Cruz to make major announcement

[kaz]

You are attempting to divert from the fact that you joined the fix to make a buck

I'm not diverting from that at all, simpleton. It's called capitalism. Of course I'm making a buck. So is everyone else who puts in the effort. I say I'm a capitalist. I'm diverting nothing. How did you possibly get the idea that I'm diverting from that? You're just making shit up as you go again.

Speaking of your making shit up as you go

- You say only people who **** people make money in capitalism
- You make money
- You aren't ******* anyone

If you are "doing fine" you are lying because you know everyone else can do fine too if they just put in the effort, or, you're lying that you're doing fine and putting the blame for your failure on others.

I'm trying to get at which is the lie. So, which is the lie?

 

[sarahgop]

No one before has thrown away a VP pick as worse as Cruz did. It shows he makes rushed, irrational decisions under pressure. Also shows how little Cruz thinks of finonia, and little she thinks of herself, though no doubt no one else would agree to get anywhere near him except someone of low self esteem.

 

[Indeependent]

You are attempting to divert from the fact that you joined the fix to make a buck

I'm not diverting from that at all, simpleton. It's called capitalism. Of course I'm making a buck. So is everyone else who puts in the effort. I say I'm a capitalist. I'm diverting nothing. How did you possibly get the idea that I'm diverting from that? You're just making shit up as you go again.

Speaking of your making shit up as you go

- You say only people who **** people make money in capitalism
- You make money
- You aren't ******* anyone

If you are "doing fine" you are lying because you know everyone else can do fine too if they just put in the effort, or, you're lying that you're doing fine and putting the blame for your failure on others.

I'm trying to get at which is the lie. So, which is the lie?

You have trouble compartmentalizing information.
Physicians earned their salaries until the Indians were allowed, via legislation, to replace them.
Accountants are earning their salaries...so far.
Attorneys are earning their salaries...so far.
Plumbers earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.
Electricians earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.
Carpenters earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.

Immoral Free Market legislation allowed you to make a quick and easy buck.
You chose to join the quick and easy route.
And yes, I knew lots of agents such as yourself so don't try to make it sound like you work hard to "earn" your pay...you don't.

Just don't try to come across as working "hard" and being part of a global economic expansion.
Americans are losing jobs and India and China can't support themselves without the American consumer.
Bottom Line...Supply Side Economics is a major failure.

 

[sarahgop]

Cruz used finonia to try and break a relentless negative news cycle. Type of panic we dont need when life and death decisions need to be made.

 

[kaz]

You are attempting to divert from the fact that you joined the fix to make a buck

I'm not diverting from that at all, simpleton. It's called capitalism. Of course I'm making a buck. So is everyone else who puts in the effort. I say I'm a capitalist. I'm diverting nothing. How did you possibly get the idea that I'm diverting from that? You're just making shit up as you go again.

Speaking of your making shit up as you go

- You say only people who **** people make money in capitalism
- You make money
- You aren't ******* anyone

If you are "doing fine" you are lying because you know everyone else can do fine too if they just put in the effort, or, you're lying that you're doing fine and putting the blame for your failure on others.

I'm trying to get at which is the lie. So, which is the lie?

You have trouble compartmentalizing information.
Physicians earned their salaries until the Indians were allowed, via legislation, to replace them.
Accountants are earning their salaries...so far.
Attorneys are earning their salaries...so far.
Plumbers earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.
Electricians earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.
Carpenters earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.

Immoral Free Market legislation allowed you to make a quick and easy buck.
You chose to join the quick and easy route.
And yes, I knew lots of agents such as yourself so don't try to make it sound like you work hard to "earn" your pay...you don't.

Just don't try to come across as working "hard" and being part of a global economic expansion.
Americans are losing jobs and India and China can't support themselves without the American consumer.
Bottom Line...Supply Side Economics is a major failure.

But it's not a problem for you, just other people. You earn money honestly even though you know anyone who earns money is screwing other people. You also know the field of economics is wrong, not sure how you know that. And you haven't observed that socialism is consistently an economic disaster where the best examples are endless stagnant growth as has been experience in Europe for a long time now and is happening here.

Given the power to further regulate and control the economy, politicians and bureaucrats will use that power honestly to help us despite all history of what politicians and bureaucrats have done with power. We just need to trust them and they'll come through for us.

