Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
By Harper Neidig - 03/05/20 05:13 PM EST
A federal judge on Thursday ordered the Department of Justice (DOJ) to hand over to him a copy of the unredacted Mueller report and accused Attorney General William Barr of misrepresenting its findings in the days before it was submitted to Congress last year.
Judge Reggie B. Walton, a federal district court judge in Washington, said that he could not reconcile Barr's public comments in April 2019 about the report with the actual findings that former special counsel Robert Mueller outlined.
"The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary," Walton wrote in his decision.
"These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility" as well as the DOJ's arguments in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Walton added.
A DOJ spokeswoman did not respond when asked for comment.
The judge, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. Bush, said he would review the full report to determine whether the redactions made by the DOJ are subject to a FOIA request. The unredacted version will not be released to the public in the meantime.
[...]
Walton is presiding over a pair of consolidated FOIA lawsuits brought by Buzzfeed journalist Jason Leopold and the nonprofit Electronic Privacy Information Center.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/do...nic-Privacy-Information-Center-vs-Justice.pdf
The judge said that Barr's public statements about the report has caused him to doubt the DOJ's arguments that the redactions should remain in place.
"The Court has grave concerns about the objectivity of the process that preceded the public release of the redacted version of the Mueller Report and its impacts on the Department’s subsequent justifications that its redactions of the Mueller Report are authorized by the FOIA," Walton wrote.
He ordered the DOJ to hand over the unredacted report by March 30.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
And?
Is this post an admission that you could find no errors in any of my posts that forced you to slither in?
Good for you- did you notice what I actually said? Do you find it not to be true?My pay is the 'wages of truth'.
Stop being such a ****- you have talent but your personality sucks.March 22nd, 2019.....
After running on the hopes of reversing the 2016 election.....hope ran out when the confused Biden-like Robert Mueller tossed in the towel....
"Special Counsel Robert Mueller delivered his report on Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election to the attorney general, William Barr; it stated that “while this report does not conclude that the President [Donald Trump] committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
Britannica.com
Again?
"...while this report does not conclude that the President [Donald Trump] committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
Anyone conversant with the law will quickly recognize that the first phrase....
"...this report does not conclude that the President [Donald Trump] committed a crime,..."
...obviated the following phrase...
"...does not exonerate him.”
And that second phrase is inserted simply to justify the vast sum and time wasted on the hoax.
'Happy' anniversary, Democrats/Liberals???
Just keep swimming, just keep swimming.
Let me boil this shit show down for you.
- Collusion/conspiracy makes its appearance in Part 1 of Mueller's report. I mean, you really think that mensa Don Jr and his crew were discussing adoption at Trump Tower? But since Mueller wasn't considering collusion a crime, it was a non-starter.
- Obstruction of justice literally is Part 2 of Mueller's report. Under any normal circumstances, that should have been grounds for impeachment right there. I mean, remember all those Republicans who said the report on Clinton's lying about a blow job needed to go straight to Congress. Because it was about protecting the integrity of the office?
Trump can thank his personal Roy Cohn for pre-empting the report and reading it out loud before any member of Congress got to look at it...other than the president's supporters. Sorry, no exoneration here. Speaking of which, has anyone seen the Attorney General lately? With all that's going I'm a bit worried. About Gulliani too. Neither of them are spring chickens.
And then instead of learning from his mistakes, he doubles down again and tries to get a foreign government to dig up dirt on his political rival and then tops it all off by completely blowing the response to the greatest outbreak of a virus in this country since 1918.
But you just keep clicking your heels together and spinning. The last laugh here will belong to the Democrats.
Re-post without the vulgarity and I may respond.
The vulgarity was a comment on the presentation of the process, not directed at you personally. Thicken that skin up. Jeez, are you sure you're from Brooklyn?
Barr took the teeth out of the presentation of the report allowing Trump to skate. Republicans controlled the Senate. Democrats controlled the House. If you remember, Nancy Pelosi, held her caucus off for months when most of them wanted Trump impeached...but Trump has no self-awareness. Just his own worst corrupt instincts. Double down, rinse, repeat, fail.
She's on vladimir's payrollIf you're not being paid by the RNC you should be. LOL
One more proof of Coulter's genius:
"Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"
i'll bet W's appointee, judge walton was a college republican...............
There are Republicans and there are Republicans.
Now.....what did Mueller say about finding links to Russia by Trump, et al?
You know....and your hurt and anger is what brought you here.
