My guess is Trump promised him a trade deal that would benefit both countries. He is a deal maker. What that was Idk. When you’re in a position of such power (president of the USA) you have to shake hands with a lot of pigs. I liked Trumps policies. And rhetoric. But he was polarizing. I get It. He wasn’t a Russian agent. Not close.
Ukraine is a sovereign country. Putin is an odious scumbag. Recognizing that basic bit of factual data isn’t “supporting” Brandon. It is simply recognition that even that senile befuddled old jerk can still occasionally be right.
My guess is Trump promised him a trade deal that would benefit both countries. He is a deal maker. What that was Idk. When you’re in a position of such power (president of the USA) you have to shake hands with a lot of pigs. I liked Trumps policies. And rhetoric. But he was polarizing. I get It. He wasn’t a Russian agent. Not close.
Democrats applauded LBJ's foray into Vietnam based on a fake "crisis" because the media said it was the way to go. Ten years later LBJ supporters were blowing up corporate headquarters, robbing banks and spitting on Soldiers because the media determined that Vietnam was Nixon's problem. Democrats wanted to impeach Reagan for violating relatively unknown amendment inserted into a military appropriations bill that prevented monitory support for anti-communist forces in Central America. Ten years later the media supported the bombing of a defenseless country in Europe because Clinton was in political trouble. Today the equally under-educated ignorant left wing freaking idiots depend on media support for democrat party military adventure in Ukraine just because the media thinks it's a good idea that we depend on a mentally impaired president who happens to be a democrat.
False choice. No reasonable person supports Putin’s behavior. We don’t know what the US position is beyond “sanctions” which we can safely predict already won’t work. (It may be mere hours before the true Russian troop invasion.) So, beyond “sanctions” and more sanctions what is there for CPAC to “support?”
Sorry Leftwhiner. Your faux “question” is just too stupid.
Russia has invaded Ukraine at least a dozen times. Every time it's for pillage, rape and forced labor on land they used to own. They don't want to make Ukraine Russian. They want Ukraine to serve Russia.
And says he would never invade if Trump were president. Per usual you only tell half the story. He is definitely smarter than you. He is about to take Ukraine after taking Crimea where Obama didn’t do anything. How about them crippling sanctions?
An alliance to impose sanctions you mean? Let’s guess ahead of time that sanctions won’t work on Putin. Then what?
I am quite sure that CPAC doesn’t (and will not) oppose an alliance for sanctions. But beyond sanctions, Brandon hasn’t said what we can or should do next. So, obviously, there’s nothing for CPAC to agree with or against neons “sanctions” and alliance for sanctions.
Do I really need to link to what happens when the Russian army invades a town? They get drunk and rape everything with an orifice. It's a tried and true method of subjugation.