Creationists

[eots]

I'm sure you will find this Interesting:


American Bigfoot Society - ABS Homepage

No not really,..but your inability to directly address the facts and use of strawmen is a somewhat mildly entertaining and insightful look into
Cognitive dissonance in action

Oh my. How sharper than a serpent's tooth is an angry eots?

Conspiracy theorist wannabe in action.

as I said before no conspiracy or theories involved ...these are facts...not speculation..3 Apollo crew members 2 ministers of defense ,5 congressmen 1 senator over 500 government, military, and intelligence community witnesses testifying to their direct, personal, first hand experience with UFOs, ETs, ET technology have petitioned congress for full disclosure...this is a fact...the only speculation is are they correct in their assertion

 

[Hollie]

No not really,..but your inability to directly address the facts and use of strawmen is a somewhat mildly entertaining and insightful look into
Cognitive dissonance in action

Oh my. How sharper than a serpent's tooth is an angry eots?

Conspiracy theorist wannabe in action.

as I said before no conspiracy or theories involved ...these are facts...not speculation..3 Apollo crew members 2 ministers of defense ,5 congressmen 1 senator over 500 government, military, and intelligence community witnesses testifying to their direct, personal, first hand experience with UFOs, ETs, ET technology have petitioned congress for full disclosure...this is a fact...the only speculation is are they correct in their assertion

So, of these Apollo crew members 2 ministers of defense ,5 congressmen (.5 congressmen, really), 1 senator over 500 government, military, and intelligence community witnesses testifying to their direct, personal, first hand experience with UFOs, ETs, ET technology, how many have presented credible evidence of their encounters with the space aliens?

I'm curious as to how it is that Apollo crew members 2 ministers of defense ,5 congressmen 1 senator over 500 government, military, and intelligence community witnesses testifying to their direct, personal, first hand experience with UFOs, ETs, ET technology have not managed to acquire some evidence.

Are you at all curious as to why Apollo crew members 2 ministers of defense ,5 congressmen 1 senator over 500 government, military, and intelligence community witnesses testifying to their direct, personal, first hand experience with UFOs, ETs, ET technology somehow forgot to pocket some space alien swag.

I'd have thought that at least one Apollo crew members 2 ministers of defense, (at least) ,5 congressmen 1 senator over 500 government, military, and intelligence community witnesses testifying to their direct, personal, first hand experience with UFOs, ETs, ET would have thought this through.

 

[eots]

Oh my. How sharper than a serpent's tooth is an angry eots?

Conspiracy theorist wannabe in action.

as I said before no conspiracy or theories involved ...these are facts...not speculation..3 Apollo crew members 2 ministers of defense ,5 congressmen 1 senator over 500 government, military, and intelligence community witnesses testifying to their direct, personal, first hand experience with UFOs, ETs, ET technology have petitioned congress for full disclosure...this is a fact...the only speculation is are they correct in their assertion

So, of these Apollo crew members 2 ministers of defense ,5 congressmen (.5 congressmen, really), 1 senator over 500 government, military, and intelligence community witnesses testifying to their direct, personal, first hand experience with UFOs, ETs, ET technology, how many have presented credible evidence of their encounters with the space aliens?

Some fairly compelling corroborating evidence has been presented in the form of military reports and radar and according to those involved much more evidence is corroborating available but remains classified.and in fact definitive evidence exist and these are in fact the assertion of both Apollo astronauts and British and Canadian defense minsters

I'm curious as to how it is that Apollo crew members 2 ministers of defense ,5 congressmen 1 senator over 500 government, military, and intelligence community witnesses testifying to their direct, personal, first hand experience with UFOs, ETs, ET technology have not managed to acquire some evidence.

because its classified ??..because they were told in was a matter of national security and they were never to speak about it.. Gordon cooper testified to an alien craft landing directly in front of him and held his silence for forty years ...I would be more curious as to why you think these men would create such stories and would be willing to testify in front of congress under oath and with penalty of perjury ?

Are you at all curious as to why Apollo crew members 2 ministers of defense ,5 congressmen 1 senator over 500 government, military, and intelligence community witnesses testifying to their direct, personal, first hand experience with UFOs, ETs, ET technology somehow forgot to pocket some space alien swag.

I would Imagine because they were honorable men with high level security clearance and smuggling swag out of area 51 was not how they rolled..

I'd have thought that at least one Apollo crew members 2 ministers of defense, (at least) ,5 congressmen 1 senator over 500 government, military, and intelligence community witnesses testifying to their direct, personal, first hand experience with UFOs, ETs, ET would have thought this through.

