Context Is Everything

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,898
60,271
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
1. There are lies of commission, and lies of omission. Today's Trivia.com question represents one of those examples of how thinking is manipulated even when facts are provided.
The Progressives/Democrats/Liberals of the 20th century was strongly allied with the totalitarians, both in Germany and in the Soviet Union.
When the horrors of the Holocaust were revealed, they needed to dissociate themselves with the Fascists, and, paint the Right as being Nazis.



2. Now...take the Holocaust as an example....although one American President actually authorized concentration camps for his citizens, and while Nazis, Fascists, and Communists were once one big, comfortable association with American Progressives and that very same President, with the unveiling of the catalogue of Nazi crimes, caused American Progressives to suddenly claim that....no, Nazis were not really of the Left...they had to be the very opposite.
The Nazis were as much socialists as the Bolsheviks and today's Democrats.


3. "American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



4. We find that control of the dissemination of information allows the Communists to be portrayed in a sympathetic light. Today, Trivia.com's question is which country lost the greatest number of its citizens in WWII.


aug82021-1.jpg


"Answer: World War II was the deadliest military conflict in history in terms of total dead, with some 75 million casualties including military and civilians, many of whom died due to genocide, massacres, mass bombings, disease, and starvation. The Soviet Union lost around 27 million people during the war, including 8.7 million military and 19 million civilians. This represents the most military deaths of any nation by a large margin. The People's Republic of China estimates 20 million deaths from the conflict and approximately 8 million deaths in Germany."




5. Here's what they leave out:

World War II left over 27 million Soviet citizens dead....but only a fraction of them were killed by the Germans. Yet throughout the West. 'war crimes' is a phrase only attached to the Nazis. When the Red Army marched, an NKVD army marched behind, with its own tanks, machine guns, firing forward....never allowing retreat. More than a million Soviet citizens joined the Nazis. Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army.​

"The Secret Betrayal" by Nikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.​

The Soviet Union killed more than twenty million men, women and children.​


This compassionate slant on Communism is why neo-Marxist Democrat Party has been so successful in America.
 
Last edited:
Once again we find that those who disagree can do no better than 'is not, isssssssss noooooottttttt!!!!!!!!"



We are witnessing the success of government schooling.


1628431840581.png
 
LOL! You dumb fucking Trumper!


This is the way you were spoken to growing up???

So very sad.


Perhaps if you had an education, were more well read, you might be better equipped and less relegated to the trailer park level of response.
 
PoliticalChic LOL! Webster was my buddy growing up. You need to be dipped in dirty frying oil twice a day to keep up with me. You Kunt.


It's obvious you can't compete, and substitute vulgarity for any sort of intellectual ability.


I already note how sad it is.....what more is there to say.
 
The Mail Order Bride from Hell is still trying to claim the Nazis were liberal?

View attachment 523119
I see the governor of my state pushing freedoms and yet we get the propaganda from Progs. Near every blue state has had fascist/communist responses to Covid. They have promoted mass violence on their territories. Progs hurting and killing mostly other Progs. Looting store after store and committing arson in a methodical way. Making heroes out of scum while tearing down statues and removing art from those who they condemn as scum. For decades people have been educated by radical thoughts and programs. Progs used a virus and violence and shady voting to steal an election. And all that has happened is that the greatest experiment in human history has been weakened. Forever jow, we will get weaker and weaker as people revolt in their own ways and not care so much but for local areas or areas that have the same way of living.
 
Clearly there is no cogent response to the facts in the OP.

But providing the truth is only half of the mission.

Commensurate education is the other half.



And here it is.

The antidote to the lies about geopolitical reality imposed by government schooling and the state media is a documentary praised by even the Leftist Economist.


Livingscoop.com

Livingscoop.com









"The Soviet Story," an award winning documentary clarifying the close and personal attachments of Hitler's Nazis and Stalin's Communists.

"Soviet Story" is the most powerful antidote yet to the sanitisation of the past. The film is gripping, audacious and uncompromising. [...] The main aim of the film is to show the close connections—philosophical, political and organisational—between the Nazi and Soviet systems."
Telling the Soviet story
 
... The Nazis were ... socialists ...

National-socialism is not socialism. This name was made before Hitler overtook this political party and made it to his own personal property. It had been a very successless party. The name had been "DAP" (Deutsche Arbeiter Partei) and was renamed in February 24th 1920 in NSDAP - National-Sozialistische DAP. At this point Hitler had been a member of this political party and to understand this step is very easy understandable: They tried to get votes from the right (=national) and the left (=socialistic) spectrum. With other words: Hitlers party tried to get votes from everyone. And the best translation of NSDAP in the English speaking world could be indeed just simple "Hitlers Party". And Hitlers party fought all other political parties not with democratic and normal political methods but with existential methods - specially Hitlers party fought also the Russian Soviets in war.

