I think your right all the polls are wrong.Obama was on his way out, he lost a lot of seats.. trumpHas nothing to do with who wins the election. The President IS President for the full term. The people voted for the FULL TERM of Donald Trump.Fine. Trump can nominate on Nov. 4th, the Senate can confirm on Dec. 15th.I’m truly dumbfounded that a woman who wants to win republican votes won’t vote to take control of the the most important seat to protect the Constitution.
Susan Collins announces her opposition to voting on a Supreme Court nominee before election
The Republican senator announced that she does "not believe that the Senate should vote on the nominee prior to the election"www.cbsnews.com
she’s going to get smoked in Maine, I wouldn’t vote for that that fraud.
No, she said nothing of the sort. She said she favors waiting until after the election to appoint a SC justice.
Susan Collins says she opposes voting on SCOTUS nominee before election
Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, announced on Saturday that she thinks Republicans should, out of "fairness to the American people," wait until after the 2020 elections to vote on Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's replacement.www.foxnews.com
If Trump wins the election, I would have no issue with that. I may not like it and Democrats will still put up a fight, but it will be within his right to do so.
Doesn't matter. Mitch set the standard. If Trump loses, he don't get to pick. Lame ducks don't count.
Has a 53% approval rating
No he doesn't. Rasmussen gives him that approval rating. Here is his actual approval rating. Sorry, you don't get to walk back the standard after Mitch set it.
President Trump Job Approval | Election Other | RealClearPolitics
RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approvalwww.realclearpolitics.com
Technically....Trump has four months till he would be replaced....assuming that he loses.
Well too bad bud. This is the consequences of losing elections.
I’m truly dumbfounded that a woman who wants to win republican votes won’t vote to take control of the the most important seat to protect the Constitution.Susan Collins announces her opposition to voting on a Supreme Court nominee before election
The Republican senator announced that she does "not believe that the Senate should vote on the nominee prior to the election"
she’s going to get smoked in Maine, I wouldn’t vote for that that fraud.
www.crowdpac.com
I’m truly dumbfounded that a woman who wants to win republican votes won’t vote to take control of the the most important seat to protect the Constitution.Susan Collins announces her opposition to voting on a Supreme Court nominee before election
The Republican senator announced that she does "not believe that the Senate should vote on the nominee prior to the election"
she’s going to get smoked in Maine, I wouldn’t vote for that that fraud.
I’m truly dumbfounded that a woman who wants to win republican votes won’t vote to take control of the the most important seat to protect the Constitution.Susan Collins announces her opposition to voting on a Supreme Court nominee before election
The Republican senator announced that she does "not believe that the Senate should vote on the nominee prior to the election"
she’s going to get smoked in Maine, I wouldn’t vote for that that fraud.
Of course, he does. There is no standard other than what is written in the Constitution.Has nothing to do with who wins the election. The President IS President for the full term. The people voted for the FULL TERM of Donald Trump.Fine. Trump can nominate on Nov. 4th, the Senate can confirm on Dec. 15th.I’m truly dumbfounded that a woman who wants to win republican votes won’t vote to take control of the the most important seat to protect the Constitution.Susan Collins announces her opposition to voting on a Supreme Court nominee before election
The Republican senator announced that she does "not believe that the Senate should vote on the nominee prior to the election"
she’s going to get smoked in Maine, I wouldn’t vote for that that fraud.
No, she said nothing of the sort. She said she favors waiting until after the election to appoint a SC justice.
Susan Collins says she opposes voting on SCOTUS nominee before election
Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, announced on Saturday that she thinks Republicans should, out of "fairness to the American people," wait until after the 2020 elections to vote on Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's replacement.
If Trump wins the election, I would have no issue with that. I may not like it and Democrats will still put up a fight, but it will be within his right to do so.
Doesn't matter. Mitch set the standard. If Trump loses, he don't get to pick. Lame ducks don't count.
Advice and/or Consent. That is the standard.
I’m truly dumbfounded that a woman who wants to win republican votes won’t vote to take control of the the most important seat to protect the Constitution.Susan Collins announces her opposition to voting on a Supreme Court nominee before election
The Republican senator announced that she does "not believe that the Senate should vote on the nominee prior to the election"
she’s going to get smoked in Maine, I wouldn’t vote for that that fraud.
The thread title is grossly misleading. Nowhere in the article does it say she wants the next SC Justice to be a democrat...
The voters already decided.
You do understand that polls mean nothing in this process, right?Of course, he does. There is no standard other than what is written in the Constitution.Has nothing to do with who wins the election. The President IS President for the full term. The people voted for the FULL TERM of Donald Trump.Fine. Trump can nominate on Nov. 4th, the Senate can confirm on Dec. 15th.I’m truly dumbfounded that a woman who wants to win republican votes won’t vote to take control of the the most important seat to protect the Constitution.Susan Collins announces her opposition to voting on a Supreme Court nominee before election
The Republican senator announced that she does "not believe that the Senate should vote on the nominee prior to the election"
she’s going to get smoked in Maine, I wouldn’t vote for that that fraud.
