Concerning White Crime

IM2

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Mar 11, 2015
77,002
34,234
2,330
I will use the FBI Uniform Crime Report crime offender data for 2020 to make my point. According to the 2020 Uniform Crime Report, there were 7,173,072 crime offenders in the United States. 3,642,932 whites, 2,122,038 blacks. Clearly, the numbers show that 1.5 million more whites were offenders than blacks. Whites were 51 percent of the criminal offenders in 2020. Blacks were 30 percent. In any circumstance, 51 percent is a majority. Instead of facing the problem of crime among whites, this is the answer:

3,642,932 #white offenders / 235,400,000 #American white population(2020) = 0.0154754970263381 x 100,000= 1,548 white offenders per capita.

2,122,038 #black violent offenders /46,900,000 #American black population(2020) =
0.045246012793177 x 100,000= 4,524 black offenders per capita.

Poof! As if by magic, a group that had 1.5 million more offenders suddenly now has less of a crime problem because instead of looking at the total number of crimes, crime is broken down into units of 100,000. If this is being done to guess the probability of the commission of a crime, logic shows us that if there are more whites than blacks, the probability of a crime committed by someone white is greater than it being done by someone black. If the crime in your community is so high that you must divide two numbers to get a percentage, then multiply it by 100,000 to claim that you don’t have serious problems, you have serious issues. Who decided that occurrences must be divided by 100,000? Why couldn’t it be 1? What happened to individualism? The excuse begins with whites being five times the population of blacks. I was told that since whites have five times the population, they must commit five times the number of crimes for the problem to be equal to what blacks are doing. “We are allowed to commit more crime because there are more of us.” If this is not lunacy, then what is?

The problem with this opinion is if you multiply things by 5 to make the populations the same, there are things that no longer exist for blacks. We would have more economic opportunities. We would have equal representation relative to numbers of police, lawyers, judges, and political representatives. Increased black representation affects public policy formation, law enforcement, and legislation. Crime would reduce because of the increased opportunities; wealth would increase, and poverty would be dramatically reduced. Things would be dramatically different. Yet to the racist, nothing else changes except that crime increases. The racist subculture continues arguing this ridiculous per capita idiocy no matter what. The use of per capita fails miserably and is used by the racist subculture to deny a severe crime problem THEY need to address instead of trying to preach to us.

The argument coming from the right is that since blacks are 13 percent of the population, blacks should be committing 13 percent of the crime. The problem with this claim is that percentages come attached with real numbers, and when you use those real numbers, the 13 percent excuse has no merit as an argument. In 2020, whites made up 51 percent of all criminal offenders.

Let’s return to the 2020 Uniform Crime Report Crime data I just presented. Again, in 2020, there were 7,173,072, crime offenders in the United States. That 7.1 million is 100 percent of the offenders in America. In 2020 according to the census, the U.S. population was 331,449,281.31 That number is 100 percent of the U.S. population. Out of 331,449,281 citizens, 7,173,072 people or 2.16 percent of the American population were criminal offenders. The 3,642,932 white offenders were 1.09 percent of the American population. The 2,122,038 black offenders were 0.6 percent of the American population. This is where the 13 percent excuse fails. Simple math shows the misuse of percentages. The 13 percent excuse uses the percentage of blacks committing a crime against the percentage of the black population instead of it being used to reflect the percentage of blacks committing a specific violation. The numbers here show that 13 percent of the American people are not committing 50 percent of the crime. Furthermore, they show that 1 percent of the population is 51 percent of the criminal offenders and they are not black.

In 2020 blacks led in arrests in 2 categories in the Uniform Crime Report, murder and robbery. I am not going to pretend this is a good thing, but let’s look at the arrest categories whites led in:

Rape, Aggravated assault, Burglary, Larceny-theft, Motor vehicle theft, Arson, Violent crime, Property crime, Other assaults, Forgery and counterfeiting, Fraud, Embezzlement, buying, receiving, and possessing stolen property, Vandalism, carrying, possessing, Weapons, Prostitution and commercialized vice, Sex offenses besides rape and prostitution, Drug abuse violations, Gambling, Offenses against the family and children, Driving under the influence, Liquor laws, Drunkenness, Disorderly conduct, Vagrancy, All other offenses (except traffic), Suspicion, Curfew and loitering law violations.