You don't' have trouble "compartmentalizing" information, you have trouble processing it at all

 

[Indeependent]

You are attempting to divert from the fact that you joined the fix to make a buck

I'm not diverting from that at all, simpleton. It's called capitalism. Of course I'm making a buck. So is everyone else who puts in the effort. I say I'm a capitalist. I'm diverting nothing. How did you possibly get the idea that I'm diverting from that? You're just making shit up as you go again.

Speaking of your making shit up as you go

- You say only people who **** people make money in capitalism
- You make money
- You aren't ******* anyone

If you are "doing fine" you are lying because you know everyone else can do fine too if they just put in the effort, or, you're lying that you're doing fine and putting the blame for your failure on others.

I'm trying to get at which is the lie. So, which is the lie?

You have trouble compartmentalizing information.
Physicians earned their salaries until the Indians were allowed, via legislation, to replace them.
Accountants are earning their salaries...so far.
Attorneys are earning their salaries...so far.
Plumbers earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.
Electricians earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.
Carpenters earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.

Immoral Free Market legislation allowed you to make a quick and easy buck.
You chose to join the quick and easy route.
And yes, I knew lots of agents such as yourself so don't try to make it sound like you work hard to "earn" your pay...you don't.

Just don't try to come across as working "hard" and being part of a global economic expansion.
Americans are losing jobs and India and China can't support themselves without the American consumer.
Bottom Line...Supply Side Economics is a major failure.

But it's not a problem for you, just other people. You earn money honestly even though you know anyone who earns money is screwing other people. You also know the field of economics is wrong, not sure how you know that. And you haven't observed that socialism is consistently an economic disaster where the best examples are endless stagnant growth as has been experience in Europe for a long time now and is happening here.

Given the power to further regulate and control the economy, politicians and bureaucrats will use that power honestly to help us despite all history of what politicians and bureaucrats have done with power. We just need to trust them and they'll come through for us.

You don't' have trouble "compartmentalizing" information, you have trouble processing it at all

This post displays your inability to discern the forest from the trees.
It's a defense mechanism because, fortunately, the human buried deep within you knows what you did to satisfy your avarice.

 

[kaz]

You are attempting to divert from the fact that you joined the fix to make a buck

I'm not diverting from that at all, simpleton. It's called capitalism. Of course I'm making a buck. So is everyone else who puts in the effort. I say I'm a capitalist. I'm diverting nothing. How did you possibly get the idea that I'm diverting from that? You're just making shit up as you go again.

Speaking of your making shit up as you go

- You say only people who **** people make money in capitalism
- You make money
- You aren't ******* anyone

If you are "doing fine" you are lying because you know everyone else can do fine too if they just put in the effort, or, you're lying that you're doing fine and putting the blame for your failure on others.

I'm trying to get at which is the lie. So, which is the lie?

You have trouble compartmentalizing information.
Physicians earned their salaries until the Indians were allowed, via legislation, to replace them.
Accountants are earning their salaries...so far.
Attorneys are earning their salaries...so far.
Plumbers earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.
Electricians earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.
Carpenters earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.

Immoral Free Market legislation allowed you to make a quick and easy buck.
You chose to join the quick and easy route.
And yes, I knew lots of agents such as yourself so don't try to make it sound like you work hard to "earn" your pay...you don't.

Just don't try to come across as working "hard" and being part of a global economic expansion.
Americans are losing jobs and India and China can't support themselves without the American consumer.
Bottom Line...Supply Side Economics is a major failure.

But it's not a problem for you, just other people. You earn money honestly even though you know anyone who earns money is screwing other people. You also know the field of economics is wrong, not sure how you know that. And you haven't observed that socialism is consistently an economic disaster where the best examples are endless stagnant growth as has been experience in Europe for a long time now and is happening here.

Given the power to further regulate and control the economy, politicians and bureaucrats will use that power honestly to help us despite all history of what politicians and bureaucrats have done with power. We just need to trust them and they'll come through for us.

You don't' have trouble "compartmentalizing" information, you have trouble processing it at all

This post displays your inability to discern the forest from the trees.
It's a defense mechanism because, fortunately, the human buried deep within you knows what you did to satisfy your avarice.

No content, huh. You're constantly contradicting yourself. A basic skill of the left, you can simultaneously believe completely contradictory information

 

[rcfieldz]

Omg...If Ted becomes president...and something happens to him...Fiorina could become President Of The United States? Carly Rules !

