DC Pipe Bomber's Family Worked to Free Illegals from ICE, Sued the Trump Admin, And Used Trayvon Martin's Lawyer to Fight "Racism"

It will be interesting to see how he just happened to plant the pipe bombs on J5.
Just happened to…

What does that mean. He was walking down the street and stumbled and bombs fell out of his backpack?

No. He believed the election was stolen and his reaction was planting these bombs the night before the stop the steal event

The only question is … did he act alone or in concert with the creeps that started that attack on the Capitol..
 
He planted bombs the night before Jan 6 just outside the Capitol
This does not prove his actions were related to the EVENTS of J6.

Cole’s actions were those of a lone wolf and had nothing to do with events of the following day that he had no complicity in and had no foreknowledge of.

You’re flailing

Flailing at what? What is it you think I’m trying to do?
 

Charging document link.

The FBI would not have investigated, arrested, and charged if Cole was going to be pardoned.

Read the document. The guy is not getting pardoned.

The next Dem POTUS can pardon him for planting a BOMB AT THE DNC. 😂
Trump may find himself the victim of his own broad pardon.

He wrote the pardon to be broad enough to cover people who weren't even at the capitol.

Now he has to live with his own words.
 
You're late to the game, so let me hit one point at a time.

These guys were convicted of conspiring to interrupt the vote counting process and what’s more, they were actually present at the Capital on J6.

Cole’s actions had nothing to do with the events of J6 and he was not present at nor participate in the riot.


Steve Rhodes

The most prominent figure is Stewart Rhodes, the founder and leader of the Oath Keepers, who was convicted of seditious conspiracy despite not physically entering the U.S. Capitol building on January 6, 2021.

Conviction: Rhodes was found guilty by a federal jury in November 2022 of seditious conspiracy and other charges related to the plot to obstruct the peaceful transfer of power.
What’s your point?

Again, the pardon pertained to the EVENTS of J6. Cole played no part in any of that.
 
HE IS NOT GETTING PARDONED FOR PLANTING A BOMB AT THE DNC.
 
This does not prove his actions were related to the EVENTS of J6.

Cole’s actions were those of a lone wolf and had nothing to do with events of the following day that he had no complicity in and had no foreknowledge of.



Flailing at what? What is it you think I’m trying to do?
You skipped the part where he believed the election was stolen.. like all the people who attacked the Capitol
 
Brian J. Cole, Jr., the suspect in the January 6 pipe bomb incident, has not been pardoned by Donald Trump. As of now, Cole has been arrested and charged in connection with the bombings that occurred on the eve of the Capitol riot, which indicates that he is facing legal consequences rather than receiving clemency.
 
No. The pardon stipulated that they applied to the EVENTS of J6. Meaning, the riot at the Capital and attempts to interrupt the vote count.

The pardon doesn't say "applied to" it says "related to", which means in some way connected to those events.

Which Cole’s actions were not. That Cole’s actions just happened to occur the night before J6 is circumstantial and coincidental.

He had no part in the events of J6.
A man who never came within blocks of the Capitol was determined to have his actions (having a car full of weapons) was "related" to the events on January 6th.

Lonnie Coffman, 72, parked his truck – filled with 11 Mason jars filled with gasoline and Styrofoam, several unregistered firearms, hundreds of rounds of ammo, a stun gun, machetes and a crossbow with bolts – a few blocks from the Capitol on January 6.

He never got anywhere near the Capitol, and it was determined that he was covered by the pardon.

Since it covered "related to" and not "at".
It sounds to me like his case did not fall within those parameters either.
 
What’s your point?

Again, the pardon pertained to the EVENTS of J6. Cole played no part in any of that.
Why do all of you CHANGE THE WORDS ON THE PARDON.

It's not pertained, it's "related to"

Which is a rather broad term, meaning connected, no matter how tenuous the link.
 
You skipped the part where he believed the election was stolen.. like all the people who attacked the Capitol
That proves nothing but that he happened to agree ideologically with them. It does not prove he was complicit in the riot.
 
It sounds to me like his case did not fall within those parameters either.
Both involved weapons found blocks away from the Capitol.

Both were discovered on January 6th, hours before the insurrection.

Neither was charged with being at the Capitol or participating in any events at the Capitol.

They are more alike, than they are different.
 
Why do all of you CHANGE THE WORDS ON THE PARDON.

It's not pertained, it's "related to"

Which is a rather broad term, meaning connected, no matter how tenuous the link.
Exactly. His actions were not related to the events of J6. They were related only by the circumstantial fact that they occurred the night before. The dates of these events are the only things that are related here.
 
Both involved weapons found blocks away from the Capitol.

Both were discovered on January 6th, hours before the insurrection.

Neither was charged with being at the Capitol or participating in any events at the Capitol.

They are more alike, than they are different.
Did I or did I not say that his case does not fall within those parameters? Meaning, I don’t think he should have been pardoned.
 
15th post
Wow, look how fast the Wingnuts are running from this guy.
I found it strange how they don't give a really good description of the actual devices.
But from pictures, and from the affidavit for the arrest warrant, the devices were at best an epic fail.

He placed the pipe bombs around 8:00 pm and used a mechanical kitchen timer, which is only good for 100 minutes.

capitol-explosive-ap-ps-210115_1610717485029_hpEmbed_16x13_992.webp


Yet they were found 12 hours later, and hadn't gone off.
 
That proves nothing but that he happened to agree ideologically with them. It does not prove he was complicit in the riot.
Again as I stated earlier

The only question is … did he act alone or was he part of that conspiracy

I assume we will see
 
Did I or did I not say that his case does not fall within those parameters? Meaning, I don’t think he should have been pardoned.
But we know the first one was pardoned. The DOJ determined he qualified.

So it's only logical that similarly situated people would receive "equal protection"
 
Back
Top Bottom