Sadly, as in every endeavor you have engaged in.....
....you've proven an abject failure.
I get that warm, fuzzy feeling that only cruelty to the stupid can provide.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
By Harper Neidig - 03/05/20 05:13 PM EST
A federal judge on Thursday ordered the Department of Justice (DOJ) to hand over to him a copy of the unredacted Mueller report and accused Attorney General William Barr of misrepresenting its findings in the days before it was submitted to Congress last year.
Judge Reggie B. Walton, a federal district court judge in Washington, said that he could not reconcile Barr's public comments in April 2019 about the report with the actual findings that former special counsel Robert Mueller outlined.
"The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary," Walton wrote in his decision.
"These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility" as well as the DOJ's arguments in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Walton added.
A DOJ spokeswoman did not respond when asked for comment.
The judge, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. Bush, said he would review the full report to determine whether the redactions made by the DOJ are subject to a FOIA request. The unredacted version will not be released to the public in the meantime.
[...]
Walton is presiding over a pair of consolidated FOIA lawsuits brought by Buzzfeed journalist Jason Leopold and the nonprofit Electronic Privacy Information Center.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/do...nic-Privacy-Information-Center-vs-Justice.pdf
The judge said that Barr's public statements about the report has caused him to doubt the DOJ's arguments that the redactions should remain in place.
"The Court has grave concerns about the objectivity of the process that preceded the public release of the redacted version of the Mueller Report and its impacts on the Department’s subsequent justifications that its redactions of the Mueller Report are authorized by the FOIA," Walton wrote.
He ordered the DOJ to hand over the unredacted report by March 30.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
And?
Is this post an admission that you could find no errors in any of my posts that forced you to slither in?
it means in all likelihood that barr is in a shitload of trouble, not to mention that donny might just be right after all.
She's on vladimir's payrollIf you're not being paid by the RNC you should be. LOL
One more proof of Coulter's genius:
"Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"
i'll bet W's appointee, judge walton was a college republican...............
There are Republicans and there are Republicans.
Now.....what did Mueller say about finding links to Russia by Trump, et al?
You know....and your hurt and anger is what brought you here.
Sadly, as in every endeavor you have engaged in.....
....you've proven an abject failure.
I get that warm, fuzzy feeling that only cruelty to the stupid can provide.
you mean there are real (R)s & then there is the cult 45.
The Democrats invited the radical looney left like AOC's squad, Bernie Sanders, BLM, Antifa, into their tent in order to help defeat Trump and drive out of office.
But it backfired on them, and its moderate base is abandoning the Democrat Party in droves. Thus assuring Trump an easy victory in the 2020 election. ...
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
By Harper Neidig - 03/05/20 05:13 PM EST
A federal judge on Thursday ordered the Department of Justice (DOJ) to hand over to him a copy of the unredacted Mueller report and accused Attorney General William Barr of misrepresenting its findings in the days before it was submitted to Congress last year.
Judge Reggie B. Walton, a federal district court judge in Washington, said that he could not reconcile Barr's public comments in April 2019 about the report with the actual findings that former special counsel Robert Mueller outlined.
"The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary," Walton wrote in his decision.
"These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility" as well as the DOJ's arguments in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Walton added.
A DOJ spokeswoman did not respond when asked for comment.
The judge, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. Bush, said he would review the full report to determine whether the redactions made by the DOJ are subject to a FOIA request. The unredacted version will not be released to the public in the meantime.
[...]
Walton is presiding over a pair of consolidated FOIA lawsuits brought by Buzzfeed journalist Jason Leopold and the nonprofit Electronic Privacy Information Center.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/do...nic-Privacy-Information-Center-vs-Justice.pdf
The judge said that Barr's public statements about the report has caused him to doubt the DOJ's arguments that the redactions should remain in place.
"The Court has grave concerns about the objectivity of the process that preceded the public release of the redacted version of the Mueller Report and its impacts on the Department’s subsequent justifications that its redactions of the Mueller Report are authorized by the FOIA," Walton wrote.
He ordered the DOJ to hand over the unredacted report by March 30.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
And?
Is this post an admission that you could find no errors in any of my posts that forced you to slither in?
it means in all likelihood that barr is in a shitload of trouble, not to mention that donny might just be right after all.
That's nothing but hearsay and gossip.
What, exactly, do you imagine (I almost said 'think') you're proven?
The only one who has proven anything is .....moi.
