Corona virus likely to be gone soon in US

[L.K.Eder]

Tot Cases/
1M pop
Germany
267
US
72

Irrelevant right now, as a direct comparison.. Stop that, you are being silly.

How is it irrelevant? Our population is much larger than theirs is. We had the first case, before them, yet we sit much lower on infection rate at this point in time.

Let's see where this ends up. So far it is a numbers game depending on number of tests performed. I merely brought this up to highlight the idiocy of your so called president who seems to be unable to process data and communicate clearly.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Numbers that will not cause mass panic when we know they will drop waaaayyyyy down.

Read much? EVERY SINGLE TIME I've quoted that number --- ALWAYS in response to some wag putting up fake numbers --- I've done so with the notation that it isn't realistic, because it can't be realistic, because TIME. Not enough has gone by to establish it. With a 24-day incubation period the number who will recover is Not Yet Recorded.

You want a realistic number? THERE AREN'T ANY. But if some wag keeps repeating bogus ones, they're going to be corrected.

A better estimation of a realistic number is, again, to consider the aggregate, that body of samples that has had time --- as also previously noted, that is at the moment 12%, and as noted at the same time, THAT TOO has to settle, with time. A still-better view can be ascertained by looking at China, the first country to deal with CV and therefore has had the most TIME, which has a CURRENT rate of just 4%. But that too is not yet settled as China, like everybody else still has active cases not yet resolved.

As I said at the beginning, flinging random numbers out and declaring "this is the mortality rate, full stop" is just irresponsible. Not only is it bogus math, it's pure speculation based on bogus math.

So why repeat it if it isn’t realistic?

Once AGAIN ---- I DIDN'T BRING IT UP. The OP did. Go ahead, check posts 1 and 2.

You opened yourself to this. As i said, consider the audience. They will home in on your fallacious number, but not on the initially posted fallacious number.

I don't have a fallacious number. The OP did. The audience, well that's up to them, they can figure it out or wallow in ignorance. You can lead the horse to water...

Come on. Lol. Your 64 % is not fallacious?

 

[JGalt]

I don't know what AM radio ass summa y'all continue to pull this from but the US death rate, at the moment, is 63%.

63%?

You better check your math there, Pythagoras

The actual mortality rate for the Chinese Wuhan Virus in the US is between 1.4% to 2%, which is far lower than the Flu.

Looks like the Democrats are gonna have to come up with a new disease or something.

The actual mortality rate has yet to be established --- it can't be without sufficient time --- but at the moment it's running at 64%. It went up a bit. As I and my link just laid out. What's 301 divided by 472 on your planet?

No idea where you're coming up with your numbers. 308 deaths out of 25,471 cases in the US. That comes out to 1.2% no matter how you do the math.

Microsoft Bing COVID-19 Tracker

Unless you're using common core math, which explains alot.

That's because you can't read.

You DON'T COUNT 25,471 cases whose outcome you DON"T KNOW. DUH!

If ten people go out to climb Mount Kilimanjaro, and three of them are found dead, and the other seven are unaccounted for, you do NOT have a mortality rate of 30%. If the other seven show up, THEN you do.

Understand?

Ok, dumbass: Let's look at where the virus has hit the worst, and has started to run its course:

3,255 deaths out of 81,008 confirmed cases in China. Do the math:

That's only a 4% mortality rate, Einstein. How about Italy?

4,825 fatalities out of 55,578 confirmed cases. That's a 9% mortality rate.

 

[JGalt]

Tot Cases/
1M pop
Germany
267
US
72

Irrelevant right now, as a direct comparison.. Stop that, you are being silly.

How is it irrelevant? Our population is much larger than theirs is. We had the first case, before them, yet we sit much lower on infection rate at this point in time.

Let's see where this ends up. So far it is a numbers game depending on number of tests performed. I merely brought this up to highlight the idiocy of your so called president who seems to be unable to process data and communicate clearly.

A higher number of tests is only going to make the mortality rate appear smaller.

Are you sure you secular progressive liberals want that?

