Criminals know the vast majority of New Yorkers are unarmed and helpless

Liberal Logic: Take 50% of the Middle Class wealth in taxes, disarm them so that criminals can take the other 50%...

Police Believe One Man Is Behind Series Of Subway Hammer Attacks « CBS New York

I was an unarmed New Yorker for twenty years. I was never attacked or robbed and felt perfectly safe walking the streets all night long.

There are people who have smoked for 20 years as well and never got cancer. So I guess that means, by your "logic", that everyone should suck down carcinogens into their lungs?

You were never attacked or robbed because of something called blind luck. And you felt "perfectly safe" because of something called blind ignorance (my wife used to be that way as well, until I opened her eyes to all of the actual crimes being committed that she had no idea about).

Like all cities, it is not necessary to be armed in New York City.
 
Much like they did Detroit, the cancer known as liberalism is destroying New York...

New York City is the epitome of PC liberal insanity. Due to decades of revulsion in response to the fact individuals are responsible for their own self defense and an illogical fear of firearms, thousands of people have suffered and many have died at the hands of psychopaths and violent criminals.

Criminals know they have nothing to fear. They know the vast majority of New Yorkers are unarmed and helpless. The police long ago admitted it is not their responsibility to protect the public. Police exist in New York and other large cities primarily to generate revenue for the state.

The latest incident demonstrating you have to be insane to live in New York occurred the other day in the Rockaway Avenue and Fulton Street A and C train station in Bedford-Stuyvesant. An emigre from Guyana was hit in the head with a hammer as he bought a transit card. He is lucky to be alive. The hammer-wielding attacker stole $140 from the commuter.

If NYC Allowed the 2nd Amendment, this Criminal Would be Dead as a Hammer

infowars? lmao...

the states with the highest rates of gun violence are gun loving red states.

The most dangerous states in America
 
Much like they did Detroit, the cancer known as liberalism is destroying New York...

New York City is the epitome of PC liberal insanity. Due to decades of revulsion in response to the fact individuals are responsible for their own self defense and an illogical fear of firearms, thousands of people have suffered and many have died at the hands of psychopaths and violent criminals.

Criminals know they have nothing to fear. They know the vast majority of New Yorkers are unarmed and helpless. The police long ago admitted it is not their responsibility to protect the public. Police exist in New York and other large cities primarily to generate revenue for the state.

The latest incident demonstrating you have to be insane to live in New York occurred the other day in the Rockaway Avenue and Fulton Street A and C train station in Bedford-Stuyvesant. An emigre from Guyana was hit in the head with a hammer as he bought a transit card. He is lucky to be alive. The hammer-wielding attacker stole $140 from the commuter.

If NYC Allowed the 2nd Amendment, this Criminal Would be Dead as a Hammer




If the victim had been armed, the perp would have gotten $140 and a gun, too.

What? Do you think he'd have been holding the world at gunpoint while he was purchasing his transit card?

Of course you do....
 
Much like they did Detroit, the cancer known as liberalism is destroying New York...

New York City is the epitome of PC liberal insanity. Due to decades of revulsion in response to the fact individuals are responsible for their own self defense and an illogical fear of firearms, thousands of people have suffered and many have died at the hands of psychopaths and violent criminals.

Criminals know they have nothing to fear. They know the vast majority of New Yorkers are unarmed and helpless. The police long ago admitted it is not their responsibility to protect the public. Police exist in New York and other large cities primarily to generate revenue for the state.

The latest incident demonstrating you have to be insane to live in New York occurred the other day in the Rockaway Avenue and Fulton Street A and C train station in Bedford-Stuyvesant. An emigre from Guyana was hit in the head with a hammer as he bought a transit card. He is lucky to be alive. The hammer-wielding attacker stole $140 from the commuter.

If NYC Allowed the 2nd Amendment, this Criminal Would be Dead as a Hammer

infowars? lmao...

the states with the highest rates of gun violence are gun loving red states.

The most dangerous states in America

One of the SAFEST states has the country's loosest gun laws. You fail.
 
There is a reason I have filled this thread with facts backed up with citations while the libtards like [MENTION=20321]rightwinger[/MENTION] and [MENTION=18701]NYcarbineer[/MENTION] have yet to add even one single citation but instead have added uninformed opinion...

