CO2 has ZERO impact on Climate...

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You are another Jew Supremacist Zionist Fascist too chickenshit to answer basic climate questions....

Shut up idiot.

We aren't climate scientists.

You're the coward shouting at nonscientists on a message board

Try out your act on a climate scientist.

 

[healthmyths]

170% higher than what? Show your math.

Today's global average is 57°... 500 million years ago 97° divide 97/57 =1.70 or 170%
The most distant period in time for which we have estimated CO2 levels is around the Ordovician period, 500 million years ago. At the time, atmospheric CO2 concentration was at a whopping 3000 to 9000 ppm!

A Graphical History of Atmospheric CO2 Levels Over Time | Earth.Org

As the most abundant greenhouse gas in our atmosphere, CO2 levels have varied widely over the course of the Earth’s 4.54 billion year history.

earth.org

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Today's global average is 57°... 500 million years ago 97° divide 97/57 =1.70 or 170%

So fking what? Do you think the scientists who discovered and taught you that have forgotten their own life's work?

 

[EMH]

Shut up idiot.

We aren't climate scientists.

You're the coward shouting at nonscientists on a message board

Try out your act on a climate scientist.

If you have nothing useful to add because you are a self proclaimed science invalid, you just fuck off and get out of Environment.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If you have nothing useful to add because you are a self proclaimed science invalid, you just fuck off and get out of Environment.

You are an uneducated slob and have neither added to nor subtracted from climate theory or the global consensus.

You are aware of this, no?

 

[EMH]

Today's global average is 57°... 500 million years ago 97° divide 97/57 =1.70 or 170%

Well, it was definitely warmer during Jurassic, when there was little to no land near the poles...


Jurassic - warmer, wetter, higher surface air pressure = Earth climate warm parameter

 

[EMH]

You are an uneducated slob and have neither added to nor subtracted from climate theory or the global consensus.

You are aware of this, no?

You cannot even answer basic climate questions.

You are here to troll, nothing more.


You are a useless stupid purveyor of lies, fraud, and treason against America

 

[EMH]

Today's global average is 57°... 500 million years ago 97° divide 97/57 =1.70 or 170%
The most distant period in time for which we have estimated CO2 levels is around the Ordovician period, 500 million years ago. At the time, atmospheric CO2 concentration was at a whopping 3000 to 9000 ppm!

A Graphical History of Atmospheric CO2 Levels Over Time | Earth.Org

As the most abundant greenhouse gas in our atmosphere, CO2 levels have varied widely over the course of the Earth’s 4.54 billion year history.

earth.org

Not buying that.

Where are those Co2 guesses coming from...???


Co2 does nothing.

Sincerely,

highly correlated satellite and balloon data

 

[sparky]

So we're suppose to debate something here that hasn't happened ?

~S~

 

[healthmyths]

Not buying that.

Where are those Co2 guesses coming from...???


Co2 does nothing.

Sincerely,

highly correlated satellite and balloon data

CO2 does nothing you say? Then why do the climatechangevangelistas carry signs telling us to stop
driving fossil fuel cars, or as Biden guaranteed "rid fossil fuels"?
"I guarantee We Are Going To Get Rid of Fossil Fuels” September 06, 2019, 5:49 PM

 

[EMH]

So we're suppose to debate something here that hasn't happened ?

~S~

It never happened. There was never any evidence Co2 causes warming, just FUDGE.

 

[EMH]

CO2 does nothing you say? Then why do the climatechangevangelistas carry signs telling us to stop
driving fossil fuel cars, or as Biden guaranteed "rid fossil fuels"?
"I guarantee We Are Going To Get Rid of Fossil Fuels” September 06, 2019, 5:49 PM

Why do people still blame "the terrorists" for 911?

Why do people believe the USS Liberty was "an accident?"


Stupid people believe what they want to and what they are told to....

 

[Slade3200]

But it's not.

