It says if you aren't willing to have gay sex, you are homophobic, then claims that's not what it meant.
Clearing Up Some Confusion About LGBT Issues
Clearing Up Some Confusion About LGBT Issues
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It says if you aren't willing to have gay sex, you are homophobic, then claims that's not what it meant.
Clearing Up Some Confusion About LGBT Issues
You cold make sense of that nonsense?
You cold make sense of that nonsense?
Yeah, no problem. You couldn't?
It may be hard for you to fathom, but being gay is about more than the genitalia of your sex partners.
It says if you aren't willing to have gay sex, you are homophobic, then claims that's not what it meant.
Clearing Up Some Confusion About LGBT Issues
You cold make sense of that nonsense?
Yeah, no problem. You couldn't?
It may be hard for you to fathom, but being gay is about more than the genitalia of your sex partners.
so then.........., you are gay ????????
I did a google news search for lgbt and it's one of the first stories
Provides lib insanity examples. For example if you followed the msm you'll find lots on gays being allowed to donate blood but all the stories on gays shunning condones and HIV infections increasing are buried in the gay sections of publications. Do you think those facts should be buried when decided on allowing gays to donate blood?
Provides lib insanity examples. For example if you followed the msm you'll find lots on gays being allowed to donate blood but all the stories on gays shunning condones and HIV infections increasing are buried in the gay sections of publications. Do you think those facts should be buried when decided on allowing gays to donate blood?
Since blood donations are tested for a variety of things, including HIV, it doesn't really matter.
Provides lib insanity examples. For example if you followed the msm you'll find lots on gays being allowed to donate blood but all the stories on gays shunning condones and HIV infections increasing are buried in the gay sections of publications. Do you think those facts should be buried when decided on allowing gays to donate blood?
Since blood donations are tested for a variety of things, including HIV, it doesn't really matter.
Provides lib insanity examples. For example if you followed the msm you'll find lots on gays being allowed to donate blood but all the stories on gays shunning condones and HIV infections increasing are buried in the gay sections of publications. Do you think those facts should be buried when decided on allowing gays to donate blood?
Since blood donations are tested for a variety of things, including HIV, it doesn't really matter.
You are a moron. HIV takes between 2 weeks and 6 months to be detectable in a blood test
Provides lib insanity examples. For example if you followed the msm you'll find lots on gays being allowed to donate blood but all the stories on gays shunning condones and HIV infections increasing are buried in the gay sections of publications. Do you think those facts should be buried when decided on allowing gays to donate blood?
Since blood donations are tested for a variety of things, including HIV, it doesn't really matter.
That's not the point.
For the OP and most on the right, the point is to remain willfully ignorant and hate gays.