Comey Indicted

[DonGlock26]

Like most of the cabinet, she's merely a "yes man". Nothing more.

And Garland wasn’t?

 

[DonGlock26]

Trump his regime ARE the DEEP state.

The fake story that shows how conspiracy theories spread​

View attachment 1166386
BBC
https://www.bbc.com › news › blogs-trending-38156985
Dec 2, 2016 — Thousands of people are spreading a false rumour about a Washington pizza restaurant and a child sex ring. But why?

But thousands of people are convinced that a paedophilia ring involving people at the highest levels of the Democratic Party is operating out of a Washington pizza restaurant.

The conspiracy theory bubbled up from 4chan onto the mainstream internet when a Reddit user posted a long document with all of the "evidence" several days before the US election. It first appeared on a section of the site popular with Donald Trump supporters from the extremist white nationalist alt-right.

Your gaslighter is sputtering again.

 

[Crepitus]

Trump won reelection. Cope.

We are all coping in our own ways, including you.

 

[Crepitus]

And Garland wasn’t?

Nope. If he had been tRump would have been indicted on 1/7.

 

[DonGlock26]

Nope.

 

[Rawley]

I'm usually against the political prosecution of enemies. I also thought it was a damned shame that Scooter Libby got convicted by a DC Jury, because he wasn't even the one who outed Valerie Plame.

ANd you cheered for four years while your cult tried to put the President in prison for the rest of his life. LOL

 

[rightwinger]

On what grounds?

Lack of evidence
Presidential interference

 

[leftwinger]

Here's another one to lock up;

BREAKING: CHRIS WRAY LIED UNDER OATH! FBI Had 274 Plainclothes Agents in the Crowd on January 6th – IT WAS A TOTAL FEDSURRECTION

 

[Blaster]

What Russia hoax? The hoax the DOJ and Republicans in power had reason... to appoint a Special prosecutor to investigate, after Trump fired Comey?

There was no collusion and Comey knew that.

 

[Crepitus]

Cool how you ignored the important part of my post.

 

[schmidlap]

Comey was involved in the Russia hoax.

Are you referring to Russia's interfering in the 2016 US election to hurt Clinton and help Trump as exposed by the FBI, NSA, and CIA, and confirmed by two Republican-led Senate investigative committees?

The convicted felon's petty vendetta will fizzle:

​

After a two-month investigation, federal prosecutors in Virginia were unable to gather sufficient evidence to support bringing criminal charges against former FBI Director James Comey for allegedly lying to Congress...​

​

The prosecutors earlier this week summarized their findings -- that probable cause does not exist to secure an indictment, let alone a conviction at trial -- in a detailed declination memo for ... Trump's newly appointed U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, sources said. ​

​

Nevertheless, sources say Halligan plans to ask a grand jury in the coming days to indict Comey, escalating Trump's unprecedented directive to prosecute some of his political adversaries.​

​

MSN

www.msn.com

​

 

[Rawley]

Lack of evidence

GJ - Jury said there was enough evidence.

Presidential interference

The Orange Man bad defense? GOod luck with that

 

[Marener]

And Garland wasn’t?

Nope.

 

[Marener]

GJ - Jury said there was enough evidence.

Prosecutors decide which cases to take to trial. Grand juries don’t have the ability to accurately judge the likelihood of securing a conviction.

 

[j-mac]

It’s corruption when a sitting president starts firing prosecutors for deciding against charging their political enemies.

Obviously.

They’re not even hiding it. They know they have people like you controlled.

So, when Obama did it, it was ok, right?

 

[Care4all]

There was no collusion and Comey knew that.

How would he know that, without investigating? Comey was fired, but the Republicans in the DOJ hired Robert Mueller, A long time Republican to investigate....which took another year to complete, after Comey left...

There was Russian Interference to help Trump! That's A FACT! but you are right that they found no conspiracy of the Trump campaign coordinating with the Russians ahead of the Russian actions, which is required for collusion conspiracy....

 

[Marener]

So, when Obama did it, it was ok, right?

When Obama did what exactly?

 

[j-mac]

Corruption is corruption.

You cheer when Trump and his henchmen and lackeys follow Trump around doing side deals.

It has nothing to do with anyone's side being "gored".

It is pathetic of you to try and use that as an excuse to look the other way when your leader does it.

It exxentially makes the point. You approve of Trump's open corruption.

Call a waambulence

 

[Mac1958]

One thing we know for sure: If they don't get Comey, they'll just say it was a corrupt process.

Then on to the next one who tried to hold Trump accountable.

 

[j-mac]

When Obama did what exactly?

Obama to replace U.S. Attorneys

<p><strong>Blog:</strong> President Barack Obama plans to replace a "batch" of U.S. Attorneys in the next few weeks and more prosecutors thereafter, according to At</p>

www.politico.com