Aren't you happy that a tax cheat was brought to justice for God's sake?
As for the meeting at Trump Tower? Nothing illegal happened there. I'm sorry but it didn't! Some people told the Trump campaign they had dirt on Hillary. A meeting was held to hear them out. When it quickly became apparent they didn't have any dirt on Hillary and were actually there pushing another agenda...the meeting rapidly ended.
According to whom?
As for the meeting itself; first the Trumps said it was about adoptions; now they say it was to get dirt on the campaign. Can you really trust anything they say?
There has been ZERO evidence tying the Trump campaign to any of the electronic penetration of our "political apparatus", Candy!
So Roger Stone's admitted actions were just Roger doing it on his own?
Paying off anyone to keep them from saying bad things about you before an election isn't illegal. I'm sorry but it's not! Quite frankly...THAT...pales in comparison to paying someone to make up bad things about your opponent before an election. That's what Hillary and the DNC DID!
It's so innocent; it's gotten an attorney to plead guilty to two counts of nothing then.
I ask AGAIN, Candy...why is Mueller investigating Trump AND ONLY TRUMP if the stated goal was protecting our elections? Isn’t it quite obvious that this ISN'T about protecting our elections?
I ask again…do you know what Mueller is doing? All of the known evidence points to Trump’s crime syndicate being complicit with the Russian authorities.
If it WAS then wouldn’t a campaign that paid large sums of money to create a series of phony "dossiers" to smear it's opposition warrant an investigation?
I’m not sure that happened to start with. But even if it did, that doesn’t sound remotely criminal.
Wouldn’t a campaign that colluded with one of the major networks to "fix" one of the major Democratic debates warrant an investigation?
No. Not from this special counsel anyway.
When a police officer makes a traffic stop they need probable cause. If they made that stop not because they had probable cause but because they didn’t like the person driving the car and created a false excuse to make that traffic stop...then anything they discovered after that point would be thrown out of every court in this land!
Every intel agency we have under TRUMP says that the Russians meddled in our elections.
Trump’s campaign manager was at meetings with people who had ties to the Kremlin…fact
Trump’s advisor Roger Stone has admitted ties to the hackers who hacked the DNC…fact
Trump’s son and son in law met with people who had ties to the Kremlin…fact
The deputy AG—Trump’s deputy AG as well as his AG—though there was enough probable cause to create a special counsel.
That’s what's taken place with the Mueller investigation.
Nonsense.
You've started an investigation into "collusion" based in large part on the phony dossiers that Hillary Clinton paid for as the false excuse to investigate and then used THAT as the means to punish anyone that you can who's connected with the Trump presidency! The Federal judge that's overseeing the case has made it quite clear that he has little doubt that this was always about attacking Trump's legitimate election and NOT about election crimes!
Okay…not sure what “case” you’re talking about.
Your turn to answer the questions in blue up there.