Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 65,291
- 16,438
- 2,190
Wow, you completely ignore the points I made I my post to paste that crap? What a joke. Grow up and do better
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Commutation of Stone Sentence Correct Move
- Thread starter Bush92
- Start date
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 32,104
- 20,878
- 1,845
You're making a comparison between any commutation by Obama (or any prez) and Trump's commutation of Stone and then have the audacity to say I'm taking something out of context. Wow.Well, when you take everything out of context
"On August 2, Stone again called then-candidate Trump, and the two spoke for approximately ten minutes. Again, we don’t know what was said, but less than an hour after speaking with Trump, Stone emailed an associate of his Jerome Corsi, to have someone else who was living in London“ see Assange.” Less than two days later, on August 2, 2016, Corsi emailed Stone. Corsi told Stone that, “Word is friend in embassy [Assange] plans 2 more dumps. One “in October” and that “impact planned to be very damaging,” “time to let more than Podesta to be exposed as in bed w enemy if they are not ready to drop HRC. That appears to be the game hackers are now about."
Around this time, Deputy Campaign Chairman Gates continued to have conversations with Stone about more information that would be coming out from WikiLeaks. Gates was also present for a phone call between Stone and Trump. While Gates couldn’t hear the content of the call, he could hear Stone’s voice on the phone and see his name on the caller ID. Thirty seconds after hanging up the phone with Stone, then-candidate Trump told Gates that there would be more information coming. Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, also stated that he was present for a phone call between Trump and Stone, where Stone told Trump 4 that he had just gotten off the phone with Julian Assange and in a couple of days WikiLeaks would release information, and Trump responded, “oh good, alright.” Paul Manafort also stated that he spoke with Trump about Stone’s predictions and his claimed access to WikiLeaks, and that Trump instructed Manafort to stay in touch with Stone. In his written answers to the Special Counsel’s Office, President Trump denied remembering anything about his conversations with Stone during the summer of 2016, and he denied being aware that Stone had discussed WikiLeaks with anyone associated with the campaign. One week after submitting his written answers, President Trump criticized “flipping” witnesses and stated that Stone was “very brave” in indicating he would not cooperate with prosecutors. The Special Counsel’s Report stated that the President’s statements complimenting Stone “support the inference that the President intended to communicate a message that witnesses could be rewarded for refusing to provide testimony adverse to the President[.]”
Rewarded for refusing to provide FALSE testimony
Now it is worded truthfully and accurately.
You are welcome.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 32,104
- 20,878
- 1,845
You're making a comparison between any commutation by Obama (or any prez) and Trump's commutation of Stone and then have the audacity to say I'm taking something out of context. Wow.Well, when you take everything out of context
"On August 2, Stone again called then-candidate Trump, and the two spoke for approximately ten minutes. Again, we don’t know what was said, but less than an hour after speaking with Trump, Stone emailed an associate of his Jerome Corsi, to have someone else who was living in London“ see Assange.” Less than two days later, on August 2, 2016, Corsi emailed Stone. Corsi told Stone that, “Word is friend in embassy [Assange] plans 2 more dumps. One “in October” and that “impact planned to be very damaging,” “time to let more than Podesta to be exposed as in bed w enemy if they are not ready to drop HRC. That appears to be the game hackers are now about."
Around this time, Deputy Campaign Chairman Gates continued to have conversations with Stone about more information that would be coming out from WikiLeaks. Gates was also present for a phone call between Stone and Trump. While Gates couldn’t hear the content of the call, he could hear Stone’s voice on the phone and see his name on the caller ID. Thirty seconds after hanging up the phone with Stone, then-candidate Trump told Gates that there would be more information coming. Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, also stated that he was present for a phone call between Trump and Stone, where Stone told Trump 4 that he had just gotten off the phone with Julian Assange and in a couple of days WikiLeaks would release information, and Trump responded, “oh good, alright.” Paul Manafort also stated that he spoke with Trump about Stone’s predictions and his claimed access to WikiLeaks, and that Trump instructed Manafort to stay in touch with Stone. In his written answers to the Special Counsel’s Office, President Trump denied remembering anything about his conversations with Stone during the summer of 2016, and he denied being aware that Stone had discussed WikiLeaks with anyone associated with the campaign. One week after submitting his written answers, President Trump criticized “flipping” witnesses and stated that Stone was “very brave” in indicating he would not cooperate with prosecutors. The Special Counsel’s Report stated that the President’s statements complimenting Stone “support the inference that the President intended to communicate a message that witnesses could be rewarded for refusing to provide testimony adverse to the President[.]”
Oh no!! Wikileaks published info........
Doesn't the Washington Post do the same thing?
Not info that paints Hillary in a bad light.
That is the whole and entire point of the entire story.
Truths regarding Hillary beat Hillary.
Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 65,291
- 16,438
- 2,190
I thought you already acknowledged the laws that were broken by Russians hacking and leaking DNC server info. Do you take that back? Do you think laws were not broken or that it’s not a big deal to break them?You're making a comparison between any commutation by Obama (or any prez) and Trump's commutation of Stone and then have the audacity to say I'm taking something out of context. Wow.Well, when you take everything out of context
"On August 2, Stone again called then-candidate Trump, and the two spoke for approximately ten minutes. Again, we don’t know what was said, but less than an hour after speaking with Trump, Stone emailed an associate of his Jerome Corsi, to have someone else who was living in London“ see Assange.” Less than two days later, on August 2, 2016, Corsi emailed Stone. Corsi told Stone that, “Word is friend in embassy [Assange] plans 2 more dumps. One “in October” and that “impact planned to be very damaging,” “time to let more than Podesta to be exposed as in bed w enemy if they are not ready to drop HRC. That appears to be the game hackers are now about."
Around this time, Deputy Campaign Chairman Gates continued to have conversations with Stone about more information that would be coming out from WikiLeaks. Gates was also present for a phone call between Stone and Trump. While Gates couldn’t hear the content of the call, he could hear Stone’s voice on the phone and see his name on the caller ID. Thirty seconds after hanging up the phone with Stone, then-candidate Trump told Gates that there would be more information coming. Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, also stated that he was present for a phone call between Trump and Stone, where Stone told Trump 4 that he had just gotten off the phone with Julian Assange and in a couple of days WikiLeaks would release information, and Trump responded, “oh good, alright.” Paul Manafort also stated that he spoke with Trump about Stone’s predictions and his claimed access to WikiLeaks, and that Trump instructed Manafort to stay in touch with Stone. In his written answers to the Special Counsel’s Office, President Trump denied remembering anything about his conversations with Stone during the summer of 2016, and he denied being aware that Stone had discussed WikiLeaks with anyone associated with the campaign. One week after submitting his written answers, President Trump criticized “flipping” witnesses and stated that Stone was “very brave” in indicating he would not cooperate with prosecutors. The Special Counsel’s Report stated that the President’s statements complimenting Stone “support the inference that the President intended to communicate a message that witnesses could be rewarded for refusing to provide testimony adverse to the President[.]”
Oh no!! Wikileaks published info........
Doesn't the Washington Post do the same thing?
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 32,104
- 20,878
- 1,845
Wow, you completely ignore the points I made I my post to paste that crap? What a joke. Grow up and do betterApparently so... these people fascinate meYou’re talking to a “Seth Rich did it” conspiracy theorist. Anything that doesn’t confirm their nonsense is automatically deep state lies.Yes it did... it was uncovered and verified by the FBI. Do some researchRussians stole emails from the DNC and leaked them through Wikileaks. That’s Russian crap.I'm guessing that Roger Stone had something to do with either Trump's campaign and/or the Russian crap. Concerning many things in this and past administrations I've consider my ignorance as bliss.
There was no Russian Crap.
Except that didn't happen
It’s almost impossible to penetrate their bubble.
These People Versus You people.
These People said No - When you people said Candidate Trump will lose.
These People said No - When you people said the Convention would stop him.
These People said No - When you people said that Faithless Electors would stop Trump.
These People said No - When you people said that he wouldn't be sworn in (Even Biden said that was crazy)
These People said N0 - When you people said that Russian Collusion would stop President Trump
These People said N0 - When you people said that Mueller would stop Trump
These People said No - When you People said that the Ukraine Hoax would stop President Trump
These People said No - When you people said that Flynn, Cohen, Stormy & Avenatti, and Access Hollywood would stop Trump
These People said No - When you people said that North Korea would bring President Trump down.
These People said No - When you people said that his handling of Iran would bring President Trump down.
These People said N0 - When you people said that his handling of the death of Khashoggi would bring President Trump down.
The list is longer, but you get the idea (maybe)
These People have yet to be wrong
You people have yet to be right.
Therein lies the issue - you made no points.
Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 65,291
- 16,438
- 2,190
Yes I did... reread my postWow, you completely ignore the points I made I my post to paste that crap? What a joke. Grow up and do betterApparently so... these people fascinate meYou’re talking to a “Seth Rich did it” conspiracy theorist. Anything that doesn’t confirm their nonsense is automatically deep state lies.Yes it did... it was uncovered and verified by the FBI. Do some researchRussians stole emails from the DNC and leaked them through Wikileaks. That’s Russian crap.I'm guessing that Roger Stone had something to do with either Trump's campaign and/or the Russian crap. Concerning many things in this and past administrations I've consider my ignorance as bliss.
There was no Russian Crap.
Except that didn't happen
It’s almost impossible to penetrate their bubble.
These People Versus You people.
These People said No - When you people said Candidate Trump will lose.
These People said No - When you people said the Convention would stop him.
These People said No - When you people said that Faithless Electors would stop Trump.
These People said No - When you people said that he wouldn't be sworn in (Even Biden said that was crazy)
These People said N0 - When you people said that Russian Collusion would stop President Trump
These People said N0 - When you people said that Mueller would stop Trump
These People said No - When you People said that the Ukraine Hoax would stop President Trump
These People said No - When you people said that Flynn, Cohen, Stormy & Avenatti, and Access Hollywood would stop Trump
These People said No - When you people said that North Korea would bring President Trump down.
