B
bamthin
Guest
I have been reading about the recent demonstration of the Shia in Iraq. Some 100,000 marched peacefully demanding democratic elections. Bush appears to be grovelling back to the UN with his tail between his legs begging for the UN to come back and put it's stamp of approval on his plan for the future of the Iraqi government.
If Bush, who has repeatedly said that Iraqs will govern their country and democratic elections will be held, doesn't allow the Shia, which represent roughly 60% of the population of Iraq, to come to power democratically, how can he back up his words?
In the US, Bush has a 60% approval rating and 45% of polled voters would pick an unnamed Democrat over Bush in the upcoming election. These numbers are very close to the support that El-Sistani, the expected Shia theocratic ruler, has in Iraq.
IF the Shia do take power, they will establish strict islamic law, including sharia law (which basically strips all rights from women) and will also probably start a civil war with the Kurds. An islamic Iraq would undoubtedly create a region much more fertile to anti-US radical islamic terrorism than what existed under Saddam Hussein. In addition, it will put the second largest oil reserve in the world under direct control of Islamic rule.
Does anyone see the very real possibilty of this happening? And if so, would you agree that, from a US perspective, Saddam was the lesser of two evils?
LINK
-Bam
If Bush, who has repeatedly said that Iraqs will govern their country and democratic elections will be held, doesn't allow the Shia, which represent roughly 60% of the population of Iraq, to come to power democratically, how can he back up his words?
In the US, Bush has a 60% approval rating and 45% of polled voters would pick an unnamed Democrat over Bush in the upcoming election. These numbers are very close to the support that El-Sistani, the expected Shia theocratic ruler, has in Iraq.
IF the Shia do take power, they will establish strict islamic law, including sharia law (which basically strips all rights from women) and will also probably start a civil war with the Kurds. An islamic Iraq would undoubtedly create a region much more fertile to anti-US radical islamic terrorism than what existed under Saddam Hussein. In addition, it will put the second largest oil reserve in the world under direct control of Islamic rule.
Does anyone see the very real possibilty of this happening? And if so, would you agree that, from a US perspective, Saddam was the lesser of two evils?
LINK
-Bam