“Crime differs across nations and over time for a vast array of reasons, some of which we may never fully understand. However, for countries that have abruptly changed their rules regarding gun ownership or gun carrying, we can look at what happened right after the changes.

And what do we find? The results might surprise you: In every single place that all guns or handguns were banned, murder rates went up.

Let’s take another look at Great Britain first—a place where guns have never been as freely available as they have been in the United States.

We previously looked at the overall gun control time line, but now let’s zero in on a few key parts. According to Joyce Lee Malcolm, a professor at George Mason University Law School and author of Guns and Violence: The English Experience, “Since 1920, anyone in Britain wanting a handgun had to obtain a certificate from his local police stating he was fit to own a weapon and had good reason to have one. Over the years, the definition of ‘good reason’ gradually narrowed. By 1969, self-defense was never a good reason for a permit.”

In 1987, after a massacre in Hungerford, England, killed sixteen people and wounded fourteen others (since no one else had a gun, including the police, the killer roamed for eight hours), the government cracked down. Semi-automatic rifles were banned and shotguns were regulated like handguns.

Nine years later, the Dunblane massacre in Scotland resulted in the final blow to gun ownership. The Firearms Act of 1997 banned handguns almost entirely—forcing lawful owners to turn them in or face ten years in prison.
What happened next? Professor Malcolm has summarized it well:

The results have not been what proponents of the act wanted. Within a decade of the handgun ban and the confiscation of handguns from registered owners, crime with handguns had doubled according to British government crime reports. Gun crime, not a serious problem in the past, now is. Armed street gangs have some British police carrying guns for the first time. Moreover, another massacre occurred in June 2010. Derrick Bird, a taxi driver in Cumbria, shot his brother and a colleague then drove off through rural villages killing 12 people and injuring 11 more before killing himself.

The homicide rate in Britain rose dramatically for seven years after the ban, from 1.1 homicides per 100,000 people in 1996 to 1.8 in 2003. At that point, fed up with the sudden increase in murder and violent crime, the police force was expanded by 16 percent between 2001 and 2005. Unsurprisingly, more police meant less crime. Still, even with the increased police presence, crime generally remained higher than before the Firearms Act

Excerpt From: Beck, Glenn. “Control.” Threshold Editions. iBooks.
This material may be protected by copyright.

Check out this book on the iBooks Store: Control

Canada has stricter gun control than the US and has a lower murder rate.

The next argument will be: But the US has more minorities.

Idaho is over 90% white, Canada is about 75% white, and Canada has a lower murder rate than Idaho.
 
If we didn't let the government burden people so much, perhaps they wouldn't have to resort to crime to make it by.
 
The crime rate is way down in New York. It is one of the safest major cities in the world

Tough gun laws is the reason

when was the last time anyone told you, you are full of shit ?!?!?

"It is one of the safest major cities in the world"

^^^^above^^^^ ha ha ha ha :lmao: ha ha ha ha :laugh2: "tough gun laws" ha ha ha ha ^^^^^above^^^^^^

can you possibly be any more insane ? "in the world" ???, how about limiting your assertion to strictly the U.S.of A. ?? most of the citizens of the U.S.of A. will never see the major cities in the world, many will visit NYC.


i most likely never will ever again !! and i thank GOD !! :eek:
 
In spite of weekly NRA propaganda, Chicago saw it murder rate drop 16% last year and recorded its fewest murders since 1965

It is what Republicans call a "war zone"

The Year in Murder: 2013 Marks a Historic Low for Many Cities - The Daily Beast

Wrongwinger continues to be the biggest tool on USMB. Over one weekend (Memorial Day weekend 2013), the city saw forty shootings and ten murders.

Let me repeat that - during a holiday weekend, the city had 40 shootings and 10 murders.

And wrongwinger wants to convince you that is "safe" and a "wonderful" thing. The worst part is though, if it were conservative policy that this occurred under, he would be having a ****'n annuerism and screaming like a mad man about the poor "children", and the loss of life, and sob-sob this, and sob-sob that, and oh the humanity. Proof that this tool is the worst partisan hack. No matter what the results either way, he will defend liberal failure to his last breath and denounce conservative success to his last breath.