She's on vladimir's payroll
One more proof of Coulter's genius:
"Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"
i'll bet W's appointee, judge walton was a college republican...............
There are Republicans and there are Republicans.
Now.....what did Mueller say about finding links to Russia by Trump, et al?
You know....and your hurt and anger is what brought you here.
Sadly, as in every endeavor you have engaged in.....
....you've proven an abject failure.
I get that warm, fuzzy feeling that only cruelty to the stupid can provide.
you mean there are real (R)s & then there is the cult 45.
I'm not surprised that you are unaware of never-Trumpers.
After all, there are so very many things you are unaware of.
Are you the example? If so, I'll pass- partisan bias is partisan bias and it has nothing to do with liberalism, unless of course you consider yourself "liberal"-Now, compare that to a college Republican…"
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
By Harper Neidig - 03/05/20 05:13 PM EST
A federal judge on Thursday ordered the Department of Justice (DOJ) to hand over to him a copy of the unredacted Mueller report and accused Attorney General William Barr of misrepresenting its findings in the days before it was submitted to Congress last year.
Judge Reggie B. Walton, a federal district court judge in Washington, said that he could not reconcile Barr's public comments in April 2019 about the report with the actual findings that former special counsel Robert Mueller outlined.
"The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary," Walton wrote in his decision.
"These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility" as well as the DOJ's arguments in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Walton added.
A DOJ spokeswoman did not respond when asked for comment.
The judge, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. Bush, said he would review the full report to determine whether the redactions made by the DOJ are subject to a FOIA request. The unredacted version will not be released to the public in the meantime.
[...]
Walton is presiding over a pair of consolidated FOIA lawsuits brought by Buzzfeed journalist Jason Leopold and the nonprofit Electronic Privacy Information Center.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/do...nic-Privacy-Information-Center-vs-Justice.pdf
The judge said that Barr's public statements about the report has caused him to doubt the DOJ's arguments that the redactions should remain in place.
"The Court has grave concerns about the objectivity of the process that preceded the public release of the redacted version of the Mueller Report and its impacts on the Department’s subsequent justifications that its redactions of the Mueller Report are authorized by the FOIA," Walton wrote.
He ordered the DOJ to hand over the unredacted report by March 30.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
And?
Is this post an admission that you could find no errors in any of my posts that forced you to slither in?
it means in all likelihood that barr is in a shitload of trouble, not to mention that donny might just be right after all.
That's nothing but hearsay and gossip.
What, exactly, do you imagine (I almost said 'think') you're proven?
The only one who has proven anything is .....moi.
the unredacted report might say a lot more. oh & if congress had the full unredacted report, they will have much more ground to stand on legally & constitutionally.
Good for you- did you notice what I actually said? Do you find it not to be true?My pay is the 'wages of truth'.
Stop being such a ****- you have talent but your personality sucks.March 22nd, 2019.....
After running on the hopes of reversing the 2016 election.....hope ran out when the confused Biden-like Robert Mueller tossed in the towel....
"Special Counsel Robert Mueller delivered his report on Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election to the attorney general, William Barr; it stated that “while this report does not conclude that the President [Donald Trump] committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
Britannica.com
Again?
"...while this report does not conclude that the President [Donald Trump] committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
Anyone conversant with the law will quickly recognize that the first phrase....
"...this report does not conclude that the President [Donald Trump] committed a crime,..."
...obviated the following phrase...
"...does not exonerate him.”
And that second phrase is inserted simply to justify the vast sum and time wasted on the hoax.
'Happy' anniversary, Democrats/Liberals???
Just keep swimming, just keep swimming.
Let me boil this shit show down for you.
- Collusion/conspiracy makes its appearance in Part 1 of Mueller's report. I mean, you really think that mensa Don Jr and his crew were discussing adoption at Trump Tower? But since Mueller wasn't considering collusion a crime, it was a non-starter.
- Obstruction of justice literally is Part 2 of Mueller's report. Under any normal circumstances, that should have been grounds for impeachment right there. I mean, remember all those Republicans who said the report on Clinton's lying about a blow job needed to go straight to Congress. Because it was about protecting the integrity of the office?
Trump can thank his personal Roy Cohn for pre-empting the report and reading it out loud before any member of Congress got to look at it...other than the president's supporters. Sorry, no exoneration here. Speaking of which, has anyone seen the Attorney General lately? With all that's going I'm a bit worried. About Gulliani too. Neither of them are spring chickens.
