Do you think Byrd was chosen by Piglosi by design? If there was insufficient uproar to Babbitt's murder, we would have the current result. If the uproar was too great, Byrd would be the sacrificial lamb. Either way Piglosi is off scott free.
And he will have no luck there. Even if he somehow wins which is a real long shot, Penney has no assets. The lawyer won't recover his costs, and the deadbeat farther won't get a dime. This case will quietly go away once the press stops covering it. The lawyer is just out for publicity.
Is there another reason you posted false information yesterday to try and cover up his kidnapping? Is there another reason you tried to dispute the comparison I posted today? All quite innocent and unbiased I assume?
So Penny moves out of New York to some place less unfriendly.
I see, so you refuse to reveal to us the post that you claim contained my support for "this violent, kidnapping druggie". I therefore have to say that there is no such post and your accusation is baseless.
Penny will write a book, get invited to talk shows, perhaps sell movie rights etc - so I think he may very well have assets coming his way.
It’s a thousand points of light. Your entire constellation. You have cookie all over your face. You are just too dishonest to come out and profess your love for the druggie kidnapper but it’s obvious from everything you say.
First you say I did express support for him and now you say I'm too dishonest to express support for him. Like every magat I encounter here you are thick, thick as pig shit.
god you are amazingly stupid keep proving it with comments like this.
How about you reveal the post that you claim I claimed that in? I never claim you made a singular “post”. You are just making shit up again. I just stated the opposite, that it wasn’t a single post but the entire constellation of your girly-crush for the kidnapping druggie.
Perhaps you can find this elusive post for him, although you're no better at distinguishing fact from fiction than he is.
In which post(s) did you see me "tripping over myself" to "defend" Neely? Answer is, there is no such post. Nothing I've written is consistent with your hallucinatory accusation. At no point have I defended Neely's behavior or prior charges.
What that shows is that whites commit far fewer crimes than blacks. And those figures that you posted are PER CAPITA meaning they are adjusted for population.
Why do you think it shows that? I think it shows that the system is rigged against black people.
Where did I say otherwise?
Then he will have the money to hire a good law firm to protect them from seizure. Perhaps by forming a corporation based in a foreign country and having any money paid to the corporation rather than to his private person. For instance, he can incorporate, have any income paid to the corporation, then pay himself a small salary. Any verdict will be against Daniel Penny, NOT DP Enterprises which is a different legal entity. Al that can be attached is his small salary.
Since when does a limited liability corporation (of which Giuliani had several) protect one's assets from the law? Even Trump had to put up a huge bond for his fraud conviction and he knows how to hide money too.
Look Mommy!!!
YOUR post 551: "Underline this with the fact that there are five times as many whites as there are blacks in the United States." You are clearly trying to imply that whites are prosecuted less than blacks because the numbers of criminals are lower for whites. You can't even remember your own posts and are a bad liar to boot.
That's slightly better than your previous post, but it's still a rambling jumble of words, it still needs work, AI is a new technology though so lets see how you improve next time.