 

[Pogo]

Read much? EVERY SINGLE TIME I've quoted that number --- ALWAYS in response to some wag putting up fake numbers --- I've done so with the notation that it isn't realistic, because it can't be realistic, because TIME. Not enough has gone by to establish it. With a 24-day incubation period the number who will recover is Not Yet Recorded.

You want a realistic number? THERE AREN'T ANY. But if some wag keeps repeating bogus ones, they're going to be corrected.

A better estimation of a realistic number is, again, to consider the aggregate, that body of samples that has had time --- as also previously noted, that is at the moment 12%, and as noted at the same time, THAT TOO has to settle, with time. A still-better view can be ascertained by looking at China, the first country to deal with CV and therefore has had the most TIME, which has a CURRENT rate of just 4%. But that too is not yet settled as China, like everybody else still has active cases not yet resolved.

As I said at the beginning, flinging random numbers out and declaring "this is the mortality rate, full stop" is just irresponsible. Not only is it bogus math, it's pure speculation based on bogus math.

So why repeat it if it isn’t realistic?

Once AGAIN ---- I DIDN'T BRING IT UP. The OP did. Go ahead, check posts 1 and 2.

You opened yourself to this. As i said, consider the audience. They will home in on your fallacious number, but not on the initially posted fallacious number.

I don't have a fallacious number. The OP did. The audience, well that's up to them, they can figure it out or wallow in ignorance. You can lead the horse to water...

Come on. Lol. Your 64 % is not fallacious?

It's simple math.

Doesn't mean anything, but 302 divided by 473 IS 63.8%. It is clearly not "less than 0.1%".

 

[depotoo]

Tot Cases/
1M pop
Germany
267
US
72

Irrelevant right now, as a direct comparison.. Stop that, you are being silly.

How is it irrelevant? Our population is much larger than theirs is. We had the first case, before them, yet we sit much lower on infection rate at this point in time.

Let's see where this ends up. So far it is a numbers game depending on number of tests performed. I merely brought this up to highlight the idiocy of your so called president who seems to be unable to process data and communicate clearly.

Thus my point, you brought it up trying to make it a political thing. I thusly responded.

 

[Pogo]

Tot Cases/
1M pop
Germany
267
US
72

Irrelevant right now, as a direct comparison.. Stop that, you are being silly.

How is it irrelevant? Our population is much larger than theirs is. We had the first case, before them, yet we sit much lower on infection rate at this point in time.

Let's see where this ends up. So far it is a numbers game depending on number of tests performed. I merely brought this up to highlight the idiocy of your so called president who seems to be unable to process data and communicate clearly.

A higher number of tests is only going to make the mortality rate appear smaller.

Are you sure you secular progressive liberals want that?

OMFG...

TESTS do not make the mortality rate smaller. RECOVERIES make the mortality rate smaller.

And that --- AGAIN --- takes TIME.

A TEST does not tell you what a resolution will be. Only a death or a recovery does that.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Your 64 % is not fallacious?

Correct, it is not. It could be used fallaciously, such as in a non sequitur that concludes the final morbidity rate would be 60%. But the number he stated is a fact.

 

[Zander]

Current S&P 500 PE Ratio: 17.34 -0.79 (-4.34%)
4:00 PM EDT, Fri Mar 20
Mean: 15.78
Median: 14.82
Min: 5.31 (Dec 1917)
Max: 123.73 (May 2009)

Current Shiller PE Ratio: 21.76 -0.99 (-4.34%)
4:00 PM EDT, Fri Mar 20
Mean: 16.70
Median: 15.77
Min: 4.78 (Dec 1920)
Max: 44.19 (Dec 1999)
Shiller PE ratio for the S&P 500.

Current S&P 500 Earnings Yield: 5.77% +25.00 bps
4:00 PM EDT, Fri Mar 20
Mean: 7.34%
Median: 6.75%
Min: 0.81% (May 2009)
Max: 18.82% (Dec 1917)
S&P 500 Earnings Yield. Earnings Yield = trailing 12 month earnings divided by index price (or inverse PE)

 

[L.K.Eder]

Your 64 % is not fallacious?

Correct, it is not. It could be used fallaciously, such as in a non sequitur that concludes the final morbidity rate would be 60%. But the number he stated is a fact.