These People said No - When you people said that his handling of Iran would bring President Trump down.
These People said N0 - When you people said that his handling of the death of Khashoggi would bring President Trump down.
The list is longer, but you get the idea (maybe)
These People have yet to be wrong
You people have yet to be right.
Therein lies the issue - you made no points.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 32,104
- 20,878
- 1,845
I thought you already acknowledged the laws that were broken by Russians hacking and leaking DNC server info. Do you take that back? Do you think laws were not broken or that it’s not a big deal to break them?You're making a comparison between any commutation by Obama (or any prez) and Trump's commutation of Stone and then have the audacity to say I'm taking something out of context. Wow.Well, when you take everything out of context
"On August 2, Stone again called then-candidate Trump, and the two spoke for approximately ten minutes. Again, we don’t know what was said, but less than an hour after speaking with Trump, Stone emailed an associate of his Jerome Corsi, to have someone else who was living in London“ see Assange.” Less than two days later, on August 2, 2016, Corsi emailed Stone. Corsi told Stone that, “Word is friend in embassy [Assange] plans 2 more dumps. One “in October” and that “impact planned to be very damaging,” “time to let more than Podesta to be exposed as in bed w enemy if they are not ready to drop HRC. That appears to be the game hackers are now about."
Around this time, Deputy Campaign Chairman Gates continued to have conversations with Stone about more information that would be coming out from WikiLeaks. Gates was also present for a phone call between Stone and Trump. While Gates couldn’t hear the content of the call, he could hear Stone’s voice on the phone and see his name on the caller ID. Thirty seconds after hanging up the phone with Stone, then-candidate Trump told Gates that there would be more information coming. Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, also stated that he was present for a phone call between Trump and Stone, where Stone told Trump 4 that he had just gotten off the phone with Julian Assange and in a couple of days WikiLeaks would release information, and Trump responded, “oh good, alright.” Paul Manafort also stated that he spoke with Trump about Stone’s predictions and his claimed access to WikiLeaks, and that Trump instructed Manafort to stay in touch with Stone. In his written answers to the Special Counsel’s Office, President Trump denied remembering anything about his conversations with Stone during the summer of 2016, and he denied being aware that Stone had discussed WikiLeaks with anyone associated with the campaign. One week after submitting his written answers, President Trump criticized “flipping” witnesses and stated that Stone was “very brave” in indicating he would not cooperate with prosecutors. The Special Counsel’s Report stated that the President’s statements complimenting Stone “support the inference that the President intended to communicate a message that witnesses could be rewarded for refusing to provide testimony adverse to the President[.]”
Oh no!! Wikileaks published info........
Doesn't the Washington Post do the same thing?
There was no Russian Hacking (HARD STOP)
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 32,104
- 20,878
- 1,845
Yes I did... reread my postWow, you completely ignore the points I made I my post to paste that crap? What a joke. Grow up and do betterApparently so... these people fascinate meYou’re talking to a “Seth Rich did it” conspiracy theorist. Anything that doesn’t confirm their nonsense is automatically deep state lies.Yes it did... it was uncovered and verified by the FBI. Do some researchRussians stole emails from the DNC and leaked them through Wikileaks. That’s Russian crap.I'm guessing that Roger Stone had something to do with either Trump's campaign and/or the Russian crap. Concerning many things in this and past administrations I've consider my ignorance as bliss.
There was no Russian Crap.
Except that didn't happen
It’s almost impossible to penetrate their bubble.
These People Versus You people.
These People said No - When you people said Candidate Trump will lose.
These People said No - When you people said the Convention would stop him.
These People said No - When you people said that Faithless Electors would stop Trump.
These People said No - When you people said that he wouldn't be sworn in (Even Biden said that was crazy)
These People said N0 - When you people said that Russian Collusion would stop President Trump
These People said N0 - When you people said that Mueller would stop Trump
These People said No - When you People said that the Ukraine Hoax would stop President Trump
These People said No - When you people said that Flynn, Cohen, Stormy & Avenatti, and Access Hollywood would stop Trump
These People said No - When you people said that North Korea would bring President Trump down.
These People said No - When you people said that his handling of Iran would bring President Trump down.
These People said N0 - When you people said that his handling of the death of Khashoggi would bring President Trump down.
The list is longer, but you get the idea (maybe)
These People have yet to be wrong
You people have yet to be right.
Therein lies the issue - you made no points.
Oh I get that you think that you did
You just didn't
It's bubble nonsense.
Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 65,291
- 16,438
- 2,190
I literally just showed that there was. You are just using empty proclamations. You are wrong. Hard stopI thought you already acknowledged the laws that were broken by Russians hacking and leaking DNC server info. Do you take that back? Do you think laws were not broken or that it’s not a big deal to break them?You're making a comparison between any commutation by Obama (or any prez) and Trump's commutation of Stone and then have the audacity to say I'm taking something out of context. Wow.Well, when you take everything out of context
"On August 2, Stone again called then-candidate Trump, and the two spoke for approximately ten minutes. Again, we don’t know what was said, but less than an hour after speaking with Trump, Stone emailed an associate of his Jerome Corsi, to have someone else who was living in London“ see Assange.” Less than two days later, on August 2, 2016, Corsi emailed Stone. Corsi told Stone that, “Word is friend in embassy [Assange] plans 2 more dumps. One “in October” and that “impact planned to be very damaging,” “time to let more than Podesta to be exposed as in bed w enemy if they are not ready to drop HRC. That appears to be the game hackers are now about."
Around this time, Deputy Campaign Chairman Gates continued to have conversations with Stone about more information that would be coming out from WikiLeaks. Gates was also present for a phone call between Stone and Trump. While Gates couldn’t hear the content of the call, he could hear Stone’s voice on the phone and see his name on the caller ID. Thirty seconds after hanging up the phone with Stone, then-candidate Trump told Gates that there would be more information coming. Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, also stated that he was present for a phone call between Trump and Stone, where Stone told Trump 4 that he had just gotten off the phone with Julian Assange and in a couple of days WikiLeaks would release information, and Trump responded, “oh good, alright.” Paul Manafort also stated that he spoke with Trump about Stone’s predictions and his claimed access to WikiLeaks, and that Trump instructed Manafort to stay in touch with Stone. In his written answers to the Special Counsel’s Office, President Trump denied remembering anything about his conversations with Stone during the summer of 2016, and he denied being aware that Stone had discussed WikiLeaks with anyone associated with the campaign. One week after submitting his written answers, President Trump criticized “flipping” witnesses and stated that Stone was “very brave” in indicating he would not cooperate with prosecutors. The Special Counsel’s Report stated that the President’s statements complimenting Stone “support the inference that the President intended to communicate a message that witnesses could be rewarded for refusing to provide testimony adverse to the President[.]”
Oh no!! Wikileaks published info........
Doesn't the Washington Post do the same thing?
There was no Russian Hacking (HARD STOP)
I thought you already acknowledged the laws that were broken by Russians hacking and leaking DNC server info. Do you take that back? Do you think laws were not broken or that it’s not a big deal to break them?You're making a comparison between any commutation by Obama (or any prez) and Trump's commutation of Stone and then have the audacity to say I'm taking something out of context. Wow.Well, when you take everything out of context
"On August 2, Stone again called then-candidate Trump, and the two spoke for approximately ten minutes. Again, we don’t know what was said, but less than an hour after speaking with Trump, Stone emailed an associate of his Jerome Corsi, to have someone else who was living in London“ see Assange.” Less than two days later, on August 2, 2016, Corsi emailed Stone. Corsi told Stone that, “Word is friend in embassy [Assange] plans 2 more dumps. One “in October” and that “impact planned to be very damaging,” “time to let more than Podesta to be exposed as in bed w enemy if they are not ready to drop HRC. That appears to be the game hackers are now about."
Around this time, Deputy Campaign Chairman Gates continued to have conversations with Stone about more information that would be coming out from WikiLeaks. Gates was also present for a phone call between Stone and Trump. While Gates couldn’t hear the content of the call, he could hear Stone’s voice on the phone and see his name on the caller ID. Thirty seconds after hanging up the phone with Stone, then-candidate Trump told Gates that there would be more information coming. Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, also stated that he was present for a phone call between Trump and Stone, where Stone told Trump 4 that he had just gotten off the phone with Julian Assange and in a couple of days WikiLeaks would release information, and Trump responded, “oh good, alright.” Paul Manafort also stated that he spoke with Trump about Stone’s predictions and his claimed access to WikiLeaks, and that Trump instructed Manafort to stay in touch with Stone. In his written answers to the Special Counsel’s Office, President Trump denied remembering anything about his conversations with Stone during the summer of 2016, and he denied being aware that Stone had discussed WikiLeaks with anyone associated with the campaign. One week after submitting his written answers, President Trump criticized “flipping” witnesses and stated that Stone was “very brave” in indicating he would not cooperate with prosecutors. The Special Counsel’s Report stated that the President’s statements complimenting Stone “support the inference that the President intended to communicate a message that witnesses could be rewarded for refusing to provide testimony adverse to the President[.]”
Oh no!! Wikileaks published info........
Doesn't the Washington Post do the same thing?
I thought you already acknowledged the laws that were broken by Russians hacking and leaking DNC server info.
Yup, hacking is a crime. Stealing classified info is a crime.
Hasn't the Washington Post ever published stolen or hacked info?
Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 65,291
- 16,438
- 2,190
No they were actual points. That’s a fact. You can disagree with their validity in which case you can provide a counter argument. But you’re not doing this which shows that you can’t dispute what I’ve said. You’re done. Be gone with yaYes I did... reread my postWow, you completely ignore the points I made I my post to paste that crap? What a joke. Grow up and do betterApparently so... these people fascinate meYou’re talking to a “Seth Rich did it” conspiracy theorist. Anything that doesn’t confirm their nonsense is automatically deep state lies.Yes it did... it was uncovered and verified by the FBI. Do some researchRussians stole emails from the DNC and leaked them through Wikileaks. That’s Russian crap.I'm guessing that Roger Stone had something to do with either Trump's campaign and/or the Russian crap. Concerning many things in this and past administrations I've consider my ignorance as bliss.
There was no Russian Crap.
Except that didn't happen
It’s almost impossible to penetrate their bubble.
These People Versus You people.
These People said No - When you people said Candidate Trump will lose.
These People said No - When you people said the Convention would stop him.
These People said No - When you people said that Faithless Electors would stop Trump.
These People said No - When you people said that he wouldn't be sworn in (Even Biden said that was crazy)
These People said N0 - When you people said that Russian Collusion would stop President Trump
These People said N0 - When you people said that Mueller would stop Trump
These People said No - When you People said that the Ukraine Hoax would stop President Trump
These People said No - When you people said that Flynn, Cohen, Stormy & Avenatti, and Access Hollywood would stop Trump
These People said No - When you people said that North Korea would bring President Trump down.
These People said No - When you people said that his handling of Iran would bring President Trump down.
These People said N0 - When you people said that his handling of the death of Khashoggi would bring President Trump down.
The list is longer, but you get the idea (maybe)
These People have yet to be wrong
You people have yet to be right.
Therein lies the issue - you made no points.
Oh I get that you think that you did
You just didn't
It's bubble nonsense.
Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 65,291
- 16,438
- 2,190
Before we move to the Washington post I just wanna be clear. You admit that Russians committed crimes with what they did to the DNC server and prosecutions are justified, is that correct?I thought you already acknowledged the laws that were broken by Russians hacking and leaking DNC server info. Do you take that back? Do you think laws were not broken or that it’s not a big deal to break them?You're making a comparison between any commutation by Obama (or any prez) and Trump's commutation of Stone and then have the audacity to say I'm taking something out of context. Wow.Well, when you take everything out of context
"On August 2, Stone again called then-candidate Trump, and the two spoke for approximately ten minutes. Again, we don’t know what was said, but less than an hour after speaking with Trump, Stone emailed an associate of his Jerome Corsi, to have someone else who was living in London“ see Assange.” Less than two days later, on August 2, 2016, Corsi emailed Stone. Corsi told Stone that, “Word is friend in embassy [Assange] plans 2 more dumps. One “in October” and that “impact planned to be very damaging,” “time to let more than Podesta to be exposed as in bed w enemy if they are not ready to drop HRC. That appears to be the game hackers are now about."
Around this time, Deputy Campaign Chairman Gates continued to have conversations with Stone about more information that would be coming out from WikiLeaks. Gates was also present for a phone call between Stone and Trump. While Gates couldn’t hear the content of the call, he could hear Stone’s voice on the phone and see his name on the caller ID. Thirty seconds after hanging up the phone with Stone, then-candidate Trump told Gates that there would be more information coming. Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, also stated that he was present for a phone call between Trump and Stone, where Stone told Trump 4 that he had just gotten off the phone with Julian Assange and in a couple of days WikiLeaks would release information, and Trump responded, “oh good, alright.” Paul Manafort also stated that he spoke with Trump about Stone’s predictions and his claimed access to WikiLeaks, and that Trump instructed Manafort to stay in touch with Stone. In his written answers to the Special Counsel’s Office, President Trump denied remembering anything about his conversations with Stone during the summer of 2016, and he denied being aware that Stone had discussed WikiLeaks with anyone associated with the campaign. One week after submitting his written answers, President Trump criticized “flipping” witnesses and stated that Stone was “very brave” in indicating he would not cooperate with prosecutors. The Special Counsel’s Report stated that the President’s statements complimenting Stone “support the inference that the President intended to communicate a message that witnesses could be rewarded for refusing to provide testimony adverse to the President[.]”
Oh no!! Wikileaks published info........
Doesn't the Washington Post do the same thing?
I thought you already acknowledged the laws that were broken by Russians hacking and leaking DNC server info.
Yup, hacking is a crime. Stealing classified info is a crime.
Hasn't the Washington Post ever published stolen or hacked info?
- Aug 8, 2016
- 26,074
- 25,129
- 2,445
Unfortunately Satan won that one.
