Coronavirus Hysteria?

[Care4all]

so, is trump right? Are we now suppose to think if we come out of this with 100,000 to 200 thousand deaths, then his team did an excellent job controlling it? That's what the president is saying now....? that there could be 2 MILLION DEATHS, and 100,000 deaths only, would be like a miracle?

 

[Leo123]

so, is trump right? Are we now suppose to think if we come out of this with 100,000 to 200 thousand deaths, then his team did an excellent job controlling it? That's what the president is saying now....? that there could be 2 MILLION DEATHS, and 100,000 deaths only, would be like a miracle?

You blatant liar. Trump said 100,000 COULD result. In fact he said 'at or below' which you failed to post. Typical CNN bullshit. Yet you believe that shit because if fits your political agenda and to HELL with the American people. GFY

"Trump's assertion came after he was asked about comments the nation's top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, made earlier Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that based on models, 100,000 Americans or more could die from the virus. " Remember too, that is CNN's opinion.......You guys crack me up.

Trump concedes US coronavirus death toll could be 100,000 or more

President Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday for the first time that deaths in the United States from coronavirus could reach 100,000 or more, adding that if the death toll stays at or below 100,000, "we all together have done a very good job."

www.cnn.com

 

[Care4all]

so, is trump right? Are we now suppose to think if we come out of this with 100,000 to 200 thousand deaths, then his team did an excellent job controlling it? That's what the president is saying now....? that there could be 2 MILLION DEATHS, and 100,000 deaths only, would be like a miracle?

You blatant liar. Trump said 100,000 COULD result. In fact he said 'at or below' which you failed to post. Typical CNN bullshit. Yet you believe that shit because if fits your political agenda and to HELL with the American people. GFY

"Trump's assertion came after he was asked about comments the nation's top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, made earlier Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that based on models, 100,000 Americans or more could die from the virus. " Remember too, that is CNN's opinion.......You guys crack me up.

Trump concedes US coronavirus death toll could be 100,000 or more

President Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday for the first time that deaths in the United States from coronavirus could reach 100,000 or more, adding that if the death toll stays at or below 100,000, "we all together have done a very good job."

www.cnn.com

Okee Dokee snowflake, at 100000 deaths or below....

Isn't that a HUGE number of deaths to be considered a good result when he implied over and over again, this virus was a nothing burger.... ?????

And ALL of you Trumpsters have been comparing it to a 35000 deaths for the yearly flu, and how weak this virus really is compared to the flu blah blah blah, we should reopen blah blah blah because we had less than 3000 dead blah blah blah let's open by Easter blah blah blah......

He said 1 to 2 million could die in this pandemic, and 100 to 200000 thousand dead, then said if it were 100000 that would be considered as good results.....

So now 100000 deaths would be in the category of good job done by him.....

Do you think 100,000 Americans DEAD would be worthy of praise for him?

Next week when he then revises and says 200000 people dead, would be a good job for him n team or the week after that when he says 300000 dead, would be a good job.....

Are you going to continue to follow him like a lemming, and start telling us on this board that 200000 or 400000 dead, is still a good job, by this president?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Thier "job' is not somehow divining what the President thinks or what the American people think.

Right, which is why they ask him what he thinks. But you and he whine about that, too.

 

[Pogo]

so, is trump right? Are we now suppose to think if we come out of this with 100,000 to 200 thousand deaths, then his team did an excellent job controlling it? That's what the president is saying now....? that there could be 2 MILLION DEATHS, and 100,000 deaths only, would be like a miracle?

You blatant liar. Trump said 100,000 COULD result. In fact he said 'at or below' which you failed to post. Typical CNN bullshit. Yet you believe that shit because if fits your political agenda and to HELL with the American people. GFY

"Trump's assertion came after he was asked about comments the nation's top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, made earlier Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that based on models, 100,000 Americans or more could die from the virus. " Remember too, that is CNN's opinion.......You guys crack me up.

Trump concedes US coronavirus death toll could be 100,000 or more

President Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday for the first time that deaths in the United States from coronavirus could reach 100,000 or more, adding that if the death toll stays at or below 100,000, "we all together have done a very good job."

www.cnn.com

You cannot POSSIBLY be this stupid. I mean it has to be an act.

If Dr Fauci says "100k Merkins could die", and your channel selector thingy says "CNN" --- THAT DOES NOT MAKE IT CNN'S OPINION 'scuse me for a moment

Holy SHIT that was the stupidest thing I've seen posted all day.

 

[2aguy]

so, is trump right? Are we now suppose to think if we come out of this with 100,000 to 200 thousand deaths, then his team did an excellent job controlling it? That's what the president is saying now....? that there could be 2 MILLION DEATHS, and 100,000 deaths only, would be like a miracle?

