contrast the two marches

[Avatar4321]

Look at the liberal women's march motivated by fear, anger, and even hatred toward Donald trump and the right.

Then look at the march for life which was motivated solely to protect the life and rights of someone else.

Which do you think persuaded more people? Which do you think did more to heal and unite people?

 

[buckeye45_73]

Not even cl,ose
The womens march was done by commies, feminists and abortion lovers who ironically are very dirty, nasty and leave tons of trash.
Right to Life march is done by people who actually care about others and their cause and are not nearly as nasty as the libs.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Avatar and buckeye are both wrong.

Feminism and its changing movement reaching across the center to the right may well break Trump.

 

[Stratford57]

The freaky women's march aim was to divide the country even more. As long as Soros sponsors the event, one doesn't even have to speculate about its goals.

The danger of such crazy anti- Trump crowds is: you have the crowd and the police next to each other. Add a sniper or two, shooting several people from both sides, and next thing you have is a coup. The Ukrainian coup started the same way and Soros was sponsoring it as well.

Trump supporters, be very alert, please.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Avatar and buckeye are both wrong.

Feminism and its changing movement reaching across the center to the right may well break Trump.

They are not reaching across, they kicked out pro lifers and are adamant on abortion, learn politics bro.

 

[OldLady]

Look at the liberal women's march motivated by fear, anger, and even hatred toward Donald trump and the right.

Then look at the march for life which was motivated solely to protect the life and rights of someone else.

Which do you think persuaded more people? Which do you think did more to heal and unite people?

The Pro-Life march didn't change anyone's mind or heal and unite anyone. You are in a dream world if you think they did/

 

[Avatar4321]

Avatar and buckeye are both wrong.

Feminism and its changing movement reaching across the center to the right may well break Trump.

It's difficult to reach across to the right when you tell them not to come

 

[BlueGin]

Avatar and buckeye are both wrong.

Feminism and its changing movement reaching across the center to the right may well break Trump.

The womens march reduced women to only being relevant because of vaginas. They had no other message. Waaaah we want tax free tampons....waaaah....period blood .....waaahhh....look at us...we can dress as vaginas. And they did not reach across party lines. Infact they excluded the other side.

Talk about sexist.

 

[bodecea]

Look at the liberal women's march motivated by fear, anger, and even hatred toward Donald trump and the right.

Then look at the march for life which was motivated solely to protect the life and rights of someone else.

Which do you think persuaded more people? Which do you think did more to heal and unite people?

Which one was much bigger? And the women's march was not "motivated by fear, anger and hatred".....that's your strawman.

 

[bodecea]

Avatar and buckeye are both wrong.

Feminism and its changing movement reaching across the center to the right may well break Trump.

The womens march reduced women to only being relevant because of vaginas. They had no other message. Waaaah we want tax free tampons....waaaah....period blood .....waaahhh....look at us...we can dress as vaginas. And they did not reach across party lines. Infact they excluded the other side.

Talk about sexist.

^ Why we marched.

 

[pillars]

I attended the women's march. It was not pro-abortion, it was pro providing women with resources to prevent pregnancy. Abortion should always be a last resort, or as Bill Clinton once said, "Safe, legal and rare."

No one at the women's march was promoting abortion; that is simply ridiculous. They were promoting CHOICE. The idea that women should be able to choose their own reproductive path, and have access to healthcare to prevent the need for abortions entirely. No woman wants to have to have an abortion, it's a horrible thing. And the sad thing is that abortions could be eliminated almost entirely if we focused on giving women access to effective contraception, like IUDs, depo provera, etc.

That is what has happened in most other westernized nations.

For example, planned parenthood DOES NOT RECEIVE PUBLIC FUNDS FOR ABORTION. So, cutting funds to planned parenthood WILL NOT REDUCE ABORTIONS, only INCREASE THEM, as poor women lose access to resources to prevent pregnancy.

In this sense, "pro-life" support for eliminating planned parenthood is actually anti-life, because it will result in more unplanned pregnancies.

