Debate Now Common sense gun control

[Otis Mayfield]

1. The goal is to prevent irresponsible people from accessing guns while allowing responsible people to access guns. Irresponsible gun owners are crazy people or criminals who'd use guns in a crime, like a mass shooting.

2. You can inconvenience responsible gun owners but you can't prevent them from owning or using their guns in a responsible manner. An inconvenience is taking a test, applying for a license, etc

3. Ignore the Second Amendment.


Your job is to come up with legislation that will keep irresponsible people away from guns without interfering with responsible gun ownership.

 

[progressive hunter]

1. The goal is to prevent irresponsible people from accessing guns while allowing responsible people to access guns. Irresponsible gun owners are crazy people or criminals who'd use guns in a crime, like a mass shooting.

2. You can inconvenience responsible gun owners but you can't prevent them from owning or using their guns in a responsible manner. An inconvenience is taking a test, applying for a license, etc

3. Ignore the Second Amendment.


Your job is to come up with legislation that will keep irresponsible people away from guns without interfering with responsible gun ownership.

in taking a test or getting a license,, can you fail the test or be denied a license even if youve never committed a crime??

if so thats more than an inconvenience.,,,

I think the 2nd A under its original intent is all we need,,

 

[Otis Mayfield]

in taking a test or getting a license,, can you fail the test or be denied a license even if youve never committed a crime??

if so thats more than an inconvenience.,,,

I think the 2nd A under its original intent is all we need,,

You're supposed to come up with legislation.

 

[airplanemechanic]

You're supposed to come up with legislation.

Already exists. If 10,000 gun laws can't stop people from illegally obtaining firearms, 10,001 won't either.

 

[progressive hunter]

You're supposed to come up with legislation.

no reason for any,, best to get rid of all gun laws and let the 2nd stand as intended,,

 

[Turtlesoup]

1. The goal is to prevent irresponsible people from accessing guns while allowing responsible people to access guns. Irresponsible gun owners are crazy people or criminals who'd use guns in a crime, like a mass shooting.

2. You can inconvenience responsible gun owners but you can't prevent them from owning or using their guns in a responsible manner. An inconvenience is taking a test, applying for a license, etc

3. Ignore the Second Amendment.


Your job is to come up with legislation that will keep irresponsible people away from guns without interfering with responsible gun ownership.

Biden and the dems are turning violent criminals loose in the street, bringing in criminals and rapists from the middle east, and opened the border for violent criminals and drug dealers to flood over...all while encourage the criminals in anti-fa and BLM to attack Americans. All of this top of trying to destroy the cops and corrupting the US military. You are not safe. GET all the guns and amno that you can afford and house---you are going to need them.

 

[hjmick]

There are plenty of laws regarding guns on the books now. There is no need to add any more.

The end.

 

[JGalt]

1. The goal is to prevent irresponsible people from accessing guns while allowing responsible people to access guns. Irresponsible gun owners are crazy people or criminals who'd use guns in a crime, like a mass shooting.

2. You can inconvenience responsible gun owners but you can't prevent them from owning or using their guns in a responsible manner. An inconvenience is taking a test, applying for a license, etc

3. Ignore the Second Amendment.


Your job is to come up with legislation that will keep irresponsible people away from guns without interfering with responsible gun ownership.

So how did irresponsible people shoot and wound 3084 people and shoot and kill 633 people this year, in just one city? One city that's located in a state that has some of the most stringent gun laws in the county..

Chicago Crime, Murder & Mayhem | Criminal Infographics | HeyJackass!

The theory is that criminals are getting them through "straw purchases" in neighboring states, by people who can pass a background check and lie on the BATF 4473 form. But there are already tons of federal legislation on the books that makes that a crime. So the fault of the illegal gun problem isn't on legal gun owners. It's on the government inability to protect you.

Maybe you should by a gun.

 

[JGalt]

You're supposed to come up with legislation.

There are already laws against robbery and murder.

 

[Crepitus]

1. The goal is to prevent irresponsible people from accessing guns while allowing responsible people to access guns. Irresponsible gun owners are crazy people or criminals who'd use guns in a crime, like a mass shooting.

2. You can inconvenience responsible gun owners but you can't prevent them from owning or using their guns in a responsible manner. An inconvenience is taking a test, applying for a license, etc

3. Ignore the Second Amendment.


Your job is to come up with legislation that will keep irresponsible people away from guns without interfering with responsible gun ownership.

Mental and physical competency tests for all purchases, license issued at time and place of purchase, renewable yearly. Liability insurance required for licensy.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

What about just putting the ones using the guns illegally away for life with no visitation rights from others with the exception of inmates?

I have the perfect vacation resort area to put them in also it's called Bikini Atoll.

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[Darkwind]

1. The goal is to prevent irresponsible people from accessing guns while allowing responsible people to access guns. Irresponsible gun owners are crazy people or criminals who'd use guns in a crime, like a mass shooting.

2. You can inconvenience responsible gun owners but you can't prevent them from owning or using their guns in a responsible manner. An inconvenience is taking a test, applying for a license, etc

3. Ignore the Second Amendment.


Your job is to come up with legislation that will keep irresponsible people away from guns without interfering with responsible gun ownership.

Why you are at it, ignore the 16th, 14th, and 22nd Amendments. Let's write legislation that does away with confiscatory taxation, anchor babies, and term limits for the President.

1. The very top priority is that you do not hinder, inconvenience, nor prevent a lawful citizen from the purchase or ownership of a firearm WITHOUT due process.

2. Enforce existing gun laws in which a person who uses a gun in a crime, is barred from exercising their Second Amenment rights and that NO JUDGE will be permitted to release them early. Regardless of race.

 

[Darkwind]

Mental and physical competency tests for all purchases, license issued at time and place of purchase, renewable yearly. Liability insurance required for licensy.

Mental and physical competency tests for all voters, voter registration before each and every election.

 

[progressive hunter]

Mental and physical competency tests for all purchases, license issued at time and place of purchase, renewable yearly. Liability insurance required for licensy.

how is that going to stop a criminal from killing someone with a gun??

 

[progressive hunter]

Mental and physical competency tests for all voters, voter registration before each and every election.

that would eliminate 9 out of 10 democrat voters,,

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Mental and physical competency tests for all purchases, license issued at time and place of purchase, renewable yearly. Liability insurance required for licensy.

Any such legislation must be constitutional. What you propose is not.

 

[Darkwind]

that would eliminate 9 out of 10 democrat voters,,

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

1. The goal is to prevent irresponsible people from accessing guns while allowing responsible people to access guns. Irresponsible gun owners are crazy people or criminals who'd use guns in a crime, like a mass shooting.

2. You can inconvenience responsible gun owners but you can't prevent them from owning or using their guns in a responsible manner. An inconvenience is taking a test, applying for a license, etc

3. Ignore the Second Amendment.


Your job is to come up with legislation that will keep irresponsible people away from guns without interfering with responsible gun ownership.

Do you think criminals follow "Common sense gun control"? When you find out, get back to me..

 

[Otis Mayfield]

Any such legislation must be constitutional. What you propose is not.

You don't understand the "structured debate forum".

The OP gets to set rules that the posters must follow. If you don't want to participate, there's plenty of other forums. There's like a 100 of them.

 

[progressive hunter]

You don't understand the "structured debate forum".

The OP gets to set rules that the posters must follow. If you don't want to participate, there's plenty of other forums. There's like a 100 of them.

you said legislation,, and any legislation would violate the constitution,,