Creationists

[t_polkow]

You should do not believe liberals!

Flash Darwin, Marx and other leftists "scientists" down the toilet.

Proof the earth was created 6,000 years ago in 6 days of 24 hours

Earth is 6,000 Years Old - YouTube

 

[t_polkow]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=3PDZTveY4uQ#]Creationism by Lewis Black - YouTube[/ame]!

 

[UltimateReality]

Creationism by Lewis Black - YouTube!

Guess you missed the last thousand pages. The tactic of rolling out ignorant so called creationists has been tried ad nauseum, and failed. So sorry you didn't get the memo.

 

[daws101]

Creationism by Lewis Black - YouTube!

Guess you missed the last thousand pages. The tactic of rolling out ignorant so called creationists has been tried ad nauseum, and failed. So sorry you didn't get the memo.

another one of UR'S fantasies !

 

[PMZ]

Some learn, others believe that they are entitled to just know.

Some want the truth, some want what they want.

It has always been thus.

Those who choose not to learn, can never be taught, but they can be ignored.

Ignorance is never relevant.

 

[UltimateReality]

Some learn, others believe that they are entitled to just know.

Some want the truth, some want what they want.

It has always been thus.

Those who choose not to learn, can never be taught, but they can be ignored.

Ignorance is never relevant.

Bravo!! This is a perfect description of the Darwinist Intellectual Slaves.

 

[Youwerecreated]

another false declarative.. actually I have more background in science the you do the science is just different, also I know enough biology to know that the only poster talking out his ass is you.

Really. What's your "science" background?

engineering, logic, design. 6 years of biology
and many more things that you have no concept of.

Then you would have no problem detecting design in nature but you cling to coincidence after coincidence in other words you believe in miracles. I find it hard to believe that you're educated as you claim with the level of your ignorance and the inability to carry on a debate concerning origins and biological organisms without you running off to wiki or talk origins to respond to questions. What is more absurd is when you copy and paste nonsense that does not address the question.

 

[Hollie]

Some learn, others believe that they are entitled to just know.

Some want the truth, some want what they want.

It has always been thus.

Those who choose not to learn, can never be taught, but they can be ignored.

Ignorance is never relevant.

Bravo!! This is a perfect description of the Darwinist Intellectual Slaves.

Yeah. What a shame that science, exploration and discovery should crowd hyper-religious fear and superstition.

 

[Hollie]

Really. What's your "science" background?

engineering, logic, design. 6 years of biology
and many more things that you have no concept of.

Then you would have no problem detecting design in nature but you cling to coincidence after coincidence in other words you believe in miracles. I find it hard to believe that you're educated as you claim with the level of your ignorance and the inability to carry on a debate concerning origins and biological organisms without you running off to wiki or talk origins to respond to questions. What is more absurd is when you copy and paste nonsense that does not address the question.

Identify a single instance of "design" in nature that can be attributed to any gawds.

Identify a single element or function in nature that has supernatural causation.

 

[Youwerecreated]

engineering, logic, design. 6 years of biology
and many more things that you have no concept of.

Then you would have no problem detecting design in nature but you cling to coincidence after coincidence in other words you believe in miracles. I find it hard to believe that you're educated as you claim with the level of your ignorance and the inability to carry on a debate concerning origins and biological organisms without you running off to wiki or talk origins to respond to questions. What is more absurd is when you copy and paste nonsense that does not address the question.

Identify a single instance of "design" in nature that can be attributed to any gawds.

Identify a single element or function in nature that has supernatural causation.

I have to ad nauseam. Do you believe that Random Chance is capable of producing coincidence after coincidence and these coincidences were absolutely needed ?

 

[Hollie]

Then you would have no problem detecting design in nature but you cling to coincidence after coincidence in other words you believe in miracles. I find it hard to believe that you're educated as you claim with the level of your ignorance and the inability to carry on a debate concerning origins and biological organisms without you running off to wiki or talk origins to respond to questions. What is more absurd is when you copy and paste nonsense that does not address the question.

Identify a single instance of "design" in nature that can be attributed to any gawds.

Identify a single element or function in nature that has supernatural causation.

I have to ad nauseam. Do you believe that Random Chance is capable of producing coincidence after coincidence and these coincidences were absolutely needed ?

