How does it make a difference who called? If I call the cops on you and come after you with a knife I should be allowed to stab you because I called?
It would depend on who started the fight. She was in her own home, being attacked. (Although it isn't clear if the girls attacking her already lived there or came over to attack her.) If it was a white bubba with a gun, you'd be claiming self-defense.
The only one making the claim that Bryant was the one who called 911 was the non-custodial mother who was not there at the time. The caller said someone was attacking them with a knife. The police got there and Bryant was attacking two unarmed women with a knife. It really makes zero difference who called at that point; the attacker had to be stopped. But there's nothing at all that indicates that Bryant made the call; Bryant certainly didn't say so.
well, no, because the cop killed her without trying to sort it all out. Frankly, I look a that tape, and not only does everyone else there have a "What the **** did you do?" look, but the other cops had a 'WHat the **** did you do?" Look.
Are you suggesting that increased murder rates are due to the McDonald ruling instead of no-bail releases of violent criminals, DAs who refuse to prosecute violent criminals, and judges and prisons who release those few who did get charged without serving any meaningful terms?
I'm not suggesting it, I'm saying it straight up. McDonald let the Gun Industry flood our city with their product, and we went from 400 murders a year to 800 murders a year in less than a decade. Had nothing to do with Kim Fox getting rid of the bail system, becuase those murders spiked in 2016, when useless sack of shit Anita Alvarez was there.