Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I personally saw the recordings where he negotiated with the leaders of the "Donetsk" and "Luhansk" republics and promised them support.by a Jewish oligarkh Kolomoisky, who was (is?) a head of Ukrainian Jewish union or something, I am not sure about his present status.
yes, and he even proposed his service to Kremlin, but after everything he did during and after the coup his services were rejected and he is going to be punished in due time and course.I personally saw the recordings where he negotiated with the leaders of the "Donetsk" and "Luhansk" republics and promised them support.
Incidentally, this is not an easy question. Of course, neither side will say that it supports Nazism, and if a Nazi is serving in the army, the government cannot be held responsible. Here we can only talk about some degree of loyalty and informal use of these people.by the state?
Incidentally, this is not an easy question. Of course, neither side will say that it supports Nazism, and if a Nazi is serving in the army, the government cannot be held responsible. Here we can only talk about some degree of loyalty and informal use of these people.
Was any part of the government in Russia loyal to manifestations of nationalism? I don't know, but I read that they tried to "save" the suspects in this case, and ruin the case, and in the end criminals got off with soft punishment.
For years, no one took action against the poor living conditions of Tajik labor migrants, no one prohibited the libel of the Comedy Club.
At one time, significant part of St. Petersburg musicians openly promoted extremism and Nazism, and no one seriously touched them. The "2 versus 1" journalists were overtly nationalistic, and it was legal broadcasting. Etc.
But this does not mean direct support of Nazism, do they officially count them as Nazi and it is writen in official documents?of Nazi battalions
Since there is no institution of case law in Russia, the existence of a law in itself does not prove anything, because there is no clear mechanism for choosing the "correct" law for each specific case, and this can be used very flexibly. As one well-known comrade said, "if there is a man, we can find the "article" for him," but there are several more options, for example, "each has his own law, depending on the wishes of the workers of the Milk Factory"(which is not true, I'd say Russian nationalists are suppressed in Russia much more than any other, and 282 "extremism" article of the Criminal code is called "Russian" not without reason.)