There are 30 categories of crime listed by the FBI in the Uniform crime reports, whites lead in 27-28 of those categories annually. Whites are arrested nearly 3 times more than blacks. Arrests are not made on a perc apita basis and whites have more interactions with police based on the numbers of arrests.

In 2020, Whites were 51 percent of the offenders for all crimes committed in America. A white offender committed Fifty-four percent of the crimes against persons. Whites committed most property crimes (42%) and crimes against society (65%). Seven out of every ten arrests for crimes in America is on someone white. Whites have a history of criminal behavior that started at the very beginning of this country. Whites have elected numerous criminals to make laws in this country. Whites organized crime and made it a corporate business. Whites control the manufacturing, shipment, and distribution of drugs in this country. Whites made two of the most destructive drugs legal, creating millions of addicted citizens. I am talking about alcohol and nicotine. Whites have embezzled and scammed people out of trillions of dollars in the years America has been a country. Whites control the manufacturing, shipping, sales, and distribution of deadly weapons in this country.

Per capita is used by racists as an excuse. You don't get a pass on crime just because there are more of you. Whites should not be anywhere near these kinds of numbers, but they are and excuses will not reduce the high crime among whites.

Federal Bureau of Investigation, Crime in the United States, Offenders by Race and Ethnicity, 2020, FBI Releases 2020 Incident-Based (NIBRS) Data | Federal Bureau of Investigation
 
3,642,932 whites, 2,122,038 blacks. Clearly, the numbers show that 1.5 million more whites were offenders than blacks. Whites were 51 percent of the criminal offenders in 2020. Blacks were 30 percent.

Spin it anyway you want, negro. You're never going to be able to show that a higher percentage of whites commit crimes than colored boys. Whites make up 58% of this country's population. Blacks are, what, 13%? As a percentage, the number of crimes committed by negroes is stunningly high.

Until you recognize that and acknowledge that, your idiot conversations will, rightfully, go nowhere...
 
1654543002419.png


Numbers don't lie so clean up the hoods and quit complaining because...

*****SMILE*****



:)
 
Whites are about 60% of the Population, Blacks are about 13% of the population yet they are responsible for about 1/3 of all crime in the country. I wonder why Disinformation2 didn't bring that up?

It amazes me how I'm2 can go from not understanding percentages to understanding them when it suits his narrative.
 
This is Brittanee Drexel.

1654512947413.png


She was a 17 year old white woman from NY state. She went missing in 2009 after she went to a party in South Carolina.

It was the typical missing white women of the week story.

SHE MUST FOUND !!!

They looked everywhere but had no real leads.

But in 2015 they thought they found their man in Timothy Taylor

1654513292772.png



You can imagine what this would do to Taylor and his family. A young white women presumed missing and a black man is the main suspect ?

Nothing and I mean NOTHING beefs up white rage and anger more than that

And this in South Carlina too ? Timothy Taylor's mum lost her job of 11 years and got death threats. They were put through hell

By the way here's another pic of Timothy Taylor

1654513586283.png


.Yes he has no left arm.

He lost it in a childhood aciident. So how anyone can be suspected of raping or killing anyone with one arm I don't know. But hey !!! He's black. So white and non blk society will believe anything about us.

The white authorities didn't have any evidence to link Timothy Taylor to Britenee Drexler (o what a suprise) but not to worry they just looked into Taylor's previous and he had served his time for robbery.

But that was at state level.

The FBI decided to put federal charges on him as a way to coerce him to confessing to a Drex;el murder. All he had to do is tell the FBI what happened or even make up story and he'd get a plea deal which even without a body would allow the feds to say "Case closed"

Taylor said he wasn't gonna do it.