Chicago's Memorial Day Weekend was Terrible
 
Last edited:
Much like they did Detroit, the cancer known as liberalism is destroying New York...

New York City is the epitome of PC liberal insanity. Due to decades of revulsion in response to the fact individuals are responsible for their own self defense and an illogical fear of firearms, thousands of people have suffered and many have died at the hands of psychopaths and violent criminals.

Criminals know they have nothing to fear. They know the vast majority of New Yorkers are unarmed and helpless. The police long ago admitted it is not their responsibility to protect the public. Police exist in New York and other large cities primarily to generate revenue for the state.

The latest incident demonstrating you have to be insane to live in New York occurred the other day in the Rockaway Avenue and Fulton Street A and C train station in Bedford-Stuyvesant. An emigre from Guyana was hit in the head with a hammer as he bought a transit card. He is lucky to be alive. The hammer-wielding attacker stole $140 from the commuter.

If NYC Allowed the 2nd Amendment, this Criminal Would be Dead as a Hammer

infowars? lmao...

the states with the highest rates of gun violence are gun loving red states.

The most dangerous states in America

USAToday? LMAO......

(Do you see how intellectually lazy that response is? If you can't prove anything wrong with an article posted on InfoWars, then you're really embarrassing yourself by trying to dismiss the messenger because he brings a message that is uncomfortable for you).
 
There is a reason I have filled this thread with facts backed up with citations while the libtards like [MENTION=20321]rightwinger[/MENTION] and [MENTION=18701]NYcarbineer[/MENTION] have yet to add even one single citation but instead have added uninformed opinion...

“Crime differs across nations and over time for a vast array of reasons, some of which we may never fully understand. However, for countries that have abruptly changed their rules regarding gun ownership or gun carrying, we can look at what happened right after the changes.

And what do we find? The results might surprise you: In every single place that all guns or handguns were banned, murder rates went up.

Let’s take another look at Great Britain first—a place where guns have never been as freely available as they have been in the United States.

We previously looked at the overall gun control time line, but now let’s zero in on a few key parts. According to Joyce Lee Malcolm, a professor at George Mason University Law School and author of Guns and Violence: The English Experience, “Since 1920, anyone in Britain wanting a handgun had to obtain a certificate from his local police stating he was fit to own a weapon and had good reason to have one. Over the years, the definition of ‘good reason’ gradually narrowed. By 1969, self-defense was never a good reason for a permit.”

In 1987, after a massacre in Hungerford, England, killed sixteen people and wounded fourteen others (since no one else had a gun, including the police, the killer roamed for eight hours), the government cracked down. Semi-automatic rifles were banned and shotguns were regulated like handguns.

Nine years later, the Dunblane massacre in Scotland resulted in the final blow to gun ownership. The Firearms Act of 1997 banned handguns almost entirely—forcing lawful owners to turn them in or face ten years in prison.
What happened next? Professor Malcolm has summarized it well:

The results have not been what proponents of the act wanted. Within a decade of the handgun ban and the confiscation of handguns from registered owners, crime with handguns had doubled according to British government crime reports. Gun crime, not a serious problem in the past, now is. Armed street gangs have some British police carrying guns for the first time. Moreover, another massacre occurred in June 2010. Derrick Bird, a taxi driver in Cumbria, shot his brother and a colleague then drove off through rural villages killing 12 people and injuring 11 more before killing himself.

The homicide rate in Britain rose dramatically for seven years after the ban, from 1.1 homicides per 100,000 people in 1996 to 1.8 in 2003. At that point, fed up with the sudden increase in murder and violent crime, the police force was expanded by 16 percent between 2001 and 2005. Unsurprisingly, more police meant less crime. Still, even with the increased police presence, crime generally remained higher than before the Firearms Act

Excerpt From: Beck, Glenn. “Control.” Threshold Editions. iBooks.
This material may be protected by copyright.

Check out this book on the iBooks Store: Control

Canada has stricter gun control than the US and has a lower murder rate.

The next argument will be: But the US has more minorities.

Idaho is over 90% white, Canada is about 75% white, and Canada has a lower murder rate than Idaho.

