Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
He did in exactly the way I laid out. Why aren’t you answering my question?Well in stones case I’ll let the legal findings speak for themselves....Ok, then what should be done with people who conspire with these very serious crimes?
You'll have to define conspire in the context of this issue.
A jury determined Stone lied repeatedly to members of Congress. He lied about the identity of his intermediary to WikiLeaks. He lied about the existence of written communications with his intermediary. He lied by denying he had communicated with the Trump campaign about the timing of WikiLeaks’ releases. He in fact updated senior campaign officials repeatedly about WikiLeaks. And he tampered with a witness, imploring him to stonewall Congress.
Well in stones case I’ll let the legal findings speak for themselves....
So now you're saying he didn't "conspire"?
He did in exactly the way I laid out.
Where did he conspire? With whom?