Daniel Penny acquitted!

Not a shred of evidence this incident had anything to do with race. But the race hustlers are making it so. They are toxic and oh so tiresome.

 
The corrupt judicial system finally got one right! :thup:


Daniel Penny acquitted!​

 
Not a shred of evidence this incident had anything to do with race. But the race hustlers are making it so. They are toxic and oh so tiresome.


This is typical, white people telling black people that perceived racial injustices aren't real, claiming to know what "evidence" is for it too. Like white people know what life is like when one lives in a black skin - the arrogance.

1733778103716.webp
 
This is typical, white people telling black people that perceived racial injustices aren't real.
This whole mess could have been avoided is Neely wasn’t a criminal low-life. No one targeted him like he targeted innocent people. He asked for this, he got it.

You want to push some bullshit racial narrative, back it up.

87614691-BBBA-44AF-9C33-7A0BF5EEA4BF.jpeg
 
This whole mess could have been avoided is Neely wasn’t a criminal low-life. No one targeted him like he targeted innocent people. He asked for this, he got it.

You want to push some bullshit racial narrative, back it up.

View attachment 1052075
Why do people here do this, just uncritically accept bullshit and pass it on and amplify it? They don't care about truth that's why.

1733778581612.png


But I guess if a magat like Ramaswamy says it, it must be true.
 
The Breeze

Why the "fake news" response to my post? Neely did not kidnap anyone yet Ramaswamy said he did - do you really not care when magats lie like this? What kind of sick fuckers are you all, lies, lies, lies are truth to you shitbags.
 
Why do people here do this, just uncritically accept bullshit and pass it on and amplify it? They don't care about truth that's why.
That’s because he pleaded down to a lesser charge. But don’t let that deter your defense for a criminal asshole who tried to drag a child off to do God-knows-what to.

Take a look in the accepting-bullshit mirror, oh uncritical one….

“And he was busted in August 2015 for attempted kidnapping after he was seen dragging a 7-year-old girl down an Inwood street. He pled guilty to endangering the welfare of a child and was sentenced to four months in jail.”
https://www.nydailynews.com/2023/05/04/criminal-charges-weighed-against-marine-in-chokehold-death-of-jordan-neely-as-nypd-and-manhattan-da-confer/
 
That’s because he pleaded down to a lesser charge. But don’t let that deter your defense for a criminal asshole who tried to drag a child off to do God-knows-what to.

Take a look in the accepting-bullshit mirror, oh uncritical one….

“And he was busted in August 2015 for attempted kidnapping after he was seen dragging a 7-year-old girl down an Inwood street. He pled guilty to endangering the welfare of a child and was sentenced to four months in jail.”
https://www.nydailynews.com/2023/05/04/criminal-charges-weighed-against-marine-in-chokehold-death-of-jordan-neely-as-nypd-and-manhattan-da-confer/
Stop pretending that you don't know what I'm talking about and substantiate your allegation that Neely kidnapped a seven year old girl.
 
She did perform an autopsy and then upon seeing the video too, showing he was not screaming, this was consistent with asphyxiation, until seeing the video she was unsure, because the Police originally claimed he was screaming (but he wasn't in that video) while being restrained.

So she reached a point at which she was confident in her determination, the video and the autopsy evidence together pointed toward asphyxiation.

Read the very source you just posted:



Are you imputing wrongdoing to Harris?
She did not wait for the toxicology report that revealed a contributing cause of death.
 
She did not wait for the toxicology report that revealed a contributing cause of death.
It did not reveal a contributing cause of death at all, she said that during the trial, she contested that claim. If you saw someone just shot in the street in the head, would you insist on waiting for a blood test before deciding he was killed by a shot to the head?
 
It did not reveal a contributing cause of death at all, she said that during the trial, she contested that claim. If you saw someone just shot in the street in the head, would you insist on waiting for a blood test before deciding he was killed by a shot to the head?
Yes.
 
If true then why attack a mentally handicapped person? that's nasty.

There’s no “if” about it. And it’s not an “attack.” It’s just information. And since you’re retarded, maybe you haven’t figured out yet that you’re retarded.
This is the fallacy known as the "No true Scotsman fallacy".
There IS a fallacy which is colloquially known as an as “no true Scotsman.” This isn’t it. You retard.
Stop lying, you love my posts, can't leave me alone once I start.
Cry harder.
 
There’s no “if” about it. And it’s not an “attack.” It’s just information. And since you’re retarded, maybe you haven’t figured out yet that you’re retarded.

There IS a fallacy which is colloquially known as an as “no true Scotsman.” This isn’t it. You retard.

Cry harder.
Are you always this angry?
 
Back
Top Bottom