You blatant liar. Trump said 100,000 COULD result. In fact he said 'at or below' which you failed to post. Typical CNN bullshit. Yet you believe that shit because if fits your political agenda and to HELL with the American people. GFY

"Trump's assertion came after he was asked about comments the nation's top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, made earlier Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that based on models, 100,000 Americans or more could die from the virus. " Remember too, that is CNN's opinion.......You guys crack me up.

Trump concedes US coronavirus death toll could be 100,000 or more

President Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday for the first time that deaths in the United States from coronavirus could reach 100,000 or more, adding that if the death toll stays at or below 100,000, "we all together have done a very good job."

www.cnn.com

You cannot POSSIBLY be this stupid. I mean it has to be an act.

If Dr Fauci says "100k Merkins could die", and your channel selector thingy says "CNN" --- THAT DOES NOT MAKE IT CNN'S OPINION 'scuse me for a moment

Holy SHIT that was the stupidest thing I've seen posted all day.

Yeah...except this.....

Fauci offers more conservative death rate in academic article than in public virus briefings

In New England Journal of Medicine, nation's infectious disease chief suggests COVID-19 mortality rate may end like bad seasonal flu.

justthenews.com

You’ve probably heard that COVID-19 is far deadlier than the flu. But it could turn out to be more akin to a severe flu season. Surprisingly, both of those assessments come from the same authority at the same time: Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation's chief infectious disease specialist.

Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has repeatedly cited more jarring figures in public. For instance, Fauci declared in March 11 congressional testimony that the current coronavirus “is 10 times more lethal than the seasonal flu,” which would be about 1 percent. His testimony generated news headlines that blared across the internet and television news, and it remains frequently cited today.

But among his learned colleagues in academia, he has provided the more conservative analysis.
-------

“[T]he case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%,” Fauci wrote in an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine on March 26. “This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.”

A day after the NEJM article was published, Fauci was back to repeating the higher fatality number in public rather than “considerably less than 1%.”

“The mortality of [COVID-19] is about 10 times [flu],” Fauci told Comedy Central host Trevor Noah on March 27.

 

[Leo123]

so, is trump right? Are we now suppose to think if we come out of this with 100,000 to 200 thousand deaths, then his team did an excellent job controlling it? That's what the president is saying now....? that there could be 2 MILLION DEATHS, and 100,000 deaths only, would be like a miracle?

You blatant liar. Trump said 100,000 COULD result. In fact he said 'at or below' which you failed to post. Typical CNN bullshit. Yet you believe that shit because if fits your political agenda and to HELL with the American people. GFY

"Trump's assertion came after he was asked about comments the nation's top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, made earlier Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that based on models, 100,000 Americans or more could die from the virus. " Remember too, that is CNN's opinion.......You guys crack me up.

Trump concedes US coronavirus death toll could be 100,000 or more

President Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday for the first time that deaths in the United States from coronavirus could reach 100,000 or more, adding that if the death toll stays at or below 100,000, "we all together have done a very good job."

www.cnn.com

You cannot POSSIBLY be this stupid. I mean it has to be an act.

If Dr Fauci says "100k Merkins could die", and your channel selector thingy says "CNN" --- THAT DOES NOT MAKE IT CNN'S OPINION 'scuse me for a moment

Holy SHIT that was the stupidest thing I've seen posted all day.

Yeah...except this.....

Fauci offers more conservative death rate in academic article than in public virus briefings

In New England Journal of Medicine, nation's infectious disease chief suggests COVID-19 mortality rate may end like bad seasonal flu.

justthenews.com

You’ve probably heard that COVID-19 is far deadlier than the flu. But it could turn out to be more akin to a severe flu season. Surprisingly, both of those assessments come from the same authority at the same time: Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation's chief infectious disease specialist.

Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has repeatedly cited more jarring figures in public. For instance, Fauci declared in March 11 congressional testimony that the current coronavirus “is 10 times more lethal than the seasonal flu,” which would be about 1 percent. His testimony generated news headlines that blared across the internet and television news, and it remains frequently cited today.

But among his learned colleagues in academia, he has provided the more conservative analysis.
-------

“[T]he case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%,” Fauci wrote in an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine on March 26. “This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.”

A day after the NEJM article was published, Fauci was back to repeating the higher fatality number in public rather than “considerably less than 1%.”

“The mortality of [COVID-19] is about 10 times [flu],” Fauci told Comedy Central host Trevor Noah on March 27.

so, is trump right? Are we now suppose to think if we come out of this with 100,000 to 200 thousand deaths, then his team did an excellent job controlling it? That's what the president is saying now....? that there could be 2 MILLION DEATHS, and 100,000 deaths only, would be like a miracle?