So they gave up on railroading Taylor but they never told the public that he'd been ruled out as a suspect.

So he and his family carried on going through the same hell from the public

But the silence was deafening when they finally found the man who killed Brittanee Drexel

1654514358934.png



1654514580251.png


Raymon Moody is his name.

Notice that even though this white man kidnapped, raped and murdered Brittanee Drexel and led dectectives to her body they STILL put an innocent black man pic next to her

This Raymond Moddy had a long history which was not shown even after his confession. The white media just leaves out things that doesn't fit it's narrative..

But his rap sheet shows that

1654519235394.png


1654519318102.png


This white man in 1983, kidnapped, raped and sodomized an 8 year old girl and performed great bodily injury to her.

For all of that ? He should have been lifed off but he's white and got a 40 year sentence of which he only served 21

1654519665587.png


So this white man comes out jail in 2004 and let off parole in 2007. He could only keep his nose clean for under a year bcoz in 2008 he was charged with indecent exposure in south Carolina. That carries up to 3 years in shawshank (well it would have done had he been blk) but that charge was reduced to "Public Disorderly Conduct" ............Because of course it was.

Under a year later in 2009 Raymond Moody raped and murdered Brittanee Drexel

It was only last month in May, 13 years after the Britanee Drexel murder that the authorities finally got Raymond Moody

1654523706866.png


I remember this story in 2009.

I remember how Brittanee Drexel was the national story at the time and when Timothy Taylor's name was put out front ? The white authorities made sure his name was in the spotlight for as long as possible as they attempted to make him confess to a crime he didn't commit.

But now the real story of the white man who killed her is out notice how they don't even mention it and they're treating it as a local story /

White society does this all the time.

If the white authorities in 2009 would have focused on Raymond Moody the Britanee Drexel family would not have had to wait 13 years to see the murderer brought to justice.

In fact if the white authorities would have done there job at ANY point Brittanee Drexel would not have died

If Raymond Moody would have got the life sentence in 1983 that the crime of raping, sodomizing and kidnapping an 8 year girl really deserved ? Brittanee Drexel would still be alive..

Hell even if they made Raymond Moody serve out his original 40 year sentence in 1983 ? Brittanee Drexel would still be alive..

Had they put Moody up in court for indecent exposure in 2008, Moody would have been to busy in court to be out here stalking and killing young women and Brittanee Drexel would still be alive.

But that's white supremacy. They'll let their own die just as long as they're "sticking it to those blacks !!!!"

giphy.gif


And of course even a fked up white man still get's some white privilege with the "O he was bullied as kid" nonsense.
1654515188728.png
 
I will use the FBI Uniform Crime Report crime offender data for 2020 to make my point. According to the 2020 Uniform Crime Report, there were 7,173,072 crime offenders in the United States. 3,642,932 whites, 2,122,038 blacks. Clearly, the numbers show that 1.5 million more whites were offenders than blacks. Whites were 51 percent of the criminal offenders in 2020. Blacks were 30 percent. In any circumstance, 51 percent is a majority. Instead of facing the problem of crime among whites, this is the answer:

3,642,932 #white offenders / 235,400,000 #American white population(2020) = 0.0154754970263381 x 100,000= 1,548 white offenders per capita.

2,122,038 #black violent offenders /46,900,000 #American black population(2020) =
0.045246012793177 x 100,000= 4,524 black offenders per capita.

Poof! As if by magic, a group that had 1.5 million more offenders suddenly now has less of a crime problem because instead of looking at the total number of crimes, crime is broken down into units of 100,000. If this is being done to guess the probability of the commission of a crime, logic shows us that if there are more whites than blacks, the probability of a crime committed by someone white is greater than it being done by someone black. If the crime in your community is so high that you must divide two numbers to get a percentage, then multiply it by 100,000 to claim that you don’t have serious problems, you have serious issues. Who decided that occurrences must be divided by 100,000? Why couldn’t it be 1? What happened to individualism? The excuse begins with whites being five times the population of blacks. I was told that since whites have five times the population, they must commit five times the number of crimes for the problem to be equal to what blacks are doing. “We are allowed to commit more crime because there are more of us.” If this is not lunacy, then what is?

