Conservatives: Do You Give

[bodecea]

For the reasons I just stated in the above post.

This is really about pushing the NAMBLA agenda to get society to accept homosexuals and pedophilia.

LOL, the NAMBLA agenda? LMAO. Awesome.

How does the "NAMBLA Agenda" affect you directly?

Wow, what a sick individual you must be. NAMBLA wants it to be legal to rape little boys. I would think all of society would have a problem with that. But, apparently there are exceptions....like you.

And NAMBLA = Gays, right?

 

[bodecea]

None.
What was your point again?

So, you have no real idea of what a gay pride parade consists of....you are just speaking from your prejudices against gay people.

Well, one in our town in Kansas some time back featured a troop of gay guys all wearing ENORMOUS stuffed penises strapped on and swinging back and forth as they marched. I thought this extremely inappropriate for a parade attended by ordinary people including kids and said so. So, incidentally, did my gay friends who did NOT participate in that kind of vulgarity.

We would not tolerate such from 'straight' people. Why should we tolerate such from 'gay' people? It isn't a double standard. It is cultural values of what is appropriate and what is not.

I was also running a large agency at that time which, among other things, included a life drawing class attended mostly by senior citizens. When my model called in sick at the last minute one day, I went down to a dance class in session--this was attended by a number of gay guys who were heavily active in our community theater and honed their dance skills at our place. "Fred" was openly gay and a hunk. I mean REALLY well built and very good looking. He agreed to stand in as a model, though it took some persuasion to keep him from removing ALL his clothes and giving the old ladies a real thrill.

What town in Kansas is that? And as for not tolerating that from straight people....have you ever been to a Mardi Gras parade? They tolerate that and a whole lot more....and yes, I've seen it myself.

 

[Liability]

Do you give a flying **** about homosexuals and how they live their lives?

This is a spin off of Dr House's comment to Jerkbert in the thread on conservative homosexuals.

nope. and they should be allowed to get married.

Or, at the very least, the STATE should get OUT of the business of involvement in the memorialization of the "status" of marriage.

 

[The Rabbi]

No no, it wouldn't be "extra benefits." Straight men would be allowed to marry other men as well and reap the same benefits.

You are exactly right!
So lets say Cuyo and I are old college friends. I lost my job and need medical care (this is supposing Obamacare hasn't eliminated employer sponsored coverage). He and I can just declare ourselves "married" and bango-- I get the benefit of his coverage. We don't have to touch dicks or anything.

Remind me how this is supposed to be good for society?

What in the world makes you think male/female "college friends" aren't doing that kind of thing already?



Thanks for PROVING another way that Straights get Special Rights that gay people don't get.

They are? This is a widespread problem? News to me.

 

[bodecea]

You are exactly right!
So lets say Cuyo and I are old college friends. I lost my job and need medical care (this is supposing Obamacare hasn't eliminated employer sponsored coverage). He and I can just declare ourselves "married" and bango-- I get the benefit of his coverage. We don't have to touch dicks or anything.

Remind me how this is supposed to be good for society?

What in the world makes you think male/female "college friends" aren't doing that kind of thing already?



Thanks for PROVING another way that Straights get Special Rights that gay people don't get.

They are? This is a widespread problem? News to me.

Define "widespread". It happens....they're called marriages of convenience....for many reasons...green cards, roommates, benefits....in the military for BAQ/BAS....

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Do you give a flying **** about homosexuals and how they live their lives?

This is a spin off of Dr House's comment to Jerkbert in the thread on conservative homosexuals.

People who practice homosexuality experience higher rates of many diseases, including:

Human Papillomavirus (HPV)
Hepatitis A, B and C
Gonorrhea
Syphillis
Gay Bowel syndrome
HIV/AIDS
Bacterial vaginosis

People who practice homosexuality have higher rates of:

Alcohol abuse
Drug abuse
Nicotine dependence
Depression
Suicide
Domestic violence (20 times more common than among heterosexuals)

In addition to a domestic violence rate that is 20 times higher than among heterosexuals, these are some of the negative effects homosexuality has on society:

Higher rates of child molestation*
(Nearly 1/3 of the child abuse cases are homosexual in nature, and homosexuals are only 3% of the population.)

Daughters of lesbian "parents" are more likely to engage in risky sexual behavior and experience the consequences of that behavior.

In areas in which homosexual marriage has become accepted (The Netherlands and areas of Scandinavia, for example), the fundamental building block of society--the family--has fallen apart. In some of these areas as many as 80% of the children are born outside of a family.

Children of homosexual "parents" do the worst in 9 of 13 acedemic categories when compared with both married heterosexual couples and cohabitating couples.