You blatant liar. Trump said 100,000 COULD result. In fact he said 'at or below' which you failed to post. Typical CNN bullshit. Yet you believe that shit because if fits your political agenda and to HELL with the American people. GFY

"Trump's assertion came after he was asked about comments the nation's top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, made earlier Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that based on models, 100,000 Americans or more could die from the virus. " Remember too, that is CNN's opinion.......You guys crack me up.

Trump concedes US coronavirus death toll could be 100,000 or more

President Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday for the first time that deaths in the United States from coronavirus could reach 100,000 or more, adding that if the death toll stays at or below 100,000, "we all together have done a very good job."

www.cnn.com

Okee Dokee snowflake, at 100000 deaths or below....

Isn't that a HUGE number of deaths to be considered a good result when he implied over and over again, this virus was a nothing burger.... ?????

And ALL of you Trumpsters have been comparing it to a 35000 deaths for the yearly flu, and how weak this virus really is compared to the flu blah blah blah, we should reopen blah blah blah because we had less than 3000 dead blah blah blah let's open by Easter blah blah blah......

He said 1 to 2 million could die in this pandemic, and 100 to 200000 thousand dead, then said if it were 100000 that would be considered as good results.....

So now 100000 deaths would be in the category of good job done by him.....

Do you think 100,000 Americans DEAD would be worthy of praise for him?

Next week when he then revises and says 200000 people dead, would be a good job for him n team or the week after that when he says 300000 dead, would be a good job.....

Are you going to continue to follow him like a lemming, and start telling us on this board that 200000 or 400000 dead, is still a good job, by this president?

No one said the virus was a nothing burger.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

so, is trump right? Are we now suppose to think if we come out of this with 100,000 to 200 thousand deaths, then his team did an excellent job controlling it? That's what the president is saying now....? that there could be 2 MILLION DEATHS, and 100,000 deaths only, would be like a miracle?

You blatant liar. Trump said 100,000 COULD result. In fact he said 'at or below' which you failed to post. Typical CNN bullshit. Yet you believe that shit because if fits your political agenda and to HELL with the American people. GFY

"Trump's assertion came after he was asked about comments the nation's top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, made earlier Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that based on models, 100,000 Americans or more could die from the virus. " Remember too, that is CNN's opinion.......You guys crack me up.

Trump concedes US coronavirus death toll could be 100,000 or more

President Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday for the first time that deaths in the United States from coronavirus could reach 100,000 or more, adding that if the death toll stays at or below 100,000, "we all together have done a very good job."

www.cnn.com

You cannot POSSIBLY be this stupid. I mean it has to be an act.

If Dr Fauci says "100k Merkins could die", and your channel selector thingy says "CNN" --- THAT DOES NOT MAKE IT CNN'S OPINION 'scuse me for a moment

Holy SHIT that was the stupidest thing I've seen posted all day.

Yeah...except this.....

Fauci offers more conservative death rate in academic article than in public virus briefings

In New England Journal of Medicine, nation's infectious disease chief suggests COVID-19 mortality rate may end like bad seasonal flu.

justthenews.com

You’ve probably heard that COVID-19 is far deadlier than the flu. But it could turn out to be more akin to a severe flu season. Surprisingly, both of those assessments come from the same authority at the same time: Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation's chief infectious disease specialist.

Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has repeatedly cited more jarring figures in public. For instance, Fauci declared in March 11 congressional testimony that the current coronavirus “is 10 times more lethal than the seasonal flu,” which would be about 1 percent. His testimony generated news headlines that blared across the internet and television news, and it remains frequently cited today.

But among his learned colleagues in academia, he has provided the more conservative analysis.
-------

“[T]he case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%,” Fauci wrote in an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine on March 26. “This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.”

A day after the NEJM article was published, Fauci was back to repeating the higher fatality number in public rather than “considerably less than 1%.”

“The mortality of [COVID-19] is about 10 times [flu],” Fauci told Comedy Central host Trevor Noah on March 27.

so, is trump right? Are we now suppose to think if we come out of this with 100,000 to 200 thousand deaths, then his team did an excellent job controlling it? That's what the president is saying now....? that there could be 2 MILLION DEATHS, and 100,000 deaths only, would be like a miracle?

You blatant liar. Trump said 100,000 COULD result. In fact he said 'at or below' which you failed to post. Typical CNN bullshit. Yet you believe that shit because if fits your political agenda and to HELL with the American people. GFY

"Trump's assertion came after he was asked about comments the nation's top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, made earlier Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that based on models, 100,000 Americans or more could die from the virus. " Remember too, that is CNN's opinion.......You guys crack me up.

Trump concedes US coronavirus death toll could be 100,000 or more

President Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday for the first time that deaths in the United States from coronavirus could reach 100,000 or more, adding that if the death toll stays at or below 100,000, "we all together have done a very good job."

www.cnn.com

Okee Dokee snowflake, at 100000 deaths or below....