And then instead of learning from his mistakes, he doubles down again and tries to get a foreign government to dig up dirt on his political rival and then tops it all off by completely blowing the response to the greatest outbreak of a virus in this country since 1918.
But you just keep clicking your heels together and spinning. The last laugh here will belong to the Democrats.
Re-post without the vulgarity and I may respond.
The vulgarity was a comment on the presentation of the process, not directed at you personally. Thicken that skin up. Jeez, are you sure you're from Brooklyn?
Barr took the teeth out of the presentation of the report allowing Trump to skate. Republicans controlled the Senate. Democrats controlled the House. If you remember, Nancy Pelosi, held her caucus off for months when most of them wanted Trump impeached...but Trump has no self-awareness. Just his own worst corrupt instincts. Double down, rinse, repeat, fail.
I want you to behave as an adult, no matter where it is directed.
"Barr took the teeth out of the presentation of the report allowing Trump to skate."
Let's see your proof....or, you are simply lying to hide your chagrin at one move failure.....
Frankly, you should be used to failure:
First collusion, collusion, collusion failed
Russia, Russia, Russia failed.
Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction failed.
Racist, Racist, Racist failed.
Impeach, Impeach, Impeach failed.
Recession, Recession, Recession failed.
Emoluments, 25th amendment, Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, Quid Pro Quo, ‘lynching,’ the GAO charges, Lev Parnas, impeachment, coronavirus ‘hoax,’ one after another lead balloons.
One more proof of Coulter's genius:
"Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"
i'll bet W's appointee, judge walton was a college republican...............
There are Republicans and there are Republicans.
Now.....what did Mueller say about finding links to Russia by Trump, et al?
You know....and your hurt and anger is what brought you here.
Sadly, as in every endeavor you have engaged in.....
....you've proven an abject failure.
I get that warm, fuzzy feeling that only cruelty to the stupid can provide.
you mean there are real (R)s & then there is the cult 45.
I'm not surprised that you are unaware of never-Trumpers.
After all, there are so very many things you are unaware of.
no, i mean real (R)s. i would know, i'm married to one.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
By Harper Neidig - 03/05/20 05:13 PM EST
A federal judge on Thursday ordered the Department of Justice (DOJ) to hand over to him a copy of the unredacted Mueller report and accused Attorney General William Barr of misrepresenting its findings in the days before it was submitted to Congress last year.
Judge Reggie B. Walton, a federal district court judge in Washington, said that he could not reconcile Barr's public comments in April 2019 about the report with the actual findings that former special counsel Robert Mueller outlined.
"The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary," Walton wrote in his decision.
"These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility" as well as the DOJ's arguments in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Walton added.
A DOJ spokeswoman did not respond when asked for comment.
The judge, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. Bush, said he would review the full report to determine whether the redactions made by the DOJ are subject to a FOIA request. The unredacted version will not be released to the public in the meantime.
[...]
Walton is presiding over a pair of consolidated FOIA lawsuits brought by Buzzfeed journalist Jason Leopold and the nonprofit Electronic Privacy Information Center.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/do...nic-Privacy-Information-Center-vs-Justice.pdf
The judge said that Barr's public statements about the report has caused him to doubt the DOJ's arguments that the redactions should remain in place.
"The Court has grave concerns about the objectivity of the process that preceded the public release of the redacted version of the Mueller Report and its impacts on the Department’s subsequent justifications that its redactions of the Mueller Report are authorized by the FOIA," Walton wrote.
He ordered the DOJ to hand over the unredacted report by March 30.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
And?
Is this post an admission that you could find no errors in any of my posts that forced you to slither in?
it means in all likelihood that barr is in a shitload of trouble, not to mention that donny might just be right after all.
That's nothing but hearsay and gossip.
What, exactly, do you imagine (I almost said 'think') you're proven?
The only one who has proven anything is .....moi.
the unredacted report might say a lot more. oh & if congress had the full unredacted report, they will have much more ground to stand on legally & constitutionally.
"....might say...."
I think you should pin your hopes on it.
Frankly, you should be used to failure:
First collusion, collusion, collusion failed
Russia, Russia, Russia failed.
Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction failed.
Racist, Racist, Racist failed.
Impeach, Impeach, Impeach failed.
Recession, Recession, Recession failed.
Emoluments, 25th amendment, Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, Quid Pro Quo, ‘lynching,’ the GAO charges, Lev Parnas, impeachment, coronavirus ‘hoax,’ one after another lead balloons.
Learning isn't a part of your skill set, is it.
