CNN has reported Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe to police

[Billiejeens]

I remember when the left used to protect whistle blowers. Now they persecute them.

James O'Queef is not a whistle blower.

He sure as hell is, dumbfuck.

He is not a whistle-blower, he is a Journalist
There is no actual whistleblower involved in this story
CNN accidently hired a decent person with a conscience who felt that information about CNN needed to become news itself.
O'Keefe made it news.

He's not a journalist either. They don't create content, they report it. O'Queef makes shit up.

None of those words are true.

 

[Billiejeens]

CNN caught burying the Hunter Biden story . . . The collusion of mainstream media and Big Tech to censor The Post’s Hunter Biden story now is laid bare in leaked recordings of CNN’s news meetings from the time. CNN boss Jeff Zucker is heard instructing his staff to downplay the bombshell story that implicated Joe Biden in a shady foreign influence-peddling scheme, according to audio released Tuesday by undercover news outlet Project Veritas. On the morning of Oct. 14, the day we published an email from Hunter’s abandoned laptop in which a top executive from corrupt Ukrainian energy company Burisma thanked Hunter for arranging a meeting with his then-VP father, CNN political director David Chalian is heard telling Zucker and his underlings that the news network would not cover the story.

 

[Crepitus]

I remember when the left used to protect whistle blowers. Now they persecute them.

James O'Queef is not a whistle blower.

He sure as hell is, dumbfuck.

He is not a whistle-blower, he is a Journalist
There is no actual whistleblower involved in this story
CNN accidently hired a decent person with a conscience who felt that information about CNN needed to become news itself.
O'Keefe made it news.

He's not a journalist either. They don't create content, they report it. O'Queef makes shit up.

They don't create content, they report it.

Liar.

Well that's a lie. O'Queef has been caught many times altering altering video and audio to change the apparent meaning.

 

[Billiejeens]

I remember when the left used to protect whistle blowers. Now they persecute them.

James O'Queef is not a whistle blower.

He sure as hell is, dumbfuck.

He is not a whistle-blower, he is a Journalist
There is no actual whistleblower involved in this story
CNN accidently hired a decent person with a conscience who felt that information about CNN needed to become news itself.
O'Keefe made it news.

He's not a journalist either. They don't create content, they report it. O'Queef makes shit up.

They don't create content, they report it.

Liar.

Well that's a lie. O'Queef has been caught many times altering altering video and audio to change the apparent meaning.

Nope

 

[Crepitus]

All of

I remember when the left used to protect whistle blowers. Now they persecute them.

James O'Queef is not a whistle blower.

He sure as hell is, dumbfuck.

He is not a whistle-blower, he is a Journalist
There is no actual whistleblower involved in this story
CNN accidently hired a decent person with a conscience who felt that information about CNN needed to become news itself.
O'Keefe made it news.

He's not a journalist either. They don't create content, they report it. O'Queef makes shit up.

None of those words are true.

All of those words are true out here in reality.

I can't speak for tRumplings.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I remember when the left used to protect whistle blowers. Now they persecute them.

James O'Queef is not a whistle blower.

He sure as hell is, dumbfuck.

He is not a whistle-blower, he is a Journalist
There is no actual whistleblower involved in this story
CNN accidently hired a decent person with a conscience who felt that information about CNN needed to become news itself.
O'Keefe made it news.

He's not a journalist either. They don't create content, they report it. O'Queef makes shit up.

They don't create content, they report it.

Liar.

Well that's a lie. O'Queef has been caught many times altering altering video and audio to change the apparent meaning.

Sounds like a typical journalist.

 

[Billiejeens]

All of

I remember when the left used to protect whistle blowers. Now they persecute them.

James O'Queef is not a whistle blower.

He sure as hell is, dumbfuck.

He is not a whistle-blower, he is a Journalist
There is no actual whistleblower involved in this story
CNN accidently hired a decent person with a conscience who felt that information about CNN needed to become news itself.
O'Keefe made it news.

He's not a journalist either. They don't create content, they report it. O'Queef makes shit up.

None of those words are true.

