Comey Indicted

[Marener]

Winning an election means that the fbi listens to your orders and policies, not works to undermine you.


If the people that hold the government offices that make the organization of government don't respect that, then that is democracy failing.


It is a violation of the concept of peaceful transfer of power.


We won. We were supposed to have the power. Instead your agents in the government ginned up fake scandals and impeachments to bog down Trump's first term.


That was denying us the peaceful transfer of power.


If democracy stops working, what do we do next?

What do you want to do next, since you are sabotaging and supporting the sabotage on democracy?

Because Trump won the election, do you think that gives him the power to tell the DoJ to persecute his enemies?

 

[Correll]

Because Trump won the election, do you think that gives him the power to tell the DoJ to persecute his enemies?

We are discussing Comey's actions.


You can refuse to discuss it. But that doesn't change anything. THe reality is still that your side, that dominates the government workers, is not respecting the peaceful transefer of power.

I have asked you a question. What do you want to do, INSTEAD of peaceful transfer of power.


This is something YOUR side is doing and you clearly support. So, what is your goal here?

 

[DonGlock26]

Did Comey turn himself into authorities yet? Where's the mugshot?

 

[Marener]

We are discussing Comey's actions.


You can refuse to discuss it. But that doesn't change anything. THe reality is still that your side, that dominates the government workers, is not respecting the peaceful transefer of power.

I have asked you a question. What do you want to do, INSTEAD of peaceful transfer of power.


This is something YOUR side is doing and you clearly support. So, what is your goal here?

There’s no threat to the peaceful transfer of power. You’re paranoid.

The DoJ should resist any attempt to influence their work based on politics. Those attempts should be made public so the people of this country can know about the corruption of people like Trump.

 

[Correll]

There’s no threat to the peaceful transfer of power. You’re paranoid.

The DoJ should resist any attempt to influence their work based on politics. Those attempts should be made public so the people of this country can know about the corruption of people like Trump.

The fbi was resisting the President based on politics.


Dude. Talking shit isn't relevant here.

I want to know what you want to do, what new game you want to play INSTEAD of "peaceful transfer of power".


Your side isn't playing that anymore. What new game do you want to play?

 

[Marener]

The fbi was resisting the President based on politics.


Dude. Talking shit isn't relevant here.

I want to know what you want to do, what new game you want to play INSTEAD of "peaceful transfer of power".


Your side isn't playing that anymore. What new game do you want to play?

I don’t know what you mean exactly by “resisting based on politics”.

Be specific.

Your question is dishonest and doesn’t deserve an answer. We had a peaceful transition of power. That doesn’t mean the president gets to violate our national principles.

 

[Hollie]

Not everyone llkes my citing objective reality.

You need to understand what objective reality is before claiming you are citing it.

 

[Correll]

I don’t know what you mean exactly by “resisting based on politics”.

Be specific.

Your question is dishonest and doesn’t deserve an answer. We had a peaceful transition of power. That doesn’t mean the president gets to violate our national principles.

Ok, you refuse to answer.

I guess in the short term, all we can do is purge all of you people from government.

... no, that's not nearly enough.


YOu guys are doing similar shit everywhere you are, corporations,schools, ect.


Yeah, we're going to need to come up with a strong response. You are clearly playing a completely new game and won't even tell us the name of it.


Short term, purge you from EVERYTHING we can and try to move forward with maga, without any consideration or mercy for you or your side or ANYTHING you have to say.


BUT, that is not enough, clearly.

 

[leftwinger]

Steele's Russian source conjured it up, from all I have read and Steele was hired by the company her lawfirm hired to get opposition research on Trump from overseas, Fusion GPS

No one has been able to prove she or Steele or Fusion GPS, created the dossier out of thin air or committed a crime. There have been, IG reviews, Doj with special prosecutor John Durham hired by William Barr, and the Mueller investigation and it didn't show Clinton was aware that the dossier was not true, until later....or at least our law enforcement hadn't been able to prove that she knew or prove that Steele ordered it to be created. That's why Trump hasn't sued all of them for defamation and won!

John McCain, who didn't know if real or not, gave the Dossier which he was given, to the FBI to check it out....the FBI might have had a copy already, not certain?

