OK
Grandma et al
Let's be fair here. Since I voted for Trump and also Bush, I'm happy to work with GOP to pay the costs of any contested expenses.
And let's hold Democrats to the same. Obama and Pelosi can raise funds and pay back the trillions doled out to Corporate insurance interests
that taxpayers contested, and the GOP can do the same with war spending contested by taxpayers in the trillions as well.
Sure, let's set up Fed Reserve accounts to track all these debts per party,
hold each responsible for their candidates and votes, and take this off taxpayers.
Totally AGREE!!! I AGREE to do so u nder the
Code of Ethics for Govt Service Public Law 96-303
www.ethics-commission.net
that calls for seeking the most efficient means of getting tasks accomplished.
I say it is more cost-effective to invest in military security
such as along the border, to create jobs and bring back
production facilities:
http://www.earnedamnesty.org
So if Trump houses VETS in his buildings to act as security,
he can create jobs for retired VETS and/or assistance for disabled Vets and their VA care at the same time with those tax dollars being spent on security.
Just move VA facilities there and work that into the budget.
Something like that, you get the idea:
What is the most cost-effective way to do this?
the SS isn't about to let a bunch of vets protect the POTUS .... dumbest damn thing today.
Dear
Siete
??? Why can't govt security involve training and paying Vets to do this work?
Can't the FBI and CIA hire veterans, or is there something I'm missing or miscommunicating?
how about THIS proposal:
Keep a running tab of how much Trump (and/or the Clintons and Obamas)
have cost Taxpayers for their "security"
Then credit that much in a Federal Reserve account to allocate for BORDER security and development.
Whatever it costs to create facilities for military bases and civilian production and educational centers,
use the credits and issues notes that are paid for the labor invested in developing 4-5 border towns.
Then taxpayers and laborers who do the work or invest in will OWN SHARES in these developments and programs.
Suggestion to start with:
1. From Trump's election to when he takes office, for every dollar of the millions
spent per day, count that up and create a budget for saving the Astrodome national landmark
as a house of Congress for people to represent their interests by party.
This will be owned by the people, based on "credit" matching the money spent on
Trump's added security costs in NY that are being protested along with the lack of
party representation in Congress and other branches of govt due to partisan dominance and exclusion of minority interests.
2. For each of 4 years, take that budget and credit it to build 4 citystates
alongside CA, NM, AZ, TX and let each major party elect a P, VP, S, and T
to organize the budget based on credit to invest matching resources and labor
into building their own state to demonstrate their leadership skills for their candidates,
including the proposal model programs they want to prove work effectively.
Greens Libertarians Progressive Dems and Tea Party GOP left out of the loop
would be ideal.
For the people's congress, if the first focus is on women, and addressing
trafficking and immigration crimes due to "lack of security" I think that is
appropriate given Trump spending that much on his own family's security.
Clinton, Sanders, Stein, Johnson, Cruz, and any other leaders can join in.
If Clinton wants to lead the people's Congress, I love to see her get a second
chance at earning the respect and support to become the first woman President
after she is allowed to prove she can unite and work with all parties across America.
More power to you!