The problem with this opinion is if you multiply things by 5 to make the populations the same, there are things that no longer exist for blacks. We would have more economic opportunities. We would have equal representation relative to numbers of police, lawyers, judges, and political representatives. Increased black representation affects public policy formation, law enforcement, and legislation. Crime would reduce because of the increased opportunities; wealth would increase, and poverty would be dramatically reduced. Things would be dramatically different. Yet to the racist, nothing else changes except that crime increases. The racist subculture continues arguing this ridiculous per capita idiocy no matter what. The use of per capita fails miserably and is used by the racist subculture to deny a severe crime problem THEY need to address instead of trying to preach to us.

The argument coming from the right is that since blacks are 13 percent of the population, blacks should be committing 13 percent of the crime. The problem with this claim is that percentages come attached with real numbers, and when you use those real numbers, the 13 percent excuse has no merit as an argument. In 2020, whites made up 51 percent of all criminal offenders.

Let’s return to the 2020 Uniform Crime Report Crime data I just presented. Again, in 2020, there were 7,173,072, crime offenders in the United States. That 7.1 million is 100 percent of the offenders in America. In 2020 according to the census, the U.S. population was 331,449,281.31 That number is 100 percent of the U.S. population. Out of 331,449,281 citizens, 7,173,072 people or 2.16 percent of the American population were criminal offenders. The 3,642,932 white offenders were 1.09 percent of the American population. The 2,122,038 black offenders were 0.6 percent of the American population. This is where the 13 percent excuse fails. Simple math shows the misuse of percentages. The 13 percent excuse uses the percentage of blacks committing a crime against the percentage of the black population instead of it being used to reflect the percentage of blacks committing a specific violation. The numbers here show that 13 percent of the American people are not committing 50 percent of the crime. Furthermore, they show that 1 percent of the population is 51 percent of the criminal offenders and they are not black.

In 2020 blacks led in arrests in 2 categories in the Uniform Crime Report, murder and robbery. I am not going to pretend this is a good thing, but let’s look at the arrest categories whites led in:

Rape, Aggravated assault, Burglary, Larceny-theft, Motor vehicle theft, Arson, Violent crime, Property crime, Other assaults, Forgery and counterfeiting, Fraud, Embezzlement, buying, receiving, and possessing stolen property, Vandalism, carrying, possessing, Weapons, Prostitution and commercialized vice, Sex offenses besides rape and prostitution, Drug abuse violations, Gambling, Offenses against the family and children, Driving under the influence, Liquor laws, Drunkenness, Disorderly conduct, Vagrancy, All other offenses (except traffic), Suspicion, Curfew and loitering law violations.

There are 30 categories of crime listed by the FBI in the Uniform crime reports, whites lead in 27-28 of those categories annually. Whites are arrested nearly 3 times more than blacks. Arrests are not made on a perc apita basis and whites have more interactions with police based on the numbers of arrests.

In 2020, Whites were 51 percent of the offenders for all crimes committed in America. A white offender committed Fifty-four percent of the crimes against persons. Whites committed most property crimes (42%) and crimes against society (65%). Seven out of every ten arrests for crimes in America is on someone white. Whites have a history of criminal behavior that started at the very beginning of this country. Whites have elected numerous criminals to make laws in this country. Whites organized crime and made it a corporate business. Whites control the manufacturing, shipment, and distribution of drugs in this country. Whites made two of the most destructive drugs legal, creating millions of addicted citizens. I am talking about alcohol and nicotine. Whites have embezzled and scammed people out of trillions of dollars in the years America has been a country. Whites control the manufacturing, shipping, sales, and distribution of deadly weapons in this country.

Per capita is used by racists as an excuse. You don't get a pass on crime just because there are more of you. Whites should not be anywhere near these kinds of numbers, but they are and excuses will not reduce the high crime among whites.

