You are poorly educated in the history of the xian pathology. Theo knew that religious thinking was itself crucified on the tree:
'The analogy of judgment was clearly at work in the christological debates that shaped the formulation of the Definition of Chalcedon....If one includes the claim that christ is "like us" (homoion), and the four times it is emphasized that he is "one" (hen), this makes fifteen references to sameness or identity in the single sentence that constitutes the Symbol of Chalcedon!
As with Plato or Aristotle, difference must be conceptually tamed. In their attempts to conceptualize the identity of christ, patristic theologians were clearly constrained by the segmentations of the Porphyrian tree....Plotinus and Porphyry had no need to threaten anyone with excommunication or damnation. For the church fathers at Chalcedon, however, the Unity of the church as a religious coalition was at stake, and so everyone in the in-group must confess One and the Same belief. When one presses too hard at the logical cracks in religious doctrine a little atheism alwayys begins to secrete, even if one's intention is to purify or reform the tradition.'
(Shults, p. 82)