All of those words are true out here in reality.

I can't speak for tRumplings.

You're the least informed person on the board

You speak for no one.

 

[Crepitus]

All of

I remember when the left used to protect whistle blowers. Now they persecute them.

James O'Queef is not a whistle blower.

He sure as hell is, dumbfuck.

He is not a whistle-blower, he is a Journalist
There is no actual whistleblower involved in this story
CNN accidently hired a decent person with a conscience who felt that information about CNN needed to become news itself.
O'Keefe made it news.

He's not a journalist either. They don't create content, they report it. O'Queef makes shit up.

None of those words are true.

All of those words are true out here in reality.

I can't speak for tRumplings.

You're the least informed person on the board

You speak for no one.

Says the brainwashing victim....

 

[Billiejeens]

All of

I remember when the left used to protect whistle blowers. Now they persecute them.

James O'Queef is not a whistle blower.

He sure as hell is, dumbfuck.

He is not a whistle-blower, he is a Journalist
There is no actual whistleblower involved in this story
CNN accidently hired a decent person with a conscience who felt that information about CNN needed to become news itself.
O'Keefe made it news.

He's not a journalist either. They don't create content, they report it. O'Queef makes shit up.

None of those words are true.

All of those words are true out here in reality.

I can't speak for tRumplings.

You're the least informed person on the board

You speak for no one.

Says the brainwashing victim....

You're in a cult
A cult that likes you stupid and uninformed
You're a dream member.

 

[Winston]

These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9007943/CNN-threatens-legal-action-against-Project-Veritas-leaked-clips-Jeff-Zuckers-conferences.html​

​

'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them' ​

​

​

I don't think it was just dialing in to the meeting, Bripat. I use Zoom most every day for conferences, meetings, and for classes I initiate. They all show who else is in the Zoom; uninvited guests are easily booted off. Only the host can give a participant permission to record, and Zuckerberg obviously wouldn't have given it to O'Keefe. So the correct wording here is HACKED. Which last I knew was illegal.

So uninformed
He was invited in and given the dial in number
By a (wait for it) whistleblower.

then it's not hacking if someone FW'd the invite to him. the invite may or may not include the password for ease of meeting entry. but again, once there, a participant can't record someone elses meeting UNLESS the admin of the meeting set the option to allow it. maybe he recorded it with an external device and not local.

who knows. but it still seems like a ton of risk to prove something everyone already knows.

Democrats don't know how to run a secure teleconference...surprise, surprise. Another 'hot mic' incident, and liberals are pissed they got caught.....again.

No, the default is that only the host can record. In order for anyone else to record, the host has to make that person a co- host, and that doesn't happen accidentally.

You can record simply by using an app that records what's on your screen.

you still would need to notify the participants as far as i know. in multi-region meetings you usually must assume 2 party consent and ask for permission.

Nope. If the person recording is in a one-party state, the other participants to the call do not need to be notified and consent, even if they are in two party States. At least that's the law in Mississippi, Kansas, and other one-party states that I have litigated cases involving this very issue.

Like I believe you have litigated shit. But if that is the case, can a hacker break into a private business conversation, and since the hacker gives himself permission to record the call in a one-party State, it is legit? Seriously, I can hack into the presidents daily briefing, and I can hack in from a one-party state, I can release classified information without legal repercussions? Come on, impress me, tell me the truth. I mean this shit is getting beyond stupid.

I don't give a shit what you believe, I've litigated cases in federal court in 13 states. Your scenario is ridiculous, as sharing classified information is always against the law. Those CNN calls were not classified information briefings. Also, there's no indication he "hacked" into the call.

If you are a real lawyer I don't understand why you can't see the problems here. This is the morning editorial meeting. It is not open to the public. It is "proprietary" information. Not really sure how O'Keefe got access to this meeting, one source claims it was a person in the IT department. And there has been much discussion about one-party consent, but the reality is O'Keefe was ZERO PARTY. He did not participate in the conversation.