Ok. I already stated that the number is technically correct. But there is no reasonable ground to use it at this time.

 

[Zander]

Probably 0.5-1.0%

Peaks mid-April.

Stocks are a buy

Stocks are a buy once the Dow drops to 12-15k which will happen after the unemployment spike

Possibly.

I can't time the market.

But I'm legging in as it goes lower.

Same here. I am buying on the down days in small tranches. Not trying to catch a bottom, or time the market, just taking advantage of irrational fear.

 

[JGalt]

Tot Cases/
1M pop
Germany
267
US
72

Irrelevant right now, as a direct comparison.. Stop that, you are being silly.

How is it irrelevant? Our population is much larger than theirs is. We had the first case, before them, yet we sit much lower on infection rate at this point in time.

Let's see where this ends up. So far it is a numbers game depending on number of tests performed. I merely brought this up to highlight the idiocy of your so called president who seems to be unable to process data and communicate clearly.

A higher number of tests is only going to make the mortality rate appear smaller.

Are you sure you secular progressive liberals want that?

OMFG...

TESTS do not make the mortality rate smaller. RECOVERIES make the mortality rate smaller.

And that --- AGAIN --- takes TIME.

A TEST does not tell you what a resolution will be. Only a death or a recovery does that.

OK then: Let's look at the percentage of recovered cases compared to the overall cases in China, where the virus has existed the longest:

71,740 recovered cases out of 81,008 confirmed cases.. That's a, 88.6% recovery rate.

You are probably under the false assumption that Communist China's medical system is far better than ours, which is probably why you're losing your shit.

Most people on the other hand, know better than that.

 

[DOTR]

I don't know what AM radio ass summa y'all continue to pull this from but the US death rate, at the moment, is 63%.

63%?

You better check your math there, Pythagoras

The actual mortality rate for the Chinese Wuhan Virus in the US is between 1.4% to 2%, which is far lower than the Flu.

Looks like the Democrats are gonna have to come up with a new disease or something.

Only a few months left before the election. but they did pivot from losing impeachment to blaming trump for a virus in under four months. So time for one more “crisis “ after this?

 

[JGalt]

I don't know what AM radio ass summa y'all continue to pull this from but the US death rate, at the moment, is 63%.

63%?

You better check your math there, Pythagoras

The actual mortality rate for the Chinese Wuhan Virus in the US is between 1.4% to 2%, which is far lower than the Flu.

Looks like the Democrats are gonna have to come up with a new disease or something.

Only a few months left before the election. but they did pivot from losing impeachment to blaming trump for a virus in under four months. So time for one more “crisis “ after this?

One more "crisis." But I doubt that they'll have enough time to come up with something as big as the "Great Wupocalypse of 2020."

Like everything else the secular progressive leftards had used as a sledgehammer against President Trump, this too has failed.

It's all over except for the wailing and moaning on election night.

 

[L.K.Eder]

I don't know what AM radio ass summa y'all continue to pull this from but the US death rate, at the moment, is 63%.

63%?

You better check your math there, Pythagoras

The actual mortality rate for the Chinese Wuhan Virus in the US is between 1.4% to 2%, which is far lower than the Flu.

Looks like the Democrats are gonna have to come up with a new disease or something.

Only a few months left before the election. but they did pivot from losing impeachment to blaming trump for a virus in under four months. So time for one more “crisis “ after this?

I know who pivoted from "reaction to virus a HOAX" to false comparison to H1N1 under Obama, to SOCIALISM.

 

[Pogo]

Irrelevant right now, as a direct comparison.. Stop that, you are being silly.

How is it irrelevant? Our population is much larger than theirs is. We had the first case, before them, yet we sit much lower on infection rate at this point in time.

Let's see where this ends up. So far it is a numbers game depending on number of tests performed. I merely brought this up to highlight the idiocy of your so called president who seems to be unable to process data and communicate clearly.

A higher number of tests is only going to make the mortality rate appear smaller.

Are you sure you secular progressive liberals want that?

OMFG...

TESTS do not make the mortality rate smaller. RECOVERIES make the mortality rate smaller.

And that --- AGAIN --- takes TIME.

A TEST does not tell you what a resolution will be. Only a death or a recovery does that.

