Conservatives: What spending cuts do the Freedom Caucus members want?

odanny

Diamond Member
May 7, 2017
16,953
13,492
2,290
Midwest - Trumplandia
What spending cuts are the 19 members of the House Freedom Caucus wanting from Speaker Johnson and the GOP? Perhaps some of the cuts they want are reasonable and justifiable, but I don't know what these folks are all about.




WASHINGTON – House lawmakers abruptly went home a day early partially due to a familiar sight for the House Republican conference: a rebellion from the lower chamber’s most conservative lawmakers.

The quick departure came just one day after passing a short-term stopgap measure to avert a government shutdown.

Some 19 Republicans, mostly comprised of members of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus, tanked a procedural vote Wednesday morning. The procedural vote – referred to as a rule vote – has traditionally passed along party lines regardless of any member’s support or opposition to the bill’s rule.

House conservatives, however, have broken that precedent multiple times this year, illustrating how unwieldy the deeply divided GOP majority is for newly installed House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La.

Hard-right lawmakers shot down the rule vote this time around partly out of retaliation for Johnson’s funding plan – referred to as a continuing resolution – that cleared the House Tuesday. Those members have clamored for past months that any funding legislation include deep spending cuts, but Johnson’s bill was considered “clean” for retaining government funding at current levels.


Among their other grievances was opposition to a slate of amendments on one of the 12 appropriations bills needed to fund the government long-term.

“There’s certainly a concern with the bill itself in addition to concern relative to what happened with the (continuing resolution) yesterday,” said Rep. Bob Good, R-Va., a member of the Freedom Caucus who voted against the rule.

Chair of the Freedom Caucus, Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., contended that he and his conservative colleagues killed the rule vote out of “good faith” in pursuit of conservative policy wins.



 
What spending cuts are the 19 members of the House Freedom Caucus wanting from Speaker Johnson and the GOP? Perhaps some of the cuts they want are reasonable and justifiable, but I don't know what these folks are all about.




WASHINGTON – House lawmakers abruptly went home a day early partially due to a familiar sight for the House Republican conference: a rebellion from the lower chamber’s most conservative lawmakers.

The quick departure came just one day after passing a short-term stopgap measure to avert a government shutdown.

Some 19 Republicans, mostly comprised of members of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus, tanked a procedural vote Wednesday morning. The procedural vote – referred to as a rule vote – has traditionally passed along party lines regardless of any member’s support or opposition to the bill’s rule.

House conservatives, however, have broken that precedent multiple times this year, illustrating how unwieldy the deeply divided GOP majority is for newly installed House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La.

Hard-right lawmakers shot down the rule vote this time around partly out of retaliation for Johnson’s funding plan – referred to as a continuing resolution – that cleared the House Tuesday. Those members have clamored for past months that any funding legislation include deep spending cuts, but Johnson’s bill was considered “clean” for retaining government funding at current levels.


Among their other grievances was opposition to a slate of amendments on one of the 12 appropriations bills needed to fund the government long-term.

“There’s certainly a concern with the bill itself in addition to concern relative to what happened with the (continuing resolution) yesterday,” said Rep. Bob Good, R-Va., a member of the Freedom Caucus who voted against the rule.

Chair of the Freedom Caucus, Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., contended that he and his conservative colleagues killed the rule vote out of “good faith” in pursuit of conservative policy wins.



total reduction down to zero. They don’t really care if there is a central government...their brand is anarchy.
 
Personally: everything. Fire up chainsaws and start slashing.
Neither side has enough political power to carry out a strictly partisan spending reduction plan

so year after year congress and the president just keep borrowing money instead of fixing the problem
 
Last edited:
In 2022 about 20% the fed budget was borrowed money

That cannot be sustained

Anyone who thinks otherwise is either stupid or insane
 
Yep, 3% a year for 5 years.
Nope, 15% the first year and 5% each year after till 25% is reached then they can reevaluate.

WTF is up with your 5-year crap anyway?....You think you are Stalin with a 5-year plan or some shit?

Every dem shill wants a 5-year plan so (if out of office in the 5th year) their party can't be blamed if it goes south.
 
Nope, 15% the first year and 5% each year after till 25% is reached then they can reevaluate.

WTF is up with your 5-year crap anyway?....You think you are Stalin with a 5-year plan or some shit?