Good for you- did you notice what I actually said? Do you find it not to be true?My pay is the 'wages of truth'.
Stop being such a ****- you have talent but your personality sucks.March 22nd, 2019.....
After running on the hopes of reversing the 2016 election.....hope ran out when the confused Biden-like Robert Mueller tossed in the towel....
"Special Counsel Robert Mueller delivered his report on Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election to the attorney general, William Barr; it stated that “while this report does not conclude that the President [Donald Trump] committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
Britannica.com
Again?
"...while this report does not conclude that the President [Donald Trump] committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
Anyone conversant with the law will quickly recognize that the first phrase....
"...this report does not conclude that the President [Donald Trump] committed a crime,..."
...obviated the following phrase...
"...does not exonerate him.”
And that second phrase is inserted simply to justify the vast sum and time wasted on the hoax.
'Happy' anniversary, Democrats/Liberals???
Just keep swimming, just keep swimming.
Let me boil this shit show down for you.
- Collusion/conspiracy makes its appearance in Part 1 of Mueller's report. I mean, you really think that mensa Don Jr and his crew were discussing adoption at Trump Tower? But since Mueller wasn't considering collusion a crime, it was a non-starter.
- Obstruction of justice literally is Part 2 of Mueller's report. Under any normal circumstances, that should have been grounds for impeachment right there. I mean, remember all those Republicans who said the report on Clinton's lying about a blow job needed to go straight to Congress. Because it was about protecting the integrity of the office?
Trump can thank his personal Roy Cohn for pre-empting the report and reading it out loud before any member of Congress got to look at it...other than the president's supporters. Sorry, no exoneration here. Speaking of which, has anyone seen the Attorney General lately? With all that's going I'm a bit worried. About Gulliani too. Neither of them are spring chickens.
And then instead of learning from his mistakes, he doubles down again and tries to get a foreign government to dig up dirt on his political rival and then tops it all off by completely blowing the response to the greatest outbreak of a virus in this country since 1918.
But you just keep clicking your heels together and spinning. The last laugh here will belong to the Democrats.
Re-post without the vulgarity and I may respond.
The vulgarity was a comment on the presentation of the process, not directed at you personally. Thicken that skin up. Jeez, are you sure you're from Brooklyn?
Barr took the teeth out of the presentation of the report allowing Trump to skate. Republicans controlled the Senate. Democrats controlled the House. If you remember, Nancy Pelosi, held her caucus off for months when most of them wanted Trump impeached...but Trump has no self-awareness. Just his own worst corrupt instincts. Double down, rinse, repeat, fail.
I want you to behave as an adult, no matter where it is directed.
"Barr took the teeth out of the presentation of the report allowing Trump to skate."
Let's see your proof....or, you are simply lying to hide your chagrin at one move failure.....
Frankly, you should be used to failure:
First collusion, collusion, collusion failed
Russia, Russia, Russia failed.
Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction failed.
Racist, Racist, Racist failed.
Impeach, Impeach, Impeach failed.
Recession, Recession, Recession failed.
Emoluments, 25th amendment, Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, Quid Pro Quo, ‘lynching,’ the GAO charges, Lev Parnas, impeachment, coronavirus ‘hoax,’ one after another lead balloons.
Honestly, you're like a tiger with no teeth. You almost remind me of that perpetual whiner Ben Shapiro running on and on about civil discourse and then running to his corner whenever he gets his ass handed to him screaming "LEFTIST!!".
Barr takes the teeth out of the Mueller report. Well, let's start here.
'Lied through his teeth': Dem lawmakers slam Barr over Mueller report
And then a second course of what was contained in the report.
Five Things I Learned From the Mueller Report
For a contrast, let's jump in the DeLorean and go back in time.
The hypocrisy of impeachment: How lawmakers' stances on ousting a president changed from Clinton to Trump
I like that this next one came from a Fox News panelist.
Juan Williams: GOP are hypocrites on impeachment
Seriously, I was about to thank you for providing a welcome distraction from all the coronavirus posts...and then you go and put the word "hoax" next to it.
Sigh....
And?
Is this post an admission that you could find no errors in any of my posts that forced you to slither in?
it means in all likelihood that barr is in a shitload of trouble, not to mention that donny might just be right after all.
That's nothing but hearsay and gossip.
What, exactly, do you imagine (I almost said 'think') you're proven?