 

[Indeependent]

You are attempting to divert from the fact that you joined the fix to make a buck

I'm not diverting from that at all, simpleton. It's called capitalism. Of course I'm making a buck. So is everyone else who puts in the effort. I say I'm a capitalist. I'm diverting nothing. How did you possibly get the idea that I'm diverting from that? You're just making shit up as you go again.

Speaking of your making shit up as you go

- You say only people who **** people make money in capitalism
- You make money
- You aren't ******* anyone

If you are "doing fine" you are lying because you know everyone else can do fine too if they just put in the effort, or, you're lying that you're doing fine and putting the blame for your failure on others.

I'm trying to get at which is the lie. So, which is the lie?

You have trouble compartmentalizing information.
Physicians earned their salaries until the Indians were allowed, via legislation, to replace them.
Accountants are earning their salaries...so far.
Attorneys are earning their salaries...so far.
Plumbers earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.
Electricians earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.
Carpenters earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.

Immoral Free Market legislation allowed you to make a quick and easy buck.
You chose to join the quick and easy route.
And yes, I knew lots of agents such as yourself so don't try to make it sound like you work hard to "earn" your pay...you don't.

Just don't try to come across as working "hard" and being part of a global economic expansion.
Americans are losing jobs and India and China can't support themselves without the American consumer.
Bottom Line...Supply Side Economics is a major failure.

But it's not a problem for you, just other people. You earn money honestly even though you know anyone who earns money is screwing other people. You also know the field of economics is wrong, not sure how you know that. And you haven't observed that socialism is consistently an economic disaster where the best examples are endless stagnant growth as has been experience in Europe for a long time now and is happening here.

Given the power to further regulate and control the economy, politicians and bureaucrats will use that power honestly to help us despite all history of what politicians and bureaucrats have done with power. We just need to trust them and they'll come through for us.

You don't' have trouble "compartmentalizing" information, you have trouble processing it at all

This post displays your inability to discern the forest from the trees.
It's a defense mechanism because, fortunately, the human buried deep within you knows what you did to satisfy your avarice.

No content, huh. You're constantly contradicting yourself. A basic skill of the left, you can simultaneously believe completely contradictory information

No content?
Are you an idiot?
I just pointed out the current professions that are under legislative attack and those that aren't and that you pretty much do zero for a living.
I also pointed out that fact that India and China are almost entirely dependent on the vanishing US middle class consumer.
Both nations are having diarrhea attacks because of Trump because they can't survive without us.
Seriously, you can't debate by telling the other person he's not saying anything when he's laying it all out for you.

 

[kaz]

I'm not diverting from that at all, simpleton. It's called capitalism. Of course I'm making a buck. So is everyone else who puts in the effort. I say I'm a capitalist. I'm diverting nothing. How did you possibly get the idea that I'm diverting from that? You're just making shit up as you go again.

Speaking of your making shit up as you go

- You say only people who **** people make money in capitalism
- You make money
- You aren't ******* anyone

If you are "doing fine" you are lying because you know everyone else can do fine too if they just put in the effort, or, you're lying that you're doing fine and putting the blame for your failure on others.

I'm trying to get at which is the lie. So, which is the lie?

You have trouble compartmentalizing information.
Physicians earned their salaries until the Indians were allowed, via legislation, to replace them.
Accountants are earning their salaries...so far.
Attorneys are earning their salaries...so far.
Plumbers earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.
Electricians earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.
Carpenters earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.

Immoral Free Market legislation allowed you to make a quick and easy buck.
You chose to join the quick and easy route.
And yes, I knew lots of agents such as yourself so don't try to make it sound like you work hard to "earn" your pay...you don't.

Just don't try to come across as working "hard" and being part of a global economic expansion.
Americans are losing jobs and India and China can't support themselves without the American consumer.
Bottom Line...Supply Side Economics is a major failure.

But it's not a problem for you, just other people. You earn money honestly even though you know anyone who earns money is screwing other people. You also know the field of economics is wrong, not sure how you know that. And you haven't observed that socialism is consistently an economic disaster where the best examples are endless stagnant growth as has been experience in Europe for a long time now and is happening here.

Given the power to further regulate and control the economy, politicians and bureaucrats will use that power honestly to help us despite all history of what politicians and bureaucrats have done with power. We just need to trust them and they'll come through for us.

You don't' have trouble "compartmentalizing" information, you have trouble processing it at all

This post displays your inability to discern the forest from the trees.
It's a defense mechanism because, fortunately, the human buried deep within you knows what you did to satisfy your avarice.

