CNN: Matt Gaetz showed nude photos of women he slept with to fellow members of Congress...lmao

Welp, bye bye.

This guy needs to not talk.

Gaetz is making Cuomo look like Mother Theresa.

How many people did Gaetz kill ?
Gaetz is a white heterosexual male. Probably Super-straight to boot.
And he's not ashamed of that.
That's why they hate him
His pool boy/son is :wink::wink::wink:

Is what ?

Your post makes no sense.
 
Matt Gaetz may have overtaken Ted Cruz as The Most Hated Man in Congress.
Republicans know his proclivity for young girls and his lack of any sort of a moral compass.
They've been avoiding him like the plague. Congrats Ted - YOU'RE NUMBER TWO! :D

 
according to reports he did nothttps://www.tampabay.com/news/publicsafety/crime/lawmakers-talk-of-mug-shot-raises-questions-about-dui-arrest/2166023/

" Less than a week later, Gaetz had his driver's license reinstated. A field officer for the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles declared there was no evidence that Gaetz refused a breath test "

Sounds like this was a hot headed police officer, with some issues...

Helps to have a filthy rich & influential Daddy huh? :rolleyes-41:
Sure, but that's not the topic or does it have anything to do with what we are talking about here.
 
Welp, bye bye.

This guy needs to not talk.

Should he thank goodness women don't really believe in equality?
 
What you are suggesting is a massive coverup by numerous different agencies for a 25 year old, recent law grad...highlight unlikely
Nope. Not a massive cover up. Just a prosecutor who didn’t press charges on the son of a state senator.

That’s it.

If it had been you or me, different story.
 
What you are suggesting is a massive coverup by numerous different agencies for a 25 year old, recent law grad...highlight unlikely
Nope. Not a massive cover up. Just a prosecutor who didn’t press charges on the son of a state senator.

That’s it.

If it had been you or me, different story.
He didn't have the evidence, why should he have? He could have been disbarred for that. A prosecutor has a duty not to bring charges if he doesn't believe he has the evidence to bring a case.
 
"
  1. Tara Reade
Reade claims Biden sexually assaulted in a hallway while she was working for him in 1993. According to Reade, Biden pinned her against a wall, shoved his hands up her skirt, and his fingers into her vagina. Reade has no fewer than five contemporaneous witnesses who say Reade told them about the assault at or near the time it happened. There is also video of Reade’s anguished mother calling into a 1993 edition of CNN’s Larry King Live desperately seeking advice for her daughter’s problems with a “prominent senator. ”

Biden denies the allegation but is refusing to open his archives at the University of Delaware where a copy of Reade’s sexual harassment complaint might be filed.

Tara Reade is a lifelong Democrat.

  1. Lucy Flores
Last year, Flores, a former Nevada Assemblywoman, accused Biden touching and kissing her:

I felt two hands on my shoulders. I froze. “Why is the vice-president of the United States touching me?” I felt him get closer to me from behind. He leaned further in and inhaled my hair. I was mortified. I thought to myself, “I didn’t wash my hair today and the vice-president of the United States is smelling it. And also, what in the actual fuck? Why is the vice-president of the United States smelling my hair?” He proceeded to plant a big slow kiss on the back of my head.
Flores is a Democrat.

  1. Amy Lappos
Lappos claims Biden pawed at her during a 2009 fundraiser:

It wasn’t sexual, but he did grab me by the head. He put his hand around my neck and pulled me in to rub noses with me. When he was pulling me in, I thought he was going to kiss me on the mouth.
Lappos is a Democrat.

  1. Vail Kohnert-Yount
“Vail Kohnert-Yount alleged that when she was a White House intern in the spring of 2013, Biden ‘put his hand on the back of [her] head and pressed his forehead to [her] forehead’ when he introduced himself, and that he called her a ‘pretty girl,’” reports The Cut.

Kohnert-Younh was interning at the Obama White House at the time.

  1. Caitlyn Caruso
Former college student and sexual assault survivor Caitlyn Caruso says Biden placed his hand on her thigh for an uncomfortable amount of time.


Incredibly, this happened during a 2016 event on sexual assault.


This might seem like a small thing, but who puts their hand on the thigh of a woman who is not his significant other?

  1. D.J. Hill
Hill says Biden got so handsy with her, her husband was forced to intervene:

Writer D. J. Hill told the Times that Biden moved his hand from Caruso’s shoulder down her lower back, which made her uncomfortable at an event, causing her husband to intervene.
Hill told her story to the far-left New York Times last year.

  1. Sofie Karasek
The Cut:

In 2016, Sofie Karasek was photographed holding hands and touching foreheads with Biden at the Oscars, where she stood alongside 50 other sexual-assault survivors during Lady Gaga’s performance. It was a moment that soon went viral, and was described then by the Post as “powerful.” But in the Post’s report published this week, Karasek says she believes that Biden violated her personal space.

Karasek is also a sexual assault survivor.

  1. Ally Coll
Ally Coll says she was made uncomfortable by Biden’s unwanted touching at a 2008 reception. He squeezed her shoulders and complimented her smile for an amount of time that made her uncomfortable.