The only one who has proven anything is .....moi.
the unredacted report might say a lot more. oh & if congress had the full unredacted report, they will have much more ground to stand on legally & constitutionally.
"....might say...."
I think you should pin your hopes on it.
Frankly, you should be used to failure:
First collusion, collusion, collusion failed
Russia, Russia, Russia failed.
Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction failed.
Racist, Racist, Racist failed.
Impeach, Impeach, Impeach failed.
Recession, Recession, Recession failed.
Emoluments, 25th amendment, Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, Quid Pro Quo, ‘lynching,’ the GAO charges, Lev Parnas, impeachment, coronavirus ‘hoax,’ one after another lead balloons.
Learning isn't a part of your skill set, is it.
just how far up donny's colon are you? is he also the chosen one?
Good for you- did you notice what I actually said? Do you find it not to be true?
Stop being such a ****- you have talent but your personality sucks.Just keep swimming, just keep swimming.
Let me boil this shit show down for you.
- Collusion/conspiracy makes its appearance in Part 1 of Mueller's report. I mean, you really think that mensa Don Jr and his crew were discussing adoption at Trump Tower? But since Mueller wasn't considering collusion a crime, it was a non-starter.
- Obstruction of justice literally is Part 2 of Mueller's report. Under any normal circumstances, that should have been grounds for impeachment right there. I mean, remember all those Republicans who said the report on Clinton's lying about a blow job needed to go straight to Congress. Because it was about protecting the integrity of the office?
Trump can thank his personal Roy Cohn for pre-empting the report and reading it out loud before any member of Congress got to look at it...other than the president's supporters. Sorry, no exoneration here. Speaking of which, has anyone seen the Attorney General lately? With all that's going I'm a bit worried. About Gulliani too. Neither of them are spring chickens.
And then instead of learning from his mistakes, he doubles down again and tries to get a foreign government to dig up dirt on his political rival and then tops it all off by completely blowing the response to the greatest outbreak of a virus in this country since 1918.
But you just keep clicking your heels together and spinning. The last laugh here will belong to the Democrats.
Re-post without the vulgarity and I may respond.
The vulgarity was a comment on the presentation of the process, not directed at you personally. Thicken that skin up. Jeez, are you sure you're from Brooklyn?
Barr took the teeth out of the presentation of the report allowing Trump to skate. Republicans controlled the Senate. Democrats controlled the House. If you remember, Nancy Pelosi, held her caucus off for months when most of them wanted Trump impeached...but Trump has no self-awareness. Just his own worst corrupt instincts. Double down, rinse, repeat, fail.
I want you to behave as an adult, no matter where it is directed.
"Barr took the teeth out of the presentation of the report allowing Trump to skate."
Let's see your proof....or, you are simply lying to hide your chagrin at one move failure.....
Frankly, you should be used to failure:
First collusion, collusion, collusion failed
Russia, Russia, Russia failed.
Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction failed.
Racist, Racist, Racist failed.
Impeach, Impeach, Impeach failed.
Recession, Recession, Recession failed.
Emoluments, 25th amendment, Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, Quid Pro Quo, ‘lynching,’ the GAO charges, Lev Parnas, impeachment, coronavirus ‘hoax,’ one after another lead balloons.
Honestly, you're like a tiger with no teeth. You almost remind me of that perpetual whiner Ben Shapiro running on and on about civil discourse and then running to his corner whenever he gets his ass handed to him screaming "LEFTIST!!".
Barr takes the teeth out of the Mueller report. Well, let's start here.
'Lied through his teeth': Dem lawmakers slam Barr over Mueller report
And then a second course of what was contained in the report.
Five Things I Learned From the Mueller Report
For a contrast, let's jump in the DeLorean and go back in time.
The hypocrisy of impeachment: How lawmakers' stances on ousting a president changed from Clinton to Trump
I like that this next one came from a Fox News panelist.
Juan Williams: GOP are hypocrites on impeachment
Seriously, I was about to thank you for providing a welcome distraction from all the coronavirus posts...and then you go and put the word "hoax" next to it.
Sigh....
"Honestly, you're like a tiger with no teeth. You almost remind me of that perpetual whiner Ben Shapiro running on and on about civil discourse and then running to his corner whenever he gets his ass handed to him screaming "LEFTIST!!".
You must sense how little I incorporate your....observations.
You should confine your attention to actually finding any errors in my posts.
(How to keep an idiot busy.)
Wrong. A "college Republican" no doubt, who's never wrong- this is the 4th time recently-born with inalienable rights,
