Colorado judge strikes down AR-15 ban, and over 10 round magazine ban....good.

[JoeB131]

And you lie again...you have been shown over and over that the CDC has done all sorts of gun research since the 1990s....I have listed that research over and over again.....they were banned from taking the political stance of calling for banning guns, you lying asshole.

The CDC Could Totally Study Gun Violence—It Just Needs Money

Congress clarified last year that the CDC can use its budget for gun research, after decades of effectively banning it. But Democrats are still fighting to get actual funding approved.

www.wired.com

For all the obsession that Americans have with guns, the country has awful little scientific data to show for it. In 1996, Congress passed a law with a provision known as the Dickey Amendment that effectively prohibited the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from using its life-saving budget to study gun violence. As a result, for decades the US has not thrown its full resources at the problem the way it has with, say, tobacco or car crashes.

After the school shooting in Parkland, Florida, last year, and the wave of activism that followed, Congress clarified that the CDC could, in fact, use funds to study gun violence. It just didn’t earmark any additional money for that purpose. Months later, Democrats regained the majority in the House. They’ve been using that status to fight to get $50 million explicitly earmarked for studying the underpinnings of America’s gun violence

 

[JoeB131]

On Biden's own website he stated part of his gun plan was to lift the liability protection for gun manufacturers and sellers. That would effectively allow commie cities and individuals to sue them all out of business.

Or they can do something as breathtakingly rational as actually check out the people they sell guns to.

Also in his plans were a law that prohibits gun, gun parts or ammo sales over the internet.

Again, great idea! We should make sure who we are selling guns to.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So now you want to move the goal posts to illegal bombs. Why not bring up poisoning city water supplies while you are at it?

His point is that people who want to commit mass murders are not going to allow strict access to firearms change their plans. Not to mention there is a good percentage of people who did commit mass murders that were able to, and did buy firearms from a store legally. They passed the federal background check, bought the guns, perhaps not all at one time, and committed their murders. They had no criminal record up to that point. The Vegas shooter is a perfect example of that.

 

[Flash]

And you lie again...you have been shown over and over that the CDC has done all sorts of gun research since the 1990s....I have listed that research over and over again.....they were banned from taking the political stance of calling for banning guns, you lying asshole.

The CDC Could Totally Study Gun Violence—It Just Needs Money

Congress clarified last year that the CDC can use its budget for gun research, after decades of effectively banning it. But Democrats are still fighting to get actual funding approved.

www.wired.com

For all the obsession that Americans have with guns, the country has awful little scientific data to show for it. In 1996, Congress passed a law with a provision known as the Dickey Amendment that effectively prohibited the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from using its life-saving budget to study gun violence. As a result, for decades the US has not thrown its full resources at the problem the way it has with, say, tobacco or car crashes.

After the school shooting in Parkland, Florida, last year, and the wave of activism that followed, Congress clarified that the CDC could, in fact, use funds to study gun violence. It just didn’t earmark any additional money for that purpose. Months later, Democrats regained the majority in the House. They’ve been using that status to fight to get $50 million explicitly earmarked for studying the underpinnings of America’s gun violence

You didn't answer my question Moon Bat.

How are my firearms a threat to your ***** ass?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Or they can do something as breathtakingly rational as actually check out the people they sell guns to.

We already do. It's called a federal background check, and you cannot buy a gun from any licensed dealer until you pass it.

Again, great idea! We should make sure who we are selling guns to.

That's not what he's after. He's trying to do a round about on the US Constitution that protects our right to own and carry firearms. If the commies sue all the gun stores out of business, sue all the gun manufacturers out of business, prohibit people buying firearms over the internet, buy parts or ammo, there would be essentially no place for Americans to buy guns accept off the street like criminals will do, and no law abiding person is going to do that.

 

[westwall]

On Biden's own website he stated part of his gun plan was to lift the liability protection for gun manufacturers and sellers. That would effectively allow commie cities and individuals to sue them all out of business.

Or they can do something as breathtakingly rational as actually check out the people they sell guns to.

Also in his plans were a law that prohibits gun, gun parts or ammo sales over the internet.

Again, great idea! We should make sure who we are selling guns to.

They have been doing that for years. The Parkland shooter was well known to law enforcement. Had they bothered to arrest him for just one of the many felonies we know he had committed prior to his rampage, he would have not been able to do his terrible deed.

And assholes, like you, support not arresting assholes like him.

 

[freyasman]

I've got a lot of feedback, but no explanation of why anyone needs high-powered weaponry.

The AR-15 is not high powered....the 5.56 or .22 version of the rifle is weaker than the deer hunting rifle people use every fall....you have no idea what you are talking about or the issues involved........you talk out of your ass and ask questions that reveal your ignorance.....

It's not a matter of this gun or that gun. Why are you people doing this? I'm trying to find out what you folks are so afraid of. So many Americans, like me, are not afraid to live each day in these United States. You are. What gives? What's your neighborhood like? I live in one in northern Virginia in which I can find people from every nation in the world, but there are no problems, and the food is really good.

You are the one who seems to be afraid; why does freedom scare you so much?