You can't give the IT dude some money so you can listen in on private business meetings and then broadcast the meeting to anyone and everyone. You don't get whisteblower protections unless laws are being broken. And I swear, nothing is more ironic than Trumpbots screaming for whistleblower protection. In Trump's world, whisteblowers get FIRED.

I mean let's spin up this scenario. I know someone that works in the IT department at a major competitor of the company I work for. He gives me access to that company's daily strategy meeting. I record the meeting, I learn their strategies, their upcoming sales, the merchandising initiatives, and I deliver them to my boss. Do I get protection because I live in a one-party consent state? Maybe they claim to be the low cost leader and I find out they are instead charging more than the competition on certain products, do I get whisteblower protection? Or hell, maybe I got this badass blog and I call myself a journalist, does that give me a license to break the law?

Here is my problem. Some things are just common sense. It is common damn sense that you can't listen in on private business meeting of public, or private companies, and release the information you discover. Hell, you can't even listen in and not release any information. CNN is bias. No damn shit. Fox is bias, and there are other news outlets that are more propaganda outlets than anything else. Aldous Huxley predicted this shit when computers were the size of a barn. And O'Keefe is a known entity. He has pleaded guilty to illegal behavior. He has been sanctioned. If his lawyers tell him he is in the clear the first thing he needs to do is fire the damn lawyers. Personally, I believe his lawyers have told him his ass is in a sling.

And you have to understand why I fail to believe you are a lawyer. The whole one-party consent bullshit. Evidently, you can secretly tape private meetings and you are protected because you gave yourself permission to tape the conversations that you don't even participate in. I am not a lawyer. But I am also not a damn dumbass. If you are not party to the conversation you can't claim one-party protection. Matter of fact, from my understanding of the law, both federal and most states, if you are not party to the conversation you have to have permission from ALL parties.

 

[Winston]

CNN caught burying the Hunter Biden story . . . The collusion of mainstream media and Big Tech to censor The Post’s Hunter Biden story now is laid bare in leaked recordings of CNN’s news meetings from the time. CNN boss Jeff Zucker is heard instructing his staff to downplay the bombshell story that implicated Joe Biden in a shady foreign influence-peddling scheme, according to audio released Tuesday by undercover news outlet Project Veritas. On the morning of Oct. 14, the day we published an email from Hunter’s abandoned laptop in which a top executive from corrupt Ukrainian energy company Burisma thanked Hunter for arranging a meeting with his then-VP father, CNN political director David Chalian is heard telling Zucker and his underlings that the news network would not cover the story.

You know, the whole Biden laptop story is indicative of the sheer stupidity of the Trump crowd. No self respecting news organization would give two shits about such an obvious bogus story. Who forgets their laptop? Who believes a legally blind man can find child porn on this left laptop? I mean we got someone that "forgot" about his laptop that had incriminating evidence involving child porn, international collusion, payoff, seriously? I mean how do you believe this shit. I mean it is a sad, sad world when people are so emotionally invested in s narcistic piece of shit that couldn't give two shits for anyone but themselves that they are willing to believe fairy tales that make the tooth fairy seem realistic.

 

[Billiejeens]

CNN caught burying the Hunter Biden story . . . The collusion of mainstream media and Big Tech to censor The Post’s Hunter Biden story now is laid bare in leaked recordings of CNN’s news meetings from the time. CNN boss Jeff Zucker is heard instructing his staff to downplay the bombshell story that implicated Joe Biden in a shady foreign influence-peddling scheme, according to audio released Tuesday by undercover news outlet Project Veritas. On the morning of Oct. 14, the day we published an email from Hunter’s abandoned laptop in which a top executive from corrupt Ukrainian energy company Burisma thanked Hunter for arranging a meeting with his then-VP father, CNN political director David Chalian is heard telling Zucker and his underlings that the news network would not cover the story.

You know, the whole Biden laptop story is indicative of the sheer stupidity of the Trump crowd. No self respecting news organization would give two shits about such an obvious bogus story. Who forgets their laptop? Who believes a legally blind man can find child porn on this left laptop? I mean we got someone that "forgot" about his laptop that had incriminating evidence involving child porn, international collusion, payoff, seriously? I mean how do you believe this shit. I mean it is a sad, sad world when people are so emotionally invested in s narcistic piece of shit that couldn't give two shits for anyone but themselves that they are willing to believe fairy tales that make the tooth fairy seem realistic.