Before we move to the Washington post I just wanna be clear. You admit that Russians committed crimes with what they did to the DNC server and prosecutions are justified, is that correct?I thought you already acknowledged the laws that were broken by Russians hacking and leaking DNC server info. Do you take that back? Do you think laws were not broken or that it’s not a big deal to break them?You're making a comparison between any commutation by Obama (or any prez) and Trump's commutation of Stone and then have the audacity to say I'm taking something out of context. Wow.Well, when you take everything out of context
"On August 2, Stone again called then-candidate Trump, and the two spoke for approximately ten minutes. Again, we don’t know what was said, but less than an hour after speaking with Trump, Stone emailed an associate of his Jerome Corsi, to have someone else who was living in London“ see Assange.” Less than two days later, on August 2, 2016, Corsi emailed Stone. Corsi told Stone that, “Word is friend in embassy [Assange] plans 2 more dumps. One “in October” and that “impact planned to be very damaging,” “time to let more than Podesta to be exposed as in bed w enemy if they are not ready to drop HRC. That appears to be the game hackers are now about."
Around this time, Deputy Campaign Chairman Gates continued to have conversations with Stone about more information that would be coming out from WikiLeaks. Gates was also present for a phone call between Stone and Trump. While Gates couldn’t hear the content of the call, he could hear Stone’s voice on the phone and see his name on the caller ID. Thirty seconds after hanging up the phone with Stone, then-candidate Trump told Gates that there would be more information coming. Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, also stated that he was present for a phone call between Trump and Stone, where Stone told Trump 4 that he had just gotten off the phone with Julian Assange and in a couple of days WikiLeaks would release information, and Trump responded, “oh good, alright.” Paul Manafort also stated that he spoke with Trump about Stone’s predictions and his claimed access to WikiLeaks, and that Trump instructed Manafort to stay in touch with Stone. In his written answers to the Special Counsel’s Office, President Trump denied remembering anything about his conversations with Stone during the summer of 2016, and he denied being aware that Stone had discussed WikiLeaks with anyone associated with the campaign. One week after submitting his written answers, President Trump criticized “flipping” witnesses and stated that Stone was “very brave” in indicating he would not cooperate with prosecutors. The Special Counsel’s Report stated that the President’s statements complimenting Stone “support the inference that the President intended to communicate a message that witnesses could be rewarded for refusing to provide testimony adverse to the President[.]”
Oh no!! Wikileaks published info........
Doesn't the Washington Post do the same thing?
I thought you already acknowledged the laws that were broken by Russians hacking and leaking DNC server info.
Yup, hacking is a crime. Stealing classified info is a crime.
Hasn't the Washington Post ever published stolen or hacked info?
You admit that Russians committed crimes with what they did to the DNC server
Already said, the hackers, Russian or not, should be shot.
colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
I thought you already acknowledged the laws that were broken by Russians hacking and leaking DNC server info. Do you take that back? Do you think laws were not broken or that it’s not a big deal to break them?You're making a comparison between any commutation by Obama (or any prez) and Trump's commutation of Stone and then have the audacity to say I'm taking something out of context. Wow.Well, when you take everything out of context
"On August 2, Stone again called then-candidate Trump, and the two spoke for approximately ten minutes. Again, we don’t know what was said, but less than an hour after speaking with Trump, Stone emailed an associate of his Jerome Corsi, to have someone else who was living in London“ see Assange.” Less than two days later, on August 2, 2016, Corsi emailed Stone. Corsi told Stone that, “Word is friend in embassy [Assange] plans 2 more dumps. One “in October” and that “impact planned to be very damaging,” “time to let more than Podesta to be exposed as in bed w enemy if they are not ready to drop HRC. That appears to be the game hackers are now about."
Around this time, Deputy Campaign Chairman Gates continued to have conversations with Stone about more information that would be coming out from WikiLeaks. Gates was also present for a phone call between Stone and Trump. While Gates couldn’t hear the content of the call, he could hear Stone’s voice on the phone and see his name on the caller ID. Thirty seconds after hanging up the phone with Stone, then-candidate Trump told Gates that there would be more information coming. Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, also stated that he was present for a phone call between Trump and Stone, where Stone told Trump 4 that he had just gotten off the phone with Julian Assange and in a couple of days WikiLeaks would release information, and Trump responded, “oh good, alright.” Paul Manafort also stated that he spoke with Trump about Stone’s predictions and his claimed access to WikiLeaks, and that Trump instructed Manafort to stay in touch with Stone. In his written answers to the Special Counsel’s Office, President Trump denied remembering anything about his conversations with Stone during the summer of 2016, and he denied being aware that Stone had discussed WikiLeaks with anyone associated with the campaign. One week after submitting his written answers, President Trump criticized “flipping” witnesses and stated that Stone was “very brave” in indicating he would not cooperate with prosecutors. The Special Counsel’s Report stated that the President’s statements complimenting Stone “support the inference that the President intended to communicate a message that witnesses could be rewarded for refusing to provide testimony adverse to the President[.]”
Oh no!! Wikileaks published info........
Doesn't the Washington Post do the same thing?
I thought you already acknowledged the laws that were broken by Russians hacking and leaking DNC server info.
Yup, hacking is a crime. Stealing classified info is a crime.
Hasn't the Washington Post ever published stolen or hacked info?
Wasn’t this particular issue settled by NY Times vs United States?