I am not scared. I walk in the US free and not scared. What are you so scared of that you have to have a gun every time you step outside? What is your "freedom" thing about? Why do you feel so threated?

Again...

According to you rape does not exist in the U.S.?

According to you robberies do not happen in the U.S.?

According to you, no one is ever murdered in the U.S.?

Is that your stance?

No. And I never said that it was. You sound like a scared old queen.

Hmmmmm....and now we see that homophobia is also a hallmark of the left...whenever they are pressed, it gets thrown out there.....they aren't against homophobia, they simply want it as a tool to attack their enemies...

Really? What are we supposed to call these scaredy cats who have guns and moronic beards who pretend to be men (heterosexual men) but are not? Oathkeepers? Proud boys? Militia? will "white trash" do?

Cat lady is spazzing out.....

 

[Concerned American]

When the record holders all used one specific weapon

The bombers in OKC, Nashville and the Boston marathon might disagree with you

So now you want to move the goal posts to illegal bombs. Why not bring up poisoning city water supplies while you are at it?

Not moving the goal posts at all--if guns are not available, other forms of terrorism will arise and all you did was to disarm law-abiding citizens. The crooks will still have the weapons of terror. I thought you had enough common sense to be able to draw the parallel--apparently I was mistaken. And yes, poisoning water supplies is another option.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

The CDC Could Totally Study Gun Violence—It Just Needs Money

Congress clarified last year that the CDC can use its budget for gun research, after decades of effectively banning it. But Democrats are still fighting to get actual funding approved.

www.wired.com

For all the obsession that Americans have with guns, the country has awful little scientific data to show for it. In 1996, Congress passed a law with a provision known as the Dickey Amendment that effectively prohibited the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from using its life-saving budget to study gun violence. As a result, for decades the US has not thrown its full resources at the problem the way it has with, say, tobacco or car crashes.

After the school shooting in Parkland, Florida, last year, and the wave of activism that followed, Congress clarified that the CDC could, in fact, use funds to study gun violence. It just didn’t earmark any additional money for that purpose. Months later, Democrats regained the majority in the House. They’ve been using that status to fight to get $50 million explicitly earmarked for studying the underpinnings of America’s gun violence

The only way to resolve "the problem" is to make owning AR-15's and at least a dozen 30 round magazines MANDATORY for every citizen.

Studies prove that would stop nearly all government violence against citizens.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

View attachment 469466

Why don't you care?
Shouldn't every American have equal rights as pre the 14th amendment?

At least conservatives are consistent at being willfully ignorant and wrong.

This has nothing to do with the 14th Amendment; this isn’t a civil rights issue.

This post does illustrate the hypocrisy of conservatives, who have no problem violating the 14th Amendment when it comes to the right to privacy or the rights of gay and transgender Americans.

You don't know anything about the 14th amendment
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I've got a lot of feedback, but no explanation of why anyone needs high-powered weaponry.

That’s because no one ‘needs’ an AR 15; anyone who claims to ‘need’ one is a liar.

But that’s not the issue.

The issue is the enactment of bad laws, government excess and overreach, and firearm regulatory measures that are likely un-Constitutional – laws banning assault weapons are an example of such bad laws.

The problem of gun violence in America has little to do with the availability or possession of certain types of firearms; the problem is far too complex to be solved with ‘bans,’ where AWBs serve only to increase the authority of the state at the expense of individual liberty.

Dumb ass show me the word needs in the bill of rights
need is not a necessity for the right to have a gun

 

[freyasman]

I've got a lot of feedback, but no explanation of why anyone needs high-powered weaponry.

The AR-15 is not high powered....the 5.56 or .22 version of the rifle is weaker than the deer hunting rifle people use every fall....you have no idea what you are talking about or the issues involved........you talk out of your ass and ask questions that reveal your ignorance.....

It's not a matter of this gun or that gun. Why are you people doing this? I'm trying to find out what you folks are so afraid of. So many Americans, like me, are not afraid to live each day in these United States. You are. What gives? What's your neighborhood like? I live in one in northern Virginia in which I can find people from every nation in the world, but there are no problems, and the food is really good.

You are the one who seems to be afraid; why does freedom scare you so much?

I am not scared. I walk in the US free and not scared. What are you so scared of that you have to have a gun every time you step outside? What is your "freedom" thing about? Why do you feel so threated?

Again...

According to you rape does not exist in the U.S.?

According to you robberies do not happen in the U.S.?

According to you, no one is ever murdered in the U.S.?

Is that your stance?

No. And I never said that it was. You sound like a scared old queen.

Hmmmmm....and now we see that homophobia is also a hallmark of the left...whenever they are pressed, it gets thrown out there.....they aren't against homophobia, they simply want it as a tool to attack their enemies...

Really? What are we supposed to call these scaredy cats who have guns and moronic beards who pretend to be men (heterosexual men) but are not? Oathkeepers? Proud boys? Militia? will "white trash" do?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I've got a lot of feedback, but no explanation of why anyone needs high-powered weaponry.

