Covid delta again.

Because it's a non-factor. The vaccine doesn't stop infection... only symptoms... so we are all likely to be infected at some point...

"Marion Pepper, an immunologist and associate professor at the University of Washington in Seattle says that even after getting vaccinated, if someone is exposed to the virus it can take the body’s immune response some time to control an infection and the potential for transmission depends on how quickly the infection is controlled. “Most vaccines prevent disease as opposed to preventing infection,” says Anna Durbin"

The vaccine won’t stop every infection.

It will stop a lot of them. Data suggests it stops 90% of them, roughly. The statement you posted does not contradict this. It merely says that someone may still get COVID and transmit it. That’s true. The vaccine can and does stop infection in most cases.
 
Still doesn’t mean a vaccine resistant variant wouldn’t arise...and *gasp* the vaccine doesn’t work for the delta. This is a rapidly mutating RNA virus (we have never made a vaccine for rapidly mutating RNA viruses as I already explained) and we’ve already recorded 2000 different variants. I don’t know why this is a shock. The data shows the vaccine isn’t working for the delta, and we have lambda coming down the pike. Why is this even an argument?
Sure! And a “natural immunity” resistant variant could arise too. It’s less likely to happen if w have fewer infections.

The data shows the vaccine is working well for delta. Lambda is probably not an issue. We would know if it were by now.
 
Just as antibiotics breed resistance in bacteria, vaccines can incite changes that enable diseases to escape their control. Any virus or bacteria under pressure will adapt and overcome. That's pretty common knowledge. You should know that.
Vaccines are preventative. Antibiotics are treatment.

They’re different.
 
The Pfizer vaccine is about 88% effective for delta.

Where in the study does it use non-alpha variant previous infections as a control? It doesn’t. Wouldn’t that be kind of important to determine?

Why do y’all keep falling for this shit? These people think they can just throw fancy words at y’all, and all of a sudden everyone forgets how basic immunity and vaccinations work?
 
Because some disgruntled Republican could push a few buttons, here's the link he wanted.

I know it's not a subject all you antivaxxers don't want to hear but it's still fact. I won't embarrass you by posting stats about how many are republicans.
Do it yourselves.


Now call me an idiot.
And it's virtually all in red states.
 
Sure! And a “natural immunity” resistant variant could arise too. It’s less likely to happen if w have fewer infections.

The data shows the vaccine is working well for delta. Lambda is probably not an issue. We would know if it were by now.
Eventually COVID will break away from naturally immunity, yes. Still doesn’t change the fact that natural immunity provides a wider profile against multiple paths of evolution on COVID (and does indeed work against the delta). Unless you care to argue that there’s somehow more antigens on a spike protein vs the entire virus (that includes the spike protein). Have at that argument. It also doesn’t change the fact that we will drive (and have already driven) COVID to become less dangerous, since we select for less dangerous strains. This is obvious. When we’re really sick we isolate and go to the doc where we throw the kitchen sink at the virus. When we’re not that sick we often choose to still brave it out and go into work, and don’t go to the doc. This makes the virus more transmissible.

No the data doesn’t. I already posted the goddamn Gibraltar data. They are 100% vaccinated. Yet they’re enjoying a nice delta variant spike. Even in your own skewed data with a fake control group (that doesn’t differentiate people who’ve already recovered from COVID, a point I’ve been making from the beginning that you seem to keep ignoring), it’s only 88% effective...
 
Israel had a huge spike in COVID in September. There’s no reason there couldn’t be an outbreak now, in June. There’s been many outbreaks in warm weather. This isn’t merely a seasonality thing.

Your guess about infection rates is a guess.

The data does not support saying the vaccine isn’t effective for delta.
The data does. I’ve posted this. An a priori response of “no it doesn’t”, doesn’t actually address my (really Israeli health) data. 40% of breakthrough infections for those vaccinated in Israel. And seasonality does not mean the virus suddenly drops out of existence. It just means conditions for spread suck.
 
Because some disgruntled Republican could push a few buttons, here's the link he wanted.

I know it's not a subject all you antivaxxers don't want to hear but it's still fact. I won't embarrass you by posting stats about how many are republicans.
Do it yourselves.


Now call me an idiot.
I'm not exactly anti vax .....OR A REPUBLICAN..
Tell ya what I aint also ...a mindless lab rat

ddddmkdjdjndndnd.jpeg



He's got a Fauci ouchie boo boo.




Progressive / democratic socialist/complete imbeciles I beg you
Roll up your sleeves for booster shots
 
Where in the study does it use non-alpha variant previous infections as a control? It doesn’t. Wouldn’t that be kind of important to determine?

Why do y’all keep falling for this shit? These people think they can just throw fancy words at y’all, and all of a sudden everyone forgets how basic immunity and vaccinations work?
The purpose is to demonstrate efficacy of the virus, not to determine reinfection rates of "no-alpha variant previous infections".

I don't know why you think that would be the important control group.
 
The data does. I’ve posted this. An a priori response of “no it doesn’t”, doesn’t actually address my (really Israeli health) data. 40% of breakthrough infections for those vaccinated in Israel. And seasonality does not mean the virus suddenly drops out of existence. It just means conditions for spread suck.
It doesn't. As stated earlier, Israel has a tiny percentage of cases that they had in previous spikes. Conditions for spread are always present for COVID, given how easily it spreads.

If the vaccine truly weren't effective, the rates would be far higher. Instead, they're seeing a small percentage. You can try to explain this away, but without a vaccine, Israel would undoubtedly have higher rates of not just cases, but also much higher rates of severe disease and death.
 
It's tough to say what they're being told in their universe. They appear to believe that the 99% figure is a lie, and no doubt that's what they're being told.

Pretty soon here, we're going to need some kind of system that fully and accurately translates what's happening in their universe so that we can at least communicate with them.
Who ever said we wanted, or needed you smug assholes to communicate anything with us normal people?
 
It doesn't. As stated earlier, Israel has a tiny percentage of cases that they had in previous spikes. Conditions for spread are always present for COVID, given how easily it spreads.

If the vaccine truly weren't effective, the rates would be far higher. Instead, they're seeing a small percentage. You can try to explain this away, but without a vaccine, Israel would undoubtedly have higher rates of not just cases, but also much higher rates of severe disease and death.
Is that your final guess?
 

Forum List

Back
Top