- Thread starter
- #201
That is a lie, go ahead and explain, explain as in do not use google to give us some bullshit link.The laws of physics DO say man is causing warming.
IN YOUR OWN WORDS, go!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That is a lie, go ahead and explain, explain as in do not use google to give us some bullshit link.The laws of physics DO say man is causing warming.
AIP, wow Old Crock, the AIP uses the word PHYSICS, they must be really smart, huh.And the whole of the American Institute of Physics says otherwise. Now who to believer, a psychologist with basically little science education, or physicists concerning the laws of physics.
The laws of physics DO say man is causing warming.
No, I assure you, they do not.
The laws of physics DO say man is causing warming.
No, I assure you, they do not.
Damn boss, you need to let it go.
TubeChop - Disney s Frozen 00 14
LOL. Well, Mr. Psychologist, you just graduated from skeptic to liar. And demonstrated that you are a 'Conservative' fruitloop that knows nothing of the scientific community.And the whole of the American Institute of Physics says otherwise.
This is just basic LIES 101.
AIP is a 501(c) organization founded in the '30s under FDR to encourage physics. They have about two dozen member organizations and few dozen more affiliated organizations in various specialties of science. They publish some science journals, which specifically, and from a purely ethical standpoint, eliminates the ability of their organization to formally give an opinion.
People who write articles published in their journals may hold a particular view, this does not reflect the views of AIP or any of it's member organizations. But what the butt-hurt liberals do is read some op-ed written by one of their science geek buddies, and then claim "the whole of AIP" supports the clown. It's just simply not true.
My, my, another lying dumb fuck. No, we are sure of this because of all the scientists that are presenting evidence for it, and the lack of scientists presenting evidence that this is not occurring.
My,my, you are so full of shit your eyes have turned brown. I have concluded from scientific observations that if you jump out that window on the 100th floor of that building that you are going to hit the ground at sufficient speed to end your days. Not only that, I have concluded that I can tell you within a few mph the speed at which you will hit the ground. Simple physics.The laws of physics DO say man is causing warming.
No, I assure you, they do not.
Damn boss, you need to let it go.
TubeChop - Disney s Frozen 00 14
I'll be glad to let it go as soon as we stop this attempt to shake down capitalists for something that isn't happening. Until then, you're going to have me in your face with the thermometer readings from the last quarter century, showing you there is no "warming" happening.
Physics does not say man is causing global warming. Physics doesn't speak, it's a discipline of science and it doesn't draw conclusions on things, it continues to explore probability. MAN draws conclusions. MAN decides that "physics has spoken" when it hasn't. Once you have uttered the phrase: "Science has concluded..." then whatever is to follow is forever divorced from science because it is a faith. Science can't do anything with something concluded and believed as faith.
Absorption spectra of GHGsThat is a lie, go ahead and explain, explain as in do not use google to give us some bullshit link.The laws of physics DO say man is causing warming.
IN YOUR OWN WORDS, go!
My, my, another lying dumb fuck. No, we are sure of this because of all the scientists that are presenting evidence for it, and the lack of scientists presenting evidence that this is not occurring.
My,my, you are so full of shit your eyes have turned brown. I have concluded from scientific observations that if you jump out that window on the 100th floor of that building that you are going to hit the ground at sufficient speed to end your days. Not only that, I have concluded that I can tell you within a few mph the speed at which you will hit the ground. Simple physics.Physics does not say man is causing global warming. Physics doesn't speak, it's a discipline of science and it doesn't draw conclusions on things, it continues to explore probability. MAN draws conclusions. MAN decides that "physics has spoken" when it hasn't. Once you have uttered the phrase: "Science has concluded..." then whatever is to follow is forever divorced from science because it is a faith. Science can't do anything with something concluded and believed as faith.
And the simple physics of the absorption spectra of the GHGs states that adding them to the atmosphere will drive up the temperature here on Earth. Observation from paleontological data confirms that physics. The geological record has many periods where a rapid change in GHGs in the atmosphere, up or down, created rapid temperature changes. Many times, these were periods of extinction.
Your understanding of what science is is ridicoulous. According to what you just posted we obviously cannot use science for any kind of engineering, because that would involve basing a conclusion on the science.
old crock, you posted that CO2 vibrates in the "ether". How about explaining that before you dig a deeper hole.Absorption spectra of GHGsThat is a lie, go ahead and explain, explain as in do not use google to give us some bullshit link.The laws of physics DO say man is causing warming.
