colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
Do you have a link to the Senate vote on Garland?What does an election year have to do with filling a SCOTUS seat?
Explain it to Merrick Garland
Game, Set, Match.....Thanks for playing
Sure, I'll explain it to Garland. The President nominated him, which is his Constitutional authority. The Senate rejected him, which is their Constitutional authority.
Turns out it was pretty simple, huh?
You have to show me the text in the Constitution you're referring to that Garland has a right to a Senate vote. Thanks in advance!
I'll refer you to your own statement. You said the Senate rejected him. Please provide the vote that shows the Senate rejected him.
I never said there was a vote. I said they rejected him. A "vote" is just the artificial hurdle you put up and want me to clear. Since you're claiming the Constitutional right to a vote, prove that there is a Constitutional right to a vote. The onus is on you to prove your claim. So prove it. Go ...
The only way to reject a nominee is by voting on them. If they didn't vote on him, then you lied.