Stuttering and mumbling won't save a false claim.

Here's the question for you again: Identify a single instance of "design" in nature that can be attributed to any gawds.

Identify a single element or function in nature that has supernatural causation.

 

[Youwerecreated]

Identify a single instance of "design" in nature that can be attributed to any gawds.

Identify a single element or function in nature that has supernatural causation.

I have to ad nauseam. Do you believe that Random Chance is capable of producing coincidence after coincidence and these coincidences were absolutely needed ?

Stuttering and mumbling won't save a false claim.

Here's the question for you again: Identify a single instance of "design" in nature that can be attributed to any gawds.

Identify a single element or function in nature that has supernatural causation.

Dodge!

I already have.

 

[Hollie]

I have to ad nauseam. Do you believe that Random Chance is capable of producing coincidence after coincidence and these coincidences were absolutely needed ?

Stuttering and mumbling won't save a false claim.

Here's the question for you again: Identify a single instance of "design" in nature that can be attributed to any gawds.

Identify a single element or function in nature that has supernatural causation.

Dodge!

I already have.

I expected you to slither away.

 

[Youwerecreated]

Stuttering and mumbling won't save a false claim.

Here's the question for you again: Identify a single instance of "design" in nature that can be attributed to any gawds.

Identify a single element or function in nature that has supernatural causation.

Dodge!

I already have.

I expected you to slither away.

The only one slithering away is the one avoiding my question.

 

[Hollie]

Dodge!

I already have.

I expected you to slither away.

The only one slithering away is the one avoiding my question.

You're as confused as always.

 

[Youwerecreated]

I expected you to slither away.

The only one slithering away is the one avoiding my question.

You're as confused as always.

This is the question you're avoiding.

Do you believe that Random Chance is capable of producing coincidence after coincidence and these coincidences were absolutely needed ?

 

[daws101]

Really. What's your "science" background?

engineering, logic, design. 6 years of biology
and many more things that you have no concept of.

Then you would have no problem detecting design in nature but you cling to coincidence after coincidence in other words you believe in miracles. I find it hard to believe that you're educated as you claim with the level of your ignorance and the inability to carry on a debate concerning origins and biological organisms without you running off to wiki or talk origins to respond to questions. What is more absurd is when you copy and paste nonsense that does not address the question.

another false declarative ,you or your dogma infested pseudoscience have proven nothing of the kind.
you talking about copying and pasting is farcical.
when that's all that you do and then try to pass it off as your own.
slap dick!

 

[daws101]

Then you would have no problem detecting design in nature but you cling to coincidence after coincidence in other words you believe in miracles. I find it hard to believe that you're educated as you claim with the level of your ignorance and the inability to carry on a debate concerning origins and biological organisms without you running off to wiki or talk origins to respond to questions. What is more absurd is when you copy and paste nonsense that does not address the question.

Identify a single instance of "design" in nature that can be attributed to any gawds.

Identify a single element or function in nature that has supernatural causation.

I have to ad nauseam. Do you believe that Random Chance is capable of producing coincidence after coincidence and these coincidences were absolutely needed ?

bullshit.

 

[daws101]

I have to ad nauseam. Do you believe that Random Chance is capable of producing coincidence after coincidence and these coincidences were absolutely needed ?

Stuttering and mumbling won't save a false claim.

Here's the question for you again: Identify a single instance of "design" in nature that can be attributed to any gawds.

Identify a single element or function in nature that has supernatural causation.

Dodge!

I already have.

imitation is the highest form of flattery!
especially when you got nothing like now!

 

[Youwerecreated]

engineering, logic, design. 6 years of biology
and many more things that you have no concept of.

Then you would have no problem detecting design in nature but you cling to coincidence after coincidence in other words you believe in miracles. I find it hard to believe that you're educated as you claim with the level of your ignorance and the inability to carry on a debate concerning origins and biological organisms without you running off to wiki or talk origins to respond to questions. What is more absurd is when you copy and paste nonsense that does not address the question.

another false declarative ,you or your dogma infested pseudoscience have proven nothing of the kind.
you talking about copying and pasting is farcical.
when that's all that you do and then try to pass it off as your own.
slap dick!

So what is my false declarative that I made ?