Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 68,382
- 17,537
- 2,190
Throw doubt and questions all you want but don’t pretend to know more than the people who actually have the intel. You have no clue about the details involved in investigating the DNC server. You got a talking point that sounds good but do you really know what’s technically involved?Do you really think you know more about the details of these cases than the FBI?You folks believe in so many right wing media inspired lies I can hardly keep up.The whole Stone case is based on Russia hacking the DNC and giving the info to Wikileaks, which has never been proven
CIA Identifies Russians Who Gave DNC Emails to WikiLeaks
Officials say the report concludes Russia tried to help Donald Trump's campaign.time.com
Mueller report sheds new light on how the Russians hacked the DNC and the Clinton campaign | TechCrunch
The Mueller report contains new information about how the Russian government hacked documents and emails from Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign andtechcrunch.com
Now show me where the FBI did an independent review of the DNC servers?Trump’s mention of ‘Crowdstrike’ and Ukraine, explained
Right after President Donald Trump asked the president of Ukraine "do us a favor," Trump made an unexplained reference twww.politifact.com
Glad to see you acknowledge the FBI never did an independent investigation of the DNC servers and relied solely on Crowstrike who was hire by the DNC and even then the FBI only accessed a review as opposed to a full report...like I said the entire case against Stone is dependent on Russia having hacked the DNC server which the FBI has no way to prove happened since they never did an independent review.
No, I'm just going by what the FBI has admitted, being that they never conducted an independent investigation of the DNC server/cloud based imaging, nor did they review a final report from Crowdstrike.
It's amusing how liberals who support abolishing ICE and now Police are so trusting of the FBI.