I thought you already acknowledged the laws that were broken by Russians hacking and leaking DNC server info. Do you take that back? Do you think laws were not broken or that it’s not a big deal to break them?You're making a comparison between any commutation by Obama (or any prez) and Trump's commutation of Stone and then have the audacity to say I'm taking something out of context. Wow.Well, when you take everything out of context
"On August 2, Stone again called then-candidate Trump, and the two spoke for approximately ten minutes. Again, we don’t know what was said, but less than an hour after speaking with Trump, Stone emailed an associate of his Jerome Corsi, to have someone else who was living in London“ see Assange.” Less than two days later, on August 2, 2016, Corsi emailed Stone. Corsi told Stone that, “Word is friend in embassy [Assange] plans 2 more dumps. One “in October” and that “impact planned to be very damaging,” “time to let more than Podesta to be exposed as in bed w enemy if they are not ready to drop HRC. That appears to be the game hackers are now about."
Around this time, Deputy Campaign Chairman Gates continued to have conversations with Stone about more information that would be coming out from WikiLeaks. Gates was also present for a phone call between Stone and Trump. While Gates couldn’t hear the content of the call, he could hear Stone’s voice on the phone and see his name on the caller ID. Thirty seconds after hanging up the phone with Stone, then-candidate Trump told Gates that there would be more information coming. Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, also stated that he was present for a phone call between Trump and Stone, where Stone told Trump 4 that he had just gotten off the phone with Julian Assange and in a couple of days WikiLeaks would release information, and Trump responded, “oh good, alright.” Paul Manafort also stated that he spoke with Trump about Stone’s predictions and his claimed access to WikiLeaks, and that Trump instructed Manafort to stay in touch with Stone. In his written answers to the Special Counsel’s Office, President Trump denied remembering anything about his conversations with Stone during the summer of 2016, and he denied being aware that Stone had discussed WikiLeaks with anyone associated with the campaign. One week after submitting his written answers, President Trump criticized “flipping” witnesses and stated that Stone was “very brave” in indicating he would not cooperate with prosecutors. The Special Counsel’s Report stated that the President’s statements complimenting Stone “support the inference that the President intended to communicate a message that witnesses could be rewarded for refusing to provide testimony adverse to the President[.]”
Oh no!! Wikileaks published info........
Doesn't the Washington Post do the same thing?
I thought you already acknowledged the laws that were broken by Russians hacking and leaking DNC server info.
Yup, hacking is a crime. Stealing classified info is a crime.
Hasn't the Washington Post ever published stolen or hacked info?
Wasn’t this particular issue settled by NY Times vs United States?
Don't tell me, tell Slade.
colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
Slade doesn't seem to have any problem with this point. In reality, it seems like a distraction from the actual topic.I thought you already acknowledged the laws that were broken by Russians hacking and leaking DNC server info. Do you take that back? Do you think laws were not broken or that it’s not a big deal to break them?You're making a comparison between any commutation by Obama (or any prez) and Trump's commutation of Stone and then have the audacity to say I'm taking something out of context. Wow.Well, when you take everything out of context
"On August 2, Stone again called then-candidate Trump, and the two spoke for approximately ten minutes. Again, we don’t know what was said, but less than an hour after speaking with Trump, Stone emailed an associate of his Jerome Corsi, to have someone else who was living in London“ see Assange.” Less than two days later, on August 2, 2016, Corsi emailed Stone. Corsi told Stone that, “Word is friend in embassy [Assange] plans 2 more dumps. One “in October” and that “impact planned to be very damaging,” “time to let more than Podesta to be exposed as in bed w enemy if they are not ready to drop HRC. That appears to be the game hackers are now about."
Around this time, Deputy Campaign Chairman Gates continued to have conversations with Stone about more information that would be coming out from WikiLeaks. Gates was also present for a phone call between Stone and Trump. While Gates couldn’t hear the content of the call, he could hear Stone’s voice on the phone and see his name on the caller ID. Thirty seconds after hanging up the phone with Stone, then-candidate Trump told Gates that there would be more information coming. Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, also stated that he was present for a phone call between Trump and Stone, where Stone told Trump 4 that he had just gotten off the phone with Julian Assange and in a couple of days WikiLeaks would release information, and Trump responded, “oh good, alright.” Paul Manafort also stated that he spoke with Trump about Stone’s predictions and his claimed access to WikiLeaks, and that Trump instructed Manafort to stay in touch with Stone. In his written answers to the Special Counsel’s Office, President Trump denied remembering anything about his conversations with Stone during the summer of 2016, and he denied being aware that Stone had discussed WikiLeaks with anyone associated with the campaign. One week after submitting his written answers, President Trump criticized “flipping” witnesses and stated that Stone was “very brave” in indicating he would not cooperate with prosecutors. The Special Counsel’s Report stated that the President’s statements complimenting Stone “support the inference that the President intended to communicate a message that witnesses could be rewarded for refusing to provide testimony adverse to the President[.]”
Oh no!! Wikileaks published info........
Doesn't the Washington Post do the same thing?
