How so? Did you bother to read the paper?
CO2 has ZERO impact on Climate...
- Thread starter healthmyths
- Start date
Did you click on the link to the paper? Did you bother to read the paper?
daveman
Diamond Member
He prayed to his High Priests, and they came to him in a vision. "DO NOT READ THE HERESY," they said, "OR YOU WILL SURELY BURN IN HELL."
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,234
- 99,367
- 3,645
This article is a better place to start.
www.electifacts.eu
"However, the claim that Earth's atmosphere is already "saturated" with CO2 and that further increases will not cause temperatures to rise, should be taken with a grain of salt. While it is true that there is a limit to how much additional warming can occur from increased CO2 concentrations alone (known as the logarithmic effect), this does not mean that CO2 emissions have no effect on global temperatures. There are a large variety of factors that lead to global warming and that influence models. Climate scientists have been studying this for years and research has shown that these theories are flawed and that CO2 is nowhere near being saturated. The authors of this study base their arguments on scientific papers that have already been refuted."
FACT-CHECK: No, a new study doesn’t claim CO2 has no effect on Global warming
Dutch MEP Marcel de Graaff recently asserted in a tweet that a new peer-reviewed study provides “Decisive evidence that CO2 is not the cause of any global warming whatsoever.” The study in...
www.electifacts.eu
"However, the claim that Earth's atmosphere is already "saturated" with CO2 and that further increases will not cause temperatures to rise, should be taken with a grain of salt. While it is true that there is a limit to how much additional warming can occur from increased CO2 concentrations alone (known as the logarithmic effect), this does not mean that CO2 emissions have no effect on global temperatures. There are a large variety of factors that lead to global warming and that influence models. Climate scientists have been studying this for years and research has shown that these theories are flawed and that CO2 is nowhere near being saturated. The authors of this study base their arguments on scientific papers that have already been refuted."
Did you bother to read the paper?This article is a better place to start.
FACT-CHECK: No, a new study doesn’t claim CO2 has no effect on Global warming
Dutch MEP Marcel de Graaff recently asserted in a tweet that a new peer-reviewed study provides “Decisive evidence that CO2 is not the cause of any global warming whatsoever.” The study in...
"However, the claim that Earth's atmosphere is already "saturated" with CO2 and that further increases will not cause temperatures to rise, should be taken with a grain of salt. While it is true that there is a limit to how much additional warming can occur from increased CO2 concentrations alone (known as the logarithmic effect), this does not mean that CO2 emissions have no effect on global temperatures. There are a large variety of factors that lead to global warming and that influence models. Climate scientists have been studying this for years and research has shown that these theories are flawed and that CO2 is nowhere near being saturated. The authors of this study base their arguments on scientific papers that have already been refuted."
Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 82,301
- 41,193
- 2,615
abu afak
ALLAH SNACKBAR!
- Mar 3, 2006
- 7,958
- 2,768
- 315
ding's link:
The study, published in Science Direct
THE 'Study'/link itself:
Loading…
www.sciencedirect.com
1. Introduction
"Due to the overlap of the absorption spectra of certain atmospheric gases and vapours with a portion of the thermal radiation spectrum from the Earth's surface, these gases absorb the mentioned radiation.
This leads to an increase in their temperature and the re-emission of radiation in all directions, including towards the Earth.
As a result, with an increase in the concentration of the radiation-absorbing gas, the temperature of the Earth's surface rises.
Due to the observed continuous increase in the average temperature of the Earth and the simultaneous increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, it has been recognized that the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration associated with human activity may be the cause of climate warming."
`
Last edited:
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 22,301
- 13,516
- 2,288
- Banned
- #109
This article is a better place to start.
FACT-CHECK: No, a new study doesn’t claim CO2 has no effect on Global warming
Dutch MEP Marcel de Graaff recently asserted in a tweet that a new peer-reviewed study provides “Decisive evidence that CO2 is not the cause of any global warming whatsoever.” The study in...
"However, the claim that Earth's atmosphere is already "saturated" with CO2 and that further increases will not cause temperatures to rise, should be taken with a grain of salt. While it is true that there is a limit to how much additional warming can occur from increased CO2 concentrations alone (known as the logarithmic effect), this does not mean that CO2 emissions have no effect on global temperatures. There are a large variety of factors that lead to global warming and that influence models. Climate scientists have been studying this for years and research has shown that these theories are flawed and that CO2 is nowhere near being saturated. The authors of this study base their arguments on scientific papers that have already been refuted."
Always quick with the denial of truth, and the adherence to 100% pure FUDGED FRAUD....
What $500 billion a year purchases... lots of liars on duty 24 7, including here....
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,234
- 99,367
- 3,645
In short, the paper being cited in this thread by amateurs is not taken seriously, in the scientific community. Three guys venturing outside their fields of expertise, using dubious premises and dubious tests, doesn't make much of a dent.This article is a better place to start.
FACT-CHECK: No, a new study doesn’t claim CO2 has no effect on Global warming
Dutch MEP Marcel de Graaff recently asserted in a tweet that a new peer-reviewed study provides “Decisive evidence that CO2 is not the cause of any global warming whatsoever.” The study in...
"However, the claim that Earth's atmosphere is already "saturated" with CO2 and that further increases will not cause temperatures to rise, should be taken with a grain of salt. While it is true that there is a limit to how much additional warming can occur from increased CO2 concentrations alone (known as the logarithmic effect), this does not mean that CO2 emissions have no effect on global temperatures. There are a large variety of factors that lead to global warming and that influence models. Climate scientists have been studying this for years and research has shown that these theories are flawed and that CO2 is nowhere near being saturated. The authors of this study base their arguments on scientific papers that have already been refuted."
This paper just isn't significant or impactful. In fact, it appears it was perhaps manufactured for a reason, by people who know better.
I think we all know what that reason probably is.
What did I claim the paper says and what do you think the paper says?
Here's the relevant conclusion.
CO2 absorption lines at different altitudes are narrower than CO2 absorption lines under atmospheric pressure, and thus, it could be authoritatively stated that we are dealing with atmospheric saturation, and the additional CO2 emitted into the atmosphere, regardless of its altitude, will not be a greenhouse gas.
How about challenging the content instead of attacking the authors?
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 22,301
- 13,516
- 2,288
- Banned
- #114
Since you are too much if an intellectually inferior Zionist Fascist Jew Supremacist to answer basic climate questions, maybe you can find us a "climate scientist" who will...
1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?
Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,158
- 198
Yup. Funny but on the mark post. Everyone knows Trump is a stupid dumb ass. But he’s their stupid dumb ass here to protect them from the evil, commies, fascists……you name it. Remaining ignorant is easy. It’s like running down hill. Easier than going up, till the next day you wake up and your knees are killing you and you realized you just fked yourself..
Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,158
- 198
You Trump bozos go from one “ ism” to another to avoid think’n. Now you have your little emojis of capitulation.Good Gaea, you're just eat up with leftism.
Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 82,301
- 41,193
- 2,615
But the thread title says what?
That CO2 has zero impact on the climate
The paper does not say that at all
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Similar threads
New Topics
-
FBI reassigns agents from iconic photo of them kneeling during George Floyd protest
- Started by 1srelluc
- Replies: 4
-
Trump Insists that Abrego-Garcia has "MS-13" tattooed on his knuckles- Started by Dont Taz Me Bro
- Replies: 34
-
-
share more AD Judge orders release of Columbia student Mohsen Mahdawi from ICE detention after his arrest during citi- Started by Tommy Tainant
- Replies: 5