IN YOUR OWN WORDS, go!
Boss, we directly measure the heat flux of the atmosphere. More heat goes in than out.
We also see the backradiation increasing, a smoking gun that greenhouse gases are the cause.
The directly measured evidence says human-caused global warming is a fact.
You fail hard at the science, and your cult has ordered you to keep failing, so that's what you'll do. You're emotionally incapable of admitting you were fooled, so you will continue to be totally wrong, forever.
So that is how you interpret "absorption spectra of GHGs". LOLold crock, you posted that CO2 vibrates in the "ether". How about explaining that before you dig a deeper hole.Absorption spectra of GHGsThat is a lie, go ahead and explain, explain as in do not use google to give us some bullshit link.The laws of physics DO say man is causing warming.
IN YOUR OWN WORDS, go!
δ13Corg chemostratigraphy of the Permian‐Triassic boundary in the Maitai Group, New Zealand: Evidence for high‐latitudinal methane releaseMy,my, you are so full of shit your eyes have turned brown. I have concluded from scientific observations that if you jump out that window on the 100th floor of that building that you are going to hit the ground at sufficient speed to end your days. Not only that, I have concluded that I can tell you within a few mph the speed at which you will hit the ground. Simple physics.Physics does not say man is causing global warming. Physics doesn't speak, it's a discipline of science and it doesn't draw conclusions on things, it continues to explore probability. MAN draws conclusions. MAN decides that "physics has spoken" when it hasn't. Once you have uttered the phrase: "Science has concluded..." then whatever is to follow is forever divorced from science because it is a faith. Science can't do anything with something concluded and believed as faith.
And this illustrates how utterly foolish and stupid you are to draw conclusions. I could indeed jump out of that 100th floor window and land safely on the ground by using a wind foil of some kind, like a hang glider or parachute. Ooops! Your conclusion was absolutely WRONG!
Again, try to grasp the point in that little pea-sized brain... Science is what? The observation and investigation of the physical universe. Once you have drawn a conclusion, you are no longer investigating or studying observation, you have made up your mind on a conclusion. Science is done. You've stopped practicing science the instant you made your conclusion, it has no other function, can do nothing else. You are now practicing FAITH.
And the simple physics of the absorption spectra of the GHGs states that adding them to the atmosphere will drive up the temperature here on Earth. Observation from paleontological data confirms that physics. The geological record has many periods where a rapid change in GHGs in the atmosphere, up or down, created rapid temperature changes. Many times, these were periods of extinction.
Your understanding of what science is is ridicoulous. According to what you just posted we obviously cannot use science for any kind of engineering, because that would involve basing a conclusion on the science.
Simple physics states no such thing. You are making assumptions and drawing conclusions based on a small amount of scientific data while disregarding all other scientific data present and future. Previous mass extinction events had absolutely nothing to do with man-made GHGs because man wasn't here yet. In fact, I will dispute that you can prove such events were caused by GHGs at all. In the case of the mass extinction event which wiped out the dinosaurs, scientists believe this was the result of a large meteor hitting the planet near the Yucatan Peninsula. Debris from that impact filled the atmosphere, blocking the sun and heat, causing years of sub-freezing temperatures. By the way, that is not a conclusion, it's only what scientists believe happened.
I've never said that man can't base a conclusion on science. I said you are no longer practicing science once you've drawn a conclusion. Engineers are not constructing buildings as science projects to observe whether or not principles of physics are true. We don't design an airplane based on theory and then put passengers on it saying... well science says it should fly! We try the idea first and observe whether it does or doesn't work. We build models, test them in various conditions, not because we don't believe the science which suggests the plane should fly, but because we can't jump to conclusions when human lives are involved. Sometimes, we may even conclude the design is sound only to find out later, after some horrific crash, that the science was flawed, there was a factor we didn't calculate or anticipate.
Your understanding of science is dangerous and potentially detrimental to mankind. You tend to adopt faith in science that hasn't concluded anything. You tend to draw false conclusions based on limited science theory which has not been observed. Once you've adopted your faith, you are no different than the biggest bible-thumping theocrat. You've abandoned science through your hubris and arrogance. It is precisely this attitude which has hindered scientific discovery in the past. In short, you are a mouth-breathing knuckle-dragger who doesn't understand what science is.