Pro-Life is a misnomer, because most anti-abortionists don't give a fuck about life except pre-born life.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Ah, so my march was better than your march? Man, no wonder americans are so feckless in dealing with a corrupt political and economc system.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Look at the liberal women's march motivated by fear, anger, and even hatred toward Donald trump and the right.

Then look at the march for life which was motivated solely to protect the life and rights of someone else.

Which do you think persuaded more people? Which do you think did more to heal and unite people?

You don't think 'Abortion is murder' is an angry slogan?

What about blowing up abortion clinics?

 

[sakinago]

Avatar and buckeye are both wrong.

Feminism and its changing movement reaching across the center to the right may well break Trump.

Really?? The same women's march that denied pro life women's group to march is reaching across to right?

Women's March Reverses Itself on Granting Pro-Life Group Partnership

You're living in a fantasy world, wake up to reality. The left IS the most intolerant group to ideas that are not their own. From a group that preaches tolerance, they sure have a hard time accepting the idea that a large group of people wants secure boarders for a reason other than racism or xenophobia. They have hard time accepting that there are people out there (with actual science on their side) who believe that a fetus is a separate human life, yet the left want to tell themselves these people just want to see women suffer. And the left also happens to believe that wanting to lower government dependency is just racism in hiding. Oh and not to mention that if you are republican, to left, you just want tax breaks for the rich, and to turn our rivers into toxic waste dumps.

 

[Little-Acorn]

Look at the liberal women's march motivated by fear, anger, and even hatred toward Donald trump and the right.
Then look at the march for life which was motivated solely to protect the life and rights of someone else.
Which do you think persuaded more people? Which do you think did more to heal and unite people?

Without doubt, the liberal march persuaded a LOT more people. In part because it got far more press coverage than the Right to Life march.

The liberal march persuaded a LOT of people that the liberals are whiners and crybabies, who throw major mass temper tantrums over things they cannot do anything about, without even a clear goal of what they want to accomplish. Cursing, swearing, putting on obscene chants, calling names, and telling ludicrous lies about Republicans continuously, but basically accomplishing nothing.

Keep up the good work, libbies!

 

[Avatar4321]

Look at the liberal women's march motivated by fear, anger, and even hatred toward Donald trump and the right.

Then look at the march for life which was motivated solely to protect the life and rights of someone else.

Which do you think persuaded more people? Which do you think did more to heal and unite people?

Which one was much bigger? And the women's march was not "motivated by fear, anger and hatred".....that's your strawman.

Actually yes it was. Would it have happened if anyone but Donald trump became president last week? It was a reaction based on fear and anger of him being elected. And the hate was clearly on display

 

[Papageorgio]

Avatar and buckeye are both wrong.

Feminism and its changing movement reaching across the center to the right may well break Trump.

It didn't reach across the center, it was women who didn't vote for Trump, no one else.

 

[jknowgood]

Avatar and buckeye are both wrong.

Feminism and its changing movement reaching across the center to the right may well break Trump.

Trump will be you president for at least the next four years, get over it.

 

[Avatar4321]

Look at the liberal women's march motivated by fear, anger, and even hatred toward Donald trump and the right.

Then look at the march for life which was motivated solely to protect the life and rights of someone else.

Which do you think persuaded more people? Which do you think did more to heal and unite people?

You don't think 'Abortion is murder' is an angry slogan?

What about blowing up abortion clinics?

How is stating a fact anger?

Who at the march blew up any abortion clinics? What clinics were blown up yesterday?

 

[Avatar4321]

Look at the liberal women's march motivated by fear, anger, and even hatred toward Donald trump and the right.
Then look at the march for life which was motivated solely to protect the life and rights of someone else.
Which do you think persuaded more people? Which do you think did more to heal and unite people?

Without doubt, the liberal march persuaded a LOT more people. In part because it got far more press coverage than the Right to Life march.

The liberal march persuaded a LOT of people that the liberals are whiners and crybabies, who throw major mass temper tantrums over things they cannot do anything about, without even a clear goal of what they want to accomplish. Cursing, swearing, putting on obscene chants, calling names, and telling ludicrous lies about Republicans continuously.

Keep up the good work, libbies!

I should have been clearer. Who persuaded more people to their cause?