Homosexual behavior is linked with higher rates of promiscuity, physical disease, mental illness, substance abuse, child sexual abuse and domestic violence--all things that impact society negatively. Don't try to say homosexual behavior doesn't hurt society--it is a major force that tears down society and harms children.

Homosexuality Harms Society

Your source cracks me up....www.evangelical.us.....:rofl:

Yea that's all you can do is laugh because you certainly can't argue the facts presented. But that's what you liberal do.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

LOL, the NAMBLA agenda? LMAO. Awesome.

How does the "NAMBLA Agenda" affect you directly?

Wow, what a sick individual you must be. NAMBLA wants it to be legal to rape little boys. I would think all of society would have a problem with that. But, apparently there are exceptions....like you.

And NAMBLA = Gays, right?

Why yes it does.

Can you offer proof to the contrary?

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Do you give a flying **** about homosexuals and how they live their lives?

This is a spin off of Dr House's comment to Jerkbert in the thread on conservative homosexuals.

Nope sorry.

 

[theHawk]

Okay, let's test that theory.

A pedophile is an adult -- of either gender -- who sexually desires children so young, they have no secondary sex characteristics yet. With me so far? These people may have boyfriends or husbands, but those relationships are not satisfying, and many times are merely "covers" so they seem like everyone else and can better access prey.

You can call it evil or psychotic, but by whatever value system you apply, pedophilia is a life killing act against a child that society should and mostly does go to any length to eradicate. The people who pose the greatest risk to children are not strangers and they are certainly not gay men. They are pedophiles posing as straight, married men and women. Usually, they are known to the child's parents as extended family or friends.

A lesbian or gay man has no more sexual desire for a child than any normal straight person does. Many do have the same desire anyone else has to parent, by reproduction or adoption, and these rights should be respected, just as yours are.

"A lesbian or gay man has no more sexual desire for a child than any normal straight person does."
If this was true then the percentage of homosexual pedophiles in prison should reflect the same percentage of homosexuals in society.

For example, if homos make up 3% of all of society then according to you they should only make up 3% of convicted pedophiles.

Of course our government refuses to keep records on people that identify themselves as homosexual via census (even though they keep track of other ethnic and religious groups), and they don't keep good public records on convicted pedophiles. But if you look at independant studies and polls done, you'll easily find that the percentage of convicted homosexual pedophiles is vastly greater than the percentage of homos. Some studies have shown that 30% of convicted child molesters are homosexual. I'm sure you'll argue that there aren't any real accurate numbers do go by, and I would agree. But that is because the pro-homosexual agenda doesn't want us to know the numbers.
But, no matter how you cut it, if homos make up 2-10% of society, yet make up 20-45% of convicted pedophiles, then its quite clear homos are much more likely to molest children.

Do some research on your own, and make up your own mind. That is if you have an open mind on the subject.

Most pedophiles have only limited gender preferences as to prey, but they can more easily access children of the same sex. The body of a 5 year old boy compared to a girl is not all that different, and you'd be just as likely to find preferences for hair color as gender. What you are not getting here is that any adult who looks at a 5 year old with lust is not later going to glance at any adult with lust too.

This is seriously fucked brain wiring we are talking about, and these sick ***** are NOT (almost ever) openly GLBT. Gay, by definition, means sexual desire for an ADULT same sex partner.
And BTW, pedophilia is not limited to men, but crimes by women are way underreported.

That is YOUR definition, not THE definition of "gay" or "homosexual". Homosexuality is defined as:

2. erotic activity with another of the same sex
Homosexuality - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

It does not limit it to within a certain age. By your definition a man who is only attracted to male children isn't a homosexual.

There is no doubt we are talking about some seriously fucked brain wiring, whether or not they are "openly gay" or not is irrelivant.

 

[Immanuel]

You are exactly right!
So lets say Cuyo and I are old college friends. I lost my job and need medical care (this is supposing Obamacare hasn't eliminated employer sponsored coverage). He and I can just declare ourselves "married" and bango-- I get the benefit of his coverage. We don't have to touch dicks or anything.

Remind me how this is supposed to be good for society?

What in the world makes you think male/female "college friends" aren't doing that kind of thing already?



Thanks for PROVING another way that Straights get Special Rights that gay people don't get.

They are? This is a widespread problem? News to me.

I am not 100% certain what Bodecea is talking about here, but if it is what it sounds like and these couples are not actually married but just claiming to be, then I would think that constitutes fraud and could get them into trouble.

