Most people don't go to jail over petty embezzlement... if that what was even going on here.
Which, frankly, it sounds like it wasn't.
Hmmmm... some lying pinhead on the internet or the St Johns County District Attorney.
Lemme' ask you, dipshit: Whose opinion do you think might actually matter?
Look, man, you know you keep changing your story and hiding the facts because they make you look bad. A person who was in the right could recite all the facts with no issues.
I've changed nothing, and you'd prove to be a failure, yet again, at showing how I have. If anything, I've added details.
And, again, as far as you not knowing those details, that's on you. I gave you a golden opportunity and you fucked it up...
No, I blame the company for not settling.
That's such bullshit.
Before the union declared the strike, these folks were able to pay their bills. It was only after the strike was called that shit hit the fan. Some people lost everything, and it happened only AFTER the ******* UNION called the strike...
And the fact that most Americans would have a problem with a $400.00 expense is an indictment of capitalism.
No it's not. It's an indictment of poor money management skills.
When I was 16 years old I had over $6,000 in my bank account. I had a myriad of jobs between my paper route at age 12 and working in a camera store at age 16. I learned about money management. I learned how to budget. I learned about investing and about making smart financial choices. Capitalism didn't keep me from having a spare $400 in the bank, it enabled it.
But taking care of yourself, and doing right by yourself, is a concept you'll never understand...
people like you think it's okay to pay working people poverty wages and how dare they go on strike for better wages.... you'll probably make someone like him inevitable.
My people are among the best paid in my industry. People get performance bonuses and regular raises. They get great benefits. They get plenty of PTO. My people are happy.
And they didn't need a union...
Except he didn't "steal" from you. He used an expense account you gave him to try to win business from one of your customers.
He did steal from me, and he wasn't trying to win business.
Again, had you not been an idiot, you'd know the facts. But the fact of the matter is that you STILL can't being yourself to say that stealing from an employer is never acceptable.
So, I guess along with being a ******* liar, you're also a piece of shit thief should the opportunity present itself...
Except not a lot of grocery workers lost their homes, and most of them came out better.
I see.
So it's okay that a few lost their homes?
You're such a ******* scumbag...
I blame the fact that for the last 40 years, people like you have been intent on dismantling the middle class, which is why most people have so little in savings.
Well, while I appreciate you comparing me to the likes of Albertson's, Ralph's, Von's and other SoCal grocery chains, I'm simply not as big as they are.
The people who work for me do very well. I see to that. You just can't wrap your pointed little head around the fact that a business owner like me can actually care about the people he employs...
Unions have the same purpose now that they've always had
You know, 300 years ago, a scythe had a specific purpose: to cut crops like wheat or grass. Today, April 16, 2021, the scythe has that exact same purpose.
No one actually needs a scythe today, though, simply because there are better, more efficient ways to do the job.
It's just like unions...
You see, the thing was, in the oldy days, you had unions, the rich paid high taxes.... and we were all better off for it.
Who do you consider "rich"?
Would you support a flat tax? You pay 20% of your income and I pay 20% of mine?
Can't be any more fair than that, right?
We had an honest to God middle class where people weren't living paycheck to paycheck, where people weren't driving Ubers because their day jobs don't pay enough, where most people weren't getting government assistance.
Did you even read the link I posted?
Things can't go on like this. This is what you guys on the right don't get. You think you can keep getting stupid white people to vote against their own economic interests by playing on the racial, religious and sexual fears, but that won't go on forever.
Not quite sure where you're going with your comment about playing on "racist religious and sexual fears". Likely, it's a sad attempt to further obfuscate the discussion in an attempt to move it away from the discussion you're currently failing miserably at...