I thought you already acknowledged the laws that were broken by Russians hacking and leaking DNC server info.
Yup, hacking is a crime. Stealing classified info is a crime.
Hasn't the Washington Post ever published stolen or hacked info?
Wasn’t this particular issue settled by NY Times vs United States?
Don't tell me, tell Slade.
colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
Apparently so... these people fascinate meYou’re talking to a “Seth Rich did it” conspiracy theorist. Anything that doesn’t confirm their nonsense is automatically deep state lies.Yes it did... it was uncovered and verified by the FBI. Do some researchRussians stole emails from the DNC and leaked them through Wikileaks. That’s Russian crap.I'm guessing that Roger Stone had something to do with either Trump's campaign and/or the Russian crap. Concerning many things in this and past administrations I've consider my ignorance as bliss.
There was no Russian Crap.
Except that didn't happen
It’s almost impossible to penetrate their bubble.
These People Versus You people.
These People said No - When you people said Candidate Trump will lose.
These People said No - When you people said the Convention would stop him.
These People said No - When you people said that Faithless Electors would stop Trump.
These People said No - When you people said that he wouldn't be sworn in (Even Biden said that was crazy)
These People said N0 - When you people said that Russian Collusion would stop President Trump
These People said N0 - When you people said that Mueller would stop Trump
These People said No - When you People said that the Ukraine Hoax would stop President Trump
These People said No - When you people said that Flynn, Cohen, Stormy & Avenatti, and Access Hollywood would stop Trump
These People said No - When you people said that North Korea would bring President Trump down.
These People said No - When you people said that his handling of Iran would bring President Trump down.
These People said N0 - When you people said that his handling of the death of Khashoggi would bring President Trump down.
The list is longer, but you get the idea (maybe)
These People have yet to be wrong
You people have yet to be right.
"The People" don't elect the president.
Slade doesn't seem to have any problem with this point. In reality, it seems like a distraction from the actual topic.I thought you already acknowledged the laws that were broken by Russians hacking and leaking DNC server info. Do you take that back? Do you think laws were not broken or that it’s not a big deal to break them?You're making a comparison between any commutation by Obama (or any prez) and Trump's commutation of Stone and then have the audacity to say I'm taking something out of context. Wow.Well, when you take everything out of context
"On August 2, Stone again called then-candidate Trump, and the two spoke for approximately ten minutes. Again, we don’t know what was said, but less than an hour after speaking with Trump, Stone emailed an associate of his Jerome Corsi, to have someone else who was living in London“ see Assange.” Less than two days later, on August 2, 2016, Corsi emailed Stone. Corsi told Stone that, “Word is friend in embassy [Assange] plans 2 more dumps. One “in October” and that “impact planned to be very damaging,” “time to let more than Podesta to be exposed as in bed w enemy if they are not ready to drop HRC. That appears to be the game hackers are now about."
Around this time, Deputy Campaign Chairman Gates continued to have conversations with Stone about more information that would be coming out from WikiLeaks. Gates was also present for a phone call between Stone and Trump. While Gates couldn’t hear the content of the call, he could hear Stone’s voice on the phone and see his name on the caller ID. Thirty seconds after hanging up the phone with Stone, then-candidate Trump told Gates that there would be more information coming. Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, also stated that he was present for a phone call between Trump and Stone, where Stone told Trump 4 that he had just gotten off the phone with Julian Assange and in a couple of days WikiLeaks would release information, and Trump responded, “oh good, alright.” Paul Manafort also stated that he spoke with Trump about Stone’s predictions and his claimed access to WikiLeaks, and that Trump instructed Manafort to stay in touch with Stone. In his written answers to the Special Counsel’s Office, President Trump denied remembering anything about his conversations with Stone during the summer of 2016, and he denied being aware that Stone had discussed WikiLeaks with anyone associated with the campaign. One week after submitting his written answers, President Trump criticized “flipping” witnesses and stated that Stone was “very brave” in indicating he would not cooperate with prosecutors. The Special Counsel’s Report stated that the President’s statements complimenting Stone “support the inference that the President intended to communicate a message that witnesses could be rewarded for refusing to provide testimony adverse to the President[.]”
Oh no!! Wikileaks published info........
Doesn't the Washington Post do the same thing?
I thought you already acknowledged the laws that were broken by Russians hacking and leaking DNC server info.
Yup, hacking is a crime. Stealing classified info is a crime.
Hasn't the Washington Post ever published stolen or hacked info?
Wasn’t this particular issue settled by NY Times vs United States?
Don't tell me, tell Slade.
Slade doesn't seem to have any problem with this point.
I haven't seen him say that yet.
it seems like a distraction from the actual topic.
The topic seems to be communicating with Wikileaks.
Is there a law against communicating with Wikileaks? Should there be?
Similar threads
- Replies
- 281
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 18
- Views
- 304
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 141
- Replies
- 25
- Views
- 228
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 21
- Views
- 35
- Replies
- 129
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 1K
- Views
- 14K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8032
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 468
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-