Isn't that a HUGE number of deaths to be considered a good result when he implied over and over again, this virus was a nothing burger.... ?????

And ALL of you Trumpsters have been comparing it to a 35000 deaths for the yearly flu, and how weak this virus really is compared to the flu blah blah blah, we should reopen blah blah blah because we had less than 3000 dead blah blah blah let's open by Easter blah blah blah......

He said 1 to 2 million could die in this pandemic, and 100 to 200000 thousand dead, then said if it were 100000 that would be considered as good results.....

So now 100000 deaths would be in the category of good job done by him.....

Do you think 100,000 Americans DEAD would be worthy of praise for him?

Next week when he then revises and says 200000 people dead, would be a good job for him n team or the week after that when he says 300000 dead, would be a good job.....

Are you going to continue to follow him like a lemming, and start telling us on this board that 200000 or 400000 dead, is still a good job, by this president?

No one said the virus was a nothing burger.

Except for these brilliant Trump supporters who, of course, were taking their cues from Dear Leader:

 

[Pogo]

so, is trump right? Are we now suppose to think if we come out of this with 100,000 to 200 thousand deaths, then his team did an excellent job controlling it? That's what the president is saying now....? that there could be 2 MILLION DEATHS, and 100,000 deaths only, would be like a miracle?

You blatant liar. Trump said 100,000 COULD result. In fact he said 'at or below' which you failed to post. Typical CNN bullshit. Yet you believe that shit because if fits your political agenda and to HELL with the American people. GFY

"Trump's assertion came after he was asked about comments the nation's top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, made earlier Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that based on models, 100,000 Americans or more could die from the virus. " Remember too, that is CNN's opinion.......You guys crack me up.

Trump concedes US coronavirus death toll could be 100,000 or more

President Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday for the first time that deaths in the United States from coronavirus could reach 100,000 or more, adding that if the death toll stays at or below 100,000, "we all together have done a very good job."

www.cnn.com

You cannot POSSIBLY be this stupid. I mean it has to be an act.

If Dr Fauci says "100k Merkins could die", and your channel selector thingy says "CNN" --- THAT DOES NOT MAKE IT CNN'S OPINION 'scuse me for a moment

Holy SHIT that was the stupidest thing I've seen posted all day.

Yeah...except this.....

Fauci offers more conservative death rate in academic article than in public virus briefings

In New England Journal of Medicine, nation's infectious disease chief suggests COVID-19 mortality rate may end like bad seasonal flu.

justthenews.com

You’ve probably heard that COVID-19 is far deadlier than the flu. But it could turn out to be more akin to a severe flu season. Surprisingly, both of those assessments come from the same authority at the same time: Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation's chief infectious disease specialist.

Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has repeatedly cited more jarring figures in public. For instance, Fauci declared in March 11 congressional testimony that the current coronavirus “is 10 times more lethal than the seasonal flu,” which would be about 1 percent. His testimony generated news headlines that blared across the internet and television news, and it remains frequently cited today.

But among his learned colleagues in academia, he has provided the more conservative analysis.
-------

“[T]he case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%,” Fauci wrote in an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine on March 26. “This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.”

A day after the NEJM article was published, Fauci was back to repeating the higher fatality number in public rather than “considerably less than 1%.”

“The mortality of [COVID-19] is about 10 times [flu],” Fauci told Comedy Central host Trevor Noah on March 27.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

It's a severe illness. But not worthy of this type of hysteria.

amazingly, the whole world seems to be in hysteria mode.

We actually don't know. We get what's happening in the world filtered through the democrat media.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We actually don't know. We get what's happening in the world filtered through the democrat media

No you don't. The next time you read or listen to anything that isn't a right wing nutball wagging his chin will be the first.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

so, is trump right? Are we now suppose to think if we come out of this with 100,000 to 200 thousand deaths, then his team did an excellent job controlling it? That's what the president is saying now....? that there could be 2 MILLION DEATHS, and 100,000 deaths only, would be like a miracle?

You blatant liar. Trump said 100,000 COULD result. In fact he said 'at or below' which you failed to post. Typical CNN bullshit. Yet you believe that shit because if fits your political agenda and to HELL with the American people. GFY

"Trump's assertion came after he was asked about comments the nation's top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, made earlier Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that based on models, 100,000 Americans or more could die from the virus. " Remember too, that is CNN's opinion.......You guys crack me up.

Trump concedes US coronavirus death toll could be 100,000 or more

President Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday for the first time that deaths in the United States from coronavirus could reach 100,000 or more, adding that if the death toll stays at or below 100,000, "we all together have done a very good job."

www.cnn.com

Okee Dokee snowflake, at 100000 deaths or below....