Is it a crack head who knows his pedophile father is a member of the bubblecult who have cult members like you that will suck their dicks 24/7/365?

Yeah, that's who

 

[Winston]

CNN caught burying the Hunter Biden story . . . The collusion of mainstream media and Big Tech to censor The Post’s Hunter Biden story now is laid bare in leaked recordings of CNN’s news meetings from the time. CNN boss Jeff Zucker is heard instructing his staff to downplay the bombshell story that implicated Joe Biden in a shady foreign influence-peddling scheme, according to audio released Tuesday by undercover news outlet Project Veritas. On the morning of Oct. 14, the day we published an email from Hunter’s abandoned laptop in which a top executive from corrupt Ukrainian energy company Burisma thanked Hunter for arranging a meeting with his then-VP father, CNN political director David Chalian is heard telling Zucker and his underlings that the news network would not cover the story.

You know, the whole Biden laptop story is indicative of the sheer stupidity of the Trump crowd. No self respecting news organization would give two shits about such an obvious bogus story. Who forgets their laptop? Who believes a legally blind man can find child porn on this left laptop? I mean we got someone that "forgot" about his laptop that had incriminating evidence involving child porn, international collusion, payoff, seriously? I mean how do you believe this shit. I mean it is a sad, sad world when people are so emotionally invested in s narcistic piece of shit that couldn't give two shits for anyone but themselves that they are willing to believe fairy tales that make the tooth fairy seem realistic.

Is it a crack head who knows his pedophile father is a member of the bubblecult who have cult members like you that will suck their dicks 24/7/365?

Yeah, that's who

Sorry, but you are IGNORANT. Peace out FOOL.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Democrats are like arsonists going from house to house with torches yelling "Arson, eh? Where's your proof?"

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

This is the morning editorial meeting. It is not open to the public. It is "proprietary" information.

Journalists can't publish "proprietary" information?

 

[Roudy]

I guess Jeff Fucker got caught with his hands in the cookie jar.

 

[dannyboys]

These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9007943/CNN-threatens-legal-action-against-Project-Veritas-leaked-clips-Jeff-Zuckers-conferences.html​

​

'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them' ​

What's the problem FingerBoi? You don't like it when CNN calls out right wing liars and assholes as liars and assholes.? Big whoop. Project Veritas, whose name is a lie, should be reported to the police as a fraud and scam agency.

What are you going to do after Trump leaves office and people start treating him as a parriah and an outcast?

73 million Trump voters wouldn't piss on Biden if he was on fire. Everyone of those 73 million voters will NEVER accept Biden. With a REP Senate Biden the global ball licker won't get anything passed.

 

[Zorro!]

Project Veritas Strips CNN Naked.

Project Veritas’ expose of CNN’s behind-the-scenes conference calls shows that the network’s slogan should be “We won’t fully report so you can’t knowledgeably decide.”

There’s no explaining away their admissions of news doctoring in these tapes.

The recordings prove that the executives not only dictate the network’s editorial slant but also manipulate its news side in deciding what stories will be reported and how they will be presented — to ensure that Trump is portrayed in a negative light and Biden is protected at all costs.

It would be less objectionable if the network would admit that it has a liberal bias, but it does the opposite: The anchors and reporters hold themselves out as consummate journalists, exemplary professionals committed to giving their viewers information without a partisan filter. Through these tapes, they prove that their mission is to tailor the news to fit their liberal narrative, rather than to fairly report it. These are the same people who sermonize on air and on Twitter daily about the importance of honest journalism and political integrity, and who denigrate so-called conservative networks as hopelessly biased.

Liberal politicians and media figures constantly rail against threats to “our democracy,” but there is no greater threat to democracy than a corrupt news media, because it emasculates free speech, which is the single greatest constitutional safeguard for the integrity of our representative republic.