Federal Bureau of Investigation, Crime in the United States, Offenders by Race and Ethnicity, 2020, FBI Releases 2020 Incident-Based (NIBRS) Data | Federal Bureau of Investigation
I find it hard to believe you don't know you are a IDIOT, by your own numbers FOOL.
 
I will use the FBI Uniform Crime Report crime offender data for 2020 to make my point. According to the 2020 Uniform Crime Report, there were 7,173,072 crime offenders in the United States. 3,642,932 whites, 2,122,038 blacks. Clearly, the numbers show that 1.5 million more whites were offenders than blacks. Whites were 51 percent of the criminal offenders in 2020. Blacks were 30 percent. In any circumstance, 51 percent is a majority. Instead of facing the problem of crime among whites, this is the answer:

3,642,932 #white offenders / 235,400,000 #American white population(2020) = 0.0154754970263381 x 100,000= 1,548 white offenders per capita.

2,122,038 #black violent offenders /46,900,000 #American black population(2020) =
0.045246012793177 x 100,000= 4,524 black offenders per capita.

Poof! As if by magic, a group that had 1.5 million more offenders suddenly now has less of a crime problem because instead of looking at the total number of crimes, crime is broken down into units of 100,000. If this is being done to guess the probability of the commission of a crime, logic shows us that if there are more whites than blacks, the probability of a crime committed by someone white is greater than it being done by someone black. If the crime in your community is so high that you must divide two numbers to get a percentage, then multiply it by 100,000 to claim that you don’t have serious problems, you have serious issues. Who decided that occurrences must be divided by 100,000? Why couldn’t it be 1? What happened to individualism? The excuse begins with whites being five times the population of blacks. I was told that since whites have five times the population, they must commit five times the number of crimes for the problem to be equal to what blacks are doing. “We are allowed to commit more crime because there are more of us.” If this is not lunacy, then what is?

The problem with this opinion is if you multiply things by 5 to make the populations the same, there are things that no longer exist for blacks. We would have more economic opportunities. We would have equal representation relative to numbers of police, lawyers, judges, and political representatives. Increased black representation affects public policy formation, law enforcement, and legislation. Crime would reduce because of the increased opportunities; wealth would increase, and poverty would be dramatically reduced. Things would be dramatically different. Yet to the racist, nothing else changes except that crime increases. The racist subculture continues arguing this ridiculous per capita idiocy no matter what. The use of per capita fails miserably and is used by the racist subculture to deny a severe crime problem THEY need to address instead of trying to preach to us.

The argument coming from the right is that since blacks are 13 percent of the population, blacks should be committing 13 percent of the crime. The problem with this claim is that percentages come attached with real numbers, and when you use those real numbers, the 13 percent excuse has no merit as an argument. In 2020, whites made up 51 percent of all criminal offenders.

Let’s return to the 2020 Uniform Crime Report Crime data I just presented. Again, in 2020, there were 7,173,072, crime offenders in the United States. That 7.1 million is 100 percent of the offenders in America. In 2020 according to the census, the U.S. population was 331,449,281.31 That number is 100 percent of the U.S. population. Out of 331,449,281 citizens, 7,173,072 people or 2.16 percent of the American population were criminal offenders. The 3,642,932 white offenders were 1.09 percent of the American population. The 2,122,038 black offenders were 0.6 percent of the American population. This is where the 13 percent excuse fails. Simple math shows the misuse of percentages. The 13 percent excuse uses the percentage of blacks committing a crime against the percentage of the black population instead of it being used to reflect the percentage of blacks committing a specific violation. The numbers here show that 13 percent of the American people are not committing 50 percent of the crime. Furthermore, they show that 1 percent of the population is 51 percent of the criminal offenders and they are not black.

In 2020 blacks led in arrests in 2 categories in the Uniform Crime Report, murder and robbery. I am not going to pretend this is a good thing, but let’s look at the arrest categories whites led in:

Rape, Aggravated assault, Burglary, Larceny-theft, Motor vehicle theft, Arson, Violent crime, Property crime, Other assaults, Forgery and counterfeiting, Fraud, Embezzlement, buying, receiving, and possessing stolen property, Vandalism, carrying, possessing, Weapons, Prostitution and commercialized vice, Sex offenses besides rape and prostitution, Drug abuse violations, Gambling, Offenses against the family and children, Driving under the influence, Liquor laws, Drunkenness, Disorderly conduct, Vagrancy, All other offenses (except traffic), Suspicion, Curfew and loitering law violations.

There are 30 categories of crime listed by the FBI in the Uniform crime reports, whites lead in 27-28 of those categories annually. Whites are arrested nearly 3 times more than blacks. Arrests are not made on a perc apita basis and whites have more interactions with police based on the numbers of arrests.

In 2020, Whites were 51 percent of the offenders for all crimes committed in America. A white offender committed Fifty-four percent of the crimes against persons. Whites committed most property crimes (42%) and crimes against society (65%). Seven out of every ten arrests for crimes in America is on someone white. Whites have a history of criminal behavior that started at the very beginning of this country. Whites have elected numerous criminals to make laws in this country. Whites organized crime and made it a corporate business. Whites control the manufacturing, shipment, and distribution of drugs in this country. Whites made two of the most destructive drugs legal, creating millions of addicted citizens. I am talking about alcohol and nicotine. Whites have embezzled and scammed people out of trillions of dollars in the years America has been a country. Whites control the manufacturing, shipping, sales, and distribution of deadly weapons in this country.

Per capita is used by racists as an excuse. You don't get a pass on crime just because there are more of you. Whites should not be anywhere near these kinds of numbers, but they are and excuses will not reduce the high crime among whites.

Federal Bureau of Investigation, Crime in the United States, Offenders by Race and Ethnicity, 2020, FBI Releases 2020 Incident-Based (NIBRS) Data | Federal Bureau of Investigation
How long did it take you to type this up. It's a shame because absolutely NONE of it is logically valid.
Your refusal to accept "per capita" as a legitimate measure does not change the fact that an individual black person is more likely to have committed a crime than an individual white person.
 
I will use the FBI Uniform Crime Report crime offender data for 2020 to make my point. According to the 2020 Uniform Crime Report, there were 7,173,072 crime offenders in the United States. 3,642,932 whites, 2,122,038 blacks. Clearly, the numbers show that 1.5 million more whites were offenders than blacks. Whites were 51 percent of the criminal offenders in 2020. Blacks were 30 percent. In any circumstance, 51 percent is a majority. Instead of facing the problem of crime among whites, this is the answer:

3,642,932 #white offenders / 235,400,000 #American white population(2020) = 0.0154754970263381 x 100,000= 1,548 white offenders per capita.

2,122,038 #black violent offenders /46,900,000 #American black population(2020) =
0.045246012793177 x 100,000= 4,524 black offenders per capita.

Poof! As if by magic, a group that had 1.5 million more offenders suddenly now has less of a crime problem because instead of looking at the total number of crimes, crime is broken down into units of 100,000. If this is being done to guess the probability of the commission of a crime, logic shows us that if there are more whites than blacks, the probability of a crime committed by someone white is greater than it being done by someone black. If the crime in your community is so high that you must divide two numbers to get a percentage, then multiply it by 100,000 to claim that you don’t have serious problems, you have serious issues. Who decided that occurrences must be divided by 100,000? Why couldn’t it be 1? What happened to individualism? The excuse begins with whites being five times the population of blacks. I was told that since whites have five times the population, they must commit five times the number of crimes for the problem to be equal to what blacks are doing. “We are allowed to commit more crime because there are more of us.” If this is not lunacy, then what is?

The problem with this opinion is if you multiply things by 5 to make the populations the same, there are things that no longer exist for blacks. We would have more economic opportunities. We would have equal representation relative to numbers of police, lawyers, judges, and political representatives. Increased black representation affects public policy formation, law enforcement, and legislation. Crime would reduce because of the increased opportunities; wealth would increase, and poverty would be dramatically reduced. Things would be dramatically different. Yet to the racist, nothing else changes except that crime increases. The racist subculture continues arguing this ridiculous per capita idiocy no matter what. The use of per capita fails miserably and is used by the racist subculture to deny a severe crime problem THEY need to address instead of trying to preach to us.

The argument coming from the right is that since blacks are 13 percent of the population, blacks should be committing 13 percent of the crime. The problem with this claim is that percentages come attached with real numbers, and when you use those real numbers, the 13 percent excuse has no merit as an argument. In 2020, whites made up 51 percent of all criminal offenders.

Let’s return to the 2020 Uniform Crime Report Crime data I just presented. Again, in 2020, there were 7,173,072, crime offenders in the United States. That 7.1 million is 100 percent of the offenders in America. In 2020 according to the census, the U.S. population was 331,449,281.31 That number is 100 percent of the U.S. population. Out of 331,449,281 citizens, 7,173,072 people or 2.16 percent of the American population were criminal offenders. The 3,642,932 white offenders were 1.09 percent of the American population. The 2,122,038 black offenders were 0.6 percent of the American population. This is where the 13 percent excuse fails. Simple math shows the misuse of percentages. The 13 percent excuse uses the percentage of blacks committing a crime against the percentage of the black population instead of it being used to reflect the percentage of blacks committing a specific violation. The numbers here show that 13 percent of the American people are not committing 50 percent of the crime. Furthermore, they show that 1 percent of the population is 51 percent of the criminal offenders and they are not black.

In 2020 blacks led in arrests in 2 categories in the Uniform Crime Report, murder and robbery. I am not going to pretend this is a good thing, but let’s look at the arrest categories whites led in:

Rape, Aggravated assault, Burglary, Larceny-theft, Motor vehicle theft, Arson, Violent crime, Property crime, Other assaults, Forgery and counterfeiting, Fraud, Embezzlement, buying, receiving, and possessing stolen property, Vandalism, carrying, possessing, Weapons, Prostitution and commercialized vice, Sex offenses besides rape and prostitution, Drug abuse violations, Gambling, Offenses against the family and children, Driving under the influence, Liquor laws, Drunkenness, Disorderly conduct, Vagrancy, All other offenses (except traffic), Suspicion, Curfew and loitering law violations.

There are 30 categories of crime listed by the FBI in the Uniform crime reports, whites lead in 27-28 of those categories annually. Whites are arrested nearly 3 times more than blacks. Arrests are not made on a perc apita basis and whites have more interactions with police based on the numbers of arrests.

In 2020, Whites were 51 percent of the offenders for all crimes committed in America. A white offender committed Fifty-four percent of the crimes against persons. Whites committed most property crimes (42%) and crimes against society (65%). Seven out of every ten arrests for crimes in America is on someone white. Whites have a history of criminal behavior that started at the very beginning of this country. Whites have elected numerous criminals to make laws in this country. Whites organized crime and made it a corporate business. Whites control the manufacturing, shipment, and distribution of drugs in this country. Whites made two of the most destructive drugs legal, creating millions of addicted citizens. I am talking about alcohol and nicotine. Whites have embezzled and scammed people out of trillions of dollars in the years America has been a country. Whites control the manufacturing, shipping, sales, and distribution of deadly weapons in this country.

Per capita is used by racists as an excuse. You don't get a pass on crime just because there are more of you. Whites should not be anywhere near these kinds of numbers, but they are and excuses will not reduce the high crime among whites.

Federal Bureau of Investigation, Crime in the United States, Offenders by Race and Ethnicity, 2020, FBI Releases 2020 Incident-Based (NIBRS) Data | Federal Bureau of Investigation

Tell me you don't understand what "per capita" means without telling me you don't understand what "per capita" means.

LOL
 
This is Brittanee Drexel.

1654512947413.png


She was a 17 year old white woman from NY state. She went missing in 2009 after she went to a party in South Carolina.

It was the typical missing white women of the week story.

SHE MUST FOUND !!!

They looked everywhere but had no real leads.

But in 2015 they thought they found their man in Timothy Taylor

1654513292772.png



You can imagine what this would do to Taylor and his family. A young white women presumed missing and a black man is the main suspect ?

Nothing and I mean NOTHING beefs up white rage and anger more than that

And this in South Carlina too ? Timothy Taylor's mum lost her job of 11 years and got death threats. They were put through hell

By the way here's another pic of Timothy Taylor

1654513586283.png


.Yes he has no left arm.

He lost it in a childhood aciident. So how anyone can be suspected of raping or killing anyone with one arm I don't know. But hey !!! He's black. So white and non blk society will believe anything about us.

The white authorities didn't have any evidence to link Timothy Taylor to Britenee Drexler (o what a suprise) but not to worry they just looked into Taylor's previous and he had served his time for robbery.

But that was at state level.

The FBI decided to put federal charges on him as a way to coerce him to confessing to a Drex;el murder. All he had to do is tell the FBI what happened or even make up story and he'd get a plea deal which even without a body would allow the feds to say "Case closed"

Taylor said he wasn't gonna do it.

So they gave up on railroading Taylor but they never told the public that he'd been ruled out as a suspect.

So he and his family carried on going through the same hell from the public

But the silence was deafening when they finally found the man who killed Brittanee Drexel

1654514358934.png



1654514580251.png


Raymon Moody is his name.

Notice that even though this white man kidnapped, raped and murdered Brittanee Drexel and led dectectives to her body they STILL put an innocent black man pic next to her

This Raymond Moddy had a long history which was not shown even after his confession. The white media just leaves out things that doesn't fit it's narrative..

But his rap sheet shows that

1654519235394.png


1654519318102.png


This white man in 1983, kidnapped, raped and sodomized an 8 year old girl and performed great bodily injury to her.

For all of that ? He should have been lifed off but he's white and got a 40 year sentence of which he only served 21

1654519665587.png


So this white man comes out jail in 2004 and let off parole in 2007. He could only keep his nose clean for under a year bcoz in 2008 he was charged with indecent exposure in south Carolina. That carries up to 3 years in shawshank (well it would have done had he been blk) but that charge was reduced to "Public Disorderly Conduct" ............Because of course it was.

Under a year later in 2009 Raymond Moody raped and murdered Brittanee Drexel

It was only last month in May, 13 years after the Britanee Drexel murder that the authorities finally got Raymond Moody

1654523706866.png


I remember this story in 2009.

I remember how Brittanee Drexel was the national story at the time and when Timothy Taylor's name was put out front ? The white authorities made sure his name was in the spotlight for as long as possible as they attempted to make him confess to a crime he didn't commit.

But now the real story of the white man who killed her is out notice how they don't even mention it and they're treating it as a local story /

White society does this all the time.

If the white authorities in 2009 would have focused on Raymond Moody the Britanee Drexel family would not have had to wait 13 years to see the murderer brought to justice.

In fact if the white authorities would have done there job at ANY point Brittanee Drexel would not have died

If Raymond Moody would have got the life sentence in 1983 that the crime of raping, sodomizing and kidnapping an 8 year girl really deserved ? Brittanee Drexel would still be alive..

Hell even if they made Raymond Moody serve out his original 40 year sentence in 1983 ? Brittanee Drexel would still be alive..

Had they put Moody up in court for indecent exposure in 2008, Moody would have been to busy in court to be out here stalking and killing young women and Brittanee Drexel would still be alive.

But that's white supremacy. They'll let their own die just as long as they're "sticking it to those blacks !!!!"

giphy.gif


And of course even a fked up white man still get's some white privilege with the "O he was bullied as kid" nonsense.
1654515188728.png

TLDR.
 
It amazes me how I'm2 can go from not understanding percentages to understanding them when it suits his narrative.
I understand that 51 percent is higher than 30 percent and whites were 51 percent of the criminal offenders.
 
Nothing but excuses.

As expected.
 

Forum List

Back
Top