Every dem shill wants a 5-year plan so (if out of office in the 5th year) their party can't be blamed if it goes south.

What the fuck are you talking about, find me one fucking Dems calling for a 3% cut each year for 5 years.

I will wait while you look.
 
and year after year you all keep voting them back into office
Instead of voting for some 3rd party druggie that you like?

The swamp rats survive because voters like you walk away without giving either point of view a clear majority
 
Yep, 3% a year for 5 years.
3% is too much in my opinion

Remove all automatic increases and then reduce spending 1% each year across the board in every program with no exceptions

Btw: it must be all budget items rather than targeted reductions

Everyone must contribute
 
Instead of voting for some 3rd party druggie that you like?

The swamp rats survive because voters like you walk away without giving either point of view a clear majority

The swamp rats thrive because you vote for them every election.

3% is too much in my opinion

Remove all automatic increases and then reduce spending 1% each year across the board in every program with no exceptions

You could save 5% across the board by merely getting away from the "use it or get less money next year" mentality that is the US Fed Govt.

Btw: it must be all budget items rather than targeted reductions

Everyone must contribute

Yep, every single Agency gets 3% less next year and they choose what to cut. Do that for 5 years.
 
What spending cuts are the 19 members of the House Freedom Caucus wanting from Speaker Johnson and the GOP? Perhaps some of the cuts they want are reasonable and justifiable, but I don't know what these folks are all about.




WASHINGTON – House lawmakers abruptly went home a day early partially due to a familiar sight for the House Republican conference: a rebellion from the lower chamber’s most conservative lawmakers.

The quick departure came just one day after passing a short-term stopgap measure to avert a government shutdown.

Some 19 Republicans, mostly comprised of members of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus, tanked a procedural vote Wednesday morning. The procedural vote – referred to as a rule vote – has traditionally passed along party lines regardless of any member’s support or opposition to the bill’s rule.

House conservatives, however, have broken that precedent multiple times this year, illustrating how unwieldy the deeply divided GOP majority is for newly installed House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La.

Hard-right lawmakers shot down the rule vote this time around partly out of retaliation for Johnson’s funding plan – referred to as a continuing resolution – that cleared the House Tuesday. Those members have clamored for past months that any funding legislation include deep spending cuts, but Johnson’s bill was considered “clean” for retaining government funding at current levels.


Among their other grievances was opposition to a slate of amendments on one of the 12 appropriations bills needed to fund the government long-term.

“There’s certainly a concern with the bill itself in addition to concern relative to what happened with the (continuing resolution) yesterday,” said Rep. Bob Good, R-Va., a member of the Freedom Caucus who voted against the rule.

Chair of the Freedom Caucus, Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., contended that he and his conservative colleagues killed the rule vote out of “good faith” in pursuit of conservative policy wins.



You are confused because you approve the process and think it must be the specifics. WRONG>
Let's take 3 histtorically wrong, illegal, unconstituional spending problems

1) PRogressive administrative state spending its asss off with no oversight. EPA, CFPB,
Federal Election Commission
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (DOE)
Federal Housing Finance Agency
Federal Insurance Office
Federal Labor Relations Authority
Federal Maritime Commission
2) Peolois's massive OMNIBUS BILLS, so big that you can and do hide 100's of millinos of pork barrel waste
3) Pelosi bypassing House Committees to force bills throuh

AND THE TOTAL DECOUPLING OF TAXES FROM SPENDING , never a good thing to the Founders


_
 
The swamp rats thrive because you vote for them every election.



You could save 5% across the board by merely getting away from the "use it or get less money next year" mentality that is the US Fed Govt.



Yep, every single Agency gets 3% less next year and they choose what to cut. Do that for 5 years.
3% is pretty radical

1% is more realistic and doable
 
You must know thats a lie

The growth of government must stop before its too late
Anyone who wants to cut government spending needs to be specific about which programs he wants to cut or eliminate. Every item in the budget has a powerful constituency to protect it. The largest and most expensive programs are the post popular.
 
In 2022 about 20% the fed budget was borrowed money

That cannot be sustained

Anyone who thinks otherwise is either stupid or insane
The debt problem has been caused by the fact that whenever Republicans have the power to do so they cut taxes for the rich and raise military spending.
 

Forum List

Back
Top