No content, huh. You're constantly contradicting yourself. A basic skill of the left, you can simultaneously believe completely contradictory information

No content?
Are you an idiot?
I just pointed out the current professions that are under legislative attack and those that aren't and that you pretty much do zero for a living.
I also pointed out that fact that India and China are almost entirely dependent on the vanishing US middle class consumer.
Both nations are having diarrhea attacks because of Trump because they can't survive without us.
Seriously, you can't debate by telling the other person he's not saying anything when he's laying it all out for you.

What you didn't do is tell me how you know the field of economics is wrong or how you know we can actually trust politicians and bureaucrats

 

[Indeependent]

You have trouble compartmentalizing information.
Physicians earned their salaries until the Indians were allowed, via legislation, to replace them.
Accountants are earning their salaries...so far.
Attorneys are earning their salaries...so far.
Plumbers earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.
Electricians earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.
Carpenters earned their salaries until GW opened the Southern Border.

Immoral Free Market legislation allowed you to make a quick and easy buck.
You chose to join the quick and easy route.
And yes, I knew lots of agents such as yourself so don't try to make it sound like you work hard to "earn" your pay...you don't.

Just don't try to come across as working "hard" and being part of a global economic expansion.
Americans are losing jobs and India and China can't support themselves without the American consumer.
Bottom Line...Supply Side Economics is a major failure.

But it's not a problem for you, just other people. You earn money honestly even though you know anyone who earns money is screwing other people. You also know the field of economics is wrong, not sure how you know that. And you haven't observed that socialism is consistently an economic disaster where the best examples are endless stagnant growth as has been experience in Europe for a long time now and is happening here.

Given the power to further regulate and control the economy, politicians and bureaucrats will use that power honestly to help us despite all history of what politicians and bureaucrats have done with power. We just need to trust them and they'll come through for us.

You don't' have trouble "compartmentalizing" information, you have trouble processing it at all

This post displays your inability to discern the forest from the trees.
It's a defense mechanism because, fortunately, the human buried deep within you knows what you did to satisfy your avarice.

No content, huh. You're constantly contradicting yourself. A basic skill of the left, you can simultaneously believe completely contradictory information

No content?
Are you an idiot?
I just pointed out the current professions that are under legislative attack and those that aren't and that you pretty much do zero for a living.
I also pointed out that fact that India and China are almost entirely dependent on the vanishing US middle class consumer.
Both nations are having diarrhea attacks because of Trump because they can't survive without us.
Seriously, you can't debate by telling the other person he's not saying anything when he's laying it all out for you.

What you didn't do is tell me how you know the field of economics is wrong or how you know we can actually trust politicians and bureaucrats

Trees vs Forests once again...
Show me where I state the field of Economics is wrong...I'll wait.
I stated that Supply Side Economics , bereft of the 7 Rules of Ricardo, does not benefit all nations involved.

You are under the impression that mega Corporation Directors and COEs, who are THE major contributors to political campaigns, DON'T hand over legislation to Politicians.
The mega wealthy hand over legislation and then make give vague testimony before congress of the incompetence of non-Indians.

Try catching a Bill Gates interview once in a while where he states that by far the most advanced educational systems in the world are in India and the African Continent...both bastions of cheap labor.

 

[kaz]

But it's not a problem for you, just other people. You earn money honestly even though you know anyone who earns money is screwing other people. You also know the field of economics is wrong, not sure how you know that. And you haven't observed that socialism is consistently an economic disaster where the best examples are endless stagnant growth as has been experience in Europe for a long time now and is happening here.

Given the power to further regulate and control the economy, politicians and bureaucrats will use that power honestly to help us despite all history of what politicians and bureaucrats have done with power. We just need to trust them and they'll come through for us.

You don't' have trouble "compartmentalizing" information, you have trouble processing it at all

This post displays your inability to discern the forest from the trees.
It's a defense mechanism because, fortunately, the human buried deep within you knows what you did to satisfy your avarice.

No content, huh. You're constantly contradicting yourself. A basic skill of the left, you can simultaneously believe completely contradictory information

No content?
Are you an idiot?
I just pointed out the current professions that are under legislative attack and those that aren't and that you pretty much do zero for a living.
I also pointed out that fact that India and China are almost entirely dependent on the vanishing US middle class consumer.
Both nations are having diarrhea attacks because of Trump because they can't survive without us.
Seriously, you can't debate by telling the other person he's not saying anything when he's laying it all out for you.