OK then: Let's look at the percentage of recovered cases compared to the overall cases in China, where the virus has existed the longest:

71,740 recovered cases out of 81,008 confirmed cases.. That's a, 88.6% recovery rate.

Actually it's 96% when you insert the correct numbers. AS I ALREADY POSTED.

63%?

You better check your math there, Pythagoras

The actual mortality rate for the Chinese Wuhan Virus in the US is between 1.4% to 2%, which is far lower than the Flu.

Looks like the Democrats are gonna have to come up with a new disease or something.

The actual mortality rate has yet to be established --- it can't be without sufficient time --- but at the moment it's running at 64%. It went up a bit. As I and my link just laid out. What's 301 divided by 472 on your planet?

No idea where you're coming up with your numbers. 308 deaths out of 25,471 cases in the US. That comes out to 1.2% no matter how you do the math.

Microsoft Bing COVID-19 Tracker

Unless you're using common core math, which explains alot.

That's because you can't read.

You DON'T COUNT 25,471 cases whose outcome you DON"T KNOW. DUH!

If ten people go out to climb Mount Kilimanjaro, and three of them are found dead, and the other seven are unaccounted for, you do NOT have a mortality rate of 30%. If the other seven show up, THEN you do.

Understand?

Ok, dumbass: Let's look at where the virus has hit the worst, and has started to run its course:

3,255 deaths out of 81,008 confirmed cases in China. Do the math:

That's only a 4% mortality rate, Einstein. How about Italy?

4,825 fatalities out of 55,578 confirmed cases. That's a 9% mortality rate.

You are COMPLETELY ILLITERATE, aren'tchya little feller?

 

[depotoo]

I don't know what AM radio ass summa y'all continue to pull this from but the US death rate, at the moment, is 63%.

63%?

You better check your math there, Pythagoras

The actual mortality rate for the Chinese Wuhan Virus in the US is between 1.4% to 2%, which is far lower than the Flu.

Looks like the Democrats are gonna have to come up with a new disease or something.

Only a few months left before the election. but they did pivot from losing impeachment to blaming trump for a virus in under four months. So time for one more “crisis “ after this?

I know who pivoted from "reaction to virus a HOAX" to false comparison to H1N1 under Obama, to SOCIALISM.

He never called it a hoax.

 

[L.K.Eder]

I don't know what AM radio ass summa y'all continue to pull this from but the US death rate, at the moment, is 63%.

63%?

You better check your math there, Pythagoras

The actual mortality rate for the Chinese Wuhan Virus in the US is between 1.4% to 2%, which is far lower than the Flu.

Looks like the Democrats are gonna have to come up with a new disease or something.

Only a few months left before the election. but they did pivot from losing impeachment to blaming trump for a virus in under four months. So time for one more “crisis “ after this?

I know who pivoted from "reaction to virus a HOAX" to false comparison to H1N1 under Obama, to SOCIALISM.

He never called it a hoax.

Pavlov's bell, eh. Could not see the quotation marks, eh?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I don't know what AM radio ass summa y'all continue to pull this from but the US death rate, at the moment, is 63%.

63%?

You better check your math there, Pythagoras

The actual mortality rate for the Chinese Wuhan Virus in the US is between 1.4% to 2%, which is far lower than the Flu.

Looks like the Democrats are gonna have to come up with a new disease or something.

Only a few months left before the election. but they did pivot from losing impeachment to blaming trump for a virus in under four months. So time for one more “crisis “ after this?

I know who pivoted from "reaction to virus a HOAX" to false comparison to H1N1 under Obama, to SOCIALISM.

He never called it a hoax.

 

[Pogo]

Btw, USA has passed Germany in the confirmed infected count. Lol.

With less than a third of the population of the US.

That's right. But it is far from over. I monitored the numbers, and your president's rhetoric. When he blamed the virus on europe, and banned Europeans, but not the UK and Ireland, he sure liked the US numbers.

Then some testing started, lol.

Tot Cases/
1M pop
Germany
267
US
72

See where your post says 72 cases per 1M population?

A week ago that number was SIX.

See where that post refers to 72 per 1M population?

It's now 78. Forty minutes later.