The AR-15 is not high powered....the 5.56 or .22 version of the rifle is weaker than the deer hunting rifle people use every fall....you have no idea what you are talking about or the issues involved........you talk out of your ass and ask questions that reveal your ignorance.....

View attachment 469877

It's the little one on the right.

Would you believe the north American Arms 22 mag. revolver is restricted in Californa

 

[Flash]

I've got a lot of feedback, but no explanation of why anyone needs high-powered weaponry.

The AR-15 is not high powered....the 5.56 or .22 version of the rifle is weaker than the deer hunting rifle people use every fall....you have no idea what you are talking about or the issues involved........you talk out of your ass and ask questions that reveal your ignorance.....

View attachment 469877

It's the little one on the right.

Would you believe the north American Arms 22 mag. revolver is restricted in Californa

Not being a member of the Communist Party USA or an Illegal is considered a hate crime in California.

 

[Flash]

Looks Like JoeB is too chickenshit to answer my simple question.

Typical uneducated Libtard. He ain't bright enough to give a coherent answer.

 

[westwall]

Randy weaver was a mountain top yahoo, who was no threat to anyone. The fbi tried to get him to spy on someone they wanted to build a case on, and when he refused they went after him.

They framed him for a petty crime and used that as an excuse to spy on him, and when they got caught, the agent shot weavers kid, and dog.

Then, good old lon horiuchi, of sicherheistdienst fame, murdered weavers wife while she was holding a baby.

You left out the part where his Nazi ass shot a Federal Marshall executing a valid arrest warrant.

Or that Weaver's Nazi buddies were shooting at the FBI when Lon shot his Nazi old lady.

Koresh was a loon who previously had turned himself in when charged with a crime. The ATF though needed to justify the existence of their SWAT team so decided to raid the community.

There were 25+children incinerated in that fire. Completely innocent children. You bleat about the DACA kids but turn your blind eye to those kids because you are a sociopath.

There were THREE investigations of the Waco fire, one of them led by John Danforth, a respected Republican Senator, and ALL THREE of them concluded the Davidians set themselves on fire and committed mass suicide.

Koresh had 53 days to turn himself in. He picked mass suicide and took all those kids with him.

Yes, I feel bad those kids weren't rescued when it was determined Koresh was ******* them.

There was no warrant presented when the agent was shot. The warrant was FRAUDULENTLY obtained which made it null and void, and you ignore the millions paid to Weaver because of the illegal government action you lying piece of shit.

 

[Flash]

And you lie again...you have been shown over and over that the CDC has done all sorts of gun research since the 1990s....I have listed that research over and over again.....they were banned from taking the political stance of calling for banning guns, you lying asshole.

The CDC Could Totally Study Gun Violence—It Just Needs Money

Congress clarified last year that the CDC can use its budget for gun research, after decades of effectively banning it. But Democrats are still fighting to get actual funding approved.

www.wired.com

For all the obsession that Americans have with guns, the country has awful little scientific data to show for it. In 1996, Congress passed a law with a provision known as the Dickey Amendment that effectively prohibited the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from using its life-saving budget to study gun violence. As a result, for decades the US has not thrown its full resources at the problem the way it has with, say, tobacco or car crashes.

After the school shooting in Parkland, Florida, last year, and the wave of activism that followed, Congress clarified that the CDC could, in fact, use funds to study gun violence. It just didn’t earmark any additional money for that purpose. Months later, Democrats regained the majority in the House. They’ve been using that status to fight to get $50 million explicitly earmarked for studying the underpinnings of America’s gun violence

You are confused about this Moon Bat.

There is not what you stupid uneducated Moon Bats call "gun" violence. It is just crime and it is mostly in our Democrat controlled big city shitholes among mostly minority demographics. The crimes are mostly among gang bangers, druggies, street thugs and other assorted lowlifes. You know, the core voting block for the Democrat Party. The ones that don't obey the existing laws now, no less any more law you idiots want to pass.

We don't need to study jackshit because we know where the crime is at an who is doing it and passing more stringent gun control laws ain't gonna change anything. Passing oppressive laws that only law abiding citizens will obey that don't commit the crime won't change anything.

Are you too stupid to understand this? Is this over your Moon Bat head?

 

[Vrenn]

The reality- Most gun deaths are suicides, accidents and domestic violence. Cases of criminals shooting people are the exception, and cases of civilians killing bad guys are so rare they barely register.

The presence of an armed civilian certainly changes the plans of a bad guy, doesn't it? It's one of the reasons people like you who don't carry a firearm are safe. The criminal has no idea if you are armed or not.

And I promote CCW. With only a couple or three times, the CCW people have NOT been part of the problem. Meanwhile, the list of the unlicensed open carry problems goes on and on. It's called Regulation.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

On Biden's own website he stated part of his gun plan was to lift the liability protection for gun manufacturers and sellers. That would effectively allow commie cities and individuals to sue them all out of business.

Or they can do something as breathtakingly rational as actually check out the people they sell guns to.

Also in his plans were a law that prohibits gun, gun parts or ammo sales over the internet.

Again, great idea! We should make sure who we are selling guns to.

damn you are one ignorant bastard

 

[freyasman]