What you didn't do is tell me how you know the field of economics is wrong or how you know we can actually trust politicians and bureaucrats

Trees vs Forests once again...
Show me where I state the field of Economics is wrong...I'll wait.
I stated that Supply Side Economics , bereft of the 7 Rules of Ricardo, does not benefit all nations involved.

You are under the impression that mega Corporation Directors and COEs, who are THE major contributors to political campaigns, DON'T hand over legislation to Politicians.
The mega wealthy hand over legislation and then make give vague testimony before congress of the incompetence of non-Indians.

Try catching a Bill Gates interview once in a while where he states that by far the most advanced educational systems in the world are in India and the African Continent...both bastions of cheap labor.

Everything you are saying is contradictory to the field of economics. Free trade is good for the economy even if it's not reciprocated. Since you know that's not true, you know the field of economics is wrong.

The rest of what you said was pretty convoluted, but you believe that giving politicians and bureaucrats MORE power over trade will yield a better result. That is stunningly naive

 

[Indeependent]

This post displays your inability to discern the forest from the trees.
It's a defense mechanism because, fortunately, the human buried deep within you knows what you did to satisfy your avarice.

No content, huh. You're constantly contradicting yourself. A basic skill of the left, you can simultaneously believe completely contradictory information

No content?
Are you an idiot?
I just pointed out the current professions that are under legislative attack and those that aren't and that you pretty much do zero for a living.
I also pointed out that fact that India and China are almost entirely dependent on the vanishing US middle class consumer.
Both nations are having diarrhea attacks because of Trump because they can't survive without us.
Seriously, you can't debate by telling the other person he's not saying anything when he's laying it all out for you.

What you didn't do is tell me how you know the field of economics is wrong or how you know we can actually trust politicians and bureaucrats

Trees vs Forests once again...
Show me where I state the field of Economics is wrong...I'll wait.
I stated that Supply Side Economics , bereft of the 7 Rules of Ricardo, does not benefit all nations involved.

You are under the impression that mega Corporation Directors and COEs, who are THE major contributors to political campaigns, DON'T hand over legislation to Politicians.
The mega wealthy hand over legislation and then make give vague testimony before congress of the incompetence of non-Indians.

Try catching a Bill Gates interview once in a while where he states that by far the most advanced educational systems in the world are in India and the African Continent...both bastions of cheap labor.

Everything you are saying is contradictory to the field of economics. Free trade is good for the economy even if it's not reciprocated. Since you know that's not true, you know the field of economics is wrong.

The rest of what you said was pretty convoluted, but you believe that giving politicians and bureaucrats MORE power over trade will yield a better result. That is stunningly naive

Yawn...I've got friends in town who work at Goldman-Sachs and JP Morgan.
Anyway, go ahead and have the last word.

 

[kaz]

No content, huh. You're constantly contradicting yourself. A basic skill of the left, you can simultaneously believe completely contradictory information

No content?
Are you an idiot?
I just pointed out the current professions that are under legislative attack and those that aren't and that you pretty much do zero for a living.
I also pointed out that fact that India and China are almost entirely dependent on the vanishing US middle class consumer.
Both nations are having diarrhea attacks because of Trump because they can't survive without us.
Seriously, you can't debate by telling the other person he's not saying anything when he's laying it all out for you.

What you didn't do is tell me how you know the field of economics is wrong or how you know we can actually trust politicians and bureaucrats

Trees vs Forests once again...
Show me where I state the field of Economics is wrong...I'll wait.
I stated that Supply Side Economics , bereft of the 7 Rules of Ricardo, does not benefit all nations involved.

You are under the impression that mega Corporation Directors and COEs, who are THE major contributors to political campaigns, DON'T hand over legislation to Politicians.
The mega wealthy hand over legislation and then make give vague testimony before congress of the incompetence of non-Indians.

Try catching a Bill Gates interview once in a while where he states that by far the most advanced educational systems in the world are in India and the African Continent...both bastions of cheap labor.

Everything you are saying is contradictory to the field of economics. Free trade is good for the economy even if it's not reciprocated. Since you know that's not true, you know the field of economics is wrong.

The rest of what you said was pretty convoluted, but you believe that giving politicians and bureaucrats MORE power over trade will yield a better result. That is stunningly naive

Yawn...I've got friends in town who work at Goldman-Sachs and JP Morgan.
Anyway, go ahead and have the last word.

word