Wyatt earp
Diamond Member
- Apr 21, 2012
- 69,975
- 16,401
- 2,180
Backed by gold?It doesnt? So your claim is that the working man having more money is a bad thing? Do you really want to go with that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Backed by gold?It doesnt? So your claim is that the working man having more money is a bad thing? Do you really want to go with that?
Our money isn't backed by gold Its fiat money.Backed by gold?
Handing people free money doesn't raise prices across the board. It only raises prices on items that become in demand. Its called supply and demand and a lot of times its an artificial supply problem created by billionaires trying to line their pockets.
I told you that you didn't sound educated enough to get it. Basically you wasted my time.
So what?
He's never hid the facts he's a malignant narcissist and pathological liar either.
Donald Trump Settlement & Lawsuits - History of Legal Affairs - CRUSH The LSAT 2021
Go check the violent crime stats. People kill for money.
Go check the violent crime stats. People kill for money.
So the best you can do is show me a meme?8
You make a lot of nonsensical comments. Is that supposed to be some great revelation? Do you mean that no one would kill for more if everyone had the same amount of money?
You're so cute. Naive, but cute!
stop paying people send their pay to big brother and then everyone stops working the commies can never remember thisSo says Bernie Sanders...https://berniesanders.com/issues/tax-extreme-wealth/
He says ..."Will raise an estimated $4.35 trillion over the next decade"
That's $435 billion additional tax revenue per year.
Right now... if the top 1% of US households (164 million households) or 1.64 million earn
$1,700,000 per year and pay right now about 20% of all federal tax revenue.
BUT if Bernie and the majority of the ignorant people on this board have their way...
according to Bernie these "billionaires" will have "cut the wealth of billionaires in half over 15 years,"
Hmmm... so if Bernie has his way and cuts these evil billionaires wealth in half... how will Bernie pay for the next 15 years?
Remember he is counting on these "billionaires" to pay $435 billion a year from their wealth which according to his plan will be reduced every year.
Which means the tax payments will be reduced. It's just simple economics.
I asked you a question and you, typically, could not answer. I'll try again. If none of those men existed, how much money would you have in your pocket?I'm not sure you are educated enough to understand what I am saying. I mean you're claiming that taking half of a multi billionaires money is somehow stealing as if it would hurt them. No. They would simply make it back and rather quickly. That half a million could go to others that have been disenfranchised by this country to bring them to a level of economic prosperity. As such they would pay larger taxes and stimulate the economy where guess who benefits? The billionaires
If none of those men existed, how much money would you have in your pocket?
At the same place or another company. Why do you ask? What happens when a company completely goes out of business? Do you think the people just hang out waiting for them to reopen?If you liquidate only HALF of their billions, where would the people work who are now employed by those companies?
1 clue is that inflation benefits billionaires. Obviously you have no clue the Central Bank creates inflation.
Nope. The people that raise their prices to take advantage of more money in the system cause inflation. If they didnt raise their prices there would be no inflation.massive spending by the government causes inflation which we see already.
It doesnt? So your claim is that the working man having more money is a bad thing? Do you really want to go with that?
Thats patently false. The more the worker takes on the more work the employer will give them without raising their pay at all and getting rid of the employees he no longer needs. Theres a reason they down size and take on new talent. They know the young eager beaver is going to work harder for less pay.if the worker improves their value to an employer the employer will pay them more and yes, that is a great thing!
What kind of stupid question is that and how would I know the answer to it?
I dont spend much time on stupid hypotheticals there are no answers to. That would involve predicting what ventures those billionaires would be involved in and how that would affect me.How can it be a stupid question if you are advocating for liquidating billions of dollars from those who earned that money. How much did that take from you personally? You must have thought it through, have you not?
You have a billionaire "mentor", Milk Weed? Of course you do! And he's "awesome" too? Of course he is! Is he here in the room now?One of my mentors is a white billionaire so I am well aware of what they do with their money. What they do with it is not something I would give you for free. I would make you pay for that information.
We have had many discussions about taxes and he and I only differ on one thing. He feels he specifically would be better off determining where his money goes. I have to admit that in his case I agree as he is awesome in what he does. He pays for his employees children college educations and he builds schools in the areas that his employees live.
I am indeedNo you're not.