Isn't that a HUGE number of deaths to be considered a good result when he implied over and over again, this virus was a nothing burger.... ?????

And ALL of you Trumpsters have been comparing it to a 35000 deaths for the yearly flu, and how weak this virus really is compared to the flu blah blah blah, we should reopen blah blah blah because we had less than 3000 dead blah blah blah let's open by Easter blah blah blah......

He said 1 to 2 million could die in this pandemic, and 100 to 200000 thousand dead, then said if it were 100000 that would be considered as good results.....

So now 100000 deaths would be in the category of good job done by him.....

Do you think 100,000 Americans DEAD would be worthy of praise for him?

Next week when he then revises and says 200000 people dead, would be a good job for him n team or the week after that when he says 300000 dead, would be a good job.....

Are you going to continue to follow him like a lemming, and start telling us on this board that 200000 or 400000 dead, is still a good job, by this president?

100,000 dead in a population of 327 million would be a fantastic job by the president. That figure is miniscule.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

We actually don't know. We get what's happening in the world filtered through the democrat media

No you don't. The next time you read or listen to anything that isn't a right wing nutball wagging his chin will be the first.

I certainly wouldn't believe a democrat. I am waaayyy beyond that and so is most everyone else.

 

[2aguy]

so, is trump right? Are we now suppose to think if we come out of this with 100,000 to 200 thousand deaths, then his team did an excellent job controlling it? That's what the president is saying now....? that there could be 2 MILLION DEATHS, and 100,000 deaths only, would be like a miracle?

You blatant liar. Trump said 100,000 COULD result. In fact he said 'at or below' which you failed to post. Typical CNN bullshit. Yet you believe that shit because if fits your political agenda and to HELL with the American people. GFY

"Trump's assertion came after he was asked about comments the nation's top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, made earlier Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that based on models, 100,000 Americans or more could die from the virus. " Remember too, that is CNN's opinion.......You guys crack me up.

Trump concedes US coronavirus death toll could be 100,000 or more

President Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday for the first time that deaths in the United States from coronavirus could reach 100,000 or more, adding that if the death toll stays at or below 100,000, "we all together have done a very good job."

www.cnn.com

Okee Dokee snowflake, at 100000 deaths or below....

Isn't that a HUGE number of deaths to be considered a good result when he implied over and over again, this virus was a nothing burger.... ?????

And ALL of you Trumpsters have been comparing it to a 35000 deaths for the yearly flu, and how weak this virus really is compared to the flu blah blah blah, we should reopen blah blah blah because we had less than 3000 dead blah blah blah let's open by Easter blah blah blah......

He said 1 to 2 million could die in this pandemic, and 100 to 200000 thousand dead, then said if it were 100000 that would be considered as good results.....

So now 100000 deaths would be in the category of good job done by him.....

Do you think 100,000 Americans DEAD would be worthy of praise for him?

Next week when he then revises and says 200000 people dead, would be a good job for him n team or the week after that when he says 300000 dead, would be a good job.....

Are you going to continue to follow him like a lemming, and start telling us on this board that 200000 or 400000 dead, is still a good job, by this president?

100,000 dead in a population of 327 million would be a fantastic job by the president. That figure is miniscule.

In the medical journal Fauci stated it would likely be no worse than a bad seasonal flu rate.....then, the day after that article came out, he told the anti-Trump, left wing, trever noah on comedy central and the zombies that watch that show, it would be 10 times worse than the flu....

I think Trump has another james comey, john brennan problem....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We actually don't know. We get what's happening in the world filtered through the democrat media

No you don't. The next time you read or listen to anything that isn't a right wing nutball wagging his chin will be the first.

I certainly wouldn't believe a democrat. I am waaayyy beyond that and so is most everyone else.

Actually, you're an immoral, evil little puke. You don't listen to anyone or anything, save for your own colon. You only tune into the right wing fucktards to affirm your prejudices.

 

[Pogo]

so, is trump right? Are we now suppose to think if we come out of this with 100,000 to 200 thousand deaths, then his team did an excellent job controlling it? That's what the president is saying now....? that there could be 2 MILLION DEATHS, and 100,000 deaths only, would be like a miracle?

You blatant liar. Trump said 100,000 COULD result. In fact he said 'at or below' which you failed to post. Typical CNN bullshit. Yet you believe that shit because if fits your political agenda and to HELL with the American people. GFY

"Trump's assertion came after he was asked about comments the nation's top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, made earlier Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that based on models, 100,000 Americans or more could die from the virus. " Remember too, that is CNN's opinion.......You guys crack me up.

