- Nov 18, 2019
- Reaction score
The only way to reject a nominee is by voting on them. If they didn't vote on him, then you lied.I never said there was a vote. I said they rejected him. A "vote" is just the artificial hurdle you put up and want me to clear. Since you're claiming the Constitutional right to a vote, prove that there is a Constitutional right to a vote. The onus is on you to prove your claim. So prove it. Go ...I'll refer you to your own statement. You said the Senate rejected him. Please provide the vote that shows the Senate rejected him.You have to show me the text in the Constitution you're referring to that Garland has a right to a Senate vote. Thanks in advance!Do you have a link to the Senate vote on Garland?Sure, I'll explain it to Garland. The President nominated him, which is his Constitutional authority. The Senate rejected him, which is their Constitutional authority.
Turns out it was pretty simple, huh?