You mean no one who is sane believes Joe got 20 million more votes than Obama.
Yeah and it would be nice if they could explain how Trump was leading in one state by 700,000 votes and leading in the contested states and still lost. That would mean that every vote that came in after that 700,000 was a Biden vote. Realistic?? Not hardly.
It's because "leading" is a false narrative when it comes to counting votes. All of the votes are cast on election day or before. One candidate has already won. No one is "leading". No one comes from "behind". (I, for one, don't think they should release any totals until all of them are counted. It confuses the dummies.)
Do you have children? If you do, you have no doubt experienced their persistence when they are disappointed with a parent's decision. They'll cling to any shred of hope that they can change the decision. They ask "why" over and over again - not listening to the answers, but just hoping to change the decision through sheer will. You learn quickly, that answering their questions is a losing game. At some point, you have to tell them to sit down and shut up - they're not going to win.
Now, voters aren't children, and normally I wouldn't advocate treating them as such. But they are following the lead of Trump, a man who is extremely childish. Addressing every single one of their empty doubts about the election is a losing game. "Sit down and shut up" is the only way to deal.