So and now I have to warn you and I hope you understand this warning. I saw once a film about the so called 3rd empire in Germany. In this film the little son of a party member of the NSDAP asked his daddy: "Dad, what's the party program of the NSDAP?" The father was for a moment confused - then he said: "The party program of the NSDAP is Adolf Hitler".

So what was the party program of the Republicans in the last elections in the USA? Exactly: There was none. Why? Because the party program of the Republicans had been "Donald Trump". This gives anything else than a good feeling for the future of the new Republican party under Donald Trump and the future of the USA.

 
Last edited:
National-socialism is not socialism. This name was made before Hitler overtook this political party and made it to his own personal property. It had been a very successless party. The name had been "DAP" (Deutsche Arbeiter Partei) and was renamed in February 24th 1920 in NSDAP - National-Sozialistische DAP. At this point Hitler had been a member of this political party and to understand this step is very easy understandable: They tried to get votes from the right (=national) and the left (=socialistic) spectrum. With other words: Hitlers party tried to get votes from everyone. And the best translation of NSDAP in the English speaking world could be indeed just simple "Hitlers Party". And Hitlers party fought all other political parties not with democratic and normal political methods but with existential methods - specially Hitlers party fought also the Russian Soviets in war.

So and now I have to warn you and I hope you understand this warning. I saw once a film about the so called 3rd empire in Germany. In this film the little son of a party member of the NSDAP asked his daddy: "Dad, what's the party program of the NSDAP?" The father was for a moment confused - then he said: "The party program of the NSDAP is Adolf Hitler".

So what was the party program of the Republicans in the last elections in the USA? Exactly: There was none. Why? Because the party program of the Republicans had been "Donald Trump". This gives anything else than a good feeling for the future of the new Republican party under Donald Trump and the future of the USA.



"National-socialism is not socialism. This name was made before Hitler overtook this political party..." blah blah blah....


Exactly as outlined in the OP.....

....the simpletons tricked into supporting socialism, the Nazis, try their hardest to avoid the truth.




A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.(Article provided in the film)

Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika. (18:30)

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists." Vladimir Bukovsky.

The film goes on to show a series of Nazi and Russian propaganda posters....except for the language, almost identical.


1628446269799.png





Nazis, Bolsheviks, Democrats......socialists all.
 
Seems there are an abundance of suckers who need to swear by the propaganda.....denying that the Nazis weren't the very same socialists that their Democrats are....
So....I'll have to bury 'em......

Let's see the programs of those National SOCIALIST German Worker's Party:


Government spending as a percentage of GDP averaged around 40% pre-war. Additionally (at least in the beginning) 80% of the budget was spent on social programs, not the hallmark of an "evil, right wing, capitalist economy." Sign in



-------------------------------------------------------------

Workers Welfare Programs:


In the best passage of Government largess, the Nazi regime fostered a purified liberal concept to enhance the living standard of German citizens across all segments of society. In order to stimulate the spirit of integrity, comradeship and happiness, Adolf Hitler fanned numerous programs and instituted strict rules for officials to carry them in eternal way.

a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.

b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.

c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

d) 5 day week.

e) Free Public Health.

f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.

g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools

h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either.






1933-1945: In 1933 Hitler disbands the labor movement and strips Jews of citizenship. Jews, dissidents, and other minorities are put in concentration camps, where they are forced to work or killed outright. The Reich centralizes social programs and education as a means of control. The regime extends health insurance to retirees in 1941, and expands health care and maternity leave the following year. Commanding Heights : Germany | on PBS



During the 12 years of Hitler’s Third Reich, the National Socialists expanded and extended the welfare state to the point where over 17 million German citizens were receiving assistance under the auspices of the National Socialist People's Welfare (NSV) by 1939, an agency that had projected a powerful image of caring and support. Welfare state - Wikipedia







The Nazi rule under Adolf Hitler in the 1930s and 1940s led to an improvement in medical care and old age provision largely financed by high taxes on the wealthy, and theft from Jews and the people of the conquered territories (Aly 2007, 7). The Viability of the European Social Model: The German Welfare State and Labor Market Reform











The Nationalsozialistische Volkswohlfahrt (NSV), meaning "National Socialist People's Welfare", was a social welfare organization during the Third Reich. The NSV was established in 1933,.... The NSV became established as the single Nazi Party welfare organ in May 1933.[1] .... the programme was massively expanded, so that the régime deemed it worthy to be called the "greatest social institution in the world." One method of expansion was to absorb, or in NSDAP parlance coordinate, already existing but non-Nazi charity organizations. NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1939, second only to the German Labor Front.