You can also add a number of women and children who might not have accused Biden of inappropriate behavior, but we still have countless videos and photographs of Biden touching them in ways that are wildly inappropriate and make the recipients noticeably uncomfortable.

Obviously, not all of these allegations rise to the level of assault. But these are not Republicans coming forward to accuse Biden. These are Democrats and women we can assume are at least left-leaning."

True; no minors SO FAR!!!! You can watch the embedded videos though.


Greg

All 100% discredited - BriteFart? LoLz!! :lol:
#metoo but not for me; just for you.

Greg
 
Welp, bye bye.

This guy needs to not talk.

More anonymous sources? Pretty pathetic.

Sounds like a desperate distraction from Cuomo.

Sounds like you guys got an Anthony Weiner-style idiot in office.
 
He didn't have the evidence, why should he have?
Ignoring evidence is different than not having it.
You are the one ignoring the evidence...read the article....there was an eyewitness, there was a report form the State Police, the arresting officer was fired, for numerous creditability issues...etc.
The eyewitness is credible? We don’t even know who it is. The arresting officer wasn’t the only one present. They don’t mention anything about Gaetz at the station. Let the defense attack the credibility of the officer. Claiming there’s no evidence is factually false even if the officer has credibility problems.
 
He didn't have the evidence, why should he have?
Ignoring evidence is different than not having it.
You are the one ignoring the evidence...read the article....there was an eyewitness, there was a report form the State Police, the arresting officer was fired, for numerous creditability issues...etc.
The eyewitness is credible? We don’t even know who it is. The arresting officer wasn’t the only one present. They don’t mention anything about Gaetz at the station. Let the defense attack the credibility of the officer. Claiming there’s no evidence is factually false even if the officer has credibility problems.
Why isn't the eyewitness credible? Just because the paper didn't know who the witness was, doesn't mean they weren't credible.

They mentioned what the State Police determined about what happened at the station. The defense didn't have to...because the officer was canned before the case went to trial and the State Attorney judged the officier's credibily against the the other evidence. The prosecutor has a ethical duty not to pursue a charge when they don't believe they have a case.
 
He didn't have the evidence, why should he have?
Ignoring evidence is different than not having it.
You are the one ignoring the evidence...read the article....there was an eyewitness, there was a report form the State Police, the arresting officer was fired, for numerous creditability issues...etc.
The eyewitness is credible? We don’t even know who it is. The arresting officer wasn’t the only one present. They don’t mention anything about Gaetz at the station. Let the defense attack the credibility of the officer. Claiming there’s no evidence is factually false even if the officer has credibility problems.
Why isn't the eyewitness credible? Just because the paper didn't know who the witness was, doesn't mean they weren't credible.

They mentioned what the State Police determined about what happened at the station. The defense didn't have to...because the officer was canned before the case went to trial and the State Attorney judged the officier's credibily against the the other evidence. The prosecutor has a ethical duty not to pursue a charge when they don't believe they have a case.
No one knows who the witness was. Their name was not mentioned in any of the documents. How is the court to decide their credibility without having any idea who they are? You can’t. I can’t.

No one mentions what happened at the station. They just pretend like it basically never happened.

Everyone pretends like nothing actually happened. It’s just a mystery. Down the memory hole.
 
He didn't have the evidence, why should he have?
Ignoring evidence is different than not having it.
You are the one ignoring the evidence...read the article....there was an eyewitness, there was a report form the State Police, the arresting officer was fired, for numerous creditability issues...etc.
The eyewitness is credible? We don’t even know who it is. The arresting officer wasn’t the only one present. They don’t mention anything about Gaetz at the station. Let the defense attack the credibility of the officer. Claiming there’s no evidence is factually false even if the officer has credibility problems.
Why isn't the eyewitness credible? Just because the paper didn't know who the witness was, doesn't mean they weren't credible.

They mentioned what the State Police determined about what happened at the station. The defense didn't have to...because the officer was canned before the case went to trial and the State Attorney judged the officier's credibily against the the other evidence. The prosecutor has a ethical duty not to pursue a charge when they don't believe they have a case.
No one knows who the witness was. Their name was not mentioned in any of the documents. How is the court to decide their credibility without having any idea who they are? You can’t. I can’t.

No one mentions what happened at the station. They just pretend like it basically never happened.

Everyone pretends like nothing actually happened. It’s just a mystery. Down the memory hole.
The witness came forward...hence why we know there was a witness...the reporter didn't know who it was.

The court didn't have to, because the prosecutor dropped the case due to the fact it was so weak. The ARTICLE, didn't go into it....but states, the STATE POLICE investigated and said there wasn't evidence to support what this discredited officer stated. Frankly, your defense of an officer, that was canned for their repeated violations is shocking....just shocking.....
 
The witness came forward...hence why we know there was a witness...the reporter didn't know who it was.
How do we know a witness came forward?
Did you not read the article I provided? I guess you do believe some conspiracy that law enforcement just made it all up...geez...ok..
The witness came forward...hence why we know there was a witness...the reporter didn't know who it was.
How do we know a witness came forward?
did you not read the article? Do you think the reporter made it up?
 

Forum List

Back
Top