Trump concedes US coronavirus death toll could be 100,000 or more

President Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday for the first time that deaths in the United States from coronavirus could reach 100,000 or more, adding that if the death toll stays at or below 100,000, "we all together have done a very good job."

www.cnn.com

Okee Dokee snowflake, at 100000 deaths or below....

Isn't that a HUGE number of deaths to be considered a good result when he implied over and over again, this virus was a nothing burger.... ?????

And ALL of you Trumpsters have been comparing it to a 35000 deaths for the yearly flu, and how weak this virus really is compared to the flu blah blah blah, we should reopen blah blah blah because we had less than 3000 dead blah blah blah let's open by Easter blah blah blah......

He said 1 to 2 million could die in this pandemic, and 100 to 200000 thousand dead, then said if it were 100000 that would be considered as good results.....

So now 100000 deaths would be in the category of good job done by him.....

Do you think 100,000 Americans DEAD would be worthy of praise for him?

Next week when he then revises and says 200000 people dead, would be a good job for him n team or the week after that when he says 300000 dead, would be a good job.....

Are you going to continue to follow him like a lemming, and start telling us on this board that 200000 or 400000 dead, is still a good job, by this president?

100,000 dead in a population of 327 million would be a fantastic job by the president. That figure is miniscule.

In the medical journal Fauci stated it would likely be no worse than a bad seasonal flu rate.....then, the day after that article came out, he told the anti-Trump, left wing, trever noah on comedy central and the zombies that watch that show, it would be 10 times worse than the flu....

I think Trump has another james comey, john brennan problem....

Rump has the same problem he's had for the duration. Rump has a RUMP problem. Starting with, learning how to STFU.

 

[Montrovant]

so, is trump right? Are we now suppose to think if we come out of this with 100,000 to 200 thousand deaths, then his team did an excellent job controlling it? That's what the president is saying now....? that there could be 2 MILLION DEATHS, and 100,000 deaths only, would be like a miracle?

You blatant liar. Trump said 100,000 COULD result. In fact he said 'at or below' which you failed to post. Typical CNN bullshit. Yet you believe that shit because if fits your political agenda and to HELL with the American people. GFY

"Trump's assertion came after he was asked about comments the nation's top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, made earlier Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that based on models, 100,000 Americans or more could die from the virus. " Remember too, that is CNN's opinion.......You guys crack me up.

Trump concedes US coronavirus death toll could be 100,000 or more

President Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday for the first time that deaths in the United States from coronavirus could reach 100,000 or more, adding that if the death toll stays at or below 100,000, "we all together have done a very good job."

www.cnn.com

Okee Dokee snowflake, at 100000 deaths or below....

Isn't that a HUGE number of deaths to be considered a good result when he implied over and over again, this virus was a nothing burger.... ?????

And ALL of you Trumpsters have been comparing it to a 35000 deaths for the yearly flu, and how weak this virus really is compared to the flu blah blah blah, we should reopen blah blah blah because we had less than 3000 dead blah blah blah let's open by Easter blah blah blah......

He said 1 to 2 million could die in this pandemic, and 100 to 200000 thousand dead, then said if it were 100000 that would be considered as good results.....

So now 100000 deaths would be in the category of good job done by him.....

Do you think 100,000 Americans DEAD would be worthy of praise for him?

Next week when he then revises and says 200000 people dead, would be a good job for him n team or the week after that when he says 300000 dead, would be a good job.....

Are you going to continue to follow him like a lemming, and start telling us on this board that 200000 or 400000 dead, is still a good job, by this president?

100,000 dead in a population of 327 million would be a fantastic job by the president. That figure is miniscule.

In the medical journal Fauci stated it would likely be no worse than a bad seasonal flu rate.....then, the day after that article came out, he told the anti-Trump, left wing, trever noah on comedy central and the zombies that watch that show, it would be 10 times worse than the flu....

I think Trump has another james comey, john brennan problem....

Fauci compared it to 2 different flu epidemics which each led to 100,000+ deaths.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

We actually don't know. We get what's happening in the world filtered through the democrat media

No you don't. The next time you read or listen to anything that isn't a right wing nutball wagging his chin will be the first.

I certainly wouldn't believe a democrat. I am waaayyy beyond that and so is most everyone else.

Actually, you're an immoral, evil little puke. You don't listen to anyone or anything, save for your own colon. You only tune into the right wing fucktards to affirm your prejudices.

Nothing is as evil as a Democrat you are one. An enemy Democrat. Listening to democrats makes one mentally I'll. Look at what happened to you. ******* Renfield.

 

[White 6]

He just said "A lot of people are dying and it is a very unpleasant thing to go through."
I think he may be starting to understand.

well, you're wrong.

I really need to control my ebullient optimism for his administration, at least until we can vote him the hell out.

Zat all you got out of an 1.5 hour press conference? Are you drinking?