The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a “people’s community” where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated “8,000 day-nurseries” by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a “wide variety of other facilities.”[4]

The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941[5] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible “for travellers’ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; ‘support’ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.”

These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans “the highest possible standard of living.” National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia
 
"National-socialism is not socialism. This name was made before Hitler overtook this political party..." blah blah blah....


Exactly as outlined in the OP.....

....the simpletons tricked into supporting socialism, the Nazis, try their hardest to avoid the truth.




A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.(Article provided in the film)

Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika. (18:30)

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists." Vladimir Bukovsky.

The film goes on to show a series of Nazi and Russian propaganda posters....except for the language, almost identical.


View attachment 523199




Nazis, Bolsheviks, Democrats......socialists all.

Very clear: Many of my family members were murderd from Nazis. I inform you about a very serios fact: This form of political propaganda which you use here is independet from any facts a form of propaganda which was structurally also used from the Commies and the Nazis of the past - what leaded here im Germany to violent street fights between left (Commies) and right (Nazis) - and what had weakend the young democracy of Weimar so it broke down. I expect from you to stop such forms of propaganda. See the fight between Republicans and Democrats more as a kind of sports with the basic rule "fair play". The Democrats of the USA have absolutelly nothing to do with the historical Nazis. Think about why it is for a whole society important to keep the 9th commandement: "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour" (Exodus 20:16). And think about that you are in danger of hell if you continue this wrong way. And don't think you are able to force me to discuss about Nazis. I inform you: that's all.

 
Last edited:
Very clear: Many of my family members were murderd from Nazis. I inform you about a very serios fact: This form of political propaganda which you use here is independet from any facts a form of propaganda which was structurally also used from the Commies and the Nazis of the past - what leaded here im Germany to violent street fights between left (Commies) and right (Nazis) - and what had weakend the young democracy of Weimar so it broke down. I expect from you to stop such forms of propaganda. See the fight between Republicans and Democrats more as a kind of sports with the basic rule "fair play". The democrats of the USA have absolutelly nothing to do with the historical Nazis. Think about why it is for a whole society important to keep the 9th commandement: "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour" (Exodus 20:16). And think about that you are in danger of hell if you continue this wrong way. And don't think you are able to force me to discuss about Nazis. I inform you: that's all.




I post nothing but facts.

Linked, sourced, documented facts.

There is nary 1° of difference between any of the socialists.....Nazis, Bolsheviks, or Democrats.


Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists, Democrats
The collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

The Democrats check every one of those boxes.



They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."




du bist ein esel
 
"National-socialism is not socialism. This name was made before Hitler overtook this political party..." blah blah blah....

Oh by the way: If you had spoken so in front of me then you had got a slab in the face by saying so - and afterwards I had been desperated how I was able to forget that a man never should beat a woman. This is obsolete since more than 1600 years. But you are no woman, isn't it? And I inform you about something else. One day when Donald Trump was president of the USA I had a serios problem with a suddenly appearing philosophical question: If I had a weapon (I never used a weapon in my life and nearly never I killed an animal) - so again the question: If I had a weapon and I would be in the same room like Donald Trump: Would it be my duty to eliminate this man forever, because he is a danger for the survival of all mankind? I never was able to find a valid answer. Fortunatelly he is not president of the USA any longer. Well done. And I have absolutelly not any problem to let it be in this way. I'm able to live with open questions.
 
I post nothing but facts.

Linked, sourced, documented facts.

There is nary 1° of difference between any of the socialists.....Nazis, Bolsheviks, or Democrats.


Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists, Democrats
The collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

The Democrats check every one of those boxes.



They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."




du bist ein esel
no comment
 
Oh by the way: If you had spoken so in front of me then you had got a slab in the face by saying so - and afterwards I had been desperated how I was able to forget that a man never should beat a woman. This is obsolete since more than 1600 years. But you are no woman, isn't it? And I inform you about something else. One day when Donald Trump was president of the USA I had a serios problem with a suddenly appearing philosophical question: If I had a weapon (I never used a weapon in my life and nearly never I killed an animal) - so again the question: If I had a weapon and I would be in the same room like Donald Trump: Would it be my duty to eliminate this man forever, because he is a danger for the survival of all mankind? I never was able to find a valid answer. Fortunatelly he is not president of the USA any longer. Well done. And I have absolutelly not any problem to let it be in this way. I'm able to live with open questions.



"Oh by the way: If you had spoken so in front of me then you had got a slab in the face by saying so -"


I'd beat you like a red-headed step-child....

The beatings would continue until I see the light of learning on your part….and then they will continue for the sheer joy of it.



Democrats, Nazis, Bolsheviks......socialists all.

And you....a dunce.
 

Forum List

Back
Top