am there.

That simple.

Pro Choice...I am not planning on getting an abortion any time soon and I don't think Roe gets overturned anytime soon.....so I could almost care less.

...At least the Paul people have the balls to support a losing candidate that truly ebndorses their beliefs.

We can discuss this with them in the unemployent line if they get the current Moron-In-Charge reelected.

Sign in below....[/QUOTE]