Over all actually a good briefing. Better tone and better knowledge of the score. It actually did sound like he gets it now. Him sounding like he gets it now may not be much to some, but I have mediocre expectations of him due to past performance. So, it was something to me. He didn't say anybody would have to be appreciative, for him to do is job. He only took time to get petulant with a couple of the reporters. he backed off talk of opening by easter and filling the church pews. Somebody got to him, or maybe the story of his friend falling into coma is true and that got to him. I don't know. Any way you slice it or no matter his real motivations, he sounded more like a president, a troubled president, (as well he should be) when possibly coming to grips with the situation the country is facing, not just his presidency, the economy and his re-election, but the situation and lives of the people of this country. The quote was from then end and it was a little rambling, but OK, I would have probably been rambling by that time also.

If you ask me, the reporters were petulant with Trump. Different POV and one which is shared by 60% of the U.S. Population. Trump gives us information about the virus every day and what they are doing, what is recommended, he is surrounded by professional medical experts which he defers to. His optimistic view is ATTACKED by stupid, ******* leftist reporters of which there are (I have noticed) fewer and fewer.

They were not being petulant, just doing their job. Hard questions answered get deeper into the thinking. His job is to answer hard questions. This ain't high school. He has always been thin skinned, but I did make the point that he only did it twice. Sometimes it becomes the sum total of the content of he briefings, especially when speaking off the cuff. He is not very good off the cuff. In the beginning of this mess, it was BS, lies, blowing smoke and sunshine up the butt. Then he wen for Open up by Easter/fill the church pews. I also made the point that his change in tone overall was more appropriate to his office. For him, that's a lot. I'm an Independent. When he sucks, as is often the case, I say so. If I approve I say so and try to point out what he is did or is doing better. I thought I was pretty even handed and optimistic in my evaluation and comments. I will never be a fan, because character counts and he has proven, he lacks it, but I give him his due, when it is due, as I did in my post.

Thier "job' is not somehow divining what the President thinks or what the American people think. They are not reporting they are trying to sway public opinion. Thank God Trump can identify these vermin and out them for thier, pro-illegal alien, anti-American sentiment. No one cares what YOU think is 'appropriate'....... just how intolerant and arrogant can you be anyway? You have already proven you wouldn't know character if it smacked you in your ugly mug.

I guess about as appropriate and intolerant as you, you jerk. You asked if that was all I got out of it, so I expanded. Not important to me if you want to suck trumps dick and think he is more than he is. I did not list to "they", I listened to trump. Been listening to him for over 3 years, mostly not liking it. If you can stomach the outright lies, blaming others for his own shortcomings and whining when he is called out on them, his lack of support for the military in denigrating those wounded in battle for him, disparaging Gold Star Families, interfering in military justice, his pulling troops off the line to at the behest of foreign militatary to attack allies that fought for us, with us, and for him, that's up to you. I do not. If you can accept that in January he was only able to watch his impeachment and tweat, at the expense of handling and reacting to the Corona virus intel he was already getting coming out of China, instead of doing his job to protect this country and the people instead of whining and worrying about his political future

He just said "A lot of people are dying and it is a very unpleasant thing to go through."
I think he may be starting to understand.

well, you're wrong.

I really need to control my ebullient optimism for his administration, at least until we can vote him the hell out.

Zat all you got out of an 1.5 hour press conference? Are you drinking?

Over all actually a good briefing. Better tone and better knowledge of the score. It actually did sound like he gets it now. Him sounding like he gets it now may not be much to some, but I have mediocre expectations of him due to past performance. So, it was something to me. He didn't say anybody would have to be appreciative, for him to do is job. He only took time to get petulant with a couple of the reporters. he backed off talk of opening by easter and filling the church pews. Somebody got to him, or maybe the story of his friend falling into coma is true and that got to him. I don't know. Any way you slice it or no matter his real motivations, he sounded more like a president, a troubled president, (as well he should be) when possibly coming to grips with the situation the country is facing, not just his presidency, the economy and his re-election, but the situation and lives of the people of this country. The quote was from then end and it was a little rambling, but OK, I would have probably been rambling by that time also.

If you ask me, the reporters were petulant with Trump. Different POV and one which is shared by 60% of the U.S. Population. Trump gives us information about the virus every day and what they are doing, what is recommended, he is surrounded by professional medical experts which he defers to. His optimistic view is ATTACKED by stupid, ******* leftist reporters of which there are (I have noticed) fewer and fewer.

They were not being petulant, just doing their job. Hard questions answered get deeper into the thinking. His job is to answer hard questions. This ain't high school. He has always been thin skinned, but I did make the point that he only did it twice. Sometimes it becomes the sum total of the content of he briefings, especially when speaking off the cuff. He is not very good off the cuff. In the beginning of this mess, it was BS, lies, blowing smoke and sunshine up the butt. Then he wen for Open up by Easter/fill the church pews. I also made the point that his change in tone overall was more appropriate to his office. For him, that's a lot. I'm an Independent. When he sucks, as is often the case, I say so. If I approve I say so and try to point out what he is did or is doing better. I thought I was pretty even handed and optimistic in my evaluation and comments. I will never be a fan, because character counts and he has proven, he lacks it, but I give him his due, when it is due, as I did in my post.

Thier "job' is not somehow divining what the President thinks or what the American people think. They are not reporting they are trying to sway public opinion. Thank God Trump can identify these vermin and out them for thier, pro-illegal alien, anti-American sentiment. No one cares what YOU think is 'appropriate'....... just how intolerant and arrogant can you be anyway? You have already proven you wouldn't know character if it smacked you in your ugly mug.

No, their job is to ask questions,they think might be of interest to the public of the country. Part of Trumps job is to answer questions from the public. Been that way since the first newspaper. Most presidents just deal with it better, like Reagan, Kennedy, Clinton and to an extent Obama. When he "outs the vermin" as you say, it makes him look like he is afraid to answer questions and is trying to withhold his views from the public. In last week he has actually gotten better. You are the one that asked if my only quote from the presidential briefing was all I go out of it, so I told you. If you don't want to know, don't ask if YOU really don't care, you ignorant, intolerant ass hole. As for Character, did you approve when he lied about Mexico building us a wall, to get elected? Did you approve of him screwing those women, denying he even knew them, denied paying them off to keep them quiet before the election? How about when he stole the money appropriated by congress and signed into law by him from the military budget for schools and construction including rebuilding on Navy base that had be half destroy by a hurricane? What did you think when Putin and Erdogon wanted him to let Turkey invade northern Syria, to attack our allies, the Kurds (who had fought and died besides our troops fighting for his foreign policy. I bet you reall got a kick out of him belittling the soldiers injured in the missile attack on our base in Iraq after he assasinated the Iranian General (who actually did deserve a missile up his but). The man has not ethics or character and neither do you.

 

[Care4all]

so, is trump right? Are we now suppose to think if we come out of this with 100,000 to 200 thousand deaths, then his team did an excellent job controlling it? That's what the president is saying now....? that there could be 2 MILLION DEATHS, and 100,000 deaths only, would be like a miracle?

You blatant liar. Trump said 100,000 COULD result. In fact he said 'at or below' which you failed to post. Typical CNN bullshit. Yet you believe that shit because if fits your political agenda and to HELL with the American people. GFY

"Trump's assertion came after he was asked about comments the nation's top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, made earlier Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that based on models, 100,000 Americans or more could die from the virus. " Remember too, that is CNN's opinion.......You guys crack me up.

Trump concedes US coronavirus death toll could be 100,000 or more

President Donald Trump acknowledged Sunday for the first time that deaths in the United States from coronavirus could reach 100,000 or more, adding that if the death toll stays at or below 100,000, "we all together have done a very good job."

www.cnn.com

You cannot POSSIBLY be this stupid. I mean it has to be an act.

If Dr Fauci says "100k Merkins could die", and your channel selector thingy says "CNN" --- THAT DOES NOT MAKE IT CNN'S OPINION 'scuse me for a moment

Holy SHIT that was the stupidest thing I've seen posted all day.

Yeah...except this.....

Fauci offers more conservative death rate in academic article than in public virus briefings

In New England Journal of Medicine, nation's infectious disease chief suggests COVID-19 mortality rate may end like bad seasonal flu.

justthenews.com

You’ve probably heard that COVID-19 is far deadlier than the flu. But it could turn out to be more akin to a severe flu season. Surprisingly, both of those assessments come from the same authority at the same time: Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation's chief infectious disease specialist.

Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has repeatedly cited more jarring figures in public. For instance, Fauci declared in March 11 congressional testimony that the current coronavirus “is 10 times more lethal than the seasonal flu,” which would be about 1 percent. His testimony generated news headlines that blared across the internet and television news, and it remains frequently cited today.

But among his learned colleagues in academia, he has provided the more conservative analysis.
-------

“[T]he case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%,” Fauci wrote in an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine on March 26. “This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.”

A day after the NEJM article was published, Fauci was back to repeating the higher fatality number in public rather than “considerably less than 1%.”

“The mortality of [COVID-19] is about 10 times [flu],” Fauci told Comedy Central host Trevor Noah on March 27.

what the article said, was if the transmission rate was not the 2.2 people infected for every 1 person having it as the statistics show with limited testing, and was below infecting 1 person, by every infected person, then it may have a mortality rate similar to the influenza virus, of 0.1 %