You just defeated your own argument genius. New York has much stricter gun laws than Canada - they are completely banned in every capacity except for the rare exceptions when they actually grant a license - and yet New York has an exponentially higher murder rate than Canada.

Oops..... :lmao:
 
Idaho is over 90% white, Canada is about 75% white, and Canada has a lower murder rate than Idaho.

98% of all statistics are made up on the spot (people who aren't mindless liberals will enjoy the irony here). If you can't post a link backing up your false information, don't bother posting it.

By the way chief, Canada isn't being over run by MS-13 murderous thugs from Mexico, El Salvador, and Honduras because A.) their nation doesn't have a piece of shit president who wants and needs illegal votes from illegal aliens for his party so they actually secure their borders, and B.) nobody is trying to break into that piece of shit country.

If Canada is so great with their peace & harmony and universal healthcare, why is it that everyone is dying to break into the United States and nobody breaks into Canada? :eusa_whistle:
 
The crime rate is way down in New York. It is one of the safest major cities in the world

Tough gun laws is the reason

when was the last time anyone told you, you are full of shit ?!?!?

"It is one of the safest major cities in the world"

^^^^above^^^^ ha ha ha ha :lmao: ha ha ha ha :laugh2: "tough gun laws" ha ha ha ha ^^^^^above^^^^^^

can you possibly be any more insane ? "in the world" ???, how about limiting your assertion to strictly the U.S.of A. ?? most of the citizens of the U.S.of A. will never see the major cities in the world, many will visit NYC.


i most likely never will ever again !! and i thank GOD !! :eek:

NYC is one of the safest major cities in the US.

It had its lowest murder rate in decades last year
 
Idaho is over 90% white, Canada is about 75% white, and Canada has a lower murder rate than Idaho.

98% of all statistics are made up on the spot (people who aren't mindless liberals will enjoy the irony here). If you can't post a link backing up your false information, don't bother posting it.

By the way chief, Canada isn't being over run by MS-13 murderous thugs from Mexico, El Salvador, and Honduras because A.) their nation doesn't have a piece of shit president who wants and needs illegal votes from illegal aliens for his party so they actually secure their borders, and B.) nobody is trying to break into that piece of shit country.

If Canada is so great with their peace & harmony and universal healthcare, why is it that everyone is dying to break into the United States and nobody breaks into Canada? :eusa_whistle:

Total bulshit once again

91.7% of Internet statistics are made up on the spot
 
Citizens in Washington D.C. are also unarmed and helpless but thanks to the education system they can't even read by the 8th grade so they don't mind.
 
15th post
One statistic that is truly shocking is the Alaskan rape rate. 5 times higher than some rates in the east.

Why? Surely guns stop this sort of thing, or maybe they can just make it worse.
 
Total bulshit once again

91.7% of Internet statistics are made up on the spot

No, not really. However you have to be able to read the statistics.

To take, say, rape statistics from one country to another, you have to know what rape means, what programs there are in place to report rape, or what the police are like, what the courts are like, how likely are people to report rape, and so on and on and on.

If you don't, you just look stupid.
 
In spite of weekly NRA propaganda, Chicago saw it murder rate drop 16% last year and recorded its fewest murders since 1965

It is what Republicans call a "war zone"

The Year in Murder: 2013 Marks a Historic Low for Many Cities - The Daily Beast

Wrongwinger continues to be the biggest tool on USMB. Over one weekend (Memorial Day weekend 2013), the city saw forty shootings and ten murders.

Let me repeat that - during a holiday weekend, the city had 40 shootings and 10 murders.

And wrongwinger wants to convince you that is "safe" and a "wonderful" thing. The worst part is though, if it were conservative policy that this occurred under, he would be having a ****'n annuerism and screaming like a mad man about the poor "children", and the loss of life, and sob-sob this, and sob-sob that, and oh the humanity. Proof that this tool is the worst partisan hack. No matter what the results either way, he will defend liberal failure to his last breath and denounce conservative success to his last breath.

Chicago's Memorial Day Weekend was Terrible

And major weekends fit into your annual crime rate. Any way you slice it, Chicago saw a 16% drop in its murder rate.

Gun control is working in Chicago despite NRA propaganda
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom