WinterBorn
Diamond Member
This is an extreme case. If there is no other way out, then you have to kill. But if it is possible not to kill, then not to kill. I have a positive attitude to the killing of predators, I see a metaphysical meaning in this.
In the end, if we justify the predator by the fact that nature created it this way, then there are no obstacles to justifying any villain with the same arguments.
It is extremely rare that predators kill without doing so for food. Any villain that kills because they have no other way to eat is very different from other murderers.