"...the Eemian was punctuated by many short-lived cold events, as shown by variations in electrical conductivity (a proxy for windblown dust, with more dust indicating colder, more arid conditions) and stable oxygen isotopes (a proxy for air temperature) of the ice were used by these workers infer the climatic conditions during the Eemian. The cold events seemed to last a few thousand years, and the magnitude of cooling was similar to the difference between glacial and interglacial conditions; a very dramatic contrast in climate. Furthermore, the shifts between these warm and cold periods seemed to be extremely rapid, possibly occurring over a few decades or less...."

Sudden climate changes in the recent geological record

And then there were the D-O events of the last glacial period which also had 5C swings over several decades.

True, The Eemian was characterized by short-lived cold events... electrical conductivity (dust) and oxygen isotopes were used to infer these shifts in climate. These events likely represented fluctuations in temperature and aridity.

The magnitude of these cold events, while significant, is likely less dramatic than the full glacial-interglacial temperature differences.

The idea that these warm-cold shifts occurred over a few decades or less may be an overstatement. I don't believe current study's have confirmed the precise timing of these shifts in the Eemian.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Today's global average is 57°... 500 million years ago 97° divide 97/57 =1.70 or 170%
The most distant period in time for which we have estimated CO2 levels is around the Ordovician period, 500 million years ago. At the time, atmospheric CO2 concentration was at a whopping 3000 to 9000 ppm!

A Graphical History of Atmospheric CO2 Levels Over Time | Earth.Org

As the most abundant greenhouse gas in our atmosphere, CO2 levels have varied widely over the course of the Earth’s 4.54 billion year history.

earth.org

divide 97/57 =1.70 or 170%

Well, first of all, that would be 70% higher, not 170% higher.
And why the fuck would you use percentages when talking about temperature?
And if you insisted on stupidly doing that, it would make a lot more sense to
use Kelvin. It would still be stupid.

 

[Dagosa]

If you have to tell everybody your opponent surrendered...he didn't.

You conceded. You’re babbling. Geesus, you post like an 8 year old. Your little playground antics are pathetic,

 

[Dagosa]

If you have to tell everybody your opponent surrendered...he didn't.

You do have to remind them if MAGAs struggle to even respond with any facts, just made up shit.

 

[ding]

True, The Eemian was characterized by short-lived cold events... electrical conductivity (dust) and oxygen isotopes were used to infer these shifts in climate. These events likely represented fluctuations in temperature and aridity.

The magnitude of these cold events, while significant, is likely less dramatic than the full glacial-interglacial temperature differences.

The idea that these warm-cold shifts occurred over a few decades or less may be an overstatement. I don't believe current study's have confirmed the precise timing of these shifts in the Eemian.

So it was an interglacial with rapid cooling events followed by rapid warming events. D-O events occurred in the last glacial period and were rapid warming events followed by rapid cooling events. And no, neither of those type of events was an overstatement to say they occurred over several decades. They really were that rapid. No one is disputing that.

 

[ding]

True, The Eemian was characterized by short-lived cold events... electrical conductivity (dust) and oxygen isotopes were used to infer these shifts in climate. These events likely represented fluctuations in temperature and aridity.

The magnitude of these cold events, while significant, is likely less dramatic than the full glacial-interglacial temperature differences.

The idea that these warm-cold shifts occurred over a few decades or less may be an overstatement. I don't believe current study's have confirmed the precise timing of these shifts in the Eemian.

Do you know what caused those rapid climate changes?

The ocean. Or more accurately changes to heat transport from the Atlantic to the Arctic. Thermohaline circulation. The AMOC.

The more you dig the more you are going to question the narrative that the atmosphere is responsible for climate changes. It's the ocean. That's where the heat is stored.

 

[healthmyths]

divide 97/57 =1.70 or 170%

Well, first of all, that would be 70% higher, not 170% higher.
And why the fuck would you use percentages when talking about temperature?
And if you insisted on stupidly doing that, it would make a lot more sense to
use Kelvin. It would still be stupid.

Idiot Use this simple calculator OK???
!Percentage Calculator

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Idiot Use this simple calculator OK???
!Percentage Calculator
View attachment 1030084

Yes, I mocked your confusion over percentages once or twice before.

170 is 170% of 100 and 70% higher than 100.

Understand the difference?

So explain to me how come with the global temperature 500 million years being nearly 170% ( 97° F) higher

Now you try it with 97 and 57.