No, she said nothing of the sort. She said she favors waiting until after the election to appoint a SC justice.
Susan Collins says she opposes voting on SCOTUS nominee before election
Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, announced on Saturday that she thinks Republicans should, out of "fairness to the American people," wait until after the 2020 elections to vote on Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's replacement.
If Trump wins the election, I would have no issue with that. I may not like it and Democrats will still put up a fight, but it will be within his right to do so.
Doesn't matter. Mitch set the standard. If Trump loses, he don't get to pick. Lame ducks don't count.
Advice and/or Consent. That is the standard.
I agree. But Mitch crapped all over that precedent. So, if the President is President for the full term, by my recollection, Barack Obama was President until noon on January 20th, 2017.
He should have had the right to at least put Garland before the Senate for confirmation. Again, you don't get to apply a different standard now.
I’m truly dumbfounded that a woman who wants to win republican votes won’t vote to take control of the the most important seat to protect the Constitution.Susan Collins announces her opposition to voting on a Supreme Court nominee before election
The Republican senator announced that she does "not believe that the Senate should vote on the nominee prior to the election"
she’s going to get smoked in Maine, I wouldn’t vote for that that fraud.
| RCP Average | 7/2 - 9/16 | -- | -- | 47.2 | 41.0 | Gideon +6.2 |
| NY Times/Siena* | 9/11 - 9/16 | 663 LV | 5.1 | 49 | 44 | Gideon +5 |
| Quinnipiac | 9/10 - 9/14 | 1183 LV | 2.9 | 54 | 42 | Gideon +12 |
| Bangor Daily News | 7/28 - 8/9 | 500 RV | -- | 43 | 38 | Gideon +5 |
| Colby College | 7/18 - 6/24 | 888 LV | 3.9 | 44 | 39 | Gideon +5 |
| PPP (D) | 7/2 - 7/3 | 1022 RV | 3.1 | 46 | 42 | Gideon +4 |
I think she’s losing because she is so weak, and doesn’t support 96% of republican wants.I’m truly dumbfounded that a woman who wants to win republican votes won’t vote to take control of the the most important seat to protect the Constitution.Susan Collins announces her opposition to voting on a Supreme Court nominee before election
The Republican senator announced that she does "not believe that the Senate should vote on the nominee prior to the election"
she’s going to get smoked in Maine, I wouldn’t vote for that that fraud.
She's been in deep shit with her constituents for a while now, because she's so ******* milquetoast about Trump and the shit he pulls.
Mainers threw the gauntlet down when Kavanaugh was being vetted for SC, and started fundraising money for her opponent.
They've given her opponent, Sara Gideon, over $4M in campaign donations.
Fund Susan Collins' Future Opponent
Susan Collins announced that she is officially running for re-election in 2020. She wants to keep her seat. With your help, we won’t let her.
Correct. He was. The Senate said No to his nominee. Well within their authority.Of course, he does. There is no standard other than what is written in the Constitution.Has nothing to do with who wins the election. The President IS President for the full term. The people voted for the FULL TERM of Donald Trump.Fine. Trump can nominate on Nov. 4th, the Senate can confirm on Dec. 15th.I’m truly dumbfounded that a woman who wants to win republican votes won’t vote to take control of the the most important seat to protect the Constitution.Susan Collins announces her opposition to voting on a Supreme Court nominee before election
The Republican senator announced that she does "not believe that the Senate should vote on the nominee prior to the election"
she’s going to get smoked in Maine, I wouldn’t vote for that that fraud.
No, she said nothing of the sort. She said she favors waiting until after the election to appoint a SC justice.
Susan Collins says she opposes voting on SCOTUS nominee before election
Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, announced on Saturday that she thinks Republicans should, out of "fairness to the American people," wait until after the 2020 elections to vote on Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's replacement.
If Trump wins the election, I would have no issue with that. I may not like it and Democrats will still put up a fight, but it will be within his right to do so.
Doesn't matter. Mitch set the standard. If Trump loses, he don't get to pick. Lame ducks don't count.
Advice and/or Consent. That is the standard.
I agree. But Mitch crapped all over that precedent. So, if the President is President for the full term, by my recollection, Barack Obama was President until noon on January 20th, 2017.
He should have had the right to at least put Garland before the Senate for confirmation. Again, you don't get to apply a different standard now.
If that was the case she would vote right?I’m truly dumbfounded that a woman who wants to win republican votes won’t vote to take control of the the most important seat to protect the Constitution.Susan Collins announces her opposition to voting on a Supreme Court nominee before election
The Republican senator announced that she does "not believe that the Senate should vote on the nominee prior to the election"
she’s going to get smoked in Maine, I wouldn’t vote for that that fraud.
The thread title is grossly misleading. Nowhere in the article does it say she wants the next SC Justice to be a democrat...
Haha.. You consider pandering to Leftists as integrity... How cute..