Immie

 

[bodecea]

People who practice homosexuality experience higher rates of many diseases, including:

Human Papillomavirus (HPV)
Hepatitis A, B and C
Gonorrhea
Syphillis
Gay Bowel syndrome
HIV/AIDS
Bacterial vaginosis

People who practice homosexuality have higher rates of:

Alcohol abuse
Drug abuse
Nicotine dependence
Depression
Suicide
Domestic violence (20 times more common than among heterosexuals)

In addition to a domestic violence rate that is 20 times higher than among heterosexuals, these are some of the negative effects homosexuality has on society:

Higher rates of child molestation*
(Nearly 1/3 of the child abuse cases are homosexual in nature, and homosexuals are only 3% of the population.)

Daughters of lesbian "parents" are more likely to engage in risky sexual behavior and experience the consequences of that behavior.

In areas in which homosexual marriage has become accepted (The Netherlands and areas of Scandinavia, for example), the fundamental building block of society--the family--has fallen apart. In some of these areas as many as 80% of the children are born outside of a family.

Children of homosexual "parents" do the worst in 9 of 13 acedemic categories when compared with both married heterosexual couples and cohabitating couples.

Homosexual behavior is linked with higher rates of promiscuity, physical disease, mental illness, substance abuse, child sexual abuse and domestic violence--all things that impact society negatively. Don't try to say homosexual behavior doesn't hurt society--it is a major force that tears down society and harms children.

Homosexuality Harms Society

Your source cracks me up....www.evangelical.us.....:rofl:

Yea that's all you can do is laugh because you certainly can't argue the facts presented. But that's what you liberal do.

I laugh at YOUR source as much as you would laugh if I sources MediaMatters or Huffington.

But, I don't expect you to get that. Which makes it even funnier.

 

[bodecea]

What in the world makes you think male/female "college friends" aren't doing that kind of thing already?



Thanks for PROVING another way that Straights get Special Rights that gay people don't get.

They are? This is a widespread problem? News to me.

I am not 100% certain what Bodecea is talking about here, but if it is what it sounds like and these couples are not actually married but just claiming to be, then I would think that constitutes fraud and could get them into trouble.

Immie

Nope...they are totally, legally married. Just because they marry for other reasons besides love doesn't make their marriages illegal. Only if they marry someone of the same gender (love or not)....then, except in a few states, it IS illegal.

 

[theHawk]

LOL, the NAMBLA agenda? LMAO. Awesome.

How does the "NAMBLA Agenda" affect you directly?

Wow, what a sick individual you must be. NAMBLA wants it to be legal to rape little boys. I would think all of society would have a problem with that. But, apparently there are exceptions....like you.

And NAMBLA = Gays, right?

Well what the **** would you call "Man-Boy" love?

 

[theHawk]

They are? This is a widespread problem? News to me.

I am not 100% certain what Bodecea is talking about here, but if it is what it sounds like and these couples are not actually married but just claiming to be, then I would think that constitutes fraud and could get them into trouble.

Immie

Nope...they are totally, legally married. Just because they marry for other reasons besides love doesn't make their marriages illegal. Only if they marry someone of the same gender (love or not)....then, except in a few states, it IS illegal.

Yes, and guess what, gays get married for the same reasons too! I knew a gay female and gay male in military that got married to each other so they could get the benefits.

 

[theHawk]

Only if they marry someone of the same gender (love or not)....then, except in a few states, it IS illegal.

Thats an outright lie. Gay marriage isn't illegal in any state. Name one gay couple that has been thrown in jail because of their "marriage".

 

[chanel]

I do not know nor care what consenting adults do in their own bedrooms. I know plenty of gays who are great people, and some who are pricks. Just like heteros. Imagine that.

I believe in civil unions, but not gay marriage. It's not a religious/moral issue for me. Just a semantic one. Marriage is between a man and woman. Bill Clinton said so.

Gay people can marry. But only to the opposite sex.

 

[kwc57]

Wow, what a sick individual you must be. NAMBLA wants it to be legal to rape little boys. I would think all of society would have a problem with that. But, apparently there are exceptions....like you.

And NAMBLA = Gays, right?

Well what the **** would you call "Man-Boy" love?

Pedaphilia.

 

[Gunny]

Do you give a flying **** about homosexuals and how they live their lives?

This is a spin off of Dr House's comment to Jerkbert in the thread on conservative homosexuals.

And homosexuality is about as current an event as dirt.

 

[bodecea]

blow me

I'd like to hurt theHawk. Can I? Huh? I'll pay good money for the privilege. Honest.

Wow, personal threats of violence.

You libs sure are tolerant of other people's opinions!

So, just because Madeline said that, you think we all agree with her on that?

 

[bodecea]

For the reasons I just stated in the above post.

This is really about pushing the NAMBLA agenda to get society to accept homosexuals and pedophilia.

blow me

No thanks, I'm not a homo.

Well, we DO have standards.