I think what Comey gave to his friend to give to the press was his copious notes that he took on Trump and released them, after Trump...he claims , told a bunch of lies to the public about Comey's firing....? Comey released parts of his copious notes, to show Trump was lying about what he was saying about him..... Again if memory serves....

Just SHUP with your linkless on-going fairytales. You said Mueller took less than 1 yr harassing Trump in another fairytale by you. I saw it, let it go. But now, I bring the facts. The 20 Mule team wasted 22 months + Comeys wasted corrupt time in FBI. *****

The full effort from the FBI's launch under Comey to Mueller's conclusion spanned roughly 2.5 years (July 2016 to March 2019). This was not a continuous "targeting" of Trump personally but a probe into broader election interference, with Mueller's team ultimately not establishing conspiracy or coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia.

 

[Hollie]

I don’t know what you mean exactly by “resisting based on politics”.

Be specific.

Your question is dishonest and doesn’t deserve an answer. We had a peaceful transition of power. That doesn’t mean the president gets to violate our national principles.

Thats pretty funny pretending you no comprendo the slogan " resisting based on politics". The left has manufactured a new slogan wherein they call themselves, "the resistance".

Really, darlin'. Stay tuned to your politburo mouthpieces. You're hardly a "resistance" warrior if you're not in tune with the latest slogans and ideological pablum.

"Violate our national principles". That's pretty darn funny coming from a pom pom flailer for the party that has consistently violated our national principles.

 

[Marener]

Ok, you refuse to answer.

Ask a legitimate question and not in the vein of “when did you stop beating your wife”.

Grow up.

 

[Marener]

Thats pretty funny pretending you no comprendo the slogan " resisting based on politics". The left has manufactured a new slogan wherein they call themselves, "the resistance".

Resisting based on the rule of law and constitutional principles.

They’re resisting Trump’s authoritarian control of the government that conflicts with our countries founding values.

 

[Hollie]

Resisting based on the rule of law and constitutional principles.

They’re resisting Trump’s authoritarian control of the government that conflicts with our countries founding values.

Really, darlin'. You don't see the absurdity in being lectured about the "rule of law and Constitutional principles" by neo-Marxist, furry freaks who openly reject any association with the "rule of law and Constitutional principles"

 

[Crepitus]

Rule of law and honor has returned to the United States

 

[Marener]

Really, darlin'. You don't see the absurdity in being lectured about the "rule of law and Constitutional principles" by neo-Marxist, furry freaks who openly reject any association with the "rule of law and Constitutional principles"

The rule of law and constitutional principles don’t allow the president to tell the DoJ to indict Comey because Trump really hates him.

 

[Zincwarrior]

at least you are admitting your demafacism

Why not? Thats the Trump legal doctrine. Now he is after Wray, Bolton, Schiff. Next up Pelosi, Clinton, Harris, and Biden.

 

[struth]

Why not? Thats the Trump legal doctrine. Now he is after Wray, Bolton, Schiff. Next up Pelosi, Clinton, Harris, and Biden.

Trump’s legal doctrine requires you to be honest? Well, I don’t think that’s true, I think it’s just good you are honest.

As far as your list, well nobody is above the law. That’s trumps legal doctrine, which is the American legal doctrine that you demafacist so radically oppose

 

[Hollie]

The rule of law and constitutional principles don’t allow the president to tell the DoJ to indict Comey because Trump really hates him.

The DOJ was directed to indict Comey because Trump hates him?

Is that your best conspiracy theory?

 

[Marener]

The DOJ was directed to indict Comey because Trump hates him?

Is that your best conspiracy theory?

Trump deletes post demanding Bondi prosecute Comey, Schiff, James | Fox News

President Donald Trump posted and deleted criticism of AG Pam Bondi demanding prosecutions, then sent a supportive message an hour later praising her work.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Hollie]

Trump deletes post demanding Bondi prosecute Comey, Schiff, James | Fox News

President Donald Trump posted and deleted criticism of AG Pam Bondi demanding prosecutions, then sent a supportive message an hour later praising her work.

www.foxnews.com

Nothing in your cut and paste supports your conspiracy theory that "Trump hates him'