So you find men like Gordon cooper..Edgar Mitchell, Nick Pope. Paul Hellyer to be unintelligent individuals without the capacity to think things through ?
lol...I am sure they would be devastated to know you feel this way

 

[eots]

Capt. Edgar Mitchell, U.S. Navy (ret), BS Industrial Management, BS Aeronautical Engineering, Doctor of Science, Aeronautics and Astronautics from MIT – Pilot and Astronaut. Sixth man to walk on the moon (Apollo 14 mission). Patrol bomber and attack plane pilot, U.S. Navy. Test Pilot, Air Test and Evaluation Squadron 5 (VX-5). Chief of Project Management Division, Navy Field Office for the Manned Orbiting Laboratory Project. Graduated first in his class from the Aerospace Research Pilot School, and served as an instructor there. Recipient of many awards and honors including the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the USN Distinguished Medal and three NASA Group Achievement Awards. Inducted to the Space Hall of Fame in 1979 and the Astronaut Hall of Fame in 1998. Recipient of honorary doctorates in engineering from New Mexico State University, the University of Akron, Carnegie Mellon University, and a ScD from Embry-Riddle University

 

[eots]

Gordon Cooper was one of the original Mercury 7 astronauts, the first Americans chosen for space flight duty by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Cooper had flown jets in Europe and America as an Air Force pilot throughout the 1950s, finally becoming an engineer and test pilot at Edward Air Force Base in California. In 1959 he was chosen from among hundreds of pilots to join the NASA astronaut program. (The other Mercury 7 astronauts were John Glenn, Alan Shepard, Virgil "Gus" Grissom, Scott Carpenter, Wally Schirra, and Donald "Deke" Slayton.) On May 15th and 16th of 1963, Cooper orbited the Earth 22 times in Faith 7, the last of the Mercury flights. On August 21st of 1965, he and Pete Conrad were launched in Gemini 5. They orbited the Earth for eight days, proving that humans could live in space long enough to fly to the moon and back.

Read more: Gordon Cooper Biography (Astronaut) | Infoplease.com Gordon Cooper Biography (Astronaut) | Infoplease.com

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nl8lR69K7Zc]Creationists Laugh at Evolutionist Richard Dawkins - YouTube[/ame]

 

[daws101]

Creationists Laugh at Evolutionist Richard Dawkins - YouTube

laughter from the wilfully ignorant has the opposite effect of what's intended.

 

[PMZ]

Why would anyone think that God is incapable of thinking up evolution?

 

[eots]

oh come on its priceless..evolution is undeniable he says...unless of course there was alien DNA manipulation ..thats possible

 

[daws101]

Why would anyone think that God is incapable of thinking up evolution?

god do something non miraculous ..that's blasphemy !!!

 

[daws101]

oh come on its priceless..evolution is undeniable he says...unless of course there was alien DNA manipulation ..thats possible

nice story, too bad you have no proof it ever happened..

 

[eots]

oh come on its priceless..evolution is undeniable he says...unless of course there was alien DNA manipulation ..thats possible

nice story, too bad you have no proof it ever happened..

The standard positivist view of empirically acquired information has been that observation, experience, and experiment serve as neutral arbiters between competing theories. However, since the 1960s, a persistent critique most associated with Thomas Kuhn,[3] has argued that these methods are influenced by prior beliefs and experiences. Consequently it cannot be expected that two scientists when observing, experiencing, or experimenting on the same event will make the same theory-neutral observations. The role of observation as a theory-neutral arbiter may not be possible. Theory-dependence of observation means that, even if there were agreed methods of inference and interpretation, scientists may still disagree on the nature of empirical data.

Empirical evidence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[daws101]

oh come on its priceless..evolution is undeniable he says...unless of course there was alien DNA manipulation ..thats possible

nice story, too bad you have no proof it ever happened..

The standard positivist view of empirically acquired information has been that observation, experience, and experiment serve as neutral arbiters between competing theories. However, since the 1960s, a persistent critique most associated with Thomas Kuhn,[3] has argued that these methods are influenced by prior beliefs and experiences. Consequently it cannot be expected that two scientists when observing, experiencing, or experimenting on the same event will make the same theory-neutral observations. The role of observation as a theory-neutral arbiter may not be possible. Theory-dependence of observation means that, even if there were agreed methods of inference and interpretation, scientists may still disagree on the nature of empirical data.

Empirical evidence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

wow! a fabulous job of self debunking there eot's....

 

[UltimateReality]

John West on the book Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False:

"If the fundamental thesis isn't exactly new, why has it proved to be such a shock to the cultural establishment? One reason is undoubtedly that Nagel is an atheist, which preempts the usual invective against religious fundamentalists. More generally, our cultural elites are so parochial and inbred that many of them really cannot conceive that any thinking person could doubt Darwinism. When confronted with such an oddity -- from among their own class no less -- they are astounded.

One can hardly blame them. Darwinian theory forms the modern secularist's creation myth, a myth aided and abetted by a triumphalist rewrite of Western intellectual history. Western society, you see, was stuck back in the Dark Ages of flat-earthers, witch trials, and the Inquisition until Darwin embarked from the HMS Beagle like Moses from Mount Sinai to deliver his revelation that nature is the product of a blind, impersonal process. Everyone (or at least, all thinking persons) then supposedly became Darwinians."


It's Complicated: John West on the Long and Messy Evolution Debate - Evolution News & Views

 

[daws101]

John West on the book Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False:

"If the fundamental thesis isn't exactly new, why has it proved to be such a shock to the cultural establishment? One reason is undoubtedly that Nagel is an atheist, which preempts the usual invective against religious fundamentalists. More generally, our cultural elites are so parochial and inbred that many of them really cannot conceive that any thinking person could doubt Darwinism. When confronted with such an oddity -- from among their own class no less -- they are astounded.

One can hardly blame them. Darwinian theory forms the modern secularist's creation myth, a myth aided and abetted by a triumphalist rewrite of Western intellectual history. Western society, you see, was stuck back in the Dark Ages of flat-earthers, witch trials, and the Inquisition until Darwin embarked from the HMS Beagle like Moses from Mount Sinai to deliver his revelation that nature is the product of a blind, impersonal process. Everyone (or at least, all thinking persons) then supposedly became Darwinians."


It's Complicated: John West on the Long and Messy Evolution Debate - Evolution News & Views

 

[eots]

John West on the book Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False:

"If the fundamental thesis isn't exactly new, why has it proved to be such a shock to the cultural establishment? One reason is undoubtedly that Nagel is an atheist, which preempts the usual invective against religious fundamentalists. More generally, our cultural elites are so parochial and inbred that many of them really cannot conceive that any thinking person could doubt Darwinism. When confronted with such an oddity -- from among their own class no less -- they are astounded.

One can hardly blame them. Darwinian theory forms the modern secularist's creation myth, a myth aided and abetted by a triumphalist rewrite of Western intellectual history. Western society, you see, was stuck back in the Dark Ages of flat-earthers, witch trials, and the Inquisition until Darwin embarked from the HMS Beagle like Moses from Mount Sinai to deliver his revelation that nature is the product of a blind, impersonal process. Everyone (or at least, all thinking persons) then supposedly became Darwinians."


It's Complicated: John West on the Long and Messy Evolution Debate - Evolution News & Views

you need to find a new picture to spam...maybe go back to big hair tan guy or something..this chronic inane repetitve behavoir its making me feel sad for you

 

[daws101]

John West on the book Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False:

"If the fundamental thesis isn't exactly new, why has it proved to be such a shock to the cultural establishment? One reason is undoubtedly that Nagel is an atheist, which preempts the usual invective against religious fundamentalists. More generally, our cultural elites are so parochial and inbred that many of them really cannot conceive that any thinking person could doubt Darwinism. When confronted with such an oddity -- from among their own class no less -- they are astounded.

One can hardly blame them. Darwinian theory forms the modern secularist's creation myth, a myth aided and abetted by a triumphalist rewrite of Western intellectual history. Western society, you see, was stuck back in the Dark Ages of flat-earthers, witch trials, and the Inquisition until Darwin embarked from the HMS Beagle like Moses from Mount Sinai to deliver his revelation that nature is the product of a blind, impersonal process. Everyone (or at least, all thinking persons) then supposedly became Darwinians."


It's Complicated: John West on the Long and Messy Evolution Debate - Evolution News & Views

you need to find a new picture to spam...maybe go back to big hair tan guy or something..this chronic inane repetitve behavoir its making me feel sad for you

then maybe you should quit trying to date me?

 

[Hollie]

John West on the book "Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False"

How pointless. More silliness from the snake oil salesmen at the Disco'tute.

 

[YWN666]

Creationists Laugh at Evolutionist Richard Dawkins - YouTube

laughter from the wilfully ignorant has the opposite effect of what's intended.

Have you ever seen Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron's hilarious (however unintentional) bit on bananas?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdLzK9rakW4]Crazy Creationists 21: Ray Comfort's Classic Clip on Bananas - YouTube[/ame]

 

[UltimateReality]

John West on the book Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False:

"If the fundamental thesis isn't exactly new, why has it proved to be such a shock to the cultural establishment? One reason is undoubtedly that Nagel is an atheist, which preempts the usual invective against religious fundamentalists. More generally, our cultural elites are so parochial and inbred that many of them really cannot conceive that any thinking person could doubt Darwinism. When confronted with such an oddity -- from among their own class no less -- they are astounded.

One can hardly blame them. Darwinian theory forms the modern secularist's creation myth, a myth aided and abetted by a triumphalist rewrite of Western intellectual history. Western society, you see, was stuck back in the Dark Ages of flat-earthers, witch trials, and the Inquisition until Darwin embarked from the HMS Beagle like Moses from Mount Sinai to deliver his revelation that nature is the product of a blind, impersonal process. Everyone (or at least, all thinking persons) then supposedly became Darwinians."


It's Complicated: John West on the Long and Messy Evolution Debate - Evolution News & Views

Bravo!